• No results found

Bedload

N/A
N/A
Info
Download
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Bedload"

Copied!
4
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Download now ( 4 Page )

Full text

(1)

•

I

•

~Vk

HEDLUAU

Sedimentation Lab, Rm All6 Engineering Research Center

PAU.t:::

1

SAMPLES: BEDLOAU

===============================================================================

UAiE. 'E:i/2U/81:S / ' 1

o/~U/88

~

, f lME . '? •?

:RIVER

'W. FORK LITTLE THOMPSON :s. fORK ST. VRAIN

53Af

4-7A

:WT BEfoOkE BURNING

gm 1.50 258.00

JWT AFTER BURNINu

gm 1.45 253.00

JB;yVl'

f /'

J ' VI /)

:=============================================================================!

!MESH

US

!ACCUMULATED

PERCENT

!ACCUMULATED

PERCENT

i

fSIZE

mm

STANDARD fWT. RETAINED

FINER fWT. RETAINED

FINER

I

:===========================j========================!============:===========:

63.000 2.500 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.0 45.300 1.750 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.0 <31.750 1.250 I 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.0 22.430 0.883 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.0 !<~6.000 0.624 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.0 1>i - 11.200 0.441 I 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.0 :<8.000 0.312 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.0 1 5. 600 3.5 0.00 100.00 4.00 98.4 : 4. 000')>\1 5 0.15 89.66 11.00 95.7 I 1 2 .ooo)~ 10 0.15 89.66 43.00 83.0 I i

1.00~1

18 0.15 89.66 131.00 48.2 I 1 0.50 ; 35 0.94 35.17 209.00 1 T~4 I I 0.25 .. 60 1.38 4.83 250.00 L2

I

I 0 .125> 120 1.40 3.45 251.50 0.6 I I 0.063 ' 230 1.42 2.07 252.00 0.4 I

PAN

1.43 1.38 253.00 0.0 I

!=============================================================================·

I

vi

!DATE

j6/16/88

v

16/15/88

!RIVER

YOUNG GULCH

!CORRAL CREEK

I

)SAMPLING METHOD

!6

SECTIONS

@ 4

MIN EACH

17

SECTIONS

@ 10

MIN EACH!

!G/A'2- ,V\

5787

1WT BEFORE BURNING

gm

o:so

0-t.-\ "Vh 167.50 7~ tW1

!

,WT AFTER

m 0.15 160.50

j=============================================================================j

!MESH

US

JACCUMULA'l'ED

PERCENT

!ACCUMULATED

PERCI::NT

!SIZE

mm

STANDARD fWT. RETAINED

FINER fWT. RETAINED

FINER

I

J===========================j========================l======================•=t

8.00~ 3.5

o.ooo

100.0 1 91.0

43.J~

5

o.ooo

100.0 1 103.0 35.6- 1 10

o.ooo

100.0 124.0 2a~s. 1 18 I 35 60 120 ~au 0.000 0.053 0.115 0.140 0.141 0.142 100.0 62.7 ! 19.0 1.4 0.7 0.0 142.0 11.3 1 151.5

o.a

1 155.5 ~I ~ 155.8 2 .6-t 156.9 1.9=--j 16

o . o

'""().'()

I

===============================================================================

(2)

•

•

I

Sedimentation Lab. Rm A116 PAGE: 2

Engineering Research Center SAMPLES: BEDLOAD

=:=;.;=======================~~;~;;;;=~============~~=;~;;;:===============~~

,TIME j14:UU jll:3U

I<!VEI< :MCINTYRE CREEK ;TRAP CREEK

(oCJP:..,~

i57CI

;WT BEFORE BURNING gm 1WT AFTER BURNING gm

- ,Jt

,_J 10.30

I/)

1'¥1')'\ I 454.00 n'J- 'J¥1'" ~ ~ 90 1 446. 00 r

=============================================================================!

1MESH iSIZE mm US !ACCUMULATED STANDARD jWT. RETAINEU PERCENT !ACCUMULATED FINER jWT. KETAINED PERCENT l<'INER I

i===========================j========================,========================j

63.ooo 2.500 o.o 100.0 1 o.o 100.0 I

45.300 1.750 o.o 100.0 o.o 100.0 1

31.750 1.250 0.0 100.0 o.o 100.0 1

22.430 o. 883 o. o 100. o o. o 100. o 1

1s.ooo o.624 o.o 100.0 44.0 90.1 1

11.200 0.441 o.o 100.0 73.0 83.6 1 a.ooo 0.312 o.o 100.0 107.0 76.0 1 5.600 3.5 0.0 100.0 141.0 68.3 1 4.ooo 5 o.3 97.0 176.5 60.3 1 2.ooo 10 o.8 91.9 255.5 42.6 1 1.ooo 18 3.6 63.6 338.5 23.9 1 o.5oo 35 7.1 28.3 404.5 9~1 1 o.25o 60 9.6 3.0 442.5 o.6

