Errata sheet Marta Andersson The Architecture of the Result Relations

Errata sheet

Marta Andersson

The Architecture of the Result Relations

Page Reads Should read

xiv, AMT Turks Turk

2, 7th _{line from top that role that focal role}

14, 5th _{line from bottom According to In keeping with}

18, 3rd _{line below example made the speaker to}

draw made the speaker draw

20, 6th _{line from bottom which explains why}

the lack of which explains the lack of

22, 13th _{line from bottom that the list-type than the list-type}

25, 1st _{para, bottom line all-causality-types}

marker all-causality/causal event-types marker

26, bottom line in a similar same way in a similar way

26, footnote 1st _{line: different should read differ}

4th _{and 5}th _{lines, the sentence should read: The question is}

thus whether this phrase should be treated as a discourse connective or as a type of cue phrase.

33, 5th _{and 4}th _{lines from}

bottom However, Consequently,

36, 2nd _{para, 1}st _{line from top As she argues As Degand argues}

36, 3rd _{line from bottom is hope is hoped}

43, 15th _{line from bottom be harder be even harder}

46, 2nd _{para, 4}th _{line from}

top the entirely untagged the entire untagged

56, 5th _{line from top the 32-sentence task the current 32-sentence tasks}

62, 2nd _{para, 3}rd _{line from}

top unlike RESULT unlike RESULT clauses

62, 4th _{line from bottom Purpose PURPOSE}

70, footnote, last two lines (recall (21) above) (recall (19) above) 72, 3rd _{para, 6}th _{line from}

bottom their explicit. their explicit marking.

73, Ex (30) and 2 para below

74, 2nd _{para, 2}nd _{line from}

top the connective and (and also can convey the connective and also can convey

82, 4th _{and 5}th _{lines from top Result RESULT}

83, 2nd _{para, 2}nd _{line from}

bottom Section 4.4.5 will discuss Section 4.4.6 will discuss

90, 2nd _{and 4}th _{lines from top}

(below figure caption) Purpose PURPOSE

98, 2nd _{para, 2}nd _{line from}

bottom (recall (22) in 4.2.1 above) (recall (25) in 4.2.2 above)

102, 2nd _{para after examples,}

3rd _{line from top} both the number but both the number

104, 2nd _{para, 8}th _{line from}

top What follows is can What follows is that can

112, 5th _{line after (4) implies that any implies that almost any}

115, footnote, 1st _{line in (7) and (8) in (11) and (12)}

121, 14th _{and 13}th _{lines from}

bottom examples like (21) examples like (23)

130, 4th _{and 3}rd _{lines from}

bottom 12 by a speech act. The remaining 29 11 by a speech act. The remaining 28

136, 10th _{line from bottom each case each non-volitional case}

137, footnote Appendix 2 Appendix 1

151, 3rd _{line from bottom (1,2,5 in Table 6.1}

below) 72 _{or its source}

(3,4,6,7)

(4, 5 in Table 6.1 below) 72

or its source (1, 2, 3, 6, 7) 160, 1st _{para, 3}rd _{and 2}nd _lines

from bottom 42 times in epistemic… all these instances 44 times in epistemic… almost all these instances 166, 2nd _{para, 3}rd _sentence

from top Cause CAUSE

167, 2nd _{and 3}rd _{lines below}

table For this reason occur For this reason occurs

177, 4th _{line from bottom and 90 instances and 94 instances}

188, 3rd _{line from bottom As question 1 indicates As question (i) indicates}

194, Ex (48) so should I go to and so should I go and

239, 8th _{line from top uppsats avhandling}

243, Tabell 1 Hvudsats Huvudsats

Apart from the above, the text includes several other typographical and punctuation errors, as well as minor language issues. Since these problems are unlikely to influence the reader’s comprehension of the context, they have not been covered here.