Thermodynamic evaluation of the Nb-O system
Ali R. Massih and Rosa Jerlerud Pérez
QuantumTechnologiesAB,UppsalaSciencePark,SE75183Uppsala
KTH,Materialvetenskap,SE10044Stockholm
E-mail:alma@quantumtech.se
10th April2006
Abstract
Thephasediagramofthebinarysystemniobium-oxygenhasbeen
evaluatedbymeansofaCALPHAD(CALculationofPHAseDiagram)
method. The experimental data on solubility, melting temperatures
and thefreeenergy of formationof niobium oxides aresurveyed and
the thermodynamic models based on the previous assessment of the
Nb-Osystemare delineated.Theresultsofour separateindependent
computations and comparison with experimental data indicate that
themodelsdescribetheNb-Ophasediagramadequately.
1 Introduction
Niobium and oxygen are alloying elements in the zirconium alloys used in
thecoreofthecurrentpressurizedwaterpowerreactors[1].Forexample,the
alloys ZIRLO[2]andM5[3 ] areincreasinglyusedasfuelcladding materials
in pressurized water reactors, Zr-2.5Nb has been employed as a standard
material for the pressure tubes in pressurized heavy water reactors [4, 5],
and E110 [6] and E635 [7] alloys are utilized in the Russian built VVER
andRMBKcores.Inordertoassess thethethermodynamicsof theZ-Nb-O
basealloys,thethermodynamicsofthebinarycomponentsarenecessary.For
the Nb-Zr and O-Zr, we have already reported such evaluations [8, 9]. For
theNb-O system, presently thereis no publishedthermodynamic modeling
assessment;thereare,however,asetofcorrelationsandanoutlineofmodels
for the Gibbs free energies of the Nb-O system listed in the ZIRCOBASE
web site [10]and abrief private communication [11] thatcite thereferences
justifyingthecorrelations'experimentalbasis.
The aim of this note is to review of the literature on the Nb-O system
and evaluate the thermodynamic quantities and the phase diagram of the
2 Survey of experimental data
Niobium (-Nb) has a body-centered cubic (bcc) crystal structure with a
melting point 2741 K and boiling point 5015 K. Introduction of oxygen
into Nb lowers the melting point to 2188 K at around 10 at%O. Oxygen
residesasan interstitial inthesolidsolutionof -Nblattice.Oxygen's
boil-ing point is at 90.188 K and melting point at 54.8 K. In solid state at low
temperatures, oxygen has three allotropic forms, namely, -O
2
(rhombic),
-O
2
(rhombohedral) and -O
2
(cubic). Thetransitiontemperaturesbetween
thesephasesareT(!)=23:8KandT( ! )=43:8K.Here, weonly
considerthehightemperature (T 298 K)properties.
Besidesthatoxygenbeingininterstitialsolidsolutionwithinthebcc
nio-biumstructure,numerousoxidesandsub-oxidescanbeformeddependingon
the temperature and oxygen pressure or concentration. Briey,Nb-O solid
solution (bcc), NbO
x
(tetragonal), Æ-Nb-O (hexagonal), -Nb
2 O 5 (mono-clinic), -Nb 2 O 5
(orthorhombic) areformed inair at eitheratmospheric or
reduced pressure, whereas, NbO
2
(tetragonal), NbO (cubic, NaCltype)are
formedinairat reducedpressure.Structural relationsbetween theoxidesof
niobiumarediscussed byTerao [13 ].A classical work onthepolymorphism
ofNb
2 O
5
isHoltzbergetal. [14].
Thesolidsolubilityofoxygeninniobiumhasbeendeterminedbyav
ari-etyofmethodssuchasX-rayanalysis, thermaltechniques, internal friction,
micro-hardness, electric resistivityand solidstate electrolytic cell technique
(EMFmeasurements).Seybolt[15 ]byX-raydiractionandmicroscopic
ex-amination reported the solid solubility of oxygen in thetemperature range
775 Æ
C to 1000 Æ
C. He found that thesolubility is a function oftemperature
andvariesinthattemperature rangefrom 0.25to 1 wt%,respectively.
Elliott [16] studied the Nb-O phase equilibria bymeans metallographic
examination.Theexaminedsampleswereas-castandannealedarc-cast
niobium-oxygen alloys. The empirically constructed phase diagram is shown in Fig.
1.Salient featuresofthis diagramareasfollows:
There are three oxides of niobium: NbO, NbO
2 and Nb 2 O 5 . These
oxides melt congruently at 1925 Æ C (2198 K), 1915 Æ C (2188 K) and 1595 Æ
C(1768K).Figure2displaysmeasureddataonincipientmelting
oftheNb-O specimens asafunction ofoxygenconcentration.
Aeutecticreactionoccursat1915 Æ
C:L(10.5wt%O)!Nb(0.7wt%O)+NbO,
where Lstands for liquid.
Aeutectic reactionoccursat 1810 Æ
C: L(21wt%O)!NbO+NbO
2 .
Aperitecticreactionoccursat1510 Æ C:L(29.5wt%O)+NbO 2 !Nb 2 O 5 .
