• No results found

Entrepreneurship and SME Development in Transition Economies: The Case of Georgia.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Entrepreneurship and SME Development in Transition Economies: The Case of Georgia."

Copied!
71
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

J

Ö N K Ö P I N G

I

N T E R N A T I O N A L

B

U S I N E S S

S

C H O O L

JÖNKÖPING UNIVERSITY

Entrepreneurship and SME

Develop-ment in Transition Economies:

(2)

Acknowledgements

(3)
(4)

Abstract

(5)

1

INTRODUCTION

7

1.1 Background 7 1.2 Problem 7 1.3 Purpose 8 1.4 Perspective 8 1.5 Delimitation 8

2

METHODOLOGY

9

2.1 Research Paradigm 9 2.1.1 Epistemological Assumption 9 2.1.2 Ontological Assumption 10 2.1.3 Axiological Assumption 10 2.1.4 Rhetorical Assumption 10 2.2 Methodological Assumption 10

2.3 Purpose of the Research 11

2.4 Data Collection 11

2.4.1 Exploring Secondary Data 11 2.4.2 Collecting Primary Data through Interviews 12 2.4.3 Designing Interview Questions 12

2.4.4 Selecting a Sample 13

2.4.5 Qualitative Analysis of the Data 13

2.5 Trustworthiness of the Thesis 15

2.5.1 Reliability 15

2.5.2 Validity 15

2.5.3 Generalisability 15

3

FRAME OF REFERENCE

16

3.1 Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Transition Context 16

3.1.1 Determinants and Different types of Entrepreneurship 16 3.1.2 Definition of transition 17 3.1.3 Reforms in transition process 17 3.1.4 Classification of transition stages 18 3.1.5 Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Transitional Environment 19

3.2 Institutional Theory: The Role of Formal and Informal Institutions 21

3.2.1 Northean Institutional Theory 22

3.3 Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SME Development 23

3.3.1 External Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SME Development 24 3.3.2 Internal Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SME Development 25

3.4 Fostering Entrepreneurship and SME development 26

(6)

4

RESULTS

33

4.1 Secondary Data (Previous Studies) on Georgia 33

4.1.1 Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Georgia 33 4.1.2 Business Environment in Georgia 34 4.1.3 Governmental reforms towards Fostering Entrepreneurship 36 4.1.4 Existing Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Georgia 38

4.2 Primary Data 43

4.2.1 Interviewee Profiles 43

4.2.1.1 Entrepreneurs 43

4.2.1.2 Governmental and non-governmental sector Representatives 44 4.2.2 Entrepreneur’s Interviews 45

4.2.2.1 Internal Factors 45

4.2.2.2 External Factors 45

4.2.2.3 State and Other Support 46 4.2.3 Governmental and non-Governmental Representatives 47 4.2.3.1 External Environment 47 4.2.3.2 Direct and indirect governmental and other support 48

5

ANALYSIS

51

5.1 Introduction 51

5.2 Existence of Framework Conditions in Georgia 51

5.3 Perceived Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Georgia 53

5.3.1 External Barriers 53

5.3.2 Internal Barriers 55

5.4 Fostering Entrepreneurship and SME development in Georgia 57

5.5 Conclusions 60

6

REFLECTIONS

62

6.1 Contributions 62

6.2 Limitations 62

6.3 Propositions for Further Research 62

REFERENCES

63

APPENDICES

68

A. Interview Questions for Entrepreneurs 68 B. Interview Questions for government agents, private organization representatives 70

Figure 1 Methodological Assumption of the Main Paradigms 10

Figure 2 Components of Data Analysis Interactive Model 14

(7)

Figure 4 Entrepreneurship Policies in Transition Context 32

Figure 5 Transition Indicators 2008 33

Figure 6 Number of SMEs per 1,000 People in Georgia 34

Figure 8 Ease of Doing Business in Georgia as compared to Global rankings 35 Figure 7 SME membership in Business Associations in Georgia 35 Figure 9 Ease of Doing business rankings in Different aspects in Georgia 36 Figure 10 Processes SMEs in Georgia considered “Rather Difficult” and “Very Problematic” 38 Figure 11 Central Government Role in Business Development in Georgia 39 Figure 12 Obstacles to Business Development as viewed by the entrepreneurs in Georgia 39 Figure 13 SMEs rating of government processes as obstacles in Georgia 40

Figure 14 Businesses Identify Problematic Areas 41

Figure 15 Corruption Problem 41

Figure 16 Tax Perception 41

Figure 17 Access to Finance 41

Table 1 Perceived Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SME development in transition economies ... 26 Table 2 Perceived Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SME development in Georgia ... 57 Table 3 Barriers and Policies directed towards abolishing them ... 59

(8)

1

Introduction

1.1 Background

(9)

1.3 Purpose

1.4 Perspective

(10)

2

Methodology

2.1 Research Paradigm

(11)

2.1.2

Ontological Assumption

2.1.3

Axiological Assumption

2.1.4

Rhetorical Assumption

(12)

2.3 Purpose of the Research

2.4 Data Collection

(13)

2.4.2

Collecting Primary Data through Interviews

-

-

-

(14)

2.4.4

Selecting a Sample

(15)

-

-

-

(16)

2.5 Trustworthiness of the Thesis

2.5.1

Reliability

2.5.2

Validity

(17)

3

Frame of Reference

3.1 Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Transition Context

(18)

3.1.2

Definition of transition

(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)

3.2 Institutional Theory: The Role of Formal and Informal

Institu-tions

(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)

3.4 Fostering Entrepreneurship and SME development

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)

4

Results

4.1 Secondary Data (Previous Studies) on Georgia

(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)

-

-

-

-

(44)

4.2 Primary Data

4.2.1

Interviewee Profiles

(45)

4.2.1.2

Governmental and non-governmental sector Representatives

(46)

4.2.2

Entrepreneur’s Interviews

4.2.2.1

Internal Factors

(47)
(48)

4.2.3

Governmental and non-Governmental Representatives

(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)

5

Analysis

5.1 Introduction

(53)
(54)

5.3 Perceived Barriers to Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Georgia

(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)

5.4 Fostering Entrepreneurship and SME development in Georgia

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(59)
(60)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(61)
(62)
(63)

6

Reflections

6.1 Contributions

6.2 Limitations

(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)

Appendices

A. Interview Questions for Entrepreneurs

-

-

(70)
(71)

B. Interview Questions for government agents, private organization

repre-sentatives

References

Related documents

Stöden omfattar statliga lån och kreditgarantier; anstånd med skatter och avgifter; tillfälligt sänkta arbetsgivaravgifter under pandemins första fas; ökat statligt ansvar

46 Konkreta exempel skulle kunna vara främjandeinsatser för affärsänglar/affärsängelnätverk, skapa arenor där aktörer från utbuds- och efterfrågesidan kan mötas eller

Byggstarten i maj 2020 av Lalandia och 440 nya fritidshus i Søndervig är således resultatet av 14 års ansträngningar från en lång rad lokala och nationella aktörer och ett

Omvendt er projektet ikke blevet forsinket af klager mv., som det potentielt kunne have været, fordi det danske plan- og reguleringssystem er indrettet til at afværge

“Biomarker responses: gene expression (A-B) and enzymatic activities (C-D) denoting bioavailability of model HOCs in different organs (intestine (A), liver ( B, D) and

Errata Corrige

According to Pinchot III, there are factors that improve the climate for promoting entrepreneurship: ‘Self-selection’ that implies the willingness of the individual

Our research question is: How do academics in Swedish business schools and universities make sense of sustainability in business education in relation to signing the