• No results found

TAKEN FOR GRANTED

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "TAKEN FOR GRANTED "

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Can one adhere to the norms of rationality in the selection of complex enterprise information systems? Can one achieve and guarantee the selection of an optimal system?

Automation in libraries started in modest forms in the late fifties and early sixties and has since evolved to become a global multi million dollars market. Library Management Systems (LMS) are complex enterprise information systems and can include a vast array of functions and adaptation possibilities. With evolving technologies, and increasing complexities, at each system change occasion, libraries are faced with an uncertain situation and large number of products from which to choose. Much literature in the professional journals reports successful selections of optimal systems. When libraries are faced with a choice between a number of very complex systems, how can they decide which option is the best? How do libraries manage to identify the optimal system? Is there such a thing as an optimal option?

These are some of the background questions that gave rise to this study. In Taken for Granted, four cases in three countries are analyzed. Building on the theoretical work within decision theory, science and technology studies and structuration theory, it is argued that the superiority of an LMS is a socially constructed status. It can be seen to emerge through the LMS decision process based on actions and interactions that take place. The causes and consequences of the LMS decision process are not necessarily, or only, the choice of an LMS. The day-to-day actions and interactions are shaped and shape social structures and can have wider implications than the choice of an LMS.

Through the various activities and practices that emerge during an LMS decision process, shared perceptions and conceptual order is constructed and maintained.

With a background in computer science, Nasrine Olson has wide experiences with library management systems. Her previous positions have included the posts of systems librarian, systems manager, technical support analyst (at a commercial company developing library management systems), and owning a small firm offering consultancy and technical supports to libraries. She has been a lecturer at the Swedish School of Library and Information Science, a joint department at Universities of Borås and Göteborg, for the past fifteen years.

Nasrine Olson

TAKEN FOR GRANTED

The Construction of Order in the Process of Library Management System Decision Making

References

Related documents

However, there is still a need for methodologies and tools that enable the de- velopment and provision of support information services by integrating business and maintenance

The business plan is also going to make the management control systems in Apoteket more sophisticated and we can already see a beginning in this process due to the

1 Human Dynamics Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2 Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics, 3 School of Government and Public Policy, University of Arizona,

Keywords: Library Management Systems, System Selection Process, System Procurement, Consequences of Decision Making, Methodological Symmetry, Duality of Structure, Construction

These themes are: (1) How the performance management systems are developed (2) How performance management systems are used (3) Why companies develop and use performance

Two methods incorporating ―Backcasting success from principles of sustainability‖ – the Templates for sustainable product development (TSPD) and Strategic Life

It has not mainly been intended for new managers, but has been intended for those that have worked as manager for a while, and that probably know some of this, but… Yes, that is why

The purpose of this study is to investigate how occupational health and safety engineers employed in occupational health and safety services assist customer enterprises in the work of