The solid solubility of oxygen varies between 0.25 wt% at 500 Æ
Elliott by X-ray investigation, à la Debye-Scherrer [17], mapped out the
powder patterns of NbO, NbO
2
and Nb
2 O
5
and conrmed that thecrystal
structure of NbO is simple cubic with a lattice parameter of 4.210 Å. In
particular, he found that Nb atoms lie at (00 1 2 ),(0 1 2 0) and ( 1 2 00); O atoms lieat ( 1 2 1 2 0), ( 1 2 0 1 2 ) and (0 1 2 1 2
);and lattice sites(000)and ( 1 2 1 2 1 2 ) arevacant. Moreover, the Nb 2 O 5
patterns revealed arutile [18] (TiO
2
) structure.
Bryant[19 ]determinedthesolubilityofoxygeninniobiuminthe
temper-ature range 700 Æ
C to 1550 Æ
C by establishing equilibrium between an oxide
lmonthesurfaceofthespecimenandasaturatedsolidsolutionofoxygenin
metal. The solubility wasmeasured byremoving the oxide scale after
equi-librium had been reached and analyzing the underlying metal for oxygen.
The time required to establish equilibrium was determined by measuring
specimen hardiness as a function of time. Since oxygen hardens niobium
appreciably, any change in oxygen content is accompanied by a change in
hardness.Oxygenequilibriumthereforeisestablishedwhennofurther
hard-ness increase was observed. The results of Bryant's data on solubility are
depicted in Fig. 3. Figure 4 shows the weight to atom% unit conversion in
theNb-Osystemfor reader's convenience.
Gebhardt and Rothenbacher [20 ] using a combination of X-ray
dirac-tion,microhardnessandelectricresistivitymeasurementsplusmetallography
studied thesolubilityof oxygeninniobium between temperatures of500 Æ
C
and1900 Æ
C. Theirresults show thatthesolubilityincreases from 1.1at%O
at750 Æ
Cto5.5at%Oat1540 Æ
C.Inthistemperaturerange,thetemperature
dependenceofsolubilityfollowed anArrhenius description(Fig. 3).
Taylor and Doyle [21 ] investigated the solid solubilityof oxygen in
nio-biumbymeansofX-raydiraction,metallographic andthermaltechniques.
TheresultsofTaylorandDoylefallmidwaybetweenthoseofSeybolt[15]and
Gebhardtand Rothenbacher [20],Fig.3. Thesolubilitylimit dataobtained
byElliott[16 ]indicatemuchloweroxygenvaluesintheregionof1800 Æ
Cthan
otherdata.
Fromm [22] reported some data for the Nb-O system in temperatures
between 1000and2000Kbymeansofsolidstateelectromotiveforce(EMF)
measurements. He found that at the temperature of 1276 K the solubility
limit is2.42at%O(Fig. 3).
Theresultsobtainedbytheaforementionedinvestigationsarenotalways
inagreement.Inorder tore-solve the issue, Nickersonand Altstetter [23 ]in
temperature range of 973 to 1773 K employed accurate solid state
electro-motive force measurements. Nickerson and Altstetter results of the EMF
measurements oer quantitative information on the enthalpy and entropy
change.Thesedataareingoodagreementwith thecorrespondingvalues
ex-tracted from Gebhardt and Rothenbacher's work [20 ] and theearlier study
pro-vided anArrhenius formexpression forthe oxygensolidsolubilitylimit, C 1 O =49:4exp 8000 R T ; (1) whereC 1 O
isthesolidsolubilityofoxygeninat%O, R=1:987calK 1
mol 1
isthegasconstantandT isthetemperatureinkelvin.Equation(1)isplotted
inFig. 3 togetherwith the corresponding correlation based on thework of
Gebhardtand Rothenbacher[20] andthe aforementioned data.
Matsui and Naito [24 ] measured the vapor pressure over the
niobium-oxygen solid solution by mass-spectrometric method in the temperature
range 2091 to 2379 K. The solidus line of the Nb-O solid solution and the
solubilitylimitofoxygeninniobiummetalathightemperatureswere
deter-mined from the vaporization behavior. The phase transition temperatures
obtained by Matsui and Naito are depicted in Fig. 5. In an earlier
sim-ilar study, Matsui and Naito [25] measured the vapor pressure over
non-stoichiometric NbO
2x
(with O/Nb in the range of 1.972 to 2.037) in the
temperature range 1958-2326 K. Thephase transitiontemperatures around
NbO
2x
athightemperaturesweredeterminedfromthevaporizationstudy.
Table1liststhese(melting)dataplussimilardatafromotherstudies.InT
a-ble1,T
r1
correspondstothetransitionfromsolidNbO
2x
tothemixture of
solidNbO
2x
and liquidussolution; while T
r2
,around 2188 K, corresponds
to the transitionfromthemixture of liquidussolutionand solidNbO
2x to
theliquidussolution.
Table 1:Phase transitionboundariesaround NbO
2x
at hightemperatures
[25].The transitiontemperatures T
r1 and T
r2
aredened inthetext.
