IN
DEGREE PROJECT THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS
STOCKHOLM SWEDEN 2019,
Transit Oriented Development assessment of Handen Pendeltåg Station
CRISTINA COVELLI
KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAKT
2
Table of contents
1 Introduction 3
2 Theoretical framework 6
2.1 Definitions of TOD 7
2.2 TOD standard 11
2.2.1 Walk 12
2.2.2 Cycle 13
2.2.3 Connect 14
2.2.4 Transit 14
2.2.5 Mix 15
2.2.6 Densify 16
2.2.7 Compact 17
2.2.8 Shift 17
3 Methodology 19
3.1 Research methodology 20
3.2 Indicators from TOD standard 21
4 Results and TOD assessment in Handen 23
4.1 Testing TOD methodology in Handen 24
4.2 Results 27
5 Summary, discussion and conclusions 62
5.1 Results summary analysis 63
5.2 Discussion 69
5.3 General conclusions 71
5.4 Future research 72
6 References 73
6.1 References 74
6.2 List of figures 76
6.3 List of tables 78
6.4 Interviews 78
3
INTRODUCTION
4
5
6
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
7
2.1 Definitions of TOD
8
9
10
11
12 )
2017) Standard 2017
13
14
15
16 Figure 23 residential density source
Figure 22 non-residential density source
17 Figure 25 transit options source
Figure 24 developable sites source
18
19
METHODOLOGY
20
3.1 Research methodology
21
22
23
RESULTS AND TOD
ASSESSMENT IN HANDEN
24
4.1 Testing the TOD methodology in Handen
Figure 31 8 chosen regional cores source (RUFS 2018)
25
26
27
4.2 Results
WALK
28 Table 1 Non qualifying walking segments
Figure 31 Google earth
Figure 37 Example of qualifying walking segment in Handen source (Google earth 2019)
29 Figure 31 Qualifying walking segments (Own work)Figure 32 Google earth
Figure 6Google earthFigure 31 Qualifying walking segments (Own work)Figure 38 Google earth Example of non-qualifying walking segment in Handen source (Google earth 2019)
Figure 31 Qualifying walking segments (Own work)Figure 32 Google earth
30
31
32 Figure 39 Google earth
Figure 39 Google earth
Figure 39 Google earth
Figure 39 Google earth Figure 38 Google earth
Figure 44
Figure 38 Google earth
33
earth
Figure 40 Google earth
earth
Figure 40 Google earth
34 Figure 42 Google earth
Figure 42 Google earth
Figure 50 Principles of winter design source (Edmonton winter guideline 2016)
35
Cycle
36 Figure 46 Cycle parking own work Qgis
Figure 46 Cycle parking own work Qgis
Figure 47 Own picture
37
38
39
40
Connect
Figure 9 TOD (2017)Figure 53 small blocks own work Qgis
Figure 60 Pedestrian prioritized conectivity source (TOD standard 2017)
41 Figure 60 Pedestrian prioritized connectivity source (TOD standard 2017)
42 Figure 11 Qgis (Own work)
Figure 12 Qgis (Own work)
43
Transit
Figure 13 Google earth imageFigure 57 Qgis (Own work)
Figure 14 Google earth imageFigure 15 Google earth image
Figure 16 Google earth imageFigure 57 Qgis (Own work)
44
Mix
45
46 Figure 26 Booli.seFigure 27 Qgis layer (own work)
47
)
48
49
50
51
Density
52
53
54
55
Compact
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
SUMMARY ANALYSIS, DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
63
5.1 Results summary analysis
64
65
66
67
68
69
5.2 Discussion
70
71
5.3 General conclusions
72
5.4 Future research
73
REFERENCES
74
6.1 References
o o
o o o
o o o
o o
o
o o o
o o o o o o
o o o o
75 o
o o o
o o
o o o
o o
o o o o o
o o
o o o o o o o
76
6.2 List of figures
77
78
6.3 List of tables
6.4 Interviews
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
TRITA TRITA-ABE-MBT-19481
www.kth.se
