Prediction of Post-interventional Outcome in
Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence: The Role
of Venous Plethysmography with Selective
Superficial Vein Occlusion
Oskar Nelzén, Johan Skoog, Toste Länne and Helene Zachrisson
Journal Article
N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article. Original Publication:
Oskar Nelzén, Johan Skoog, Toste Länne and Helene Zachrisson, Prediction of Post-interventional Outcome in Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence: The Role of Venous Plethysmography with Selective Superficial Vein Occlusion, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2016. 52(3), pp.377-384.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.05.032 Copyright: Elsevier
http://www.elsevier.com/
Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press
Prediction of post interventional outcome in great saphenous vein incompetence. -The role of venous plethysmography with selective superficial vein occlusion.
Oskar Nelzén1*, Johan Skoog2*, Claes Lassvik3, Toste Länne1, Helene Zachrisson3
1Department of Thoracic and Vascular surgery and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping
University, Linköping, Sweden; 2Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping,
Sweden; 3Department of Clinical Physiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping
University, Linköping, Sweden
*Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author address:
Helene Zachrisson
Department of Clinical Physiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences Linköping University, SE 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
Tel: +46-10-1030000 Fax: +46-13-145949
e-mail: helene.zachrisson@regionostergotland.se
e-mail to co-authors: oskar.nelzen@liu.se, johan.skoog@liu.se, toste.lanne@liu.se, claes.lassvik@regionostergotland.se.
HOW WILL IT INFLUENCE FUTURE CLINICAL PRACTICE
Available methods used for diagnostics of venous incompetence does not permit an adequate quantification of venous function. Failure to identify all segments of venous reflux may lead to remaining venous incompetence. In this study, a cuff system by strain-gauge
plethysmography with possibility to occlude the superficial venous system in a standardized manner, was used. This seems to be a reliable method for identifying significant venous reflux. In addition it may be possible to predict the results of radiofrequency ablation in case of intervention of great saphenous vein insufficiency.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate whether the outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence may be predicted using strain-gauge
plethysmography with selective occlusion of the superficial venous system. Design: Experimental study
Materials and methods:
17 patients (20 limbs) underwent endovenous RFA treatment for GSV incompetence (C in CEAP, C2 - C5). Duplex ultrasound (DUS) and strain-gauge plethysmography (SGP) were performed with selective occlusion of superficial veins before and after radiofrequency ablation. Selective superficial occlusion was validated in a control group (C-group) of 12 patients (14 legs) with ascending phlebography. In the RFA group, time to reach 50% and 90% (T50, T90)of complete venous restitution was measured and relative maximal reflux rates
(%EV/min). The methodological error and coefficient of variation (CV) were assessed. Results: 19 of 20 legs had complete postoperative GSV obliteration using DUS, and refilling times were improved after RFA (T50 11±3 vs. 19±3 sec, P<0.0001; T90 27±5 vs. 47±6 sec,
With SGP the methodological error and CV for T50 was 4 sec and 16 % respectively.
Equivalence between preoperative superficial occlusion and postoperative baseline
measurements was achieved in 15 of 17 legs for T50 and 12 of 17 for T90 (three of the 20 legs
excluded due to treatment failure (n=1), remaining perforating veins n=2)). Mean differences (95% CI) were within the equivalence ranges (T50 1 (-1 to3) sec; T90 -3 (-11 to 4 sec)).
In the C-group superficial vein occlusion was possible in 12 of 14 legs. The remaining patient (2 legs) showed incomplete superficial vein occlusion at the ankle level (lipodermatosclerosis) and complete superficial vein occlusion at calf level.
Conclusions: SGP with standardized superficial venous occlusion seems to be a reliable method for identifying venous reflux and may be useful to predict results of successful RFA treatment.
Key words: Venous incompetence, strain-gauge plethysmography, radiofrequency ablation,
duplex ultrasound.
INTRODUCTION
Chronic venous disease has a prevalence of 30-40% evenly distributed between the sexes1,2. Clinical signs range from telangiectasias to varicose veins which can lead to edema, eczema, lipodermatosclerosis and ulcers1-3. The diagnostics rely on clinical assessment (C of the CEAP classification)4, and duplex ultrasound (DUS) is often used to describe the anatomical
distribution of the disease3,5,6. Although DUS is useful in assessing reflux in individual vein segments it does not permit an overall quantification of venous function. Failure to identify all segments of venous reflux using DUS increases the risk of persistent post-interventional venous incompetence7-10 .