Oxygencontent T r1 T r2 Method Reference atom fraction K K 0.6667 - 2188 Mass Spectrometry [25 ] 0.6679 2163 2188 0.6693 2123 2188 0.6707 2028 2188 0.6667 - 2188 Metallography [16 ] 0.6711 - 2183 0.6676 - 2173 Mass Spectrometry [26 ] 0.6657 2063 2188 Mass Spectrometry [25 ] 0.6647 2103 2188 0.6635 2103 2188 0.6466 2083 - Metallography [16 ] 0.5595 2108
-Table 2: Free energy of formation of niobium oxides determined by EMF
measurementsasa functionof temperature [27 ].
Oxide Freeenergy of formation, cal/mol T,K
NbO G Æ = 99500+20:7T (500) 1177-1388 NbO 2 G Æ = 184500+38:7T (500) 1100-1400 Nb 2 O 5 G Æ = 440200+94:1T (500) 1000-1400
Table3:Crystalstructuresandlatticeconstantsofelementsandcompounds
inthe Nb-O system.
Phase Structure Spacegroup Lattice constant, Å
-Nb bcc Im3m a=3:300 NbO cubic Pm3m a=4:210 NbO 2 tetragonal I4 1 =a a=4:837 c=2:988 -Nb 2 O 5 monoclinic P2 a=21:20 b=3:824 c=19:39 -Nb 2 O 5 orthorhombic Pban a=7:317 b=15:728 c=10:749 -O 2 rhombic C2/m a=5:403 b=3:429 c=5:086 -O 2 rhombohedral R 3m a=3:307 c=1:126 -O 2 cubic Pm3n a=6:83
Hiraoka et al. [27] usinga solidstate electrolytic cell technique (EMF
mea-surements)inthetemperaturerangeof1000to1400K.Theyalsocompared
their results with those of other investigators (see references therein). The
results of their measurements are systematized in terms of linear relations
between the standard Gibbs free energy of formation and temperature for
NbO, NbO 2 and Nb 2 O 5 (Table2).
The phase equilibria databriey surveyed above form theexperimental
basis for the models and the phase diagram presented in the subsequent
sections. The crystal structure and the phase description of the elements
and compound in O-Nb system are summarized in Table 3, [13 , 14]. The
3 Thermodynamic modeling
Alistofmodels proposedforthis workissummarizedinTable 4,where the
square symbol stands for vacancies. Mathematical descriptions for these
modelsare relegatedto Appendix A.All thesemodelsareformulated using
thecompoundenergyformalismforsolutionphaseswheretheconceptof
sub-latticeisutilized[28].TheGibbsfreeenergyexpressionsareinputparameters
tothemodelforcalculationofphaseequilibria/diagramsofcompounds.The
thermodynamicparametersfortheNb-Osystemusedinourcalculationsare
outlinedinAppendix B.
The basic idea of the computational method is to dene theGibbs free
energy of each element with respect to its stable magnetically disordered
state at 298.15 K and 101 325 Pa, referred to as the stable element
refer-ence (SER), as recommended by the Scientic Group Thermodata Europe
(SGTE). In theSGTE database [29],the Gibbs free energy isexpressed in
termsofa power seriesexpansion intemperature intheform:
G(T)=a+bT +cTln(T)+ X n d n T n ; (2)
where n takes the values 2;3; 1;:::,and a;b;c;d
n
areempirical constants
determinedbyexperimentaldata.The referencestatesfor thepureniobium
andoxygenarebcc-Nband gaseous oxygen.
Table 4: List of models selected for the Nb-O system basedon the work of
Dupinand Ansara [11,10]. Thesquare symbolstands for vacancies.
Phase Model Constitution
Gas Ideal mixture (O,O
2 ,O 3 ,Nb,NbO,NbO 2 )
Liquid Ionic melt (Nb
+2 ) P (O 2 ; 2 ;NbO 2 ;NbO 5=2 ) Q
bcc Interstitial solution (Nb)(O,)
3
Cubic NbO Stoichiometric (Nb)(O)
Tetragonal NbO 2 Stoichiometric (Nb)(O) 2 Monoclinic Nb 2 O 3 Stoichiometric (Nb) 2 (O) 5 4 Results of calculations
The binary phase diagram for the Nb-O system calculated by using the
Thermo-Calcprogram [30],armedwiththemodels delineatedinthe
forego-ingsection, is presented inFig.6. Thisgure alsodepicts theexperimental
high-experimentaldata,respectively.Thecompletephasediagramwithout
exper-imental data is shown in Fig. 9. The presented diagrams rest on the data
surveyed insection2 and theunpublishedassessmentof Dupin and Ansara
[11,10].Thisassessmentshowsthatthemaximumsolubilityofoxygenatthe
eutectictemperatureof2192Kis0.9at%.Thecalculatedcongruentmelting
points ofthe three typesofniobium oxides arelistedinTable 5.
Table 5: The congruent melting points of the stoichiometric oxides in the
Nb-Osystem[11 ], cf.Fig.9.
Oxide Oxygen content (at.%) Meltingtemperature (K)
NbO 50 2218 NbO 2 66.7 2182 Nb 2 O 5 71.4 1923
Thecalculated invariant reactions andpointsinthesystemareoutlined
in Table 6. The calculated values of the compositions and temperatures in
thistable aredue to Dupinand Ansara [11 ].
