• No results found

Subjective cognitive decline in memory clinic patients – characteristics and clinical relevance

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Subjective cognitive decline in memory clinic patients – characteristics and clinical relevance"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Göteborg, 2017

SAHLGRENSKA AKADEMIN

Subjective cognitive decline in memory clinic patients – characteristics and clinical relevance

Akademisk avhandling

Som för avläggande av medicine doktorsexamen vid Sahlgrenska akademin, Göteborgs universitet kommer att offentligen försvaras i sal Ivan Östholm,

Medicinaregatan 13, fredagen den 9 juni 2017, klockan 9.00 av Marie Eckerström

Fakultetsopponent:

Professor Elisabet Londos Lunds universitet

Avhandlingen baseras på följande delarbeten

I. Eckerström M, Skoogh J, Rolstad S, Göthlin M, Steineck G, Johansson B, Wallin A.

Sahlgrenska Academy Self-reported Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (SASCI-Q) – a research tool discriminating between subjectively cognitively impaired patients and healthy controls. International Psychogeriatrics, 2013, 25 (3): 420-30.

II. Eckerström M, Berg A I, Nordlund, A, Rolstad S, Sacuiu S, Wallin A. High Prevalence of Stress and Low Prevalence of Alzheimer Disease CSF Biomarkers in a Clinical Sample with Subjective Cognitive Impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2016, 42: 93–105.

III. Eckerström M, Göthlin M, Rolstad S, Hessen E, Eckerström C, Nordlund A, Johansson B, Svensson J, Jonsson M, Sacuiu S, Wallin A. Longitudinal evaluation of criteria for subjective cognitive decline and preclinical AD in a memory clinic sample.

Manuscript accepted for publication in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, April 2017.

IV. Eckerström M, Eckerström C, Göthlin M, Rolstad S, Wallin A. Subjective

cognitive symptoms in progressing vs. non-progressing memory clinic patients – a five year follow-up. Manuscript.

INSTITUTIONEN FÖR

NEUROVETENSKAP & FYSIOLOGI

(2)

Göteborg, 2017

ISBN: 978-91-629-0201-8 (TRYCK) ISBN: 978-91-629-0202-5 (PDF)

http://hdl.handle.net/2077/51883

Subjective cognitive decline in memory clinic patients – characteristics and clinical relevance

Marie Eckerström

Avdelningen för psykiatri och neurokemi, Institutionen för neurovetenskap &

fysiologi, Sahlgrenska akademin, Göteborgs universitet, Sverige.

Abstract

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) refers to concerns – symptoms - regarding one’s cognitive functioning, in the absence of objective evidence of impairment. SCD has been described as a possible stage preceding mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and de- mentia. The characteristics and clinical relevance in relation to subsequent objective cognitive decline is however still unclear.

We developed a patient-based comprehensive questionnaire on everyday cognitive dif- ficulties. Patients with SCD were followed over time, to analyze the associations be- tween SCD and cognitive outcome. Furthermore, we investigated the associations be- tween SCD and stress, depressive symptoms and CSF AD profiles, and evaluated newly published international criteria for SCD, ‘preclinical AD’ and subcategories, involving both clinical features and neurochemical biomarkers. All participants in the current the- sis were patients or healthy volunteers at the Sahlgrenska memory clinic in Mölndal.

We identified specific SCD symptoms that were more frequently reported by subjec- tively impaired patients seeking help for cognitive problems, compared to healthy el- derly. The self-report instrument SASCI-Q is a useful research tool to investigate cog- nitive symptoms further. SCD patients were characterized by relatively young age, high educational attainment, high prevalence of stress conditions and depressive symptoms, and a family history of dementia. About 40 % of patients with SCD declined cognitively over 4±2.9 years – one fourth of them converted to dementia. When CSF biomarkers were added, the ability to predict MCI, dementia and AD dementia clearly increased. A specific profile of subjective cognitive symptoms could not be associated with cognitive decline in a mixed SCD+MCI patient sample. However, when groups were analysed separately, reporting more symptoms was associated with subsequent decline in the SCD group whilst reporting less symptoms was associated with subsequent decline in the MCI group.

Cognitive symptoms reported by the patient may signify many different conditions, and their associations with subsequent dementia should not be overstated when there are no objective signs present.

Keywords: cognition; self-assessment; memory: mild cognitive impairment; subjective cognitive decline: dementia: Alzheimer’s disease; preclinical AD; stress; depressive symptoms;

memory clinic.

References

Related documents

Göthlin, M., Eckerström, M., Rolstad, S., Kettunen, P., Wallin, A., 2018, Better prognostic accuracy in younger MCI patients with more years of education, Alzheimer's &

If MCI, or mild neurocognitive disorder as it is called in the latest iteration of the DSM [22], is to be used in other populations than memory- clinic patients worried

Another purpose was to explore if patients with higher reserve diverge from patients with intermediate and lower reserve in terms of CSF pathology, and cognitive functioning

After adjustment for age, a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, a PIGD phenotype, high disease severity (as measured by total- and part III UPDRS scores), general slowness (as

Parkinson disease, multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, natural history, cognitive impairment, dementia, predictors of mortality, cerebrospinal fluid

The biology of cognitive decline and reduced survival in Parkinson disease. Prognostic factors in a

PD, Parkinson’s disease; COMT, catechol- O- methyltransferase; DRD2, dopamine receptor D2; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; PDD, Parkinson’s disease dementia... 96  |  

2) Method development – development and evaluation of different methods to measure SCD, and investigation of how different research settings may influence findings. 3)