Big Thompson 1980 flood L.S. depositions

•

-· ..

•

·--th _

_

L!!!~(~

______

}{_!~_:_ c~~J11

-2

.jt::l a

o~-IJ

'? [;,

~

f7-1 / "

'"n /:)

,·/r

4

(<!,;,i,,

ar.

Jh;-;;~;: ~

" ----

.

~-.... ·-7C~

·i/ac.,·

C

1~( 7-- ' _ '::? /(/ I' f4/ 7s .'

lr~~-2

-·- 3_,

dt:7

~

'f

-~-1-r-~~~ ~__·t

_

?'.

zit"

·--~

_ (

tt; _

_f

_p~----

_ 'S

I'~

(/t',. ,..( .

~

t

~~~/

13urn.s -

- . -. . . .

_

S'/td!~

JO--- _

~ lhu/i -~- _ ____ ~~fl

__

l/, __

C__)r_!!!_;u/

~ /?;JM~

- --- - --- -- --·- -- ----

~,7_;.Q·_;;

/. Ct///j'

~ ~-

F

1'7/

'A_.//~~- ~/;..('

?::f,.L.-,

~~

_

07C;;<c~_·

..

...,-.:::0;;

tt

rl .

7 . .(,

~

A

2 nPt:_.,.,._:·r

7.

-~:;-, L~.tllt

_

~-r' _!'~

7

&

£

FA"

~(t!J/Je?.n ~-

___

Jf./~j af!_:/_l~

_______ __

___

_ ____ .

.. __ ... __

•

~;-, ~-,___!(/_~

_ _

.

_!J_l_V...:·..=

-•

•

7~

I-

J

~-if/

:7

~ L~/

0 c.J

I

1 r

/ f .,{

~·

r{ h

I/

1,/t- /,5

t,

0

~

I'

/::.

7

A~WJI'

:1

~

r,

7r,

W_7/'-

~

fie:-~

o~ r~v

1-v

7--7

c/

P~·;(

7

~

.:J

1-$/3

~

/'1'1

3

~Ti,

9,:

cP

c

rrr--r

_

~;~Gre:J ~s

-

5>-~ J,c~

.4~~-7.

Uu

r;s

),_,n~

..;,

?sA

//-1

r/U4t

f3,.

f

#'(~ I $' :1 I

¥

-~·

(/ ..

f.

HifJr~

_/'~fJh$.

~-

!l./~ l'r,/t:7r""

f,

7?

--/;-tf't/J I. ·-~:~ .. __

, /

7t;;,.r/c~//

I I

Pl-v("~ /

r'}r/

.A~d>~s D

f

1/r

~s-

,r

kt:t</.--

")nt'~

t""o

?A._-4" ;-'tt:?5

r

:7

~~~

e~---

__:;;,;

;//,7?/'

~/'~

....

r

14 •.

kw,:s

_+~,-ne;

__

&__. __

~~~--~:Z~--h,·£-

_ ---·- _________ _

.. lh

{_!d~/

-)//J,tt/_, ______

/:)(:f'~

__

l1.~'-.

__

f4<1lfl~_

--- HI

ffr_~

__

/}1.;_,_ _ ..

1 _

qga_, ____ _ _ _

___ _ ____

_

. _ _

__ ...

'

f'-~JS~-~ fl~

---~-

- - --- -

--~---

--- --- - ·--- -- ···---

···---. Jl;J;

dClt:?/:?t'r-'.

.

-

. . . .

.

...

//, -f

v.rs

~

_c(;

Jf'--

~

_

cP

i.A ___ C._r_tt? __ 2:1

~fi/- d:~ 7t.~/

l:-:1--•--- _ ___ ___ __ _ _ ____ _ __ __ __

---- __ ---fLj!L. ___

e_(~

_ _ ___ _ _ __ __ _

______________ . __ . . . ... ________ _

,..\\

•

•

.•

- - ·

f/t

't-

h

1{~

It"

b -)

/3

7 /O Jrl £... ,... • ./

A(

H/~

C(.

~·

H,

C

~

£c/

f-J()U/

/V1

o-;--,

Lf

t

I

9

8

'2-3,

4·

fU>-1!/~

A ) )

/rd

f /

L1·c /Vo~

t3o9C.

C?o

·~

;9777

rvj

C7

tG.v-

t- /

L

B

:7 11 It

s

-!_) I; I

I/

t-

r-P ..

/f/1 7

r

o

01-'1

.J /

A

r/-Z.

\_;:J

r~

₁

.~

:1

I

r'-' ('

k ..

j

c;,

('Of/~ _1../l..;

hG

(,.r~

7

d ~ Y

f

r-t.J

r

t' 5 J,:;-r-'.

?

D/3

S/r!O 1"1'

6-

<' 5 .,r

>·>

.---c (/

f( S:--'--"-··

/3.7

rh~-:.1.::·:•

ti

tv·

s

{ h t

.It:..~<._)· • ';;;:; • C../ ~

---, I

·~

•

-·

<:"· '-"''}' - J I (YI /:5 -j{J -{' .(,1.-'f-·· -{e--rr..

f3

p .r(

r~s-13

1/

f'0o

I'I?(:J'a v, 1 ) h q

-1

J

M _,

/u,J

/L~--~--:-·

)

5

_-r""',:;

I

I :;-

/o

,rv

/L1or--P .51.7hl,

b.;11

k. C A;;-;~ ~ V;, ~?,_.-'-(]

,..

' .. /j

/A

r::__rYTf'S<t:7 ~--< 1 -J

.7

Ac .) ..

~ /L·~

!3

~) "? )u; ___ ( 11 l"e- '"'';: ., / r? /,.

'1:{'

r'~ fl J?v

'~

-

E

s f,.v

l

1

?r

lr..

~

~~·;.,._,l'dL

l /

J

s

~

C/ t.-t/

-~.

-j

rt .(;;

"11

r..,

I

S'r::r"' r--r--·'

1""

L

(/'~ ~ ~ ,.A /--r_;~ ~

d

_.5'

.;7;:r~ I '

2

--· /f /'-f!·

)...-

I

II

r

~

" ' _

hI'

l~tw

_/1-~--

_~~

fl,~.-?if-

1-'.c,~.

It

/_ d/.-.,.c) I ' ~,-, fj,-~- I)

r,

(i.e A"~- -n,ff/t:t~ t· ~-c:::oo-c.~

"--(

__ 7

o t' h)-

~AJ

IJ.;, .

I_([~~,

·::s r-__ c::-__

~Jre-

/..;

f

!__ ___

-..;,~-~:

·---·--- ·---·--- ·---·--- ~-

---~--J

v/~

__

/CJjO __ -

Ar

~~---. ' -4 . '""J-' 0 .. ·- _ _f__;//t_t

·-~

J,?M_

~38/_2.._

~---

?oat

IJ.~:--E_,~--;,;~;,-~;..c~~-

·

--~(

cllr_f"l"t:/

5-'c::Yh-! __

l_

r: __

~7- __

>'______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( c '!:1/'-u}~/1 __ (~t ~-~ r v ( _ .[~~~ ~

. 1)

-e :.

H)~---

s-

{lJI;oj~..r.

-FI~ ~dv/r\ ~ ---·---··---··-·---·-·-.

P

r b fl( ,- CCJ u?z-f-

2d6

1

•

•

I 'JOO ~/h

1'1

l-it

I-t /h ,·rf 2_

3,

f?l!J?nh.

r7

_Oct I _L

_::>'""'

_,..J.. .::.-,J. ... ~ r-.:. h ,.._~ fhr"1( /

~/~

/9,8 C

F<a

d

~"(-I' I .· f/ )c:/t:; tJ,

s

I

/J

J " ' I

s / /"'-' '"

I

v .,_(' I cfur-J¥1/ ')

~

1 7

J.1;1

J98Z-j /),

S'

~ C v r~ /h'j _ . t"on~(, · 1-nu-r , /1Jr.JS7~,

tJ ,-

J-, .~ f-1,:; vv·

f

;~,_. ~ I) 5 /--fo o/

f7 .)

~ rtFH f, t'" h :}~, Me;~/(,~ ;1/e~r!t,..,. /oo I

us

~

(00

trh

f) ,J I

/iJ(

1

'7 ' .

. .

() ~~( f( I~

!3 ,._,,;

13 /' /( ( 9 § d

f (

~ 5' / YvJ / 1? '

.Ey,

&'. /),

5, ) 0 Oo 1 / ) , J L-oo h--r,) £~ch /vf;;i/ ~ ~ Ot.;!t_.,

tV'cJ

I~ ~-

P,IV )3v;·;r

f (.

9 , .

f3 ,

r( c;{

~1:::-

r; /! /V? _.' /.

r-~

fy

II~·

3

B' ./

- · ~./--<.-c--r,

-;.:-y

I 2

7

0 ~ I

U: _) ,

£. • ; ~ r '-' _{7 J}

E.t

_{1 ·} I · 1.;: • . -; ._!. Li f~ )

J,

f-J.

J. C .c: nr ~ /3 /<:. c

/c!..

?o o ·

~ Y

f.j--.,.

<

-7r 6 .. .c/ 1r·.J

l.

o o ~---<-;

0,

Y._ L dcJY7,':; __ rrup~

/3.;nk

~-f-1/.- ~loor( . C:cJ[ h d_l"( /r-'j ~- /]~.:Yh 1 _l

rt~-.

_

.r

rn.1. ·

t;;

r

. l

1-'

,' -} : ; '.?"~·_£-;_-· I ?oc.-ru:r.

•

[_ o

Vi~<~

(3

r

/err- /

CJ

8

0

A

~:.t fl;

lt~~-IJ

r 5 /

