• No results found

Center for Sports and Business at the Stockholm School of Economics invites you to the research seminar: Paradox Theory:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Center for Sports and Business at the Stockholm School of Economics invites you to the research seminar: Paradox Theory:"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Center for Sports and Business at the Stockholm School of Economics invites you to the research seminar:

Paradox Theory:

A Lens for Understanding Organizational Tensions

Monday March 14th 2016, Stockholm School of Economics, room KAW 10-15 Wendy Smith

In an increasingly global world with high technological progress and new organizational forms, organizations and their leaders constantly have to deal with competing demands. Effectively managing these tensions is vital for an organization’s success and even survival.

To address these tensions, scholars have applied insights from theories of paradox, dualities and dialectics (Schad, Lewis, Raisch, & Smith, 2016, Smith and Lewis, 2011). Together, these approaches challenge academics and practitioners to explore both the contradictory and interdependent nature of such tensions. At the organizational level, scholars have explored tensions inherent to ambidexterity, organizational change (Lüscher & Lewis, 2008), organizational identity, and social responsibility. At the individual level, studies expound our understanding of competing demands embedded in creativity,

leadership and everyday work experiences.

This proliferation of research suggests the value of a paradoxical approach to understanding and addressing our increasingly complex world (Schad et al., 2016; Smith & Lewis, 2011). In this masterclass, we will explore insights from research about the nature and management of paradox. We will unpack key

(2)

2

dimensions of paradox as contradictory, interdependent, persistent and unresolvable tensions. We will further explore strategies for addressing paradox from individual emotional and cognitive approaches, as well as organizational practices of differentiating and integrating. Finally, we will investigate how paradox theory can inform your own research questions.

SCHEDULE 09.30-10.00 Registration and coffee

10.00-12.00 Lecture – introduction to paradox theory and how it can be used to study organizational tensions

12.00-13.00 LUNCH (will be provided if you let us know in advance)

13.00-15.00 Workshop – how to use paradox theory on your own research and how to publish in top-tier journals.

PRACTICAL INFORMATION Registration: E-mail martin.carlsson-wall@hhs.se before March 1st.

Directions: Room KAW is in the main Atrium at the Stockholm School of Economics, Sveavägen 65.

Questions: E-mail martin.carlsson-wall@hhs.se or call +46 730 440 900.

READINGS BEFORE THE SEMINAR

Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. 2008. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2): 221-240.

Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. 2016. Paradox research in management science:

Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1).

Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 381-403.

References

Related documents

When considering the analysis regarding the dynamics between the cognitive elements, our findings suggest that a negative evaluation of advantages and disadvantages, combined with a

Additionally, the results are not aligned with previous empirical research, which show that sin stocks outperforms comparable stock portfolios and other market stock portfolios

The primary contribution of this study is that it proposes and tests a series of hypotheses pertaining to the factors that influence adoption of CRM technology at organizational

This study examines how manager motivation is fostered as well as impacted by an organizational change effort, through a case study of ATA Hill & Smith, a company in the

Theoretically, it contributes to the literature on founder heritage and legacy by showing how reference to a living founder makes the founder a label/identity referent of

The HR transformation Project at Volvo Cars got employees resistance from different perspectives but everyone in the change process tried to let the negative emotions go and work

If the organization finds itself being on the first level of Håkansson’s (1991) model with little or no need to develop any further but still has to go through a

Given the technological innovations and technological changes inside and outside of companies, the research carried out in this Master thesis focuses on one of the