• No results found

Herbivores influence nutrient cycling and plant nutrient uptake:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Herbivores influence nutrient cycling and plant nutrient uptake:"

Copied!
44
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Herbivores influence nutrient

cycling and plant nutrient uptake:

Insights from tundra ecosystems

Hélène Barthelemy

Ecology and Environemntal Sciences 901 87 Umeå

(2)

This work is protected by the Swedish Copyright Legislation (Act 1960:729) Copyright©Hélène Barthelemy

ISBN: 978-91-7601-456-1

Cover: Reindeer in the moutains, photo by Hélène Barthelemy Electronic version available at http://umu.diva-portal.org/ Printed by: Service Center KBC

(3)

To Marthe and Adrien Barthelemy my so loved and wonderful grandparents

(4)

Contents

List of papers i

Authors contribution ii

Abstract iii

1. Introduction 1

1. 1 The role of large herbivores in ecosystem nutrient cycling 1

1. 2 Study system: the arctic tundra 2

1. 3 Reindeer grazing and nutrient cycling in the Arctic 6

1. 4 Objectives of the thesis 8

2. Materials and Methods 9

2. 1 Study sites 9

2. 2 Experimental designs 10

2. 3 Field sampling and laboratory procedures 13

2. 4 Statistical analysis 17

3. Results and Discussion 18 3. 1 The role of reindeer grazing for ecosystem N cycling 18

3. 2 The role of dung and urine deposition 19

3. 3 How does herbivore grazing influence plant nutrient uptake? 22

3. 4 The complex role of mosses 23

3. 5 Conclusion and perceptive 25

References 27

(5)

List of papers

This thesis is a summary of the following four studies, which will be referred to by their roman numerals

I. Barthelemy, H., S. Stark, and J. Olofsson. 2014. Strong Responses of Subarctic Plant Communities to Long-Term Reindeer Feces Manipulation. Ecosystems 18: 740-751

II. Barthelemy, H., S. Stark, A. Michelsen, and J. Olofsson. 2016. Effect of herbivory on the fate of added 15N-urea in a grazed Arctic

tundra. Manuscript

III. Barthelemy, H., E. Dorrepaal, and J. Olofsson. 2016.

Defoliation, soil grazing legacy, dung and moss cover influence growth and nutrient uptake of the common grass species, Festuca ovina

Manuscript

IV. Barthelemy, H., S. Stark, M. M. Kytöviita, and J. Olofsson. 2016. Grazing decreases N partitioning among coexisting plant species. Manuscript

(6)

Authors contribution

Paper I:

JO established and maintained the field sites and collected initial data together with SS. HB collected field data, performed chemical analysis, analyzed the data and wrote the first version of the manuscript with supervision from JO and SS.

Paper II:

HB designed the experiment with supervision from JO. HB performed field work, collected data, and prepared samples for chemical and isotopic analysis. HB analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript with comments from JO, SS and AM.

Paper III:

HB designed the experiment with supervision from JO and ED. HB performed greenhouse work, field work and chemical analyses. HB analyzed the data and wrote the first version of the manuscript with comments from JO and ED.

Paper IV:

HB designed the experiment with supervision from JO. HB performed field work, chemical analysis and mycorrhizal analysis with help from JO, SS and MMK. HB analysed the data and wrote the first version of the manuscript with comments from JO, SS and MMK.

Authors:

HB: Hélène Barthelemy, JO: Johan Olofsson, SS: Sari Stark, AM: Anders

(7)

Abstract

Reindeer appear to have strong positive effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling in strongly nutrient-limited ecosystems. While the direct effects of grazing on vegetation composition have been intensively studied, much less is known about the indirect effect of grazing on plant-soil interactions. This thesis investigated the indirect effects of ungulate grazing on arctic plant communities via soil nutrient availability and plant nutrient uptake.