~~~

f..-;

5

fLL-c.;p!-r:-t:_,'..., . _ ---~--~--~--~ X) 5r-~f Jt-a 71'4' 13~41 ~/~-<--c;;;__, () ln

A

/, C

iJ

/c- '-'

/.7 1-r

~ r~l'?So ;: /;7

1

,:z__

,;

3

I

-•

•

)J-/~ r I d,rr -7 ~'7 Tf ... ;_, -

u/

S; -~

/J

,·v,

_ _ r.,

I,. c.--/:~ ; , ..:?"n --., -··· __ _ _ ..

5/o

(U

ll ,

r_/

J.

c-u

~~~ ~ Ccm('vlr . ----JC}

7o/

3

r,_,/ /--.; ...

;J,

.

5

I .

·~~

7

_()56~- . _"brO'(,J (~

c

:.?_n_~_ tl 1 f f _ __

?::

9

5

.J

11

~

t?

r_.;_y ___ .

~ --. --· . -- ---· -- --·

J3

JS

j,,

t/~--

1

~----~ !J,(,-~_{!r~-

_

fJ

r_,(,_

__

_ct>)"'3t __

~,~._,.~ s~;.,

_______ .

s lor

--~-·/··-·-· t;

•

•

•

• f / ~

I

C--1 , ,) .·• c. I

!8,.

f

vr~'

I

9

t? () -

13;

11

h

r

~? ~

c; ,-:;:,

d o c /' ,.J

A

r- I'Yto ""'/ ~ 6? a 1._

a _, ,..

b

"rl;

'r .s

()

~

vv

c-f

c:.

'1

t:?

~

k n.?

~ ~

6

,;~

r.· h ?-'h/ /'" - ) · :/ /

flhvro.

!3'-''h-;;nn:?..-, ~7:..-ih

I )

t"7f,

3,

' 7

I:J'~

!t_r

~r

,-y,,

S' ,--z_,-- ~ . /-~ .; Ao~ -1

3<r

'??-! 7-n -;', 1ao@~fJ, ---'-·-·---·-~---~ / A/cr-71]

13

9n)<

I J ?~ 5/

'i..-far-YY7

? I

13

7 n /( J J

/3

I

cP-

J {

I f) I:.>

lur

~ .7~ Lft:J

US-J-.J

/n7!"

~~

I f / ./'

/'lo~r

S:;ly

~,,J-. ~ ~ I ~Vi

o6

7

I

"'o,U

. . . "1'4.~1 h J11 k ·· ... .

H.

?' Ur.

rf

17.

c;.

P ' . 0

Jz

11

~

h/. ·

(~

- (_

~

7 l' 7 _.J ! . ·,. r.· / ,;} / 1 . l.

~..

;:-7(

4·./

'h

/'f- /

~

~

_,Cvy

'fO

I

r(fj:J?

Cdulr(

nof

70r

?h._,.,/·r-•,J /

fi,

i,) ', F ,·,:;M~- lu ,7r·

n

""o?J I

r/ ..

~ J ~ \:'

l ; ..

~-

::;,...

<:~.! j ~ ~ "c-~-~'

?

~e;t9~ ~~

C f ) i

v

5A;>IcfiJ~~7i 7~ -f~{k.~ C . } r ha-£/-<~ ~-AX'..e~1

(

•

L;;/'' r--y

fJ~-:;,..,J

'

1

s

•

•

~~--~

_,

\

M/ot/ /

,d

""'Jt70

~

y / /

(7

~~

7

0

/'~-ryr;:; //c·~-7

+

::7-r,

Ar?J?ar

L,:;;~

I

17

8

₎₍

__ I

9]9

l?oo cf:; -/-~ drrrt~'

/W

) ___ . r Cf d f:

~

"L _ f f7J'- leij

?

o

I

laC'

~1

I

OJ

7 {;

f

f

o a c(

-~I

P~'.JA

f/cvv

'2-..s;<:'O<:J

cF _;]· ..

7f lo-'ri-J,'.J

_tf/~,--7 C J c t o c f j _ _ _ _

-"YV>-.77

-~ It~ -~(

__

r·_;(r-~i?lr~

~-t'

Y;

I

9

7~ flo -:t·~

lo/go

fldar(

___ /_~ t/C!CJ r f 5 ( O 'WI ,-~

i.J!

fitt?oc

f'

L 7 ~

3

J..c /7/

/9 8o fla-ac( ~-dO~ ~ OdO C /',:)

/

--

-- -

~-(;;;-cJ_q_~ ~f_5_

.

_ .(o ....

Jo

d

(f.s-) .... .... . .. t•• ~

/2_

Ae~urr_.,

£

IJ.<:?. c;_,f!:.~ ..

-

,;,Litr<Jf~"~

]6dA. IV! fo_ ,/[r()vYJ

i-!. ___

o_~_/z?l'liv?

/:

lo

~.

_______ _

( }'\01 t 1

il _

fl/J.QiY? ('

_liJ~Ll_~_ ~

__ IQ-r__(}a_o c__f ::;_ _, ___

.::z

f

[q~lJ ~l_[:o_/;_,

___ - --

•

•

•

" _ , __

/,

!frrnP'.r_

1.~

7

__.,_

~

~/'f I ' f-,?

A',:;-

J?-C . ; / he

I"/;

/ ' /i I ' I

IV

;J

f

t>

~ ~·

/.fr

1--Vlu

r

/

?'7' ,--

J-/u

.7

~~

.,

'). !/

1-1 ' ; - ; /.,

7 / / "- ;;-{ ,- ,,_;

,(>

n

~

~

-/;";

·~"

..

~~ h-er~

I

old

4

/H--l

~hr.J,-,../

. 2., ...

A

rJ7'7e-/,.,.-

/;7'7,..-{ r-c""n ,.. c rlL

r

c/

1..!. }:.--

c

~

S }

:J

r )-,. ""(

I ,.

~

1

~"'

; .. .-.

h

.s- _., ··

~-r ~

~-

r--/ /-

~

L

I~

r

I

?r ;'-

(

lc; 5' r .

/F //

/j<-f / ./

~

7

•

····~-·

'lh

(,//r I .

-/c/f

/;7,1_

/ '/

~/~

fl,,£,,

1

I

~>i>b"t'-/

_?-II"

~,

_{/ /}

/

F

r/ _ ;:- ,..

7

fLP _

8

IF=

9

io

Jd_5-Fr

--:.J

t

fC'/'1/';

Sfru__../vr-1--<J.

_ho-

C.?l,.~ (;'~h _")1

~