Table6:Invariant reactions inthe Nb-O system(x
O
=mole fraction)[11 ].
Reaction Type Composition, x
O Temperature, K Liquid +gas Nb 2 O 5 ... 0.713 1.0000.714 1919 Liquid Nb 2 O 5 +NbO 2 Eutectic 0.709 0.7140.667 1782.3 Liquid NbO+NbO 2 Eutectic 0.616 0.5000.667 2099.2
Liquid -Nb+NbO Eutectic 0.393 0.0090.500 2191.9
5 Verication and discussion
5.1 Gibbs free energy calculations
TheGibbsfreeenergyofthe-Nb-Ointerstitialsolutionisevaluated
accord-ing to formulae of section A.3. In particular, we write the the total Gibbs
freeenergy ofthe bcc phase, insimpliednotation, as
G inter (y;T) = (1+3y) 1 yG Nb;O +(1 y)G Nb + +3R T ylogy+(y 1)log(1 y) + +y(y 1) L 0 +L 1 (2y 1) ; (3) where y y O
is the site fraction in the sub-lattice model for oxygen and
L 0
;L 1
de-pendent.Wehaveusedthetemperature-dependent correlationsforG Nb;O , G Nb ,L 0 ;L 1
listedinAppendixBtoevaluateG
inter
(y;T).Figure10shows
the plots of G
inter
as a function of y, while Fig. 11 illustrates the relation
between the mole fraction of oxygen x x
O
and y; and Fig. 12 shows
the plots of G
inter
as a function the mole fraction of oxygen x at dierent
temperatures. Using theThermo-Calcprogram [30 ] we have found identical
results.
5.2 Free energy of formation
The Gibbsenergy of formation for thestoichiometric niobium oxidesNbO,
NbO 2 andNb 2 O 5
arecalculatedaccordingtoEq.(A.17).Letusrstevaluate
the temperature dependence of the term G bcc
Nb
a O
b
(T) using the correlations
listed in Appendix B. The results in thetemperature range of 300 to 2900
K are plotted in Fig. 13, where the values of the free energies are divided
bythenumberofatoms peroxide.Thecorrespondingresults fortheenergy
offormation, G bcc A a B b
(T),arecalculated inthetemperature rangeof900to
1500 K and the results are depicted inFig. 14. In the same gure we have
plotted the experimental data of Hiraoka et al. [27 ] as symbols. We note
thatthe agreement between modelcalculations and Hiraoka et al. dataare
excellent. Utilizing the Thermo-Calc program [30], we have found identical
results.Moreover, at room temperature (298.16 K), we have calculated the
enthalpy of formation H
f
for NbO, NbO
2 and Nb 2 O 5 compounds and
compared our results withsome of experimental datareportedin literature
inorderto checkthestabilityoftheseoxides(Table7).Ascanbeseenfrom
Table7,thecalculationsbasedontheDupin-AnsaraassessmentoftheNb-O
system[31 ] show good agreement with theexperiments. It should be noted
that, in the thermodynamic assessment by Dupin and Ansara [11 , 10 ], all
theoxideswere considered to be stoichiometric andtheir Gibbsfreeenergy
expressions were chosen from the SGTE Substance Database [31], which is
available intheThermo-Calcprogram [30].
6 Closure
In this note we rst reviewed the experimental data available in literature
concerningthe thermodynamic properties of theNb-O binarysystem; then
we summarized the thermodynamic models that are developed to describe
this system. These models had been assessed in a previous study for the
Nb-O systemandhere theywere employed in both in-house MATLABles
and inthe Thermo-Calc program for theevaluation of phasediagram. Our
calculations agreebycomparing theoutput of separatecomputer programs
Table 7: The enthalpy of formation H
f
(kJ/mole) for NbO, NbO
2 and Nb 2 O 5 at 298.15 K. Compound H f
uncertainty Method Reference
::: kJ/mol kJ/mol ... ... NbO -426.2 5.1 Calorimetry [32 ] -419.7 12.6 ::: [33 ] -455.22 2.51 Calorimetry [34 ] -419.65 ::: Assessed [31 ] NbO 2 -792.7 4.2 Calorimetry [32 ] -795.0 8.4 ::: [33 ] -833.87 2.5 Calorimetry [34 ] -794.96 ::: Assessed [31 ] NbO 2:42 -930.2 1.4 Calorimetry [32 ] -930.5 ::: Calorimetry [35 ] NbO 2:47 -942.9 0.6 Calorimetry [32 ] NbO 2:485 -945.6 0.3 Calorimetry [32 ] NbO 2:5 -949.8 4.2 ::: [33 ] -988.68 ::: Calorimetry [34 ] -949.78 ::: Assessed [31 ]
References
[1] C. Lemaignan and A. T. Motta. Zirconium alloys in nuclear
applica-tions. In R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen, and E. J. Kramer, editors, Nuclear
Materials, volume 10B of Material Science and Technology, chapter 7.
VCH, Weinheim, Germany,1994. Volume editor B.R.T.Frost.