Strain-gauge-, photo- and air plethysmography, have been suggested to provide quantitative information about whole limb venous hemodynamics11-17. Plethysmographic
assessment of venous reflux with tourniquet application has also been used to differentiate superficial from deep venous incompetence13,14,16,18. It remains unknown whether the
functional parameters derived from plethysmography are able to predict outcome after venous intervention and there is no consensus regarding the use of compression cuffs for selective occlusion of the superficial veins, contributing to conflicting results regarding the utility of compression cuffs in the assessment of venous reflux13,16,17,19,20. Zachrisson et al. showed that it is possible to achieve selective occlusion of the superficial veins using a standardized cuff occlusion model, being able to differentiate between superficial and deep venous reflux14.
The high frequency of recurrences of venous incompetence is a challenge to develop noninvasive methods for assessing the hemodynamic significance of venous disease, which is not always possible by DUS alone.
The aim of this study was to evaluate strain-gauge plethysmography with standardized selective occlusion as a complement to DUS in superficial venous incompetence and to investigate whether the results of radiofrequency ablation could be predicted.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Seventeen patients were included (20 legs, 3 men, mean age 55 yrs, range 31 - 73 yrs) who underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. All patients were investigated with duplex ultrasound (DUS) before admission to the unit
according to local routines. Only patients without any previous venous intervention in the studied leg were enrolled. Disease severity was (C2 to C5) according to the C in the CEAP classification4 (Table 1). DUS and strain-gauge plethysmography (SGP) were performed before and after treatment: SGP 1 (1-2) and DUS 2 (1-14) (median (range)), months
postoperatively. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Linköping and Gothenburg, Sweden and written informed consent was given by each participant.
Ascending phlebography
Ascending phlebography was performed to validate selective occlusion of superficial veins in a separate control group (C-group) of 12 patients (14 legs), (7 men, mean age 51 yrs, range 30-79 yrs) with similar C distribution in the CEAP classification as in the patient group. The rationale for the inflated cuff pressures for selective vein occlusion has been described elsewhere (Zachrisson et al.14).
During ascending phlebography compensation for the hydrostatic pressures was performed (semi-erect position (60 degrees). Images were acquired in two planes after fractionated injections of contrast medium (Omnipaque) into a dorsal foot vein. Pressures of (60 mmHg (calf) and 30 mmHg (ankle)) (added the hydrostatic column from 30 cm above heart levelto the position of phlebography) were used to induce selective superficial vein occlusion without affecting the deep veins14.
Duplex Ultrasound
DUS examinations were performed with an ACUSON S2000 TM ultrasound system (Siemens
Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) with 9 and 18 MHz--transducers. The 9 Mhz- transducer was used for assessment of reflux. Both the 18 MHz and 9 MHz- transducer were used to exclude wall changes in the superficial and deep veins. A standardized protocol to assess reflux was used, including superficial veins (saphenous veins and tributaries), perforator veins and deep veins (femoral-, common femoral, deep femoral-, the popliteal vein and the calf veins)21. A standardized cuff unit (Ekman Biomedical Data AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) was used with distal cuff pressure of 100 mmHg for distal compression and rapid release. Presence of normal phasic flow during breathing in the common femoral vein was mandatory in order to exclude significant central obstruction. GSV incompetence was classified by the initial reflux
flow and graded as severe (> 100 ml/min during the 1st second after release of the distal compression, and/or a maximal flow velocity of > 30 cm/s.) or moderate (50-100 ml/min and/or <30 cm/s) measured in the proximal and mid part of GSV. This classification system concerning volume flow is used at our institution and is based on unpublished data which correlates to peak flow velocity mentioned above22.
Strain-gauge plethysmography (SGP)
SGP was performed with the same cuff occlusion model as in the ascending phlebography section. A strain-gauge was placed around the forefoot to register the refilling curve14 (Fig 1A). An ankle compression cuff (3 x 30 cm) was applied just above the malleoli and a calf cuff (3x40 cm) just below the tibial condyles using a cuff inflator (Bergenheim,
Elektromedicin, Gothenburg, Sweden).