r .:"/,

a / -:;;•

lv-,_,

f

cc(2-sdf!.0

1 /

h

7

~

,£"

Sre:-fl

't:!_h

I

I

rf;rvf_ ..

/;'h_/ :2,

~~

c(

/-~~- ~;:{

r-

r~

i .•

•

·-·

, y . . !1~ (/ f.5 ~~. ("'_ J-. .);-t .,....-.

{9

'l(;

~

/

8'

G

IJ

Jd ,.,

I+

A.

·7

~

·'

~··t

I. h / ... /"< .'f"'h .,_"'1

'1':.

<? h

('~

_/97~

f-/cvw .

_

..

~L

CIO, _,

~ -~~lk-*"'"-~~~d-7

.

r--/---~

r ..

.. L-

<!.1~--t;l

t<

!-""

r :; r,_ ."' '·:;.5 .- .:; ~f-oo

I

hiJ.

?J.

( j

l'

(.;f'

f'

9 ,) ,.. .../ 4

-*'=--·--·--·--·--/

~

T;J

v-el ··

~

J'J..-1/7-r t/_, __

S:'

Yt.-~

f . .;;

~

r

e.CZ:~

_'

l

""':tf/;/.'1 J',

'-:t.:::y~--

/

f_

SrCJw,..,

~.;lrr r{l,,.<~..-~-:: s/r~ci~_r

-~,.~

s

""o "'

r

----

L~

r

v/ ..

Sr c"'

r

IJ,J',

-~/'

..

.f

I

r'-" ___

..-j"

c..--,....-r_,··.

•

J

/1/1

for

i.;r)

•

.. / ) " J

!~)

.><L/ _

/j (nlr

!'/"f.,.,.. /

~.

~'/ - - L_ --·---~'

t171

f'/

~

1.1/ : ( ~C£.-17 ·-···-·· -···· . . __ , __

1

_/1/

!.__,-.£

It~~/!

..

o-~ z~ _{lf!'lf·_;-'f_f,..( __} Fi!i!!/1J~

.F!_

/?-~-- f-C" I

'J .

.?'.t:2

Fl.~-~

/

l/ .A!';-

('IJ~J.~L 5"~~

__

r;

'l.r

_j;o~

/ ;:;/ __

~(-~

J7_

{' y-,.

£.'7_'· (

q

g' 0

f (

(7 , .

,I<

. -·. - ..

2

...

-···· --· ... ·-· ... -- ---

---- _____

!(!/~I~

;I-r-:4t __ i

h _ _

{j

:1

nA__ . -- ,)_

f_ -

1:__ /..,-: ··· .

..

. _ (IJ

(v. __

5lr._~r

fu,.-r

...,.C":c."YY~c,~:::t. ..T~JtS'

...

J __ _

.... .. .. _

... __ ... _

__

.-~_h-J?.r.?¥1 II...~

y _ _

/c,,._,-7_·/.~-~ l~--

i f __

/)2_r~ttcd._

····---····

- --- - --·- ---. --

-{0

•

•

~

'(

S~c

-},

13 /" /

~

13 -)

/T A_ [ltr; ,7 f,,

~J'f

,/~lor/

1"7

/J/'5-J

--~- ----

~---·----8

c

.YIJ

,t' /)' r

~/,

· e ' 1

f

r m ""/'

I::') ,

,-(Vo

)

.--I

I ' I~ <~ 1./V.:JS" !o " /

I

-1

f

/v-yJ

I

I!~

111/AJf_ (.; lr (.,_ I? { I ' ~ / r.or:"';.._.

I' IJ.

M._

VfJ

~--~ 1-- ~ . fV1 , 11 L 5 _{l n-t..--r}

- rJ?r--f.

_/(7

t

t_

---~J

1/

,f7-_-'-" .:,. .:,~ (

•

•

·-·-s

/z_Qy! ---

5___<1-~~,

ACC'~cZ.c:~,--, -{ I

ocrrJ

r_o

7

A/

1-;·ohs~

- ( p

I

q

0

Q

( 9

"2-- C) -C , · ( c- ..- (./

./r-

I ,

V,.. /"

~

'· /

';?

Z.

S;z"

rJ,vf . -~--.,

(/)_, 5.

' I .;: -- -

---· E

I

h-:JII~;z~_ -~

s

,/ll&_h2 __

~-S'ir~--~

- - -- - - c

S4t

-:r ;

,J-J-1

f~.,._A ~

t, -

t.~-4~A!"'~!

1

{ f ) _ ( / -:J__

M

{J

2!1

k

•

///~~-~~J

0

JI!./1,

tJ

~~)

t1

lr.

!:Y

- -l ! 'l rv;v'-.<~~

-]

A5:/u~ ~d),.,-r_; /

~-~ ~ ~

!)

r,

_5

~

~ ~IJ

t7

u

;;

5

s-

c:-

~

5

;'fn/' "/;J.r-. /h /~7 / ! /~ I . -·· ~ /'.c:l_. ~;-;~~~

~I

'"

r~· :;~

" - . ~ .

{i..--

A

rr. J ;t., ~ / J /-v! . .f/co.-/ / :_::;.;.,

j/~_

r

Z-.

}fv

,--.en /r?.- (ov-

;eu

f

Jv

S -/;-:;-_P

'J-7--;,--:c-:~~

i t;

/i-v ..

(iia

b:b«-

.7

~~-h

.

.

·

3

)i rJn.t:- y--f 1/L--1

·//crc.-t/J

OC/j

~/~

(r-

7u-~

& .

( 0 17 f(LR

- -

-.- I

lt-s.sc,YIV0

J"-d~ ~

!.;

/}

?r-r

4

~A~/-<'-.~

tL.:··· _ _cr

()-:!?cJ

7

•

_J/ J_f

j.:1-U- {ih/l_

~

?

4/

?u.o

~

(lr< _ _

}/72/;_~c~

.. f

- -- c-c?

(:1

I {./

t

I

j

/,J :;

G

A

-...<../..

c:C<-~

)

~j

·:_J-1-··

..

•

•

'

...

- I );7 ,:.;,

L /-,/

c

I

~. _dk.:;., ~I

. i;)e

-1-///1

w~

_"Wt;;l--~~ ~-

1

/-;;;r;c/

J

f

Tlv·-·-

~L

...

Puf

.6.).1(

ltv

~;;(,~

fA,/-

f'

'f"'i>~ 6;~

4

'~"

--

1-fow_~

?

~r/

01

~-~

.

