Linköping Studies in Arts and Sciences No. 772
Business Model Design for Social Goods and Services in Developing Economies
by Mirella L. Haldimann
Errata list
Location Error Correction
1 p.vi, §3, l.1 „Haldimann, M.“ “Haldimann, M. & Gebauer, H.” 2 p.vi, §5, l.1 „Haldimann, M., Gebauer, H. (revision [...]journal)“ „Haldimann, M. & Gebauer, H. (2019)“
3 p.ix, l.3 „iv“ „v“
4 p.1, §1, l.7 “200” “2007”
5 p.5, §4, l.1 „business model (BM)“ „BM“
6 p.6, §2, l.2 „lags“ „lagged behind“ 7 p.7, §3, l.3 „viewing“ „viewing the“
8 p.8, table See table 1-1 below
9 p.15, figure See figure 1-3 below
10 p.27, §2, l.4 „In addition“ „Yet“
11 p.28, §1, l.2 „fig“ „fig.“
12 p.28, §1, l.4 „see p. 28“ „see p.31-32“ 13 p.30, §2, l.2 „the review“ „a review“
14 p.30, §2, l.2 „see table 2-1, p.29“ „see table 2-1, p.31“ 15 p.32, §1, l.7 „may ay“ „may pay“
16 p.36, §1, l.1 „import“ „important“
17 p.36, §1, l.5 „objectives“ „objectives in BoP markets“ 18 p.39, §1, l.3 “social BM design and implementation” “social BM design” 19 p.39, §1, l.4 “adopting a such” “adopting such” 20 p.39, §2, l.5 “designed” “devised”
21 p.41, §1, l.3 “I” “In”
22 p.43, §3, l.7 “their” “its”
23 p.49, §2, l.3 “we” “I in collaboration with my research team” 24 p.50, §1, l.2 “the provision” “provided the provision”
25 p.51, §4, l.5 “see table 6” “see table 3-3” 26 p.51, footnote “did not” “supported” 27 p.53, §3, l.2 “interactions organizations’” “organizations’”
28 p.54, §1, l.1 “our” “the”
29 p.54, §2, l.3 “reading, re-reading” “reading and re-reading”
30 p.59, table See table 4-1 below
31 p.60, §1, l.2 ”the design process of” “devising” 32 p.60, §2, l.8 “interviews (avg. 120min)” “interviews”
33 p.60. §3, l.3 “realize them” “realize them (see tab. 4-2)”
34 p.62, §3, l.5 “cases” “case”
35 p.63-66 “BM innovation” “BMI”
36 p.64, tab. 4-3 “purify-cation”, “mar-ket” “purification, “market” 37 p.66, §2, l.3 “dynamic and uncertainties” “dynamic and uncertain nature” 38 p.67, figure “Haldimann” “Haldimann & Gebauer, 2019a, p.38“ 39 p.68, §3, l.3 “Dahan and colleagues (2010)” “(Dahan et al., 2010)”
40 p.70, §1, l.4 “teach” „each“
41 p.72, figure “n.d.” “2019b”
42 p.74, §2, l.5 “way” “why”
43 p.75, §2, l.3 “are in consistent” „are consistent“ 44 p.77, §2, l.9 “study IV” „study V“
45 p.81, §3, l.10 “and” „that“
46 p.83, §1, l.4 “study V” “study IV” 47 p.83, §2, l.4 “triangulation” “of triangulation”
48 p.87, §1, l.1 “set” “sets”
49 p.95, §H “(under submission)” “(2019a)”; “(2019)”; “(2019b)” 50 p.95, §H Reference 7 and 8 are not alphabetically sorted Switched position of reference 7 and 8
Correction No. 8
Source: own table
Correction No. 9
fig. 1-3. Composition of Thesis (own image)
Tab. 1-1. Overview of Research Questions and Related Publications
Main RQ’s RQ’s Related Studies
MQ1: How are social BM’s devised?
I What guides social businesses in devising their social BM’s? Gebauer, H., Saul, C. J., Haldimann, M. (2017). "Business model innovation in base of the
pyramid markets", Journal of Business Strategy, 38(4), 38-46. II What challenges are associated with devising social BM’s?
Gebauer, H., Haldimann, M., Saul, C. J. (2017). Business model innovations for overcoming barriers in the base-of-the-pyramid market. Industry & Innovation, 24(5), 543-568.
MQ2: How are social BM’s
developed?
III How are social BM’s implemented?
Haldimann, M. & Gebauer, H. (1st submission stage). Design of Business Models for Social Goods and Services in Low-income Markets. Working Paper.
IV How are value creation and appropriation mechanisms developed?
Haldimann, M., Moellers, T., Gebauer, H. (2nd submission stage). ‘Opening Up’ of Social Business Models in BoP Markets. Working Paper.
V How do social businesses maintain balance between commercial and social value creation and appropriation activities?
Haldimann, M. & Gebauer, H. (2nd submission stage). Ambidextrous responses to paradoxes of hybrid organizations in bottom-of-the-pyramid markets. Working Paper.
Correction No. 30
Source: own table
Tab. 4-1. Overview of Studies
Study Area Focus Personal Contributions MRQ
I Social BM
Design
Design themes of Social BM’s
As a third author, my major contribution consisted of the reviewing the relevant literature. The authors contributed equally to the introduction, theoretical section, and conclusions. The other authors conducted the primary analysis, and wrote the first version of the analysis section.
1
II Social BM
Design
Innovative value creation and capture mechanisms
As a second author, my major contribution consisted of reviewing relevant literature and the conceptual developments that arose from the joint cross-case analysis. I also substantially supported the writing of the methodological and empirical sections. We contributed equally to the remaining parts of the paper.
1
III Social BM
Development
Managerial cognition & the Social BM concept
I was the main author of Paper 3. The second author provided additional case material (case 4). I was able to draw on valuable feedback from my co-author with regards to the conceptual development. 1/2 IV Social BM Development Co-creation in BoP markets
I was the main author of Paper 4. The second author provided additional case material (case 5). Both co-authors provided valuable feedback regarding the theoretical and empirical developments at various stages of the manuscript development.
2
V Social BM
Development
Ambidexterity and Paradoxes in SE
I was the main author of Paper 5. I drew on valuable feedbacks from my co-author as the synthesis of multiple theoretical themes proved challenging. The co-author also provided other forms of feedback at various stages of the manuscript development.
2
