• No results found

Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions

(an analytical study)

CC, Ruth Durrer, Thomas Konstandin, Geraldine Servant

Phys.Rev. D77 (2008) + Phys.Rev. D79 (2009)

(2)

Outline

motivation

sources of GW from phase transition: expected frequency and amplitude

analytical model of the sources

analytical model of the spectra

(3)

Why primordial sources?

Small perturbations in FRW metric:

ds

2

= a

2

(η)(dη

2

− (δ

ij

+ 2h

ij

)dx

i

dx

j

) G

µν

= 8πG T

µν

¨h

ij

(k, η) + 2

η ˙h

ij

(k, η) + k

2

h

ij

(k, η) = 8πGa

2

(η)Π

ij

(k, η) Π

ij

(k, η)

anisotropic stress

Once emitted, propagate without interaction

Direct probe of physical processes in the early universe (gravitons) Primordial source: stochastic background of GWs (example: inflation)

(h

ii

= h

ij|j

= 0)

Source:

G = ! ˙hij ˙hij"

c = !

dk k

dΩG(k) d log(k) GW energy density:

(4)

Characteristic frequency of GWs produced at time

η

H

−1

= a

˙a

! !

!

= η

causality:

k

≥ H

LISA detection at low frequency:

at about 1 mHz

Frequency window from a cosmological source: keq ! 10−15Hz

10

−4

Hz ≤ k ≤ 1Hz

kinf ! 1GHz

Characteristic frequency

100 GeV (EW phase transition):

{

G

∼ 10

−12

k

100GeV

≥ 10

−5

Hz

10!4 10!3 10!2 10!1 1 10 100f !Hz"

10!18 10!16 10!14 10!12 10!10 10!8

"GW h2

LISA

BBO Corr

EI#3 1016GeV

EI#5 1015 GeV

LIGO III

(5)

GW from phase transitions

Collision of bubbles walls Turbulent motions

Magnetic fields

duration of the phase transition

speed of the bubbles walls FIRST ORDER:

v

b

≤ 1

R ! v

b

β

−1

β

−1

! 0.01 H

−1

size of the bubbles at collision

f ! β ! 10

−2

β H

T

100 GeV mHz

(6)

Energy density in bubble walls to radiation energy density:

(phase transition in a thermal bath)

v

i velocity profile in the bubble enthalpy density

kin

rad

= 4 3

v

2

1 − v

2

T

ij

= (ρ + p)γ

2

v

i

v

j

4

3 ρ

Bubbles:

Turbulence:

Magnetic fields:

T

ij

= (ρ + p)v

i

v

j !v2" ≤ 1

3

T

rad

= 2

3! v

2

"

T

ij

= 1

B

i

B

j

B

rad

= !

B2"

8πρ

rad

Scaling of the GW amplitude

(7)

Scaling of the GW amplitude

δG

ij

= 8πGT

ij

β

2

h ∼ 8πG T

T ∼ ρrad kin rad

˙h ∼ 8πG T β

characteristic time of evolution tensor perturbation

energy density:

10

−5

10

−4

10

−2

G

∼ Ω

rad

! H

β

"

2

! Ω

kin

rad

"

2

ρ

G

˙h

2

8πG

(8)

Analytic study of the GW signal

GW power spectrum:

h

ij

(k, η) = !

η

ηin

G(τ, η)Π

ij

(k, τ)

Wave equation:

ij

(k, τ

1

ij

(q, τ

2

)" = δ(k − q)Π(k, τ

1

, τ

2

)

Anisotropic stress power spectrum:

Energy momentum tensor:

Wick

theorem Power spectrum of the source

dΩ

G

d ln k = k

3

| ˙h|

2

c

! ˙h

ij

(k, η)˙h

ij

(q, η)" = δ(k − q)|˙h|

2

(k, η)

Π

ij

= P

ijlm

T

lm

4 point correlation function

T

ij

(k, τ) = w(τ ) 1 − v

2

(τ)

!

d

3

p v

i

(k − p, τ)v

j

(p, τ)

(9)

Bubble walls power spectrum

Hydrodynamics of bubble growth at late times:

symmetric phase broken phase

v1 v2

combustion front

(conservation of energy and momentum) DETONATIONS:

v

1

> c

s

, v

2

= c

s

v

1

< c

s

, v

2

< c

s

DEFLAGRATIONS:

symmetric phase at rest (Steinhardt 82)

broken phase at rest

shock wave in the symmetric phase

ρ1 = aT14 + ρvac p1 = aT14/3 − ρvac ρ2 = aT24

p2 = aT24/3

(10)

Bubble walls power spectrum

Two point correlation function

Velocity profile of a spherical bubble:

x and y in the same bubble the velocity is not zero

p: probability that there is a centre in the intersection region

|x − y| ≤ 2R(t)

!v

i

(x, t)v

j

(y, t)"

non-zero only if

!v

i

(x, t)v

j

(y, t)" = v

f2

R

2

p V

!