Pressures for superficial venous occlusion during SGP were calculated as: Ankle pressure: Hydrostatic column (cm · 0.76) + (30 cm · 0.76) + 30 mmHg Calf pressure: Hydrostatic column (cm · 0.76) + (30 cm · 0.76) + 60 mmHg
The hydrostatic column was measured from heart level (4 cm below the sternal angle) to the mid part level of either the ankle or the calf cuff. In the supine position, with the knees bent, a hydrostatic column estimated from 30 cm above heart level (30 cm · 0.76) was added
(conversion factor of 0.76 was used, from cm H2O to mm Hg.). The room temperature was
stabilized (23-24C). A custom built foot plate was designed to allow the strain-gauge to be stretched freely (Fig 1A). The strain-gauge was mechanically calibrated in the standing position.
After achieving steady state volume, twenty knee bends were performed with 1 sec intervals. Thereafter, the patient was asked to remain standing until a steady state SGP volume
was achieved.
The intervals from standing still to 50% and 90 % of the maximum of the venous volume (T50, T90) was measured and the relative maximal reflux in percent of expelled
volume (%EV/min)was calculated (Fig. 1B, C). The procedure was performed without and with the standardized cuff pressures (Fig 1 A). The same protocol was used pre- and
postoperatively. All data were recorded, stored and analyzed using PeriVasc Software (Ekman Biomedical Data AB, Gothenburg, Sweden).
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
RFA was performed using the segmental heating Closure FAST radiofrequency catheter (VNUS Medical Technologies Inc., San Jose, Calif), using ultrasound guidance and local (tumescent) anesthesia. Treatment was performed from just below knee level to 2 cm from the sapheno-femoral junction. Two cycles where used near the sapheno- femoral junction and phlebectomies were performed when needed. Refluxing accessory saphenous veins were treated at the same occasion. The full protocol of the RFA treatment is described by Proebstle et al.9.
Statistical evaluation
Values are expressed as mean ± SE unless otherwise stated. Paired Students t-test was used to compare plethysmographic reflux parameters. The standard error (SE) of a single
plethysmographic reflux parameter was assessed from two repeated measurements in 10 of the 20 legs. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the methodological error was expressed as 2 SE, and was used to test for equivalence between preoperative and postoperative
measurements. Two measurements were considered equivalent if the mean of differences (95% CI) were within the methodological error. The coefficient of variation (CV) was
determined according to P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
RESULTS
Ascending phlebography
By the cuff occlusion model ascending phlebography verified selective occlusion of great- and small saphenous vein in 12 of 14 legs at both cuff levels. The remaining patient (2 legs) had incomplete occlusion of superficial veins at the ankle level (lipodermatosclerosis) and complete superficial occlusion at calf level. The deep veins in the lower limb were unaffected in all legs.
Preoperative Duplex Ultrasound (DUS)
Preoperative DUS showed severe incompetence in 18 legs and moderate incompetence in two legs. Great saphenous vein (GSV) median diameter at thigh level was 7.2 mm (range 4.2 – 13 mm). The distribution of the reflux segments of the GSV is shown in Table 1. Two legs had moderate reflux in the small saphenous vein, four had insufficient anterior accessory saphenous veins at the thigh level and eight had reflux in vein branches at the calf level. Incompetent perforating veins were found in 1 leg. The deep leg veins were competent in all patients and showed normal phasic flow and a normal breathing curve in common femoral vein.
Postoperative DUS
Postoperative DUS revealed complete obliteration of the GSV in 19 of the 20 legs. Leg nr. 20 showed an incomplete obliteration of the GSV and was considered as a treatment failure. Legs
nr. 6 and 19 had successful obliteration of the GSV but still possible hemodynamic impact from incompetent perforating veins located below the area treated with RFA.
Strain-gauge plethysmography (SGP)
The reproducibility of SGP was considered adequate with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) ranging between 16-18% (Table 2). The methodological error for T50 was 4 sec and for T90 13
sec.
Reflux parameters of untreated legs with GSV incompetence were markedly improved when superficial veins were occluded (Figure 2). T50 increased from 11 ± 3 sec to 22 ± 3 sec
(P < 0.001) and T90 increased from 27 ± 5 sec to 47 ± 6 sec (P < 0.001). Relative maximal
reflux (%EV/min) decreased from 764 ± 148 to 261 ± 45 (P < 0.001).
RFA similarly improved all reflux parameters when comparing pre-and postoperative baseline measurements (Figure 3). T50 increased from 11 ± 3 to 19 ± 3 sec, and T90 increased
from 27 ± 5 to 51 ± 7 sec (Both, P < 0.0001). Relative maximal reflux (%EV/min) decreased from 764 ± 148 to 258 ± 38 (P < 0.01).
