• No results found

Off-peak goods deliveries in Stockholm inner city - evaluation of transport efficiency

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Off-peak goods deliveries in Stockholm inner city - evaluation of transport efficiency"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

http://www.diva-portal.org

This is the published version of a paper presented at Off-peak city distribution - workshop.

Citation for the original published paper:

Fu, J., Jenelius, E. (2016)

Off-peak goods deliveries in Stockholm inner city - evaluation of transport efficiency.

In:

N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper.

Permanent link to this version:

http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-200593

(2)

Off-peak Goods Deliveries in Stockholm Inner City

- Evaluation of Transport Efficiency

Jiali Fu Erik Jenelius Department of Transport Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology

December 6, 2016

(3)

Evaluation on Transport Efficiency

Comparison on 4 aspects of transport efficiency between off-peak/daytime delivery

•  Driving Efficiency

-  Average speed

•  Delivery Efficiency

-  Travel time -  Arrival time

•  Energy Efficiency

-  Fuel consumption

•  Service Efficiency

-  Service time/delivery stop -  Service speed

-  #Service stops/driving time

01:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:0024:00

Link speed (km/h)

28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48

Average speed Standard deviation

Network-wide average speed (km/h) in

Stockholm inner city

(4)

Delivery Routes of the two off-peak trucks

(a) Volvo hybrid truck makes

dedicated deliveries to 3 Lidl Stores. (b) Scania gas-fueled truck makes consolidated deliveries

•  Daytime: week 19/20, 2016 (13/5, 16/5, 18/5, 19/5, 20/5)

•  Off-peak: week 19/20, 2016 (9/5 – 22/5)

•  September 24, 2015 – July 24, 2016

(totally 244 days)

(5)

Fuel consumption

Logistics data GPS probes

• Service time

• Service speed

• number of stops

• Fuel consumption

• Travel time

• Arrival time

• Driving speed

Driving Efficiency

Delivery Reliability

Energy Efficiency

Service Efficiency

Transport Efficiency Evaluation using

Different Data Sources

(6)

Driving Efficiency &

Delivery Reliability Evaluation - Truck A

(a) Driving speed of the dedicated deliveries

(b) Arrival time

off-peak

(c) Arrival time daytime

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

Driving speed (km/h)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

(a)

Off-peak Daytime

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:00 10:00--14:00 15:00--18:00 18:00--22:00

Driving speed (km/h)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

45 (b)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

22:00 23:00 24:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00

(c)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00

(d)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

Driving speed (km/h)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

(a)

Off-peak Daytime

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:00 10:00--14:00 15:00--18:00 18:00--22:00

Driving speed (km/h)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

45

(b)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

22:00 23:00 24:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00

(c)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00

(d)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

Driving speed (km/h)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

(a)

Off-peak Daytime

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:00 10:00--14:00 15:00--18:00 18:00--22:00

Driving speed (km/h)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

45 (b)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

22:00 23:00 24:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00

(c)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00

(d)

(7)

Driving & Energy Efficiency Evaluation – Truck B

(a) Driving speed

Average

(b) Fuel consumption

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

Fuel consumption (liter/100 km)

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

(a)

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:00 10:00--14:00 15:00--18:00 18:00--22:00 0

10 20 30 40 50

(b)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

Driving speed (km/h)

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75

(a)

Off-peak Daytime

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:00 10:00--15:00 15:00--18:00 18:00--22:00

Driving speed (km/h)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

45 (b)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

22:00 23:00 24:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00

(c)

Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00

16:00 (d)

Average Store 1 Store 2 Store 3

Fuel consumption (liter/100 km)

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

(a)

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:0010:00--15:0015:00--18:0018:00--22:00 0

10 20 30 40 50

(b)

(8)

(a) Service time at the stops (b) Number of service stops per driving hour

Service Efficiency Evaluation – Truck B

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:00 10:00--15:00 15:00--18:00 18:00--22:00

Service time (minute/stop)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

(a)

Off-peak Daytime

6:00--10:00 10:00--15:0015:00--18:0018:00--22:00

Number of service stops per driving hour

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

(b)

(9)

Conclusions

• In general, off-peak deliveries have better performance in driving efficiency, delivery reliability and energy efficiency.

-  Dedicated deliveries: the driving speed in off-peak is ca. 31%

higher than in the morning peak.

-  Consolidated deliveries: the driving speed in off-peak is ca. 59%

higher than in the afternoon peak.

• No definitive conclusion on service efficiency.

• The consolidated delivery routes are well planed in order to

avoid congestion, thus better performance is expected while

using the same delivery route.

References

Related documents

Young men who started to smoke in young adulthood developed lower aBMD at several sites as well as lower trabecular density and smaller cortical cross-sectional

But this type of delivery system (i.e. Further, a hybrid system of truck and drone is deemed as being more potential in increasing coverage than if they operate independently.

As earlier explained our work explores how area markings can be used with existing concepts in TIBCO Spotfire to improve aspects of speed and efficiency.. The existing concepts

In conclusion, this means that the policy model used in project Highland using both the local authority energy consultants and auditors from the regional energy agency may be a

In order to save energy without causing preservation problems, such as those related to dimensional changes dependent on moisture variations or growth of mould fungi during periods

To mark the end of the first stage of the national research program the international conference Energy Efficiency in Historic Buildings was held in Visby in February 2011. Most

116 Brown, Adrian, The National Archives, Digital Preservation Guidance Note:1 – Selecting File Formats for Long-Term Preservation, August

Keywords: U-factor, U m -factor, energy efficiency, primary energy coefficient, energy certificate, Swedish building legislation, BBR, glass