[2] R.J.Comstock,G.Schoenberger,andG.P.Sabol.Inuenceof
process-ing variables and alloy chemistry on the corrosion behavior of ZIRLO
nuclear fuelcladding. InE. R.Bradleyand G.P.Sabol,editors,
Zirco-nium in Nuclear Industry: Eleventh International Symposium, volume
ASTMSTP1295,pages710725,WestConshohocken,PA,USA,1996.
American Societyfor Testing andMaterials.
[3] J-P. Mardon, D. Charquet, and J. Senevat. Inuence of composition
andfabricationprocessonout-of-pileandin-pilepropertiesofM5alloy.
InG.P.SabolandG.D.Moan,editors,ZirconiuminNuclear Industry:
TwelfthInternationalSymposium,volumeASTMSTP1354,pages505
522,WestConshohocken,PA,USA,2000.AmericanSocietyfor Testing
and Materials.
[4] D.O.Northwood,X.Meng-Burany,andB.W.Warr. Microstructureof
Zr-2.5nballoypressuretubing.InC.M.EukenandA.M.Garde,editors,
ZirconiuminNuclearIndustry:NinthInternationalSymposium,volume
ASTM STP 1132, pages 156176, Philadelphia, USA, 1991. American
Societyfor Testingand Materials.
[5] D.Srivastava,G.K. Dey,and S.Banerjee. Evolutionof microstructure
duringfabricationofZr2.5wtpctNballoypressuretubes. Metallurgical
Transactions A,26A:27072718, 1995.
[6] P.V.Shebaldovandetal.E110alloycladdingtubepropertiesandtheir
interrelationwithalloystructurephaseconditionandimpuritycontent.
InG.P.SabolandG.D.Moan,editors,ZirconiuminNuclear Industry:
TwelfthInternationalSymposium,volumeASTMSTP1354,pages545
559,WestConshohocken,PA,USA,2000.AmericanSocietyfor Testing
and Materials.
[7] A. V. Nikulina and et al. Zirconium alloy E635 as a material for fuel
rod cladding and other components of VVER and RMBK core. In
E. R. Bradley and G. P. Sabol, editors, Zirconium in Nuclear
Indus-try:EleventhInternationalSymposium,volumeASTMSTP1295,pages
785804, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1996. American Society for
[8] A.R.Massih. Thermodynamiccomputationsofthestablephasesinthe
Zr-Nb system. Technical Report PM 04-006, Quantum Technologies,
2004.
[9] A.R.Massih. Phaseboundariesof the O-Zrsystem. Technical Report
PM 05-001, QuantumTechnologies, 2005.
[10] See: www.inpg.fr/ltpcm/base/zircobase, 1999.
[11] N. Dupin and I. Ansara. Systèm Nb-O. Unpublished communication,
1999.
[12] R.Jerlerud-Pérez andA.R.Massih. Thermodynamicevaluationofthe
Nb-O-Z r system. Technical Report PM05-003, Quantum Technologies
AB, 2005.
[13] N. Terao. Structures of niobium oxides. Japanese Journal of Applied
Physics, 2:156174, 1963.
[14] F. Holtzberg, A. Reisman, M. Berry, and M. Berkenblit. Chemistry of
the groupVB pentoxides. VI the polymorphism of Nb
2 O
5
. Journal of
American Chemical Society, 79:20392043, 1957.
[15] A. U. Seybolt. Solid solubility in columbium. Transactions of AIME
Journal of Metals, 200:774776,1954.
[16] R. P. Elliott. Columbium-oxygen system. Transactions of the ASM,
52:9001014, 1960.
[17] A.Guinier. X-ray Diraction. DoverPublications,Mineola,NewYork,
1994.
[18] D. E. Sands. Introduction to Crystallography. Dover, New York,1993.
[19] R.T.Bryant.Thesolubilityofoxygenintransitionmetalalloys.Journal
of LessCommon Metals,4:6268, 1962.
[20] E. Gebhardt and R.Rothenbacher. Untersuchungen im S ystem
Niob-Sauersto. Z. Metallkunde,54:623630,1963.
[21] A.TaylorandN.J.Doyle. Thesolid-solubilityofoxygeninNb and
N-richNb-MoandNb-Walloys. Journalof LessCommonMetals,13:313
330, 1967.
[22] E.Fromm.Emfmeasurementsofniobium-oxygenandtantalum-oxygen
solidsolutions. Journalof LessCommon Metals, 22:139140,1970.
[23] W. Nickerson and C. Altstetter. A study of nobium-oxygen solid
so-lution utilizingsolid electrolytic cells. Scripta Metallurgica, 7:229232,
[24] T. Matsui and K. Naito. Vaporization study of the niobium-oxygen
solid solution by by mass-spectrometric method. Journal of Nuclear
Materials, 115:178186, 1983.
[25] T. Matsui and K. Naito. Vaporization study of nonstoichiometric
NbO
2x
by mass-spectrometricmethod. Journal of Nuclear Materials,
102:227234, 1981.
[26] S.A.Shchukarev,G.A.Semenov,andK.E.Frantseva.RussianJournal
of Inorganic Chemistry,11:129, 1966.
[27] T.Hiraoka,N.Sano,andY.Matsushita. Electricalmeasurementofthe
standard free energies of formation of niobiumoxides. Transactions of
the Iron Institute of Japan, 11:102106,1971.