~~~~l£'_1. tJ~

'·

KNAPP AND LEE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION AITORNEYS AT LAW 172b BLAKE STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202 WILLIAM H. KNAPP

BYRUM C. LEE .• JR. December 22, 1981

EDWARD J. YORK. JR.

ROBERT A. WEINBERGER Philip B. Cardi

Mr. David M. Frick

Resource Consultants, Inc. P. 0. Box Q

Fort Collins, CO 80522

Re: Civil Action No. 80CV1405 Larimer County District Court Loomis vs. City of Loveland

Dear Dave:

Enclosed herewith you will find the Answers of the Big Thompson Ditch and Manufacturing Company to our outstanding Interrogatories. The Answers do not provide all of the infor-mation we desired, but may indeed be helpful to you in com-pleting your analysis.

It would be helpful to me if you would advise me of the status of your investigation and indicate what further information you feel i t is necessary to obtain in order for you to complete your studies. I can then determine whether or not the information can be obtained via discovery proceedings or whether we will need to seek the information via other alter-natives. One important step will be the deposition of Dr. Yung Hai Chen. However, I do not wish to take his deposition until we have a pretty good idea of where we are going with our case from a technical standpoint so that I can get some assistance from you in formulating questions for Dr. Chen.

Your continued assistance is appreciated.

BCL/bn cc: Mr. Neal Carpenter Arix Mr. John C. Overton DPFC File No. 220706 w/Attachment TELEPHONE (3o:Ji 62.'l-6R86

DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE Civil Action No. 80CV1405

ANSWERS OF BIG THOMPSON DITCH AND MANUFACTU~d;. _... COMPANY TO INTERROGATORIES OF NELSON, 111\LEY, PATTERSON & QUIRK, INC.

1. KIRK LOOMIS; 2. MABELLE LOOMIS; 3. TERRY MELTON; 4. HOMER LOOMIS;

5. LINDA L. WRIGHT; and

6. BIG THOMPSON DITCH AND MANUFli.CTUIUNG COMPli.NY, Pl<J.intiffs,

VS.

THE CITY OF LOVELAND, COLORADO, <J. municipal corporation,

v s.

Defendant and Third-Party

Plaintiff,

l. GARNEY CONSTHUCTION COMPANY; ancl

2. NELSON I HALEY I PATTERSON & QUI HK I INC. I

Third-Party DefC::ndants.

The following <J.nswers to the IntcrrogntoriC::s submitted by Third-Party Defendant, NGlson, Haley, Patterson & Quirk, Inc. ("Nelson") are made by Big Thompson Ditch and Manu-facturing Company ("Ditch Comp<J.ny"), Third-Party Plaintiff.

l. INTERHOGATORY: Ple<J.se idGntify, <J.S that term is defined in the preamble hereto, the individual or individuals answering for and on behalf of the plaintiff and, if more than one individual, indicate each interrogatory answered by each individual.

1. ANSWER: N. Eugene Brownwood, President of Big Thompson Ditch and i'1anufacturing Comp<J.ny, 2165 Fourteen S.E., Loveland, Colorado 80537. I am answering these Interrogatories on behalf of the Ditch Company.

2. INTERROGATORY: Describe the business org~nization and purpose of the Big Thompson Ditch and Munufacturing

Company.

2. ANSWER: The Ditch Company is a Colorado non-profit corporation organized with the purpose of providing water to its shareholders.

3. INTERROGATORY: Identify, as that term is defined in the preamble hereto, the engineer or firm who designed the original diversion structure.

3. ANSWER: The original diversion structure was

apparently designed in the 1800's by the farmers who started the Ditch Company.

4. INTERROGATORY: Describe the nature, scope and extent of any damage done to the diversion structure during the 1976 Big Thompson Flood.

4. ANSWER: The diversion dam was damaged and under-mined. The bypass pipe was partially destroyed. Damage occurred to the headgate structure. Sediment and debris from the flood were deposited along approximately 1,000 feet of the canal southeast of the he.:tc1g,1le. Flood debris was deposited in the vicinity of the headgate.

5. INTERROGATORY: Describe u.ll repairs to the diver-sion structure following the 1976 flood, including within your response:

A. The identity of the eng1.neer or firm designing the repa1.rs;

B. The n.:1 t ure, scope u. nc1 extent of the rep:::nr s;

C. The identity of the contractor making the repairs;

D. The cost of the repu.1.rs.

5. ANSWER:

A. The Soil Conservation Service of the U.S. Depu.rtment of Agriculture made some rccommendu.tions regard-ing reconstruction u.fter the 1976 flood. No engineer was called in to design the repu.irs.

B. Gcneru.l concrete work wu.s done to rcpa~r the diversion dam. Minor repairs were performed on the sluice-gate. Excavation u.nd backfilling work were performed.

-2-c.

Gene.r::al contractor: Loveland Exco.vating Company, 1425 South Lincoln, Lovel.o.nd, Colorado 80537. Subcontro.ctor: Thor Construction Comp~ny, ~30 West Myrtle Street, Fort Collins, Coloro.do 80521.

D. $31,362.75. Of this amount, $24,500.00 came from federal and state diso.ster o.ssisto.nce; $6,862.75 came directly from the Ditch Company.

6. INTERROGATORY: Provide a complete technical des-cription of all changes in design of the diversion structure made during the repairs following the 1976 flood.

6. ANSWER: No major design cho.nges in the diversion structure were effected. The only design change that I am aware o f w a s the add i t ion of a o ~-' t-o [ r \v n 11 on the sou t h s ide

-·--- - --- -- -

-of the diversion dam.

7. INTERROGATORY: Describe in detail all work per-formed between 1976 and 1980 which involved grading of the bank, dredging of the channel, placing of riprap or other-wise altering or affecting the Dig Thompson River bank or channel within the area immediately upstream and immediately downstream of the diversion structure for n distance of 100 yards and for all such work, state:

A. The nature, scope and extent of the work; B. The date the work wo.s performed;

c.