1

0.125 120 9.7 2.0 443.8 0~3 'I o.o63 230 9.8 1.0 444.1 0;2 1 1 PAN 9.9 0.0 445.0 0.0

I

:~~;;=======================~;;~;;;;===============v=~;;;;;;;==============~:

I RIVER

I

LONE PINE CREEK I ELKHORN CREEK ;"\

i I&SG'L , 1

t>1r.3

1-o""'

' WT BEFORE BURNING gm 98. 00

~

1--- "'"

I

63 . 00

. i

: WT AFTER BURNING gm

I

94.00

I

62. 30

I

:=============================================================================!

;MESH US !ACCUMULATED PERCENT ;ACCUMULATED PERCENT

i

ISIZE mm STANDARD IWT. RETAINED FINER

IWT.

RETAINED FINER I

l===========================j========================j========================j

1 63.ooo 2.500 1 o.o 100.0 1 o.oo 100.0 I

45. 3oo 1. 750 1 o. o 100. o 1 o. oo 100. o 1

31.750 1.250 1 o.o 100.0 1 o.oo 100.0 1

22.430 0.883 1 o.o 100.0 1 o.oo 100.0 I

1s.ooo 0.624 1 o.o 100.0 1 o.oo 100.0 1

11.200 0.441 1 o.o 100.0 1 o.oo 100.0 1 8.000 0.312 1 o.o 100.0 1 0.64 99.0 1 5.6oo 3.5 1 1.0 98.9 1 2.31 96.3 1 4 . ooo 5 1 4 • o 95. 7 1 5 • 68 90 • 9 1 2. ooo 10 1 20. o 78. 7 1 24.59 60.5 1 1.000 18 1 42.0 55.3 1 41.05 34.0 0.500 35 1 61.0 35.1 1 51.41 17.3 0.250 60 1 86.0 8.5 61.27 1.5 0.125 120

!

90.0 4.3 61.85 0.5 0.063 230 92.0 2.1 62.01 0.3 PAN 94.0 0.0 62.19 0.0

===============================================================================

(3)

I

I

•

seaimentation Lab, Rm A116

~ng1neer1ng ~esearcn center

iWT AFTER BURNING ,g 864.00

PAGE: :3

SAMPLES: HEOLOAU

354.00

;=============================================================================!

:MESH US JACCUMULATED PERCENT !ACCUMULATED PERCENT

iSIZE mm STANDARD jWT. RETAINED FINER 1WT. RETAINED FINER I

r===========================l========================:=======================zt 63.000 2.500 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 45.300 1.750 180.0 79.2 0.0 100.0 01.750 1.250 277.0 67.9 0.0 100.0 2~.430 0.883 521.0 39.7 0.0 100.0 16.000 0.624 668.0 22.0 13.0 96.3 11.200 0.441 747.0 13.5 26.0 92.6 8.000 0.312 801.0 7.2 oO.O 83.0 5.ti00 0.5 820.U 5.0 93.0 73.7 4.000 5 835.0 3.3 129.0 6a.5 2.000 10 846.0 2.0 207.0 41.4 1.000 18 854.0 1.1 262.0 25.9 0.500 35 858.5 0.6 298.0 15.7 0.250 60 862.0 0.2 327.0 L5 0.125 120 862.5 0.1 344.0 2.7 0.063 230 863.0 0.1 350.0 1.0 1 PAN J 863.5 0.0 I 353.5 0.0 i=============================================================================r

I

RIVEH:

I

SOUTH FORK OF THE

./I

LONE PINE CREEK

V

j

I I CACHE LA POUDR~ I ~ 5' 6 2_ I

1

15-:JA

I

I

9

f 2 I ( g

8

I

c;

I

I?

I

8g

iWT BEFORE BURNING,g 4.30 1 4.24 ) t:> -n, '"'

1 4. 25 I 4. 07

1WT AFTER BURNING,g I

1=============================================================================r

!MESH US !ACCUMULATED PERCENT !ACCUMULATED PERCENT

I

!SIZE mm STANDARD tWT. RETAINED FINER

IWT.

