• No results found

Simultaneous Measurement Imputation and Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction for Achilles Tendon Rupture

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Simultaneous Measurement Imputation and Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction for Achilles Tendon Rupture"

Copied!
85
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

IN

DEGREE PROJECT COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS

STOCKHOLM SWEDEN 2018,

Simultaneous Measurement Imputation and Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction for Achilles Tendon Rupture

CHARLES HAMESSE

KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)

P

P S

(12)

P

P

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)

⇥ ⇥ ⇥

(29)
(30)
(31)

k

(32)
(33)
(34)

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

(35)

(36)

D = 0 BB BB BB B@

D1,1 D1,2 · · · D1,M D1,M +1 · · · D1,M +P D2,1 D2,2 · · · D1,M D2,M +1 · · · D2,M +P

| {z }

M

DN,1 DN,2 · · · DN,M

| {z }

P

DN,M +1 · · · DN,M +P

1 CC CC CC CA

9>

>>

>>

>>

=

>>

>>

>>

>; N

M = 297

P = 63 N = 442 N ⇥ M

P N ⇥ P S

D = (P|S)

(37)

N⇥ M N⇥ P

(38)

N M

Dij ⇠ N (0, 1) i, j 2 [1, N] ⇥ [1, M]

Dij 2 [0, 1] i, j 2 [1, N] ⇥ [1, M]

(39)
(40)
(41)

P

Anm

Pnm

Inm

udn

vdm

D

M

N

A U

V

p(U| U2) = YN i=1

N (uiU, U21),

p(V| V2) = YM j=1

N (vjV, 2V1) .

(42)

I

I(n, m) = 8<

:

1 Pn,m

0

P

p(P|U, V, P2) = YN n=1

YM m=1

"

N (Pnm|uTnvm, P2)

#I(n,m)

,

N (x|µ, 2)

µ 2

A

Pnm

P

p(P|U, V, 2P) = YN n=1

YM m=1

"

N (Pnm|uTnvm+ bu,n+ bv,m, P2)

#I(n,m)

,

bu,n n bv,m

m

(43)

U V R

x y

xy = ( x)( y) (x, y) ( x, y)

x y

Rij

u v

uTv A 2 RD⇥D

uTv = (Au)T(A Tv)

U 2 RD⇥N A

U0 = AU D⇥ N

V 2 RD⇥M A T R

A

U0 D = 2

"

a11 a12 a21 a22

#

| {z }

A

"

u11 u12 x13 . . . u1N u21 x22 u23 . . . u2N

#

| {z }

U

=

"

1 0 u13 . . . u1N 0 1 u23 . . . u2N

#

| {z }

U0

(44)

Anm

Pnm

Inm

udn

Xnm

vdm

Bnp

Snp

Inp0

bp

wmp

M N

P D

Pˆ

Anm

Pnm

Inm

udn

Xnm

vdm

Bnp

Snp

Inp0

bp wdp

D

M P

N Uˆ

D⇥D

S

(45)

p(S| W, b, X) = YN n=1

YP p=1

"

N (Snp| xnwp+ bp, S2)

#I0np

, p(W) = N (W | 0, 2w1),

p(b) = N (b | 0, 2b).

X W b

S

B I0

X = ˆP = I⇤ P + (1 I) ⇤ A I N ⇥ M

X = ˆU

Pˆ Uˆ

Pˆ Uˆ

(46)

p(S| ✓, X) = YN n=1

YP p=1

"

N (Snp | (xn; ✓), S2)

#I0np

.

NN ✓

L Hl = tanh⇣

Hl 1Wl+ bl

l = 1, ..., L

Hl l H0 = X Wl

l 1 l bl l

w

j l

nlj, nlj,

wlij l 1 i l j

p(wlij) =N (wlij | 0, w2lij),

2

wlij = 2

nlj, + nlj,

.

W

(47)

b ✓

S P

P3 S3

P6 S6

z x

p(z|x) = p(z, x)

p(x) = p(z, x) R p(z, x)dz

(48)

p(x, z) x z p(z | x )

q(z)

q(z)⇡ p(z | x )

q(z; ) q(z)

p(z| x)

d(q, p) q(z)

d(q, p)

P Q

DKL(q||p) =X

z

q(z) log q(z) p(z| x).

(49)
(50)

P S

(51)

Pˆ Uˆ

(52)

P

P S

N = 100 M = 30 P = 10 D = 10

p(U) = YD d=1

YN n=1

N (udn|0.5, 0.5), p(V) = YD d=1

YM m=1

N (vdm|0.5, 0.5).

U V

V D⇥D

P P

p(W) = YM m=1

YP p=1

N (wmp|0, 0.5), p(b) = YP p=1

N (bp|0, 0.5).

S p(S) = N (S|PW + b, 0.1).

(53)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2

1 0 1 2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2

1 0 1 2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

2 1 0 1 2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2

1 0 1 2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

2 1 0 1 2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2

1 0 1 2

(54)

P S

P

P

D

(55)

0.2 0.4

0.6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

P

D = 5

D

(56)

102

103

104 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

D 3

(57)

P

S

S

S

D 2 [1, 20] 2U 2

V

D

(58)

P S P S Pˆ

Uˆ Pˆ

P

S

[0, 1]

103 104

P

S Uˆ

(59)

P S

Pˆ Sˆ

P P3

P6

P P3 P6

(60)

S3 S6 S12

Pˆ Pˆ3

6

S

(61)

0 0.2 0.4

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 0

200 400

P

P

0 0.2 0.4

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

0 200 400

S

S

(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)

www.kth.se

References

Related documents

Stiffness of the healing human Achilles tendon..

We therefore recommend using the heel-rise work test along with a patient-reported outcome like the AtRs when evaluating different treatment protocols in patients with an

Key Words: Achilles tendon rupture, free flap, augmentation, deep venous thrombosis, movable brace, re-rupture, Atrs, heel-rise work test..

A randomized, controlled study comparing stable surgical repair, including accalerated rehabilitation, with non-surgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Submitted

The purpose of this thesis was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcome of a new surgical treatment protocol, including early tendon loading and ROM training, in comparison

to evaluate calf muscle endurance in a seat- ed position 3 months after an Achilles ten- don rupture and to evaluate how the ability to perform standardized seated heel-rises

Study II, a clinical prospective comparative study of a cohort of 93 patients, performed 3 months after the injury, concluded that standardized seated heel-rises were a safe and

In order to design new, improved and optimized rehabilitation protocols, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the way an Achilles tendon rupture affects the