The identity of the firm designing or detailing the work;

D. The identity of the firm doing the work;

E. The identity of the person or firm authorizing the work;

F. The cost of the work.

7. ANSWER: To the best of my knowledge the river was dredged at some point following the 1976 flood by an uniden-tified party. Prior to the 1980 flood, the City of Loveland installed a sewer line which crossed the river. I have no further information regarding the work referenced in the Interrogatory.

8. INTERROGATORY: For the 48 hour period immediately preceding and immediately following the 1976 flood, state whether the Dig Thompson diversion structure gates were open

-3-or closed, including within your response the dates and times of opening and closing and whether the gates were fully or partially opened or closed at each time interval.

8. ANSWER: The Ditch Company has no records indi-cating the status of the headgates prior to the 1976 flood. At this time the Ditch Company is in the process of procuring the desired information.

9. INTERROGATORY: l-or the t1 8 hour period immediu. tely preceding and immediately following the 1980 flood, state whether the Big Thompson diversion structure gu.tes were open or closed, including within your response the dates and

times of opening and closing and whether the gates were fully or partially opened or closed for each time period.

9. ANSWER: For the 48-hour time period before the 1980 flood, both headgates were closed. The headgate structure was subsequently washed away in the flood.

10. INTERROGATORY: At any time during the l97G flood did floating debris accumulate or back up at the diversion structure?

10. ANSWER: Yes.

ll. I NTERROG/\TORY: 1\ t any time during the 19 8 0 flood did floating debris accumulate or bu.ck up at the diversion

structure?

11. ANSWER: I can't really answer the Interrogatory. To the best of my knO\.Jl edge, I don't know of anyone \vho would have witnessed any debris u.ccur.mlo.tion before the headgate structure washed away in the flood.

12. INTERROGATORY: If your response to either of the two immediately preceding interrogotories wos in the affirm-ative, compare the extent of the debris buildup.

/ 12. ANSWER: Extensive debris u.ccumulu.ted in the

(

vicinity of the headgate and the canal during the 1976

flood. ,~Qwledge oz_~_n:L d_el_?r~2_J:lyil_~r __ d_u~i_ng the

1980 flood.

-13. INTERROGATORY: DescriLe the nnture u.nd sequence of the failure of the diversion structure in 1980, including within your answer a chronoloyy of the clivvrsion structure's failure.

(

13. 1\NSI'IER: No Ditch Compan)' rcprcscntcttives observed the failure of the diversion structure in 1980. Ilomer Loomis has advised thilt on April 30, 1980, the Wi.ltcr began washing

-4-out the riverbank in the y_~£.~_Qit;y._Qt_ the sewer cr()_§.§i.ng, __ _ The washing out of the riverbank progres-se-d. up-stream to the diversion structure.

14. INTERROGATORY: State the exact time as closely as can be determined that water first broke through the diversion structure during the 1980 flood.

14. ANSWER: See answer to Interro9atory 13.

15. INTERROGATORY: Provide a complete description of the nature, scope and extent of all damage done to the

diversion structure during the 1980 flood.

() ._t!I''G:

15. ANSWER: After the flood the diversion dam had rY', \'' shifted in the riverbed, and the balance of the diversion

I _{._,} 0 \ ' structure was gone.

16. INTERROGATORY: Describe in detail all repair or remedial work performed on the diversion structure following the 1980 flood and with respect to all such work, state:

A. The nature, scope and extent of the work; 13. 'l'he date or dates the work W<:l.S performed;

C. The person or firm recommending the work; D. The person or firm prepuring the pl<:1.ns and specifications for such work;

E. The person or firm doing the work;

F. Whether or not the work was the subject of the contract, and if so, the contract date, parties and amount;

G. The total remedial cost for work broken down by:

l. Remedial project or job;

2. Cost of m.::tterial::;, includin9 the complete listing of materials used and their costs;

3. Engineering, architectural or investiga-tion costs to develop the plan for the work.

16. ANSWER: Shortly after the flood a temporary

diversion system was effected through other ditch companies to provide water to the Big Thompson Ditch and Manufacturing Company shareholders. The plan for this temporary system

-5-was drafted by various members of the Ditch Company. Ed Shefferd, 1954 Fourteen S.E., Loveland, Colorado 80537,

performed the construction work. The work was not the subject of any contract. The cost in 1980 to complete the temporary system was $2,694.38.

A new diversion structure and concrete pipeline link to the existing canal of the Ditch Company were constructed in 1981. Construction commenced about March of 1981 and has yet to be entirely completed. The reconstruction work was not recommended in the true sense of the word, but rather necessitated by the destruction of the diversion structure. All reconstruction work was authorized by a majority of the Ditch Company's stockholders. The plans and specifications for this reconstruction were prepared by Bruns, Inc., 16 Mountain View Avenue, Suite 106, Longmont, Colorado 80501. The work was performed by Bebo Construction Company, Inc., 3536 Weld County Road No. 8, Post Office Box 820, Berthoud, Colorado 80513. The permanent reconstruction work was the

subject of a contract dated March 23, 1981 between the Ditch Company and Bebo Construction Company, Inc. for $303,055.05. The remedial project cost to date is as follows:

Did advertising

Bebo Construction Company, Inc. Bruns, Inc.

Associated attorney fees Easements $ 39.10 313,153.52 39,455.72 8,086.49 9,200.00

All materials were provided by the contractor, I3ebo Construc-tion Company, Inc. The Ditch Comp~ny is seeking to obtain a cost breakdown from the contractor.

17. INTERROGATORY: Identify, ~s that term is defined in the preamble hereto, all individuals known to you to have witnessed the flooding on your property.

17. ANSWER: People identified in answers filed by the Loomis Plaintiffs, various representatives of state and

local governmental agencies, Homer Loomis (1514 West Shore Drive, Loveland, Colorado 80537), residents of the Loomis house and their guests. These individuals witnessed the flooding but probably not the actual destruction of the Ditch Company property.

18. INTERROGATORY: Are you, your agents, or attorneys aware of or have you taken any statements from any witness to your accident? If so, for each statement state:

A. The name of the witness;

B. The person taking the statement;

-6-C. The date of the statement;

D. A summary of the statement's contents.

18. ANSWER: Homer Loomis has given a statement to the insurance company for the City of Loveland. I know nothing further of the nature or circumstances of the statement.

19. INTERROGATORY: Have you, your agents, or attorneys taken, or are you aware of any other statements regarding the facts involved in this litigation? If so, state:

A. The name of the person giving the statement;

B. The name of the person taking the statement;

C. The date of the statement;

D. A summary of the statment's contents.

19. ANSWER: Objection is made to Interrogatory 19 on the basis that the matters involved arc part of the attorney work product.

2 0. INTERROGATOHY: If <1ny per son or entity has made payment to you for any portion of the damages claimed or costs allegedly associated with the subject flood, for each such person or entity state:

A. The person or entity m<1king payment;

B. The amount paid by each person or entity and the service or loss intended to be covered by such payment;

C. Whether or not the plaintiff has been authorized to recover such payment on behalf of the person or entity

making payment or reimbursement.