[28] M. Hillert. The compound energy formalism. Journal of Alloys and
Compounds,320:161176, 2001.
[29] A.T.Dinsdale.SGTE dataforpureelements. CALPHAD,15:317425,
1991.
[30] Thermo-Calc Program User's Guide. Stockholm, Sweden, 2003.
www.thermocalc.se.
[31] SGTE substance database. AvailableinThermo-Calc software.
[32] H.Inaba,T.Mima,andK.Naito. Measurementofenthalpiesof
forma-tionofniobiumoxidesat920kinatian-calvet-typecalorimetr. Journal
of Chemical Thermodynamics,16:411418,1984.
[33] JANAFthermochemical tables,2nd edition. Supplement 1976.
[34] M. P.Marozavaand L.L.Gestkina. Enthalpyof formationof niobium
oxides. Z.Obeshei kximij,29:10491052, 1959. In Russian.
[35] J.F.Marucco,R.Tetot,P.Gerdanian,andC.Picard. Etude
thermody-namique dudioxyde de niobiumahautetemperature. Journal of Solid
A Thermodynamic relations
A.1 Gas phase
Thegasphase isconsidered asamixture ofideal gases consistingof O,O
2 ,
O
3
,Nb, NbO and NbO
2
. The Gibbs energy per mole of species in the gas
phaseisgiven by G gas (T;P)= X j x j G gas j (T;P)+R T X j x j logx j +log P P 0 ; (A.1) and G gas =G gas (T;P) X i X j x j a j i H SER i (298:5) (A.2) whereG gas j
(T;P)istheGibbsfreeenergy ofpurespeciesjattemperature
T and pressure P, H SER
i
(298:5) is the reference enthalpy of element i at
298.15 K and 0.1 MPa, so called Stable Element Reference, x
j
is themole
fractionof speciesj in thegasphase, a j
i
is the numberof atoms of element
iinthe gaseousspeciesjand Risthegasconstant.Here, thesums areover
allthe involved species.
A.2 Liquid phase
Inbinarysystems,whenoneoftheelementsisnotmetallic,theliquidphase
is described by the ionic melt sub-lattice model [28] witha genericformula
as (A v A ) P (B v B ; v ;B;AB;AB x ) Q
. Here, A denotes the metallic element,
occupyingtherstsub-lattice,Bthenon-metallicone(chargedandneutral)
andthevacancies,denotedby,whichoccupythesecondsub-lattice;v
A ,v
B
andv
arethevalancechargesofthespeciesA,Bandvacancies,respectively;
and P and Q are the number of sites of each sub-lattice. The Gibbs free
energy permole isexpressedas
G l iq =G l iq ref +G l iq id +G l iq ex : (A.3)
Herethe referencefree energy is
G l iq ref =Q y G l iq A +y B G l iq B +y B v B G l iq A:B ; (A.4)
thecongurational (ideal) freeenergy
G l iq id =R TQ X i y i logy i ; (A.5)
andthe interaction freeenergy
G l iq ex = X i6=j y i y j L l iq A:i;j ; (A.6)
where the sums over i and j cover elements , B v B and B. In relations (A.4)-(A.6),y ;y B Q and y B
arethe site fractions of thevacancies, B ions
and neutral B atoms, respectively on theanion lattice. Onthe cation
sub-lattice,A is theonly residing species,hence y
A
=1.Moreover, we have the
following constraints: y +y B v B +y B =1 (A.7) and P = v B y B v B +Qy and Q= v y A = v : (A.8) In Eq.(A.4), G l iq A and G l iq B
represent theGibbsenergies permole of
atomsofliquidmetalAandactitiouspureliquidnon-metalB,respectively.
G l iq
A:B
represents the molar Gibbs energy of the ideal hypothetical liquid
A v B B v A . In Eq. (A.6), L l iq A:i;j
accounts for the interaction energies between
speciesi,jandA;itisexpressedgenerically bytheso-calledRedlich-Klister
polynomial oftheform:
L l iq A:i;j = n X k=0 L k;l iq A (y i y j ) k : (A.9)
Alltheaforementionedfreeenergies,includingL k;l iq
A
aretemperature
depen-dent and areobtained by evaluationofexperimentaldata.
Finally,theconcentration ofthe oxygeninthe solutionis relatedto the
sub-latticesite fractions accordingto
x B v B = Qy B v B P +Q(1 y ) (A.10)
Weshouldnotethatthethreesitefractionsintheanionsub-lattice:y
;y B v B and y B
, are determined at a given solute concentration by minimising the
GibbsfreeenergyG l iq =G l iq (y ;y B v B ;y B
)withrespecttothesite fractions
subjectto theconstraintsdened byEqs.(A.7),(A.8) and (A.10).
