• No results found

Coupled structural acoustic analysis of chassis mounted fuel tanks

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Coupled structural acoustic analysis of chassis mounted fuel tanks"

Copied!
48
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Coupled structural acoustic analysis of

chassis mounted fuel tanks

Petter Tuvehed

Mechanical Engineering, master's level

2018

Luleå University of Technology

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Frequency (Hz)

0

0.5

1

1.5

S

tr

a

in

[-]

10

-5

Strain comparision for TBZ270B with a manually written PSD and a static pre-step.

Computed strain for TGBO

Computed strain for TGBU

Measured strain for TGBO

Measured strain for TGBU

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)

References

Related documents

In Figure 21 the power spectral density response at node 1 is presented for both 32 and 42 patches compared to the physical test data and the BEM- analysis.. The main interest is

The current design of chassis and shell should be analyzed in finite- element analysis to get the stress distribution and deformation under different load

To control the amount of the reductant inside the two tanks refilling the primary tank when it reaches a certain level and keep the transferring system component clean by flushing it

This approach is facilitated when both media are modelled using the same numerical method (e.g. Finite Element Method). Solving such a fully coupled set of equations is

[r]

Due to the coupling between design geometry, manufac- turing process and material selection the CAE tools used for the development of composite parts and processes in the

Instead J is determined through a numerical c model, single edge notch specimen, fitted to a fracture energy test experiment performed in a tensile test machine.. The

Figure 25: The sequence of the shock wave propagation of the 2D axisymmetric simulation also shows reflections in Figure 25c from the changing mesh size as an example to show