• No results found

New Prognostic Markers In Stage III Serous Ovarian Adenocarcinomas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "New Prognostic Markers In Stage III Serous Ovarian Adenocarcinomas"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

New Prognostic Markers In

Stage III Serous Ovarian Adenocarcinomas

Akademisk Avhandling

som för avläggande av medicine doktorsexamen vid Sahlgrenska akademin vid Göteborgs Universitet kommer att offentligen försvaras i hörsal Arvid Carlsson, Medicinaregatan 3

torsdagen den 5 juni 2008 kl. 9.00 av

Karolina Partheen

Fakultetsopponent: professor Åke Borg, avd. för Onkologi, Universitetsjukhuset i Lund, Lund Avhandlingen baseras på följande arbeten:

I Partheen, K., Levan K., Osterberg, L., Helou, K., Horvath, G.

Analysis of cytogenetic alterations in stage III serous ovarian

adenocarcinoma reveals a heterogeneous group regarding survival, surgical outcome, and substage.

Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 2004;40(4):342-8.

II Partheen, K., Levan K., Osterberg, L., Horvath, G.

Expression analysis of stage III serous ovarian adenocarcinoma distinguishes a sub-group of survivors.

European Journal of Cancer, 2006;42(16):2846-54

III Partheen, K., Levan K., Osterberg, L, Claesson I., Fallenius G., Sundfeldt K., Horvath G.

Four potential biomarkers as prognostic factors in stage III serous ovarian adenocarcinomas.

Conditionally accepted in International Journal of Cancer

IV Partheen, K., Levan K., Osterberg, L, Claesson I., Sundfeldt K., Horvath G External validation suggests Integrin Beta 3 (ITGB3) as prognostic

biomarker in serous ovarian adenocarcinomas.

Manuscript

(2)

New Prognostic Markers In

Stage III Serous Ovarian Adenocarcinomas

Karolina Partheen

Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden

ABSTRACT

Ovarian carcinoma is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in Swedish women. Patients with advanced-stage disease respond differently to treatment, and the clinical outcome is difficult to predict for an individual patient. To increase the knowledge about ovarian adenocarcinomas, we aimed to investigate genetic changes relevant to the growth and progression of advanced ovarian tumours. We classified the tumours on a biological basis to identify potential biomarkers for use as prognostic factors.

We analyzed the cytogenetic alterations with comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and found significant differences in cytogenetic alterations in relation to survival, surgical outcome, and substage. Gain of regions at chromosome 1 and loss of regions at chromosome 4, 5, 8, 16, and X were common disparities associated with reduced survival.

Gene expression analysis with microarray revealed a subgroup of survivors with a specific genetic signature that may be associated with less aggressive tumour progression or with tumours more sensitive to treatment. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) was used to evaluate potential biomarkers and to narrow down the number of relevant genes to study at the protein level. Four genes, CLU, ITGB3, CAPG, and PRAME were differently expressed in tumours from survivors and tumours from deceased patients. We used western blot for semiquantitative analysis of the corresponding proteins, and found a significant difference in expression concerning survival for all four proteins.

We performed an external validation of the four potential biomarkers in a new set of advanced ovarian adenocarcinomas. This established ITGB3 (Integrin beta 3) as significantly differently expressed concerning survival. The loss of ITGB3 expression in tumours from deceased patients and high expression in tumours from survivors could be used as a biomarker for patients with advanced serous tumours.

In conclusion, we have found cytogenetic changes and differences in gene and protein expressions between advanced ovarian adenocarcinomas from survivors and deceased patients. These differences indicate that it is possible to predict the clinical outcome with a biological model for ovarian cancer patients.

Key words: Ovarian cancer, biomarker, prognostic factors, Integrin beta 3

ISBN 978-91-628-7485-8 Göteborg 2008

References

Related documents

[75], the gene expression of PRAME was up-regulated in ovarian cancer samples compared to normal ovarian surface epithelium, but was not detected as differently expressed

The remaining dose fraction of total paclitaxel present in plasma in the middle of the infusion interval was estimated in patients having received paclitaxel by a 1-h infusion

Closure of the pancreatic remnant with staple reinforcement fails to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) compared with standard staple technique after distal

Methods: Paper I was a retrospective study comparing postoperative outcome for patients diagnosed with unresectable periampullary cancer at laparotomy and treated either with

To enable analysis of bone marrow response to absorbed dose, a novel image-based method for bone marrow dosimetry was developed.. The first paper included, was

In addition, to get a deeper understanding of the data information, and having a an innovative input, the novel MuTect2 variant caller was compared to the TVC variant caller

33 for CVID patient 6 with autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation (AI+LP) group, but, the CVID 6 and 18 start out with very different percentage of transitional B cells

We have determined expression level of tumour -catenin mRNA and could not find any significant difference when comparing with normal parathyroid tissues, suggesting that