Applying theabove formalismto theNb-O system,A=Nb, B=O, v
A = +2,v = 2andv B = 2;hencewehave(Nb +2 ) P (O 2 ; 2 ;NbO 2 ;NbO 5=2 ) Q withP =2y O 2 +Qy andQ=2.Furthermore,G l iq Nb =G l iq Nb H SER Nb and G l iq O =G l iq O H SER O
arethemolarGibbsfreeenergiesofpureNbandO,
re-spectively,whicharelistedinref.[29] andG l iq Nb;O =G l iq Nb;O H SER Nb H SER O
isthe molarGibbsenergyofthecompoundNbO;itisdeterminedby
assess-ingexperimental data [10].Also, L l iq
A;B; =L
l iq
Nb;O;
denotes theinteraction
between the oxygen atoms and vacancies in the interstitial sub-lattice; it
is determined by assessingexperimental data. Finally, theconcentration of
oxygeninthe liquid solution, Eq. (A.10)becomes
x = Qy O 2 = y O 2 : (A.11)
A.3 Interstitial solution
Oxygen is aninterstitial atom insolid solutions -Nb (bcc). Interstitial
so-lutions can be described by the sub-lattice model. In general, for a binary
system A-B, one of the sub-lattices is assumed to be entirely occupied by
theelement A (y
A
=1), whilethe second sub-lattice contains Band
vacan-cies with the formula: (A)
p (B,)
q
. The ratio p=q is related to the crystal
structureand thetype ofsites occupied by B.
Thethree componentsoftheGibbsfreeenergy inphase, G ref ,G id and G ex ,areexpressedas G ref = 1 p+qy B y G (A;) +y B G A;B ; (A.12) G id = q p+qy B R T X i=B; y i logy i ; (A.13) G ex = y B y p+qy B L A;B; : (A.14)
For application totheNb-O system,A=Nb,B=O,hence(Nb)
p (O,) q with p = 1 and q = 3. Furthermore, G (Nb;) = G Nb H SER Nb is the molar
Gibbs free energy of pure Nb, listed in ref. [29 ] and G Nb;O = G Nb;O H SER Nb qH SER O
isthemolarGibbsenergyofthecompoundwithallinterstitial
siteslled; it isdetermined byassessing experimental data. Also, L A;B; = L Nb;O;
denotes the interaction between the oxygenatoms andvacanciesin
the interstitial sub-lattice; it is determined by assessment of experimental
data.
Similar to theionic melt model, y
Nb
=1 inthe metallic sub-lattice and
inthe interstitial sub-lattice, we have theconstraint:
y
O +y
=1: (A.15)
The compositions of the phase is related to the sub-lattice site fraction y
O accordingto: x O = qy O 1+qy O ; x Nb =1 x O : (A.16)
Note that the variables y
O and y
are determined at once by Eqs. (A.15)
and (A.16); hence no minimisation of the free energy with respect to y
i is
neededhere.
A.4 Niobium oxide phases
Thecubic NbO, tetragonal NbO
2 and monoclinic Nb 2 O 3 are stoichiometric
compounds, i.e., they have xed composition at all theapplicable
A a B b ) iscalculated accordingto G A a B b (T)=G A a B b (T) aG A (T) bG B (T): (A.17)
For example for NbO
2 ,G NbO 2 , G Nb and G O
are the Gibbs freeenergies of
NbO
2
,pureniobiumandoxygen,foragivenphase(herebcc),respectively;
andsimilarly for the othertwo oxides.
B A summary of thermodynamic parameters for
the Nb-O system
Table 8 lists the thermodynamic parameters, the Gibbs free energies as a
function of temperature, describing the Nb-O system with respect to the
stableelement reference H SER
(attemperature T =298:14 Kand pressure
P = 101325 Pa). The interaction parameters are denoted by L. These
re-sults,which areinputto Thermo-Calc, arebasedonthework ofDupin and
Ansara [11, 10 ] presented here with some minor misprint corrections and
Table8:Thermodynamic properties ofthedierentphases oftheNb-O sys-tem. Parameter(J/mol) Range (K) G NbO = 434220:337+246:876204T 42:99897Tln(T) 298:14<T <2210 0:0044367135T 2 +7:61348510 10 T 3 +201346:65T 1 G NbO = 456057:083+399:171599T 62:76Tln(T) 2210 <T <6000 G NbO2 = 817191:531+381:593377T 64:17126Tln(T) 298:14<T <700 9:08246E 04T 2 4:02243510 6 T 3 +418142:7T 1 G NbO2 = 811038:971+277:505525T 47:77082Tln(T) 700<T <1000 0:01985076T 2 G NbO 2 = 7995222:39+66544:4364T 9449:355Tln(T) 1000 <T <1300 +5:400225T 2 5:8015910 4 T 3 +1:021178510 9 T 1 G NbO 2 = 825146:769+515:555749T 83:0524Tln(T) 1300 <T <2175 G NbO 2 = 849262:299+611:84916T 94:14Tln(T) 2175 <T <6000 G Nb 2 O 5 = 1942063:25+674:379374T 115:742Tln(T) 298:14<T <700 0:0547895T 2 +8:2494533310 6 T 3 +534527T 1 G Nb2O5 = 1967843:43+1010:19042T 166:3182Tln(T) 700<T <1500 0:010714595T 2 +1:0469763310 6 T 3 +2995953T 1 G Nb 2 O 5 = 1970867:16+1053:49937T 172:7281Tln(T) 1500 <T <1785 0:006198805T 2 +5:18174510 7 T 3 +2995953T 1 G Nb 2 O 5 = 2077756:73+1625:45741T 242:2536Tln(T) 1785 <T <6000 Liquidphase G L (Nb +2 ;O 2 )=2G NbO +310681:92 135:66551T 298:14<T <6000 G L (NbO 2 )=G NbO2 +62301 16:9083T 298:14<T <6000 G L (NbO 5=2 )=0:5G Nb 2 O 5 +19682:659 10T 298:14<T <6000 L 0;L (Nb +2 ;O 2 ;)=56277:338 298:14<T <6000 bcc-A2 phase G bcc (Nb:O)=G Nb 2 O 5 +G NbO +250000 298:14<T <6000 L 0;bcc (Nb:O;)= 670149+76:4T 298:14<T <6000 L 1;bcc (Nb:O;)= 354266 298:14<T <6000