Comparison between preoperative SGP with superficial venous occlusion and
postoperative baseline measurements in each leg for T50 showed equivalence in 15 of the total
20 legs (75%, Table 3).
A detailed examination of the 5 legs outside the equivalence range after RFA showed that one leg (nr. 20) demonstrated incomplete obliteration of GSV (treatment failure) and two legs (nr. 6,19) displayed hemodynamic postoperative impact from perforating veins located below the area treated with RFA as mentioned above. The exclusion of these legs indicated that T50 was able to predict the postoperative results in 15 of 17 legs, i.e., 88%. The two
remaining legs (nr. 5, 7) did improve T50 postoperatively but did not fit within the equivalence
Results from preoperative SGP with superficial venous occlusion and postoperative baseline measurements in each leg for T90 showed equivalence in 13 of the 20 legs (65%,
Table 4). However, after exclusion of three legs, (treatment failure (n=1) and remaining perforating veins (n=2), T90 was able to predict the postoperative results in 12 of 17 legs, i.e.
71%.
Group comparison (17 legs) between preoperative SGP with superficial occlusion and postoperative baseline measurements was also made (Figure 4). The mean of differences (95% CI) were found to be within the equivalence for both T50 (±4 sec), being 1 sec (-1 to 3,
Fig 4A), and T90 (±13 sec), being -3 sec (-11 to 4, Fig 4B).
DISCUSSION
The main finding of the study was that SGP showed a high correlation between improvement of venous reflux with selective preoperative superficial venous occlusion and postoperative outcome of a successful RFA. Plethysmographic methods may provide accurate quantitative information about whole limb venous hemodynamics11,12,14-17,23. Abnormalities in the reflux phase may be evaluated with plethysmography16,21,24,25. Assessment of venous reflux with tourniquet application has been used to differentiate superficial and deep venous
incompetence14,16,21,23.
Selective superficial vein occlusion is crucial for separating superficial and deep venous insufficiency and a low method variability is of importance for clinical use of
plethysmography. Prediction of venous function could be of importance for the probability of good outcome after intervention/surgery and to assess the importance of reflux pathways identified by DUS. Our results indicate that preoperative SGP with standardized superficial vein occlusion correlates well with postoperative results in cases of successful intervention. We used a cuff occlusion model for superficial vein occlusion at proximal calf and ankle
level14 and the efficacy to selectively compress the superficial veins was confirmed by ascending phlebography. The coefficient of variation was 16 -18%, which is acceptable and comparable to a recent study by Rosfors et al. using strain-gauge at the calf24, and better than earlier investigations with similar strain-gauge applications21. In this study the strain-gauge
was placed on the forefoot in order to achieve an assessment of distal venous reflux. Measurement of expelled volume was not conducted since adequate volume measurements assume a cylindrical shape26. Instead we used an index to describe maximal reflux in percent of expelled volume (Fig 1). Half refilling time (T50) after knee bends was the most reliable
parameter (Table 3), but T50 has to be related to the index of reflux and expelled volume
especially in case of low expelled volume. This index could thus be of additional importance in cases of combined superficial and deep venous reflux but this has to be studied further. An interesting aspect is whether it is possible to predict the outcome of venous intervention with functional parameters derived from plethysmography. Usually, venous hemodynamics are studied with occlusion of the vein of interest for intervention, most commonly the great saphenous vein. In most cases this vein is easily occluded with an external cuff on the calf, but it is important that the superficial occlusion does not affect the deep veins as shown in our cuff model.
When analyzing legs outside the equivalence range, one leg showed treatment failure, one had severe obesity and two had incompetent perforating veins. In addition, one patient showed better functional improvement preoperatively compared to postoperative values indicating that not all reflux pathways were excluded during RFA. Perforators have previously been shown to be an important factor in recurrent varicose veins27, and it is difficult to
evaluate the hemodynamic impact of perforator veins with DUS. Perforator incompetence might also ruin proper evaluation of SGP results when the occlusion cuff is placed only high on the calf. We used an additional cuff at the ankle level to evaluate the impact of incompetent
perforator veins. In future studies more sensors on different levels may provide additional information concerning hemodynamic significance of perforator incompetence.