V

d

3

x

0

(x − x

0

)

i

(y − x

0

)

j

x y

x0

v

i

(x, t) =

! (v

f

/R) (x − x

0

)

i

for r

int

< |x − x

0

| < R

0 otherwise

(11)

Bubble walls power spectrum

Power spectrum: Fourier transform of 2 p. correlation function

P (t)

probability that a point is in the broken phase at time t

P (t) ! 1 − exp(−Γ(t))

correlation function with

compact support

|x − y| ≤ 2R(t)

analytic power spectrum

small scale part

!v

i

(k, t)v

j

(q, t)" = δ(k − q)v

f2

R(t)

3

P (t)[ A(kR)δ

ij

+ B(kR)ˆ k

i

ˆk

j

]

A(k → 0) ∝ k

0

B(k → 0) ∝ k

2

B(k ! π/R)

A(k ! π/R) ∝ k

−4

(12)

Turbulence and magnetic field power spectra

Divergence-free vector fields

Correlated over the scale peak at

large scale part of the spectra

Kolmogorov (turbulence) Iroshnikov Kraichnan (magnetic field)

Small scale part of the spectra:

2R k ∼ π/R

k

2

k

−11/3

, k

−7/2

P

v

(k ! π/R) ∝ k

2

!v

i

(k)v

j

(q)" = δ(k − q)

ij

− ˆk

i

ˆk

j

)P

v

(kR)

(13)

Large scale part of the GW spectrum: k^3

k → 0

dΩ

G

d ln k = k

3

| ˙h|

2

c

Generic CAUSAL power spectrum:

The anisotropic stress power spectrum is the CONVOLUTION:

White noise for the anisotropic stress

→ k

3 for the GW energy density

n > −3/2 m < −3/2

P (k) ∝ v

2

R

3

! (Rk)

n

for Rk < π (Rk)

m

for Rk > π

Π(k) ∝ !

0

dq q

2

P ( |k − q|)P (q) → v

4

R

3

" 1

2n + 3 −

1

2m + 3

#

.

(14)

Small scale part of the GW spectrum?

1) totally incoherent:

ij

(k, τ)Π

ij

(q, ζ)" = δ(k − q)Π(k, τ, τ) δ(τ − ζ) β

2) totally coherent: correct one according to SIMULATIONS

3) top hat in wavenumbers:

ij

(k, τ)Π

ij

(q, ζ)" = δ(k − q)[Π(k, τ)Θ(kζ − kτ)Θ(x

c − (kζ − kτ))

+ Π(k, ζ)Θ(kτ − kζ)Θ(x

c − (kτ − kζ))]

|ζ − τ| < x

c

k

ij

(k, τ)Π

ij

(q, ζ)" = δ(k − q) !

Π(k, τ) !

Π(k, ζ)

ij

(k, τ)Π

ij

(q, ζ)" = δ(k − q)Π(k, τ, ζ)

Time dependence of anisotropic stress power spectrum

(15)

Totally coherent

time Fourier transform, differentiability of time dependence

10!4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

10!16 10!14 10!12 10!10 10!8

K"

spectrum for a continuous source

C

0

k

3

k

−1

Peak at characteristic timescale

slope due to

continuity feature at characteristic lengthscale

slope due to continuity and source

causal

k ! β

k ! π/R

k

−1

k

−4

not in

simulations !

t L!t"

t!"1 t!

v#Β$

C

m

→ k

−(m+2)

(16)

Conclusions

GW from bubbles observable for high fluid velocity or long lasting phase transition

GW production at EW symmetry breaking interesting for LISA Analytical model of the sources: bubbles, turbulence and

magnetic fields

Large scale part of the spectrum rises as k^3 (causality)

Peak frequency correspond to the typical time/length scale of the source

Small scale part of the spectrum very model dependent

References

Related documents

This is expected since all transfers occur when the two unequal equilibrium states have been reached for the case of deterministic transfers, while for random times a few

The study shows that chaotic regimes exists in a coupled four-wave system, which could make it a possible model to describe the turbulence observed in the ionosphere when it is

Since gravitational radiation is caused by alternating mass quadrupole moments, this is done by finding the quadrupole momentum tensor Q ij and expressing the energy and

Under these conditions it is appropriate to describe the particles using a mean field approach, where all the particles in the condendensate are described by using the same

• Energy small, but may be different if active at early times.. Early universe: use

In particular, in the following we explain why we consider only differences among t-channel contributions at NLO QCD accuracy for the flavour-scheme uncertainties of NLO

In this study, our simple noise model is comprised of the test mass position and acceleration noise levels, that for the sake of convenience are considered equal for all test

Credit: LISA Consor6um •  LISA’s peak sensi2vity corresponds to ~ 1/10 of Hubble horizon at 1 TeV energy scale. •  Hubble frequency f 0 =10 -4