Calibration of the ATLAS calorimeters and discovery potential
for massive top quark resonances at the LHC
Errata
Acknowledgements, pages 1-3: It should be pointed out that the work described in Part III of the thesis was supported by the Royal Society International Joint Projects 2008/2.
Page 12, line 29: . . . of a particular colour should be . . . of a particular family.
Page 14, in the caption of Table 2.3: τ+ are. . . should be The τ+decays
are. . .
Page 23: The footnote should end with a full stop.
Page 111, in the caption of Table 7.6: Parameters of t. . . should be Parameters of the t. . .
Page 124, line 3: . . . the b term originates from for example sampling uc-tuations should be . . . the b term originates from for example instru-mental eects.
Page 163, in the caption of Figure 9.14: No upper cut on zlep. . . should
be No lower cut on zlep. . .
Page 172, after Eq. 9.7: . . . signal (background sample). . . should be . . . signal (background) sample. . .
Page 175, in the legend of Figure 9.23(a) e + µ channels should be µ channel.
Page 177, line 19: . . . the observed discrepancy is kinematic. . . should be . . . the observed discrepancy is a kinematic. . .
Page 195, line 11: . . . that we could be able to discover (or exclude). . . should be . . . that we would be near a discovery (or exclusion). . . Page 196, lines 2-3 and page 197, in the caption of Figure 10.6: the signal
cross section shown in the gure is not 2 pb, but 0.2 pb. The conclusions remain the same, however.