Although the relationship between plethysmograpic reflux parameters and clinical severity of the venous disease has varied across studies20,28,29 there are indications that
decreased venous filling time (T50 and T90) is correlated with higher C class according to the
CEAP classification as well as more specific values such as skin changes24,28. Lattimer et al. suggested that venous refilling times may provide a better assessment of clinical severity and stratification of patients according to the stage of the disease compared to expelled volume28. By DUS there might be a problem to select patients for treatment with use of reflux data such as duration of reflux as proposed in earlier studies. Konoeda et al.30 demonstrated that reflux time does not correlate with the magnitude of reflux or the clinical severity of the disease. The magnitude of reflux on the other hand seems to correlate with 1st second reflux flow (ml/min) which we used in our study. Although DUS is useful in assessing individual vein segments it does not permit an overall quantification of venous function. The presence of important perforator-, accessory saphenous veins, tributaries and/or deep venous incompetence concerning hemodynamic significance or outflow obstruction is not easily assessed. Thus additional plethysmographic evaluation of venous disease might be of value, especially in complex cases with mixed deep and superficial incompetence or cases with possible proximal outflow obstruction31. Current guidelines suggest intervention against superficial
incompetence in these cases3, we believe that SGP with superficial occlusion can improve diagnostics to avoid unnecessary and in some cases harmful intervention. In this study plethysmographic data showed significant increase of venous function after superficial vein occlusion in all patients excluding the probability of significant outflow obstruction.
SGP might be a useful method in the diagnostics and choice of treatment in
patients with combined superficial and deep venous incompetence should be performed in order to further validate the method. In addition, the question of outflow obstruction may not easily be answered by DUS alone which is commonly performed in venous incompetence. These patients may show DUS examinations without suspicion of outflow obstruction, and the indication for an extended DUS of the iliac veins might be missed. Venous
plethysmography in our setting may show poor or no significant improvement in venous reflux parameters during superficial vein occlusion in case of outflow obstruction/stenosis such as May-Turner syndrome.
Limitations
By using the cuff occlusion model for selective superficial vein occlusion it is necessary to be aware of the risk of incomplete superficial vein occlusion in cases of severe obesity as well as severe skin changes (lipodermatosclerosis). Thus other diagnostic modalities should be considered.
It is important to consider that true clinical severity is provided by classification and the results of clinical severity have to be correlated to DUS and SGP.
Due to the limited study population, studies on larger patient populations should be performed to further validate the method. Pre- and postoperative follow up data using venous plethysmography and DUS have to be evaluated before implementation of DUS combined with SGP in clinical practice.
Conclusions
The study shows that SGP with standardized superficial venous occlusion seems to be a reliable method for identifying significant venous reflux. It may be possible to predict the results of RFA of the GSV which may be valuable in complex cases. Further studies are
needed to validate the combination of DUS and SPG in clinical practice.
Conflict of Interest: None
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study was supported by grants from Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden and the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation.
We thank Nora Östrup for English language advice.
REFERENCES
1. Evans CJ, Fowkes FG, Ruckley CV, Lee AJ. Prevalence of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in men and women in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53:149-53.
2. Maurins U, Hoffmann BH, Losch C, Jockel KH, Rabe E, Pannier F. Distribution and prevalence of reflux in the superficial and deep venous system in the general population--results from the Bonn Vein Study, Germany. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48:680-7.
3. Wittens C, Davies AH, Baekgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery. Editor's Choice - Management of Chronic Venous Disease: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49:678-737.
4. Vasquez MA, Rabe E, McLafferty RB, Shortell CK, Marston WA, Gillespie D et al. American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the
American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52:1387-96. 5. Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, Eklof BG, Gillespie DL, Gloviczki ML et al. Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53:2S-48S.
6. Gloviczki P, Gloviczki ML. Guidelines for the management of varicose veins. Phlebology 2012; 27 Suppl 1:2-9.
7. Proebstle TM, Alm J, Gockeritz O, Wenzel C, Noppeney T, Lebard C et al. European Closure Fast Clinical Study Group. Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54:146-52.
8. Creton D, Pichot O, Sessa C, Proebstle TM, ClosureFast Europe Group. Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year. Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24:360-6.
9. Proebstle TM, Vago B, Alm J, Gockeritz O, Lebard C, Pichot O. Treatment of the
incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47:151-6.
10. Magnusson MB, Nelzen O, Volkmann R. Leg ulcer recurrence and its risk factors: a duplex ultrasound study before and after vein surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32:453-61.
