• No results found

Analysis of water samples saved during the campaign 1918-1919

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples saved during the campaign 1918-1919"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

\ ,.

...

cc -_)

THE GREA1

.r

WESTERN SUGAR C~ANY

ANALYSIS OF NATER SAMPLES SAVED DU-RING THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919 FORT COLLINS FACTORY

Mr.

s

.

J. Osborn/ Mr. Edwin Morrison Mr.

a-.

J. Daley

.Mr.

G.

w

.

Rienks,

Mr. V • L. Aimi.n Laboratory

(2)

A?lA.LYSIS

OF

WATER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919 FORT COLLINS FACTORY

THE GREAT \VEST.Elm SUGAR COMPANY

CITY

WATER

ANALYSIS

HYPOTHETICAL COMB~nATlON~

.6,§

SAL'.m

Parts per 100,000 Parte per 1001000

Silica S102 1.44 Silica Si02 1.44

Iron Fe .21 Sodium Chloride NaCl .59

Calcium Ca

1.56

Sodium Sulphate Na2

so

4 3.04

Magnesium Mg

.os

Magnesium. Carbonate MgC0

3 ... 17

Sodium Na 1.21 Calcium Carbonate Caco3 3.90

Chlorine Cl .36 Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

-

~

9,.,57

sulphuric Acid S04 2.06

Carbonic Acid C03 2,68

9.57

Organic & Volatile Organic & Volatile

Matter (By Difference) 2.67 Matter (By Difference) 2.67

TOTAL SOLIDS 12.24 TOTAL SOLIDS 12.24

SAMPLE:- Average Sarq,le for the Campaign.

SOURCE:-

Taken from the Poudre River about

FORT

COLLINS:- CITY WATER fifteen miles north-west of Fort Coll ins

(3)

ANALYSIS OF WRT.ER SAMPLES FOR TH3 CAMPAIGN l918-l9l9

FORT

COLLINS

FACTORY

THE GR&A.T WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

RIVER WAT.EB

ANALYSIS

HYPOTHETICAL

COMBINATIONS A!?

SA,LTS

Silica

Iron

Calcium

Magnesium

Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid

Carbonic

Acid

Organic &

Volatile

Matter (By Difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Si02 Fe

Ca

Mg

Na

Cl

Parts per 1001000

1.a2

2.os

.74 6.0~

24.os

SAMPLE:- Average

Sa.nple ror

the Campaign.

SOURCEs- Taken from the Poud:re River at discharge

of

the

water turbine at the Flour Mill

of the Fort Collins Milling &

Elevator Co.

Pa.rte par

1001000

Silica

S102 1.e2

Sod1wit Chloride NaCl 1.22

Sodium

Sulphate

Na2

so

4 4.94

Magnesium Sulphate

:MgS04 3.02

Calcium Sulphate

caso

4 2.85

Calcium Carbonate CaC03 a.94

Ferrous

Carbonate FeC03

-1.t!.i

24.08

Organic

&

Volatile

Matter

(By Difference)

-1t!.6

.

TOTAL

SOLIDS

25.54

(4)

ANALYSIS OF

WATER Sil1PLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919

FORT COLLINS FACTORY

THE GBE!T WESTERN SUGAR COMP.ANY

WATER

FROM

MAIN

WATER

SUPPLY

TANK

A.NALYSIS

HYPOTHETIO,;Y;e

COMBIH&TION~

SALm.

Parts

~r

100.000

Silica

Si02 1.68

Iron

Fe

.35

Calcium

aa.

3.26

Magnesium

Mg

.62

Sodium

Na

1.68

Chlorine

Cl

.68

Sulphuric Acid

so

4 5.29

Carbonic Acid

003

5.11

18.67

Organic

&

Volatile

Matter

(By Difference)

2.31

T<WAL

SOLIDS

20.98

SAMPLE:- Average Sample for the Campaign.

SOURCE:- The larger portion of this

water is

River Water, but there

is a small

ovel'-flow

of

Ci

tu

Water into

thi

a

tank.