2 0. ANSWER: No person or entity has reimbursed the Ditch Company.

21. INTERROGATORY: Have you, your agents, or attorneys received any reports from any flood control agencies or

other agencies or entities regarding your alleged damages? If so, state:

A. The name of the agency or entity;

B. The date of the report;

-7-c.

A summary of the report's contents.

21. ANSWER: The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development issued a damage survey report dated May 9, 1980. The report described the general damage done to the Ditch Company's facilities and delineated proposed emergency construction work to enable the Ditch Company's shareholders to receive water.

22. INTERROGATORY: Itemize 1n detail the components of all expenses you have incurred since the flood, which you attribute to the flood.

22. ANSWER: See answer to Interrogatory 16.

23. INTERROGATORY: With respect to the damages you claimed to have incurred in your Complaint and any and all other damages you claimed to have incurred as a result of any action or inaction of this defendant or any other defendant herein, state:

A. The total amount of damages known and ascer-tained at the present time;

B. How such damages arc calculated and what the methods and ingredients of the calculations are;

C. Identify any and all individuals by name and last known address who had any part in the calculations of such damages, including the gathering of information,

computation of data, and determination of the stated amounts;

D. Identify any and all individuals the plaintiff intends to call as witnesses at the trial of this matter who will testify to any facet of the calculations or experience of damage;

E. Identify any and all documents which in any way bear upon or tend to establish any item of damages and with respect to each such document, indicate whether the plaintiff intends to use such document as an exhibit at the trial of this matter.

23. ANSWER:

A. $372,629.21.

B. The damages arc calculated using the actual cost of replacing the destroyed divcr~ion structure, plus those costs incidental to this actual replacement cost.

-8-\

C. Richard S. Gast

March, March, Myati, Korb & Carroll 110 East Oak Street

Post Office Box 469

Fort Collins, Colorado 80522. Randolph W. Starr

Cross, Christensen, Price & Starr 215 East 7th Avenue

Loveland, Colorado 80537.

In addition, personnel associated witl1 Bruns, Inc., Bebo Construction Company, Inc. and the Ditch Company played roles in the calculation of costs.

D. The Ditch Company has yet to identify those witnesses who will testify at trial regarding the damages issue. The Ditch Company's counsel will supply the names of these witnesses not later than thirty (30) days prior to trial.

E. The documentation bearing on the damages issue primarily involves cost invoices from the reconstruction of the Ditch Company's diversion structure and invoices repre-senting the costs incurred by the Ditch Company which were incidental to the reconstruction. Further documentation lies in the easement grants to the Ditch Company from Homer and Mabelle Loomis, Ray and Ruby Shipley, and Loveland

Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. It is undetermined at this point which documents will be used as exhibits in the trial of this matter.

24. INTERROGATORY: Has any architect or engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado or elsewhere, or any other individual familiar with the design professions, advised the plaintiff or its attorneys that in his opinion the professional work allegedly done by the Third-Party

Defendant Nelson, Haley, Patterson & Quirk, Inc. was any way contrary to, fell short of or failed to measure up to or comply with the minimum standards for the practice of archi-tecture and/or engineering in the locale of the subject property?

24. ANSWER: Yes.

25. INTERROGATORY: With respect to the preceding interrogatory, state whether any such person has given any opinion or is of the opinion that the Third-Party Defendant Nelson, llaley, Patterson & Quirk, Inc. was negligent or

guilty of professional negligence in regard to any professional

-9-services rendered by the Third-Parl)' Defendant Nelson,

Haley, Patterson & Quirk, Inc. in connection with the desir;n of the subject property.

25. ANSWER: Yes.

6.

INTERROGATORY: If the answer to either of the

previous two interrogatories is in the affirmative, identify, by giving the information requested in the preamble to these interrogatories, any and all such persons who have communi-cated or given such opinion, the date or dates upon which each opinion was communicated, to whom i t was communicated, in what manner i t was co1nmunicated, the substance of each such opinion, and the facts upon which each such opinion is

based. ~~

GJ'

ANSWER: /Dr. Yunq Hai __ C..b(2n, Civil

E!)g~~~ng

Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Lolorado 80523. Dr. Chen, i2;_ conversations with Mark L. Kor~ coun~el for the Ditch Company, has advised that the design of the sewer crossing at the Loomis property failed to properly

take into account river hydrology and therefore was deficient with respect to providing protection to that property adjacent

to

the structure being constructed. All co~nunications were oral. No formal report has yet been provided.

27. INTERROGATORY: Please identify each person the plaintiff expects to call as an expert witness at the trial of this case to testify as an expert with regard to the practice of architecture and/or engineering, and state:

A. The substance of the subject matter upon which each such expert is expected to testifj;

B. The f<1cts <~nd/or opinic1ns to which each such expert lS expected to testify;

C. l\ sununary of the grounds for eu.ch such opinion;

D. A complete description of the material, data, basis and f<1cts considered by, given to or used by such expert in forming the basis of such opinion.

27. ANS\'JER: Dr. Yung Jl<1i Chen will be called. The balance of the matters inquired into in paragraphs A through D has not yet been completed in a formal report.

28. INTERROGATORY: !las the plaintiff or its attorneys received a written report from any of the experts listed? If so, state:

A. The n<1mc of each expert and the date of such report;

-10-B. The name and address of the person now having custody of the report;

C. Set forth the entire report verbatim in your answer, or if you wish attilch <1 copy of the report to your

answer.

28. ANSWER: No.

29. INTERROGATORY: Has the plaintiff or its attorneys or anyone on its behalf received any oral report from any expert listed above. If so, state:

A. The name of each expert giving such report;

B. Provide a detailed exposition of the report;

c.

Please state whether any notes, memoranda, or correspondence exist which reflect the substance of said report in whole or in part and identify any person, firm or corporation having care, custody or control of such memoranda.

29. ANSWER: Yes, Dr. Yung Hai Chen. The matters involved in those conversations have been discussed in the responses to previous interrog.:1torics.

30. INTERJ\OGl\TORY: Please idcnti[y ony and all other experts with whom the plaintiff, its attorneys, or its

agents have consulted, whose names h.:1ve not been given in response to any previous intc~rrogatory, and regardless of whether or not you intend or expect to use such expert at the trial of this matter.

30. ANSWER: Objection is made to Interrogatory No. 30 on the basis that the matters involved arc privileged and would not lead to discoverable or relevant testimony.

31. INTERROGATORY: !las the plaintiff or its attorneys received any written or oral report from any of the experts identified in response to the immediately preceding interroga-tory? If so, state:

If written:

A. The name of each expert and the date of each report;

B. The name and address of the person having custody of the report;

-11-C. Set forth the entire report verbatim 1n your answer or if you wish, attach a copy of the report to your answer.

If oral:

A. The name of each expert giving such report;

B. The name and address of the person to whom such report was given;

c.

A detailed exposition of the report;

D. State whether or not any notes, memoranda, or correspondence exist which reflect the substance of the

report in whole or in part and identify any person, firm, or corporation having care, custody or control of the memoranda.

