• No results found

PARTICIPLES IN TIME

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "PARTICIPLES IN TIME"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

NORDISTICA GOTHOBURGENSIA

EDITORER: LARS-GUNNAR ANDERSSON OCH BO RALPH 29

PARTICIPLES IN TIME

The Development of the Perfect Tense in Swedish

(Svensk sammanfattning)

Ida Larsson

Akademisk avhandling för filosofie doktorsexamen i nordiska språk, som enligt beslut av humanistiska fakultetsnämnden vid Göteborgs universitet

kommer att försvaras offentligt lördagen den 26 september 2009 kl. 10.15 i Lilla hörsalen, Humanisten.

GÖTEBORG 2009

(2)

Abstract

Title: Participles in Time. The Development of the Perfect Tense in Swedish.

Language: English. Svensk sammanfattning.

Author: Ida Larsson

This thesis is concerned with the syntactic-semantic development of the perfect tense from a construction with possessive HAVE and a tenseless participial com- plement. Both participles and auxiliary are assumed to have internal syntactic struc- ture, and the different perfect-type constructions can thus be related synchronically and diachronically to each other. Cross-linguistic variation is tied to the properties of the present tense, the auxiliary, and the aspectual composition of the participle.

Possessive and temporal HAVE are assumed to involve prepositional elements in languages like Swedish and English: possessive HAVE involves a possessive pre- position and temporal HAVE a temporal preposition. This accounts for the diffe- rence between the two types of HAVE, as well as for the restricted semantics of the perfect in Swedish and English. Participles differ both with regard to the parts of the verb phrase they include and the presence/absence of tense and aspect.

The thesis contains a study of the early occurrences of perfect-type constructions with HAVE in Old Germanic, an investigation of the use of BE + active participle in older Swedish and of the loss of BE in Early Modern Swedish. A distinction be- tween resultant state participles and target state participles is shown to be relevant for the analysis of the construction with BE + active or passive participle in older Swedish. The loss of BE is analysed as a change in the properties of the participial stativizer. In Present-Day Swedish, resultant state participles are formed only from verbs with an external argument, but these include also certain verbs with unaccu- sative behaviour.

The perfect tense is argued to have developed from a resultant state construction which expresses bounded or resultative aspect. The establishment of the perfect in the linguistic community can be observed as a change in the relative frequency of perfects and resultant state expressions over a considerable period of time.

Keywords: Scandinavian syntax, Swedish, language change, tense, aspect, perfect, participle, supine, resultative, unaccusativity, auxiliary selection

© Ida Larsson 2009 Distribution:

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS GOTHOBURGENSIS P.O. Box 222

SE-405 30 GÖTEBORG, Sweden

ISBN 978-91-7346-663-9 Intellecta Infolog, Kållered, 2009 ISSN 0078-1134

References

Related documents

språkets hus.” 73 Jag vet inte vilken av texterna som följer på vilken, och vilken av dem som kronologiskt är skriven först har jag inte lyckats hitta (de är i alla fall

This is illustrated by example (2), where the past tense is used by the speaker to talk about an event that will take place after the time of speaking, and by example (3) where

Thirdly, the translations were analysed in terms of morphology with a main emphasis on inflectional morphology as regards pronouns: personal, possessive, reflexive, relative

19 The example is unnecessarily complex, though, due to the presence of a modal particle expressing wishing and the sequence -h yum baigaa which could occur within a single

Æèøýýëáýë -lUGA ãýñýí õýëáýð íü òºãñ áàéäàë ãýæ èëýðõèéëýõýýñ ãàäíà áàéäëèéí îíöëîãèéã íýã èõ ÷óõàë÷ëààã¿é ýíãèéí ºíãºðñºí öàã èëýðõèéëæ áàéòàë -n bü-üge õýçýý

In constructions with both a quantifier expression and a possessive pronoun the form of the noun seems to be restricted by the possessive pronoun and not by

grammaticalise aspect. English, too, expresses an aspectual distinction, although it is not morphologically expressed. The difference between the periphrastic expression he was

The resultative perfect refers to an event completed in the past which has a present relevance. According to my analysis, the 26 samples of resultative perfect in English