Pa.rte ~er

1001000

Silica

Si0

2 1.68

Sodium ¢hlor1de

NaCl

1.12

Sodium Sulphate

Na

2

so

4 3.83

Magnesium Sulphate

MgS04 3.07

Calcium Sulphate

CaS0

4 .35

Ca.leium Carbonate

CaC03 7.89

Ferrous Carbonate

FeC03 _.1.2

18.67

Organic

&

Volatile

Matter (By Difference}

2.31

TOTAL

SOLIDS

20.98

(5)

ANALYSIS

OF WA!ER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919

FORT COLLINS FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

BATTERY SUPPLY WATER ( SIMGLE SlSTEM)

.ANA.LYSIS

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINA.TIONS

AS

SALTS

Parts per

100,000

Silica $102

1.00

Iron

Fe

.14

Calcium Ca .97 Magnesium Mg .15

Sodium

Na

1.10

Chlorine Cl .68 Sulphuric Acid

so

4 .77 Carbonic Acid C03 2135 7.16 Organic & Volatile

Matter

(By

Difference) 198

TOTAL SOLIDS

8.14

SAMPLE, Average Sanple for the Campaign.

SOURCE; Composed of City r7ater after having

condensed vapors in let Condenser

~orth and South Evaporators and some

over-flow from tank containing

water

used for washing hot presses.

Parts per

Silica Si0

2

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium sulphate N¾S04

Sodium Carbomte

N32Co

3

Magnesiwn Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Carbonate

caco

3

Ferrous Carbonate FeC0

3

Organic & Volatile

Matter

,By

Difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

FORT COLLINS: - BATTERY SUPPLY WATER

100,000

1.00

1.12 1.14 .67 .52 2.42

-t..?i

7.16

,98

8.14

(6)

ANALYSIS OF

WATER

SAMPLES

FOR THE CAMPAIG1'I 1918-1919 FORT COLLINS FACTORY

THE G.EEAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

WATER FROM

BOILER FEED

TANK

ANALYSIS

HYPOTHETIC.AL COMBINATIONS

AS

SALTS

Parts per

100,000

Parts per

Silica

5102 1.00

Iron

Fe

.07

Calcium

Ca

.43

Magnesium

Mg .07

Sodium

Na .98

Chlorine

Cl .50

Sulphuric Acid

so

4 .59

Carbonic Acid

003 1.38 5.02 Organic &

Volatile

Matter

(By

Difference)

7,64

T02A.L

SOLIDS

12.66

SAMPLE:-

Average

Sample

for the Ca:npaign.

SOURCE:-

Drips :t.rom 2nd,3rd,4th,and.

5th

Effect

Evaporators, Steam Chambers;

Drips :t.rom

all

pan coils; drips

from Carbonation traps; Drips

from

Battery

Calortzators, Engine traps

and

occa-sionally City

Water

Silica

Si0

2

Sodium Chloride

NaCl

Sodium

Sulphate

N¾so4

Sodium

Carbonate

N92003

.Magnesium Carbonate

MgC03

Calcium Carbonate

Caoo

3

Ferrous Carbonate

FeC0

3

Organic

&

Volatile

Matter

(By

Difference)

TOTAL

SOLIDS

FORT COLLINS:- BOILER FEED WATER.

100,000

1.00

.a2

.87

.aa

.24 1.07 .14 5.02

7.64

12.66

(7)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES EUR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919 FORT COLLINS FACTORY

THE GREAT W.ES'11EBN SUGAR COMPANY

WATER

IN

BOILEBS

ANALYSIS . HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS

SALTS

Parts par 1001000 Silica Si02 1.60 Iron Fe .71 Calcium Ca

.so

Magnesium Mg .13 Sodium

Na

87.73 Chlorine Cl 3.66 Sulphuric Acid S04 4.60 Carbonic Acid 003 110.76 209.99 Organic & Volatile

Matter (By Difference) 192.71

TOTAL SOLIDS 402.70

SAMPLE:• Average Sample for the Campaign.