11. Struckmann JR. Assessment of venous muscle pump function by ambulatory calf volume strain gauge plethysmography after surgical treatment of varicose veins: a prospective study of 21 patients. Surgery 1987; 101:347-53.
12. Struckmann JR, Vissing SF, Hjortso E. Ambulatory strain-gauge plethysmography and blood volume scintimetry for quantitative assessment of venous insufficiency. Clin Physiol 1992; 12:277-85.
13. Rooke TW, Heser JL, Osmundson PJ. Exercise strain-gauge venous plethysmography: evaluation of a "new" device for assessing lower limb venous incompetence. Angiology 1992; 43:219-28.
14. Zachrisson H, Volkmann R, Bergerheim T, Holm J. Selectivity of superficial vein occlusion at the ankle and calf level: a methodological study in healthy volunteers. Clin Physiol 1998; 18:55-60.
15. Danielsson G, Norgren L, Jungbeck C, Peterson K. Global venous function correlates better than duplex derived reflux to clinical class in the evaluation of chronic venous disease. Int Angiol 2003; 22:177-81.
16. Skeik N, Kalsi H, Wysokinski WE, Heaser TV, Wennberg PW. Predicting superficial venous incompetence with strain gauge plethysmography. Phlebology 2012; 27:135-40. 17. Criado E, Farber MA, Marston WA, Daniel PF, Burnham CB, Keagy BA. The role of air plethysmography in the diagnosis of chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27:660-70.
18. Volkmann E, Falk A, Holm J, Philipson B, Risberg B, Volkmann R. Effect of varicose vein surgery on venous reflux scoring and plethysmographic assessment of venous function. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36:731-7.
19. Harada RN, Katz ML, Comerota A. A noninvasive screening test to detect "critical" deep venous reflux. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22:532-7.
20. Pearce WH, Ricco JB, Queral LA, Flinn WR, Yao JS. Hemodynamic assessment of venous problems. Surgery 1983; 93:715-21.
21. Volkmann E, Falk A, Holm J, Philipson B, Risberg B, Volkmann R. Effect of varicose vein surgery on venous reflux scoring and plethysmographic assessment of venous function. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36:731-7.
22. Yamaki T, Nozaki M, Sasaki K. Quantitative assessment of superficial venous
insufficiency using duplex ultrasound and air plethysmography. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26:644-8.
23. Rooke TW, Heser JL, Osmundson PJ. Exercise strain-gauge venous plethysmography: evaluation of a "new" device for assessing lower limb venous incompetence. Angiology 1992; 43:219-28.
24. Rosfors S, Persson LM, Blomgren L. Computerized venous strain-gauge plethysmography is a reliable method for measuring venous function. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47:81-6. 25. Christopoulos DG, Nicolaides AN, Szendro G, Irvine AT, Bull ML, Eastcott HH. Air-plethysmography and the effect of elastic compression on venous hemodynamics of the leg. J Vasc Surg 1987; 5:148-59.
26. Meissner MH, Moneta G, Burnand K, Gloviczki P, Lohr JM, Lurie F et al. Sumner DS. The hemodynamics and diagnosis of venous disease. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 Suppl S:4S-24S. 27. Bush RG, Bush P, Flanagan J, Fritz R, Gueldner T, Koziarski J et al. Factors associated with recurrence of varicose veins after thermal ablation: results of the recurrent veins after thermal ablation study. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014:505843.
28. Lattimer CR, Kalodiki E, Azzam M, Geroulakos G. Reflux time estimation on
air-plethysmography may stratify patients with early superficial venous insufficiency. Phlebology 2013; 28:101-8.
29. Nishibe T, Kudo F, Miyazaki K, Kondo Y, Nishibe M, Dardik A. Relationship between air-plethysmographic venous function and clinical severity in primary varicose veins. Int Angiol 2006; 25:352-5.
30. Konoeda H, Yamaki T, Hamahata A, Ochi M, Sakurai H. Quantification of superficial venous reflux by duplex ultrasound-role of reflux velocity in the assessment the clinical stage of chronic venous insufficiency. Ann Vasc Dis 2014; 7:376-82.
31. Rosfors S, Blomgren L. Venous occlusion plethysmography in patients with post-thrombotic venous claudication. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58:722-6.