31. ANSWER: See answer to Interrogatory 30.

32. INTERROGATORY; Have you taken or do you have in your possession, custody or control any photographs of the area of the subject accident? If so, state:

A. The number of photographs taken;

B. The dates the photographs were taken;

c.

The identity of the photographer;

D. The purpose for which the photographs were taken;

E. What each photograph is intended to portray.

32. ANSWER: Yes. Numerous photographs have been taken by many individuals including the Plaintiffs, the City of Loveland, Larimer County newspapers and various other governmental agencies. These photographs were taken at various times during and following the flooding. Photo-graphs which are in the possession and control of the

Plaintiffs will be made available at the Defendant's request. All photographs basically depict what occurred during the course of and after the flood.

Dated this llth day of December, 1981.

-12-STATE OF COLORADO

ss. COUNTY OF

I

it • 1•1( ( . , '

The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this ₁₁ day of December, 1981, by N. Eugene Brownwood.

Witness my hand and official scQl.

My commission expires :/ r· ./ --~-L~-L---I . . ( (( ·, 1:.' ( '\ t, (.1 11 ., 1 Notary Public ) I U (-t.i ,-/ {If' { , 1 .I i

i

r

t' ( ( .·, , , .·

/r

OBJECTION IS MADE TO TilE REQUESTS CONTAINED IN INTERROGATORIES 19, 30 AND 31 FOR THE REASON THAT SUCH INTERROGATORIES SEEK MATTERS WHICH ARE PART OF THE ATTORNEY'S WORK PRODUCT, ARE PRIVILEGED AND WOULD NOT OTHERWISE LEAD TO DISCOVERABLE, RELEVANT OR ADMISSIBLE TESTIMONY.

Dated this llth day of December, 1981.

MARCil I 1'-IYATT I KORB &

L. Kor ,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 110 East Oak Street

Post Office nox 469

Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Telephone: 482-4322

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I d.

The undersigned hereby certifies that on the '~ -- day of December, 1981, copies of the foregoing Answers of Dig Thompson Ditch and Manufacturing Company to Interrogatories

-13-~·

of Nelson, Haley, Patterson & Quirk, Inc. were placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to:

Mr. Edwin A. Howe II

1512 Larimer Street, Suite 960 Writers Square

Denver, Colorado 80202

Mr. Byrum C. Lee, Jr. Knapp and Lee, P.C.

1725 Blake Street

Denver, Colorado 80202.

Robin Wick, Esq. 110 East Oak Street

Fort Collins, Colorado 80524

-14-..

Wll.IJAM II. KNAI'l' BYHUM C. LEE. JH. EllWAHil J. YOHK. JR. HOBERT A. WEINBERGER Mr. Jack C. Overton Design Professionals Financial Corporation Union Bank Building 50 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111

KNAPP AND LEE

A PROFESSIONAL OORPORATION

ATIOHNEYS AT LAW 172S BLAKE STREET

nENV~;H, COLORADO 1!0202

September 8, 1981

Re: American Motorists Insurance File File No. 220706

Arix ads City of Loveland

Dear Mr. Overton:

TEI.EI'IIONE (;IO:l) 62:~6Hil6

As you are aware, the depositions of Chuck Sapp and Carroll Bohannon were taken in Kansas City on September 3. Since the depositions were out of state, I discussed with you the prospect of having the plaintiff pickup our costs for the deposi-tion. Rather than actually go to Fort Collins to argue the question before the Court, a venture which including attorney's fees could be nearly as costly as the cost to be awarded for the Kansas City trip, we agreed to let the City of Loveland argue the point and the other parties would abide by the Court's decision with respect to costs for the City. No costs were awarded.

The deposition of Carroll Bohannon was taken the morning of the 3rd and Chuck Sapp' s deposition consumed the afternoon. Mr. Sapp was the project manager of construction for the actual river crossing on the Loomis property. Mr. Bohannon then came on to the job as project manager for construction of the sewer line itself.

Prior to actual construction of the river crossing, Mr. Sapp met on-site two to three times with John Tarranto who was serving as Arix's field engineer. During pre-construction dis-cussions, Sapp suggested that the design of the river crossing be modified. The design change was proposed to Tarranto by Bruce Laughlin of Garney. According to Sapp, Garney had constructed

Mr. Jack C. Overton September 8, 1981 Page 2

Re: A.M.I.C. File No. 220706 Arix ads City of Loveland

crossings with the detail designed by Arix and experienced trouble with the sewer line floating at high water times. They had also constructed the design they proposed on some dozen or so occassions and felt it to be superior.

Jack, to assist in your understanding of the changes, I am enclosing details showing the original Arix design and the design proposed by Garney which is the one actually built. The first sheet shows the original Arix design. The second and third sheets show the Garney design with red 1 ine notations, presumably those of John Tarranto. The third and fourth sheets appear to incorporate the red line notations. Mr. Sapp, however, testified that he actually constructed the project from the second and third sheets. The ___ :p_LiJl_(_2ipa~ differences involve the driving of sheet

-~_pi_ling to serve as an erosion cut off wall and the pouring of a concrete cap vs. the concrete blocks with openings at the pipe bells as designed by Arix.

In order to gain a more complete understanding of the reasons for the change, as well as the respective parts played by Garney and Arix, I will plan to schedule the deposition of Bruce Laughlin. Garney's attorney has promised to make him available in Colorado for that deposition. In the meantime, I will try to meet with John Tarranto to obtain as much detail as he can recall regarding the change. While we do not yet know the plaintiff's theory from an expert witness standpoint, it appears that there case is narrowing in on two alleged problems:

( l. A failure to place riprap in the cut in the bank, thus

permitting the start of the erosion process,

\

/ 2. The installation of the erosion cut off wall which

(

1_{.in some manner interrupted the down stream rush of water causing}

it to swirl and creating back currents which acted to cut away the bank in that area.

In prior correspondence, I had commented upon the fact that stream flow had to be diverted first to one side and then to the other to facilitate Garney's work. That now appears to be a non-issue. Stream flow was only three inches to four inches and all that was involved was pushing a small earthen dam first to one side of the existing river channel and then to the other. At no time was the bank disturbed nor was it necessary to do any rechanneling outside of the existing riverbed.

Mr. Jack C. Overton September 8, 1981 Page 3

Re: A.M.I.C. File No. 220706 Arix ads City of Loveland

In addition to an alleged failure to place stone riprap on the bank cut, the plaintiff's had alleged that their "erosion control device" consisting of wrecked car bodies had been dis-turbed. Mr. Sapp testified that they indeed removed two or three car bodies, but they were replaced upon completion of the work. The plaintiff when installing the cars ran a cable through the open windows of each car to tie them together. Mr. Sapp believes that Garney replaced the cable, but has no recollection of specifically doing so. Likewise, Mr. Sapp cannot recall actually removing the cable and does not know whether they undid one end and pulled the cable through the cars or whether they cut i t at the point of their work.

According to Sapp's testimony, the cut in the riverbank was refilled with the sandy gravelly material taken from it. The fill was placed in layers and tamped with the backhoe bucket. He is unaware of any compaction testing done by either his firm or the engineers on the fill.

