http://www.diva-portal.org
This is the published version of a paper published in Acta Crystallographica Section E:
Structure Reports Online.
Citation for the original published paper (version of record):
Gracin, S., Svärd, M., Fischer, A. (2005) 4-aminophenylacetic acid
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online, 61(6): O1536-O1537 https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600536805012754
Access to the published version may require subscription.
N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper.
Permanent link to this version:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-14785
organic papers
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o1919–o1920 doi:10.1107/S1600536805016405 Gracin and Fischer C8H8O3 o1919
Acta Crystallographica Section E
Structure Reports Online
ISSN 1600-5368
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid
Sandra Gracinaand Andreas Fischerb*
aDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, andbInorganic Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence e-mail: andif@inorg.kth.se
Key indicators Single-crystal X-ray study T = 299 K
Mean (C–C) = 0.004 A˚ R factor = 0.044 wR factor = 0.111 Data-to-parameter ratio = 8.6
For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.
#2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved
The crystal structure of commercially available 4-hydroxy- phenylacetic acid, C8H8O3, is non-centrosymmetric, with four hydrogen bonds between each molecule and adjacent mol- ecules. The hydrogen bonds link the molecules in the crystal structure into an infinite three-dimensional framework.
Comment
We are currently studying surface phenomena and inter- actions between solid compounds and species in solution in contact with the solid phases. One of the compounds studied is 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, (I), the structure of which has not been determined so far. Since knowledge of structure, in particular hydrogen-bonding patterns, is crucial for an understanding of the above-mentioned phenomena, we decided to determine the crystal structure. The quality of the crystals in the sample of the commercially available compound was sufficient for collection of reasonable X-ray diffraction data. Therefore, we did not make any attempts to recrystallize the sample. The results of the structure determination are presented here.
The geometry of the 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid molecule (Fig. 1) is unexceptional. Although the molecule is not chiral, the compound crystallizes in the non-centrosymmetric space group P212121.
Unlike 4-aminophenylacetic acid, the structure of which has been determined recently (Gracin et al., 2005) and which crystallizes as a zwitterion, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid is present as a neutral uncharged molecule, because of the much lower basicity of the OH group compared with that of the NH2
group.
Both phenolic and carboxylic OH groups act as hydrogen- bond donors. Phenol atom O3 also serves as a hydrogen-bond acceptor; the second hydrogen bond uses carbonyl atom O2 as an acceptor (Table 1). The three-dimensional network thus formed is shown in Fig. 2.
Received 4 May 2005 Accepted 23 May 2005 Online 28 May 2005
Experimental
A crystal of the purchased material (Sigma–Aldrich, catalogue No.
H5,000-4) was used for the structure determination.
Crystal data C8H8O3 Mr= 152.15
Orthorhombic, P212121 a = 5.3100 (3) A˚ b = 9.0392 (4) A˚ c = 15.3871 (8) A˚ V = 738.55 (7) A˚3 Z = 4
Dx= 1.368 Mg m3
Mo K radiation Cell parameters from 74
reflections
= 4.5–21.2
= 0.10 mm1 T = 299 K Block, colourless 0.49 0.18 0.16 mm
Data collection
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer
’ and ! scans
Absorption correction: none 6743 measured reflections 871 independent reflections 706 reflections with I > 2(I)
Rint= 0.049
max= 26.0 h = 5 ! 6 k = 10 ! 11 l = 18 ! 18
Refinement Refinement on F2 R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.044 wR(F2) = 0.111 S = 1.08 871 reflections 101 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
w = 1/[2(Fo2
) + (0.0415P)2 + 0.28P]
where P = (Fo2
+ 2Fc2
)/3 (/)max< 0.001
max= 0.22 e A˚3
min= 0.15 e A˚3
Extinction correction: SHELXL97 Extinction coefficient: 0.036 (8)
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).
D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A
O3—H3A O2i 0.98 1.71 2.676 (4) 166
O1—H1A O3ii 0.95 1.74 2.689 (3) 175
Symmetry codes: (i) x þ 2; y 12; z þ12; (ii) x þ32; y þ 1; z þ12.
All H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map (C—H = 0.90–1.03 A˚ ) and then included in the refinement using a riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier atoms). In the absence of significant anomalous dispersion effects, Friedel pairs were averaged.
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell refinement:
DIRAX/LSQ (Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003); program(s) used to solve structure:
SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure:
SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001); software used to prepare material for publi- cation: MAXUS (Mackay et al., 1999).
The Swedish Research Council (VR) is acknowledged for providing funding for the single-crystal diffractometer.
References
Brandenburg, K. (2001). DIAMOND. Release 2.1e. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
Duisenberg, A. J. M. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 92–96.
Duisenberg, A. J. M., Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J. & Schreurs, A. M. M. (2003).
J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 220–229.
Gracin, S., Sva¨rd, M. & Fischer, A. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o1536–o1537.
Mackay, S., Gilmore, C. J., Edwards, C., Stewart, N. & Shankland, K. (1999).
MAXUS. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands, MacScience, Japan, and The University of Glasgow, Scotland.