TABLES
Demographics Patients, n Legs, n
Mean age, yrs. (range) Women, n (%) BMI, kg/m2 17 20 55 (31 – 73) 14 (82%) 28.5 ± 2.1 Great saphenous vein
diameter (mm) (thigh level) Median (range)
Length of great saphenous vein reflux (from sapheno-femoral junction) Knee Mid-calf Foot Highest C of CEAP Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 7.2 (4.2-13) 2 (10%) 7 (35%) 11 (55%) 5 (25%) 9 (45%) 4 (20%) 2 (10%) CV (%) SE Methodological error T50 (sec) 16 2.16 4.32 T90 (sec) 18 6.54 13.08 Mreflux (%EV/min) 18 218 436
CV, coefficient of variation; SE, standard error; Methodological error was calculated as 2 SE of a single measurement. T50, T90
Time to half maximum and 90% venous volume. Table 1. Demographic and clinical data
Table 2. Measure of variability and methodological error BMI, body mass index; CEAP,
Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology Classification. Venous reflux was evaluated by duplex ultrasound.
Leg Pre-op Occlusion (sec) Post-op Baseline (sec) Difference Pre vs. post-op 1 12 12 0 2 23 21 2 3 20 19 1 4 24 21 3 5 10 16 -6# 6 18 11 7# 7 34 20 14# 8 10 14 -4 9 29 25 4 10 33 29 4 11 15 12 3 12 7 9 -2 13 7 8 -1 14 4 7 -3 15 66 64 2 16 27 24 3 17 18 19 -1 18 43 42 1 19 22 5 17# 20 11 6 5#
Equivalence range was defined as the methodological error (2 SE for a single measurement), i.e., ±4 sec for T50. # Leg which did not fit within the predefined equivalence range. T50, Time to half
maximum venous volume.
Leg Pre-op Occlusion (sec) Post-op Baseline (sec) Difference Pre vs. post-op 1 46 36 10 2 45 84 -39# 3 39 60 -21# 4 68 64 4 5 30 36 -6 6 33 23 10 7 63 40 23# 8 19 40 -21# 9 66 63 3 10 60 75 -15# 11 46 31 15# 12 16 18 -2 13 23 25 -2 14 20 26 -6 15 116 115 1 16 55 52 3 17 36 41 -5 18 96 97 -1 19 42 10 32# 20 24 14 10
Table 4. Analysis of equivalence for T90
Equivalence range was defined as the methodological error (2 SE for a single measurement), i.e., ±13 sec for T90. # Leg which did not fit within the predefined equivalence range. T90, Time to 90%
LEGENDS FOR ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1. The methodological arrangement with superficial venous occlusion and representative tracings of preoperative strain-gauge plethysmography without (base-line) and with superficial venous occlusion (occlusion) in a 69 years old woman with superficial venous insufficiency.
A: Arrangement of patient, calf cuff, ankle cuff and strain gauge for lower extremity venous plethysmography.
B: Preoperative measurement base-line. The times required for 50% (T50) and 90% (T90)
venous refilling were 4 respectively 11 sec. The relative maximal reflux in percent of expelled volume (%EV/min)was 920 %EV/min.
C: Preoperative measurement with superficial venous occlusion. The times required for 50% (T50) and 90% (T90) venous refilling were 20 respectively 39 sec. Relative maximal reflux
(%EV/min), was 250 %EV/min.
Figure 2. Preoperative venous reflux parameters without (base-line) and with superficial venous occlusion (occlusion).
A: T50 increased with superficial venous occlusion(P < 0.001). Mean of differences (95% CI)
-11 (-15 to -8) sec.
B: T90 increased with superficial venous occlusion(P < 0.001). Mean of differences (95% CI)
-20 (-26 to -15) sec.
C: Relative maximal reflux decreased with superficial venous occlusion (P < 0.001). Mean of differences (95% CI) 503 (242 to 763) %EV/min.
Figure 3. Pre-and postoperative baseline venous reflux parameters.
-9 (-11 to -6) sec. B: T90 was improved after radiofrequency ablation (P < 0.001). Mean of
differences (95% CI) -24 (-34 to -13) sec.
C: Relative maximal reflux was improved after radiofrequency ablation (P < 0.01). Mean of differences (95% CI) 507 (223 to 790) %EV/min.
Figure 4. Preoperative with superficial venous occlusion and postoperative baseline venous reflux parameters.
A: The mean of differences (95% CI) were found to be within the equivalence for T50 (±4
sec); being 1 (-1 to 3) sec.