Sources- This water represents the actual water in the boilers. Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate1 Magnesium CarboDS. te Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate

Organic & Volatile Matter (By Difference) TOTAL SOLIDS $102 Na.Cl

N¾so4

Na:zco3

MgC03

Caco3

FeC0 3

FORT COLLI~, WATEE IN .BOILERS

Parts per 1001000 1.60 6.03 6.80 191.64 .45 2.00 1,47 209.99 192. 71 402.70

(8)

ANALYSIS OF WATER s.MMP.LES FOR TUE OA.MPAIGN 1918-1919

FORT COLLINS FACTORY THE GREAT WESi'ERN SUGAR COMPANY

WAT.ER USED FOR WASHING HOT

PRESSES

ANALYSIS

HYPOTHETIC.AL

COMBINATIONS

AS SALTS

Parts per 100,000 Parts per

Silica Si02 .48 Silica. ,

SiO.,-""

Iron Fe .29 Sodium Chloride

NaCl

Calcium

Ca

1.50

Sodium

Sulphate Na

2

so

4

:Magnesium Mg .12 Sodium Carbonate Na.

2

co

3

Sodium

Na

3.49 Magnesium Carbonate Mg003

Chlorine

Ci

1.26 Calcium Carbo:na te CaC0

3

sulphuric Acid

so

4 1.60 Ferrous Carbonate

FeCo3

Carbonic Acid

co

3 5.35

14.09

Organic

&

Volatile Organic

&

Volatile

:Matter (By Difference)

9,71

Matter (By Difference)

TOTAL SODIDS 23.80 TOT.A.l SOLIDS

SAMPLE:- Average

Sample for the Ca.npaign.

100,000 .48

2.oa

2.36 4.40 .. 42 3.75 ,60 14.09 9.71 23.80

SOURCE:- Drips from re-heaters; drips

from

steam

chambers

of lat

effect evaporatorp; Drips from Battery

Oalorizators; overflow :fl-om

Boiler Feed tank and drips from Blow-up traps.

(9)

,

.ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR TEE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919

FORT COLLINS FACTORY THE GREAT WEST'J5illi SUGAR COMPANY

LEGPIPE WATER

FROM

CONDENSER§

OF

PANS

A&B (WHITE)

-

C

1D&E

(BROWN)

ANALYSIS

HYPOTHETICAL

COMBINATIONS

AS

§ALTS

Parts per

100,000

Parts

per

Silica

S102 1.38

Silica

8102

Iron

Fe

.13

Sodium

Chloride

NaCl

Calcium

Ca

3.45

Magnesium Chloride

MgC12

Magnesium

Mg .94 Magna

sium

Sulphate

Mgt304

Sodium

Na

1.71

Calcium Sulphate

CaS0

4

Chlorine

Cl

2.73

Calcium Carbonate

Ca.C0

3

Sulphuric Acid

60

4 5.90

Ferrous

Carbonate

FeC03

Carbonic

Acid

003 3182

20.06

Organic

&

Volatile

Organic

&

Volatile

l4atter

(By

Difference)

2.90

Matter

(By

Difference)

22.96

SAMPLE:- Average Sample

for

the Campaign.

100,000 1.38 4.35 .12 4.50 3.30 6.14 127 20.06 2190 22.96

SOORCE:-

1/ater from Main

Water Supply

Ta.Ilk and

con'ensed vapor

from

condensers

of

Pans

A.B,C,D and E.

FORT COLLIE'S: LEGPIPE WATER ~'ROM CONDE!ISEB.S OF

PANS A,B,C,D and E.