Nonius (1999). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany.
organic papers
o1920 Gracin and Fischer C8H8O3 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o1919–o1920 Figure 1
The molecule of p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Figure 2
Packing diagram of p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, showing the network formed by hydrogen-bonded acid molecules. The packing is viewed approximately along the a axis of the crystal. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
supporting information
sup-1
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o1919–o1920
supporting information
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o1919–o1920 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805016405]
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid Sandra Gracin and Andreas Fischer
4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid
Crystal data C8H8O3
Mr = 152.15
Orthorhombic, P212121
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab a = 5.3100 (3) Å b = 9.0392 (4) Å c = 15.3871 (8) Å V = 738.55 (7) Å3 Z = 4
F(000) = 320 Dx = 1.368 Mg m−3
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 74 reflections θ = 4.5–21.2°
µ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 299 K Block, colourless 0.49 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm Data collection
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube φ and ω scans
6743 measured reflections 871 independent reflections
706 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.049
θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 4.5°
h = −5→6 k = −10→11 l = −18→18 Refinement
Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044 wR(F2) = 0.111 S = 1.08 871 reflections 101 parameters 0 restraints
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
H-atom parameters constrained w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0415P)2 + 0.28P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3
Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 Extinction coefficient: 0.036 (8) Special details
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry.
An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
supporting information
sup-2
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o1919–o1920
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C3 0.6679 (8) 0.3560 (4) 0.1561 (2) 0.0602 (9)
H3 0.6120 0.4049 0.1018 0.072*
C2 0.8732 (6) 0.2648 (3) 0.15162 (17) 0.0485 (8)
C6 0.8141 (7) 0.1979 (4) 0.29934 (19) 0.0557 (9)
H6 0.8838 0.1379 0.3430 0.067*
C5 0.6080 (6) 0.2880 (3) 0.30619 (18) 0.0518 (8)
C8 0.5346 (7) 0.4459 (3) 0.43709 (18) 0.0522 (8)
C1 0.9466 (6) 0.1847 (4) 0.22287 (18) 0.0547 (8)
H1 1.0998 0.1157 0.2165 0.066*
C4 0.5353 (7) 0.3669 (4) 0.2333 (2) 0.0629 (9)
H4 0.3745 0.4230 0.2343 0.075*
C7 0.4698 (8) 0.3061 (4) 0.3902 (2) 0.0671 (11)
H7A 0.2979 0.3199 0.3823 0.080*
H7B 0.4221 0.2281 0.4226 0.080*
O3 1.0014 (5) 0.2594 (2) 0.07362 (12) 0.0631 (7)
H3A 1.0902 0.1649 0.0648 0.076*
O1 0.3664 (5) 0.4870 (3) 0.49453 (13) 0.0680 (8)
H1A 0.4185 0.5783 0.5193 0.082*
O2 0.7267 (6) 0.5102 (4) 0.42620 (19) 0.0973 (11)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C3 0.075 (2) 0.0557 (19) 0.0498 (17) 0.013 (2) −0.0044 (17) 0.0068 (15) C2 0.0586 (19) 0.0437 (15) 0.0430 (14) 0.0049 (16) 0.0011 (13) 0.0011 (12) C6 0.065 (2) 0.0575 (19) 0.0449 (16) −0.0048 (18) −0.0087 (15) 0.0073 (15) C5 0.0602 (19) 0.0466 (16) 0.0484 (16) −0.0158 (16) 0.0018 (15) −0.0074 (14) C8 0.061 (2) 0.0515 (17) 0.0436 (15) −0.0108 (17) 0.0077 (15) −0.0008 (13) C1 0.0583 (18) 0.0566 (18) 0.0490 (16) 0.0066 (17) −0.0032 (15) 0.0059 (14) C4 0.063 (2) 0.0559 (19) 0.069 (2) 0.0103 (19) 0.0047 (19) −0.0020 (16) C7 0.079 (2) 0.061 (2) 0.0616 (19) −0.027 (2) 0.0211 (19) −0.0136 (16) O3 0.0820 (17) 0.0580 (13) 0.0492 (11) 0.0191 (13) 0.0154 (11) 0.0096 (10) O1 0.0757 (17) 0.0677 (15) 0.0605 (13) −0.0091 (15) 0.0182 (12) −0.0136 (12) O2 0.096 (2) 0.0910 (19) 0.105 (2) −0.0453 (18) 0.0437 (18) −0.0510 (18)
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
C3—C2 1.368 (5) C8—O2 1.186 (4)
C3—C4 1.383 (5) C8—O1 1.310 (4)
C3—H3 0.9915 C8—C7 1.496 (4)
supporting information
sup-3
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o1919–o1920
C2—C1 1.371 (4) C1—H1 1.0299
C2—O3 1.381 (3) C4—H4 0.9931
C6—C5 1.368 (5) C7—H7A 0.9291
C6—C1 1.376 (4) C7—H7B 0.8995
C6—H6 0.9402 O3—H3A 0.9850
C5—C4 1.385 (5) O1—H1A 0.9504
C5—C7 1.496 (4)
C2—C3—C4 119.5 (3) C2—C1—C6 119.5 (3)
C2—C3—H3 117.7 C2—C1—H1 117.9
C4—C3—H3 122.6 C6—C1—H1 122.6
C3—C2—C1 120.3 (3) C3—C4—C5 121.1 (3)
C3—C2—O3 117.3 (3) C3—C4—H4 119.2
C1—C2—O3 122.4 (3) C5—C4—H4 119.3
C5—C6—C1 121.8 (3) C8—C7—C5 113.3 (3)
C5—C6—H6 127.1 C8—C7—H7A 100.2
C1—C6—H6 111.1 C5—C7—H7A 112.5
C6—C5—C4 117.9 (3) C8—C7—H7B 117.4
C6—C5—C7 121.6 (3) C5—C7—H7B 122.0
C4—C5—C7 120.5 (3) H7A—C7—H7B 84.4
O2—C8—O1 122.9 (3) C2—O3—H3A 112.7
O2—C8—C7 122.9 (3) C8—O1—H1A 108.6
O1—C8—C7 114.1 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O3—H3A···O2i 0.98 1.71 2.676 (4) 166
O1—H1A···O3ii 0.95 1.74 2.689 (3) 175
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+3/2, −y+1, z+1/2.