B: The mean of differences (95% CI) were found to be within the equivalence for T90 (±13
Demographics Patients, n Legs, n
Mean age, yrs. (range) Women, n (%) BMI, kg/m2 17 20 55 (31 – 73) 14 (82%) 28.5 ± 2.1 Great saphenous vein
diameter (mm) (thigh level) Median (range)
Length of great saphenous vein reflux (from sapheno-femoral junction) Knee Mid-calf Foot Highest C of CEAP Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 7.2 (4.2-13) 2 (10%) 7 (35%) 11 (55%) 5 (25%) 9 (45%) 4 (20%) 2 (10%) CV (%) SE Methodological error T50 (sec) 16 2.16 4.32 T90 (sec) 18 6.54 13.08 Mreflux (%EV/min) 18 218 436
CV, coefficient of variation; SE, standard error; Methodological error was calculated as 2 SE of a single measurement. T50, T90
Time to half maximum and 90% venous volume. Table 1. Demographic and clinical data
Table 2. Measure of variability and methodological error BMI, body mass index; CEAP,
Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology Classification. Venous reflux was evaluated by duplex ultrasound.
Leg Pre-op Occlusion (sec) Post-op Baseline (sec) Difference Pre vs. post-op 1 12 12 0 2 23 21 2 3 20 19 1 4 24 21 3 5 10 16 -6# 6 18 11 7# 7 34 20 14# 8 10 14 -4 9 29 25 4 10 33 29 4 11 15 12 3 12 7 9 -2 13 7 8 -1 14 4 7 -3 15 66 64 2 16 27 24 3 17 18 19 -1 18 43 42 1 19 22 5 17# 20 11 6 5#
Equivalence range was defined as the methodological error (2 SE for a single measurement), i.e., ±4 sec for T50. # Leg which did not fit within the predefined equivalence range. T50, Time to half
Leg Pre-op Occlusion (sec) Post-op Baseline (sec) Difference Pre vs. post-op 1 46 36 10 2 45 84 -39# 3 39 60 -21# 4 68 64 4 5 30 36 -6 6 33 23 10 7 63 40 23# 8 19 40 -21# 9 66 63 3 10 60 75 -15# 11 46 31 15# 12 16 18 -2 13 23 25 -2 14 20 26 -6 15 116 115 1 16 55 52 3 17 36 41 -5 18 96 97 -1 19 42 10 32# 20 24 14 10
Equivalence range was defined as the methodological error (2 SE for a single measurement), i.e., ±13 sec for T90. # Leg which did not fit within the predefined equivalence range. T90, Time to 90%
LEGENDS FOR ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1. The methodological arrangement with superficial venous occlusion and representative tracings of preoperative strain-gauge plethysmography without (base-line) and with superficial venous occlusion (occlusion) in a 69 years old woman with superficial venous insufficiency.
B: Preoperative measurement base-line. The times required for 50% (T50) and 90% (T90)
venous refilling were 4 respectively 11 sec. The relative maximal reflux in percent of expelled volume (%EV/min)was 920 %EV/min.
C: Preoperative measurement with superficial venous occlusion. The times required for 50% (T50) and 90% (T90) venous refilling were 20 respectively 39 sec. Relative maximal reflux
(%EV/min), was 250 %EV/min.
Figure 2. Preoperative venous reflux parameters without (base-line) and with superficial venous occlusion (occlusion).
A: T50 increased with superficial venous occlusion(P < 0.001). Mean of differences (95%
CI) -11 (-15 to -8) sec.
B: T90 increased with superficial venous occlusion(P < 0.001). Mean of differences (95% CI)
-20 (-26 to -15) sec.
C: Relative maximal reflux decreased with superficial venous occlusion (P < 0.001). Mean of differences (95% CI) 503 (242 to 763) %EV/min.
Figure 3. Pre-and postoperative baseline venous reflux parameters.
A: T50 was improved after radiofrequency ablation (P < 0.001). Mean of differences (95%
CI) -9 (-11 to -6) sec. B: T90 was improved after radiofrequency ablation (P < 0.001). Mean
of differences (95% CI) -24 (-34 to -13) sec.
C: Relative maximal reflux was improved after radiofrequency ablation (P < 0.01). Mean of differences (95% CI) 507 (223 to 790) %EV/min.
A: The mean of differences (95% CI) were found to be within the equivalence for T50 (±4
sec); being 1 (-1 to 3) sec.
B: The mean of differences (95% CI) were found to be within the equivalence for T90 (±13