(10)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919 .FORT COLLINS FACTORY

THE GRmA.T WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

LEGPIPE WATER FROM FIRST CONDENSERS OF NORTH AND SOUTH EVAPORA.TORS

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

AS

SALTS

Parts per 100,000 Silica s102 1.28 Iron Fe

.oa

Calcium Ca 2.56 Magnesium Mg .68 Sodium Na 1.11 Chlorine Cl .84 sulphuric Acid

so

4 3.94 Carbonic Acid 003 3.71 14.20 Organic & Volatile

Matter (:By Difference) l.68

15.88 SAMPLE:- Average Sample for the Campaign.

SOURCE:- City water and vapors condensed in the

1st condensers of North and south evaporators

Parts per 1001000

Silica Si02 1.28

Sodium Chloride Na.Cl 1.38

Sodium Sulphate N¾S04 1.76

Magnesium Sulphate Mg$04 3.37

Calcium Sulphate

caso

4 .20

Calcium Carbonate CaC03 6.04

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03 .17

14.20

Organic & Volatile

Matter (By Difference) 1.68

15.88

FORr COLLINS:- LEGPIPE WATER :&ROM FIRST CONDENSER OF NORTH AND SOUTH EV.APO.RA.TORS.

(11)

Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic .n.cid Organic & Volatile

ANALYSIS OF

WA~1ER

SAMPLES FOR THE

CAMPAIGN

OF

1918-1919

~

RT C QLLINS FACTORY

'11.HE GREAT WESTEBN SUGAR CmIPANY

LEGPIPE

WATER

FROM

SECOMD

CONDENSERS OF

NORTH AND SOUTH

EVA.PORA.TORS

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

AS

Parts per 100,000 Parts

Si02 1.66 Silica Si02

Fe .14 Sodium Chloride NaCl

Ca 3.69 Sodiwn Sulphate NaS0

4

Mg .95 Magnesium Sulphate Mg-604

Na. 2.90 .Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Cl 1.20 Calcium Carbonate

caeo

3

$04 6.25 Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

co

3 6!89

23.68 Matter (By Difference) 2.30

Organic & Volatile Matter (By Difference) 25.98 SALTS per 100,000 1.66 1.98 6.54 2.29 1.70 9.22 ,29 23.68 2,30 25.98 SAMPLE:- Average Sample for the CaJllPaign.

SOURCE:- Water from the main water su.pply tank and vapor condensed in 1st condensers of North and South evaporators.

FORT COLLINS:- LEGPIPE WATER FROM SECOND

(12)

'

ANALYSIS OF WATER S41MPLES FOR THE C.AMPAIGn 1918-1919

FORT COLLINS FACTORY THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

WATER USED FOR

WASHING

SACCHARATE PRESSES

.ANALYSIS HY.POTHETICll COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Silica Iron

Calcium

.Magnesium

Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

Organic & Volatile

Matter

(By Difference)

Si0 2

Fe

c~

Mg

Na

Cl S04 003 Parts per 100,000 1.54 .21 .90 .14 .57 .37 .69 1,93 6.35 .85 7.20

SAMPLE:- Average Sample for the CalIJPaign SOURCE:- City Water after passing through the

coolers is saved in an open tank in the Steffen

House Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Magnesium Carbonate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate

Organic & Volatile

Matter (By Difference)

SiO~ NaCl Na2S04 MgC0 3 CaC03 FeC03 Parts per 100,000 1.54

.61

1.02 .49 2.25 ,,44 6.35 .85 7.20

30RT COLLINS: WATER USED TO WASH SACCHARA.TE

References

Related documents

Enligt KASAM kan individer som har tillgång till stöd från olika personer uppleva ökade känslor av hanterbarhet (Antonovsky, 2005). Psykosociala interventioner, såsom social

Men om man kan diskutera humor som pedagogiskt verktyg genom att inom lärarutbildningen använda lärares erfarenheter av framförallt de strategier som Dimbleby &amp; Burton

Detta kan vara ett sätt för dem att skapa förtroende hos mottagaren eftersom de på så vis inte upplevs som säljare som försöker tvinga på mottagaren något vilket kan bidra

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users

Since the boundary quantum field theory in this case is defined over a p-adic number field either Q p or its unramified extension Q pn , further development of

In previous works [9,10], the following correspondence between driven two-dimensional conformal field theories and dynamical systems has been established implicitly: Evolution of