I am still totally unable to evaluate the viability of the plaintiff's theories. With the information gathered in the Sapp and Bohannon depositions and the soon to be filed answers to our interrogatories, our experts should be able to provide some thoughts on whether the plaintiff's theories merit any credence. By copy of this letter to Mr. Frick, I am forwarding copies of the Garney crossing design and requesting his comments on the entire range of problems as soon as convenient.

Mr. Haylock, upon receipt of this letter, please have John Tarranto contact me to discuss his recollection of the events leading to the design proposal made by Garney.

Based upon informal discussions with the plaintiff's attorney while in Kansas City, it appears that the complaint of the Big Thompson Ditch Company will be filed in the very near future. The theories are apparently identical to the theories being pursued by the Loomis plaintiffs and Linda Wright. Mr. Korb has indicated, however, that he intends to drop all direct claims

Mr. Jack C. Overton September 8, 1981 Page 4

Re: A.M.I.C. File No. 220706 Arix ads City of Loveland

against the City of Loveland and pursue only respondeat superior claims against Loveland. All other claims will be direct claims against Arix and Garney.

BCL/kb

Enclosure /

cc: David M. Frick, P.E\

Resource Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box Q

Fort Collins, CO 80522 w/enclosure

Mr. Neal Carpenter

Arix, A Professional Corporation 2021 Clubhouse Drive

Greeley, CO 80631

Mr. Wayne Haylock

Arix, A Professional Corporation 2021 Clubhouse Drive

L,"mifs Of' Downstream

Cut-off

Wo

II -120 L F - -

---;

...---

...-I

I

I

I

I

I

-~ ----=- ~,,, I ... '"' ,,,,, ... J/t~ {I? 1/

RC.P

~---~

f

5 ,,

., 0 0

....

-co

(j'

r-..:

N

~

₀ "' 0 l!'

SECTI~N

(9

0 N ~ ~

0

N ~ ~

0

... + + "+ .,.. -+ ... .... li' N +-('0 OJ 0" t'-+ 0 l1' ·I...C' + r-("() _r0 + - - - N N N N ri" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0' (j' _(}' _ _ _ ___l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L ____________ _L _____________ !._ ____________ l __ _ ___ !_ ______________________ __j _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ __,__ ___ _:_ _ _ _ 1.__

t:J!Z!C,INAL

A/2!

~

0E.51GN

NAMAQUA INTERCEPTOR

BIG THOMPSON RIVER CROSSING

STA. 92+50

Sca!e:

Horlz..=l"=2f7'

Ver-t."

i

11 :. C)'

~~Steel

_•

0 0

....

..;:r ()'

--_g(oo

(I?,,

R.C.

P.

_:grs?

co

G'

r--:

N

+

_gCJo

0 _lr' 0 _N +

...

c-

()'

2"50 LF

/It,,#~

I

,,,

_SHOP D R A WI N G R ·E V I E W "-.

REVIEW IS ONLY FOR GENEAAL CONFORMITY WITH THE D GN CONCEi'T AND IS LIMITED TO REQUI REM£NTS CALLED FOR ~

TH~ COi':HACT DOCUMEI\. IS: CONl RACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FO~ THE ACCURACY OF DIMENSIONS, QUt,NTITIES AND DETAILS RtQUIRINi,; CORRELATIOI~ \lilTH OTHER MAlERIALS OR EQUI?-MENT, ANi) FOR INFORMATION THAT PERTAINS SOLELY TO THE

HCHNIQU~:; OF fMRICAriOI..j OR CONSTI;UCTION.

- .. ···--·-··· NO I£XCEPTICNS TAKEN --... - ... / ... M ... K'E CORRECTIOJ'o,;S NOTED

... ..}!_ ...

AMEND ·?\ND RESUBMIT . -.-... _ ... REJECTED

CNC •~HPQ. INC. . NELSON, HALEY, PATTERSCN

AJ(CI11rfCIS·~NGINC:ERS·PLANNE>lS & QUIRI(, INC. ENGH,ffRIN::; CONSULTANTS Crcclcy, Denver, Colorado Scrrn~~. Gr,,..,d /"~· Col~. . Date ....

~/fL2.f!.~.::~~'';; -~~·ro

.... :.: ..

~~

... -... 0 lf" 0

0

Lf' f'... +

...

...,.

-

-

N G"

_cr

0'

lr'

N + N ~

L/mifs

'or

Da~n

sf

ream

Cut· Off

Wa

II

/20 LF

~E9

SECTION

@

0

tf' _..,.

r-- -t-N N ()'\ (Jl

I

·--./

----0 t..r 0 N .+ + (1"\ ("() ~ 0'

G/9RNI=/

D~I6N

I

W1r1-1

Reo

ui'IE

NoT£

5

_{NAMA QUA}

I

BIG Tl-IOMPSON

l~·

.I

:t

,~

~~-,-;;:;;;,,

,,,

"'

I

I

I

0

l1' + ('{) 0'

J

_,JL.ot.:'P I C...:.. CO· G' t"-('"'

+

lt' r- -t-r0 G'

INTERCEPTOR

RlVER CROSSiNG

0 0 -+' o;;j (j'\

~T"

o?

+

~n,

\

1.

I

I

I

l

LONC~E.T5. CAP

L.J/V'l'ELDED WtRE FABRIC.

f

I

t

r I

·-·.

Flow .

__

,_

~:---,.--~

"-) j

NAMAQUA

I N"TEnCt:PTOn

IJ

I

G 1· rl 0 M

[J

S 0 N n l V En . C

f·{

0 S S \

N

G.

.

;

)70

0 0

_....

....

CJ / (\ I C() 13'

r-..:

N

+

lJ' N

_...

-G"

·o

lf' \I'

t"-"''·

. -1·

-

_-·

CJ'

CT'

2-5 0

L F

f

(p,''

D.!P

a.

44

II

w

T.

(o.J

0.

18

'Yo .

---"---0

_tf'

0

N

.,.

+ N N (j'J 0"1

L/mlls

Of'

Down sf ream

Cut-·arr

Wo II :

/20 LF .

SEC"TION

0 \f' [""--+ .,... N N 0" (jl

f?NAL 6ARNEV D£::J"CG1N

0 0 ·I-<0 0..,

I

:--;

t.r' N + (i"'l ()\ '

I

I

I

I

/

0

\.[1 + rf1 0'

----,-, ,~" ,,, ,.,, 0 l[' ₀ r- -\• "'1· r0 ~ G"'

G'

NA fV1A QUA l N ·rl:J{CEPTOf1

Flow

--~ PRECA ~~ CoNCRETE . \(\)f;..

l"''

MT

----:::>

. . ' .

3C..t:JCk:.$

~

~

-• I

1

Scale:

~z"=

1

1

_-0"

I i

•

I

.•

I

·.

1

...,. o" ..

.~~

N

~- I"' I I · •

c,of/cf?cTG

C/JP

~'v&ct

D

;::z:;>

vv/

/?~ ~

,C/-/JJI?

IC-\_M

P-

1!5

SI-~EcT

PILINq

(s

E:.f:: ATTACKED PETA

ll.j

NAMAQUA INTERCl:PTOR