hcp-A3metastable phase
G hcp
(Nb:O;)=G
NbO
C Figures
Figure 1: The equilibrium phase diagram of niobium (Cb)-oxygen system
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
Oxygen content (wt%)
Temperature (K)
Incipient melting data in Nb−O system, Elliott (1960)
melting points
NbO
NbO
2
Nb
2
O
5
Figure2: Melting datafor niobium-oxygen systemaccording to the
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
10
−1
10
0
10
1
Temperature (K)
C
O
∞
(at%)
Oxygen solubility in niobium
Nickerson & Altstetter
Gebhardt & Rothenbacher
Seybolt
Elliott
Bryant
Taylor & Doyle
Fromm
Cost
Figure3:Solubilitydatafor niobium-oxygensystemfrom various
investiga-tions[15,16,19,21,22,20,23].TheworkofCostwascitedin[23]asprivate
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Oxygen (wt%)
Oxygen (at%)
Oxygen in niobium
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
2600
2700
2800
Oxygen content (atom%)
Temperature (K)
Nb (solid)
Liquid + Nb (solid)
Nb (solid) + NbO (solid)
Phase transition data around Nb−O solid solution, Matsui & Naito (1983)
Figure 5: Phase diagram aroundniobium-oxygen solid solution determined
Elliott 1960
NbO
NbO2
Nb2O5
Seybolt 1954
Matsui and Naito 1981
Matsui and Naito 1983
Bryant 1962
Taylor and Doyle 1967
Cost 1973
Fromm 1970
Gebhardt and Rothenbacher 1963
Nickerson and Altstetter 1973
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
Temperature K
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Mole Fraction O
BCC+ NbO
NbO
2
Nb
2
O
5
Gas
Gas
Liquid
Figure 6: Calculated phase diagram for the binary Nb-O system using the
models outlined in Table 4 and the experimental data reviewed in section
2 [15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 20, 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The work of Cost was cited in [23] as
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
Temperature K
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Mole Fraction O
BCC+NbO
BCC+Liquid
BCC
Figure 7: Calculated Nb-rich portion of the Nb-O system phase diagram
togetherwiththeexperimentaldatareviewedinsection2.Thesamesymbols
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
Temperature K
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Mole Fraction O
BCC+NbO
NbO
2
Nb
2
O
5
Liquid
Gas
Gas
Figure 8: Calculated high-temperature portion of the Nb-O system phase
diagramwiththeexperimentaldatareviewedinsection2.Thesamesymbols
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
TEMPERATURE_KELVIN
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
M
OLE_FRACT
ION
O
BCC
NbO
NbO
2
Nb
2
O
5
Gas
Gas
Liquid
Figure 9: Calculated phase diagram for the binary Nb-O system using the
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
−400
−350
−300
−250
−200
−150
−100
−50
0
y
O
(−)
G
inter
(kJmol
−
1
)
The Nb−O System, bcc Phase
T = 1000 K
T = 1500 K
T = 2000 K
T = 2500 K
Figure10: The calculated Gibbs freeenergy of -Nb(in bcc phase) vs.the
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
y
O
(−)
X
O
(
−
)
The Nb−O System, bcc Phase
Figure 11: Relation between the sub-lattice site fraction y
O
and the mole
fractionofoxygenin-Nblattice, x
O .
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
−400
−350
−300
−250
−200
−150
−100
−50
0
X
O
(−)
G
inter
(kJmol
−
1
)
The Nb−O System, bcc Phase
T = 1000 K
T = 1500 K
T = 2000 K
T = 2500 K
Figure12: The calculated Gibbs freeenergy of -Nb(in bcc phase) vs.the
mole fraction of interstitial oxygen at dierent temperatures. The symbols
indicate the calculated Gibbs free energy of the stoichiometric compound
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
−450
−400
−350
−300
−250
−200
T (K)
G
m
(kJmol
−
1
)
NbO
2
Nb
2
O
5
NbO
Figure13:ThecalculatedGibbsfreeenergyofstoichiometricniobiumoxides
asa function of temperature; note that the freeenergy is evaluated as per
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
−220
−210
−200
−190
−180
−170
−160
−150
−140
T (K)
G
m
(kJmol
−
1
)
NbO
2
Nb
2
O
5
NbO
Figure14: Thecalculated Gibbsfree energy offormation of niobiumoxides
as a function of temperature, as in Fig. 13, the free energy is evaluated as