RETAINED FINER I

1===========================t========================1========================1 I 63.000 2.500 0.00 100.0

I

0.00 100.0

I

I 45.300 1.750 0.00 100.0

I

0.00 100.0

I

I

31.750 1.250 0.00 100.0

I

0.00 100.0

I

I 22.430 0.883 0.00 100.0 I 0.00 100.0

I

16.000 0.624

o.oo

100.0

I

o.oo

100.0

I

11.200 0.441 0.00 100.0 I 0.00 100.0

I

8.000 0.312 0.00 100.0

I

0.00 100.0

I

5.600 3.5 0.00 100.0 I 0.00 100.0

I

4.000 5 0.00 100.0

I

0.00 100.0 I 2.000 10 0.00 100.0 I 0.00 100.0 1.000 18 0.00 100 .. 0 I 0.00 100.0 0.500 35 3.90 8.2 3.50 14.0 0.250 tiO 4.20 1.2 4.00 1.7 0.125 120 4.24 0.2 4.05 0.5 0.063 230 4.25 0.0 4.06 0.2 PAN 4.25 0.0 4.07 0.0

===============================================================================

(4)

•

I

•

Seaimentation Lab, Rm A116

PAGE: 4

Engrneerrng Hesearcn Center

SAMPLE~: ~eDLUAO

=;;;;;======================~;;=;=~;~;;==========~=7~~;;;=;~;===~~~~;;=~;;;;~

' i S7L-I ; Lf..jC

2

7:

;WT BEFORE BUHNING,g

IWT AFTER BURNING,g

9/IJ/#$

0.30 0.28

9

/7-Ziftg

0.30 0.24

============================================================================='

!MESH

U~

jACCUMULATJ::O

1

SIZE mm

STANDARD IWT. RETAINED

PERCENT

!ACCUMULATED

FINER jWT. RETAINED

PERCENT

FINER

I ~=~=========================1========================1========================1 I I o I 63.000 45.300

:n.75o

22.430 16.000 11.200 BoOOO 2.600 1.750 1.250 0.883 0.624 0.441 00312 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.uo I 0.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 3.5 0.00 5.600 100.0 0.00 100.0 4. 000 5 o. 00 100.0 1 0. 00 100 o 0

2.ooo 10 o.oo 100.0 1 o.oo 100.0

1.000 18 0.00 100.0

!

0.00 100.0

o.

500 35 o. 20 28. 6 1 o o 20 16. o o.2so

oo

o.26 7.1 1 0.22 4.2 0.125 120 0.27 3.6 1 0.23 1.7 0.063 230 0.28 o.o 1 0.23 0.8 I

PAN

1 0.28 0.0 I 0.24 0.0

!=============================================================================•

I

RIVER

1

MCINTYRE CREEK

~I

LEFT

HAND

v-;

I

I 05

As-

I

47

8 0 'fYl;'V] I

I

9

I l'f/f}B I q ;1q,z>f'>

1

i WT diE FORE .liURN

ING,

g 0. 55 (

t

rh11 ~) I I 0

/111. 44 I i

WT AFTER BURNING, g

0. 47 11.15

!=============================================================================!

' ' 1.000 18 0.00 0.00 100.0 Oo500 35 0.17 9.60 13.7 Oo250 60 0.42 11.04 Oo7 0.125 120 0.45 11.09 0.3 0.063 230 0.47 11.10 0.2

PAN

0.47 11.12 0.0

===============================================================================

References

Download now ( PDF - 4 Page - 387.34 KB )

Related documents

A Key to the

Upper side puncturation dual: of den- ser and finer and besides more scattered and larger

d A of from

R. Second flagellar segment only lwo times as long as w'ide- The punctures of mesoscutum are finer. Malar space longer than in R. Venation in fore w'ing is

Towards a retained health in testicular-cancer patients

To study whether treatment with chemotherapy leads to long-term decreased self-reported cognitive function among testicular-cancer patients or not by comparing answers to

Calibration of log response using core and outcrop data in the eastern Uinta Basin to allow correlation from outcrop belts into the subsurface

Other, finer-grained facies (siliceous and carbonate mud rocks) have proven potential as basin wide unconventional plays. The oil shale of the Green River

net sales rose by 32.2 percent to SeK 132.0 (99.8) million.

Net Entertainment focuses on delivering games that provide top entertainment value where as superior graphic design, sound and game logic are a few factors that set the Company

Optimization of the polishing procedure by using a robot assisted polishing equipment

Maybe for the finer polishing step (next step with for example a 3µm diamond paste) it could be interesting to use less (or maybe no) vibration to have glossy

The Use of High-Alloyed EAF Slag for the Neutralization of On-Site Produced Acidic Wastewater: The First Step Towards a Zero-Waste Stainless-Steel Production Process

These two factors combined explain why both lime samples, which present a higher Ca content compared to slag and a finer PSD, neutralize one liter of wastewater with approximately

Improvements on a Hydraulic Impact Piston for Percussive Rock Drilling

Table 6.1 also gives the difference in maximum signed Tresca stress range compared to the maximum signed Tresca stress range for the transient analysis with the finer (standard)