At high density, the deposition of dung alone increased plant productivity both in nutrient rich and nutrient poor tundra habitats without causing major changes in soil possesses. Plant community responses to dung addition was slow, with a delay of at least some years. By contrast, a 15N-urea tracer study

revealed that nutrients from reindeer urine could be rapidly incorporated into arctic plant tissues. Soil and microbial N pools only sequestered small proportions of the tracer. This thesis therefore suggests a strong effect of dung and urine on plant productivity by directly providing nutrient-rich resources, rather than by stimulating soil microbial activities, N mineralization and ultimately increasing soil nutrient availability. Further, defoliation alone did not induce compensatory growth, but resulted in plants with higher nutrient contents. This grazing-induced increase in plant quality could drive the high N cycling in arctic secondary grasslands by providing litter of a better quality to the belowground system and thus increase organic matter decomposition and enhance soil nutrient availability. Finally, a 15N natural abundance study

revealed that intense reindeer grazing influences how plants are taking up their nutrients and thus decreased plant N partitioning among coexisting plant species.

Taken together these results demonstrate the central role of dung and urine and grazing-induced changes in plant quality for plant productivity. Soil nutrient concentrations alone do not reveal nutrient availability for plants since reindeer have a strong influence on how plants are taking up their nutrients. This thesis highlights that both direct and indirect effects of reindeer grazing are strong determinants of tundra ecosystem functioning. Therefore, their complex influence on the aboveground and belowground linkages should be integrated in future work on tundra ecosystem N dynamic.

(8)
(9)

1. Introduction

Large herbivores are ambassadors of wildlife and of vast and pristine landscapes. Their migration provide one of the most astonishing and sublime sight on earth. Large herbivores are vital to healthy and balanced ecosystems and are of a great importance to human welfare, especially for many indigenous communities.

The question of how herbivores control the structure and the functioning of natural ecosystems has a long history in modern ecology. During decades, the study of the effects of herbivory on nutrient cycling focused mainly on invertebrate herbivory in particular on phytophagous insects in terrestrial ecosystems and on phytoplanktivorous zooplankton in aquatic ecosystems. The role of large herbivore grazing on the regulation of nutrient cycles was largely neglected. Large herbivores consume only a relatively small proportion of the ecosystem net primary production, but their effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling are intensified through positive and negative soil-plant feedbacks (Wardle et al. 2004). Among wild large herbivores, the effects of ungulate communities of African savannas and the ungulate populations in the Arctic are probably the most widely studied. Still, the mechanisms behind their control over plant and soil interactions are not fully understood.

1. 1 The role of large herbivores in ecosystem nutrient cycling

Effects of grazing on ecosystem functioning

Aboveground herbivory strongly influence plant community structure and function and soil processes via three main mechanisms acting simultaneously over different spatial and temporal scales: (1) Defoliation directly affects individual plants by removing and consuming plant tissues; (2) By converting plant biomass into dung and urine, herbivores redistribute highly decomposable resources rich in labile nutrients within the ecosystem (Hobbs 1996). Dung and urine deposition have been reported to stimulate soil microbial activities which in turn increase nitrogen (N) mineralization and promote plant nutrient acquisition and plant productivity (McNaughton et al. 1997; Bardgett et al. 1998a; Hamilton and Frank 2001); (3) Finally, trampling by large herbivores has pronounced effects on soil microclimate (i.e.

(10)

temperatures and water balance) and soil structure (i.e. infiltration rate and soil pore size) by decreasing vegetation cover and compacting the soil (Veldhuis et al. 2014). In the long term, by feeding selectively on plant species based on their nutritional status and their digestibility, herbivores can induce large changes in species composition and can either decelerate or accelerate ecosystem nutrient cycling (Bardgett et al. 1998b; Wardle et al. 2004; Bardgett and Wardle 2003; Ritchie et al. 1998). While, the effect of herbivory on plant species composition have been widely studied, much less is known about the indirect effects of grazing on ecosystem nutrient dynamic and plant nutrient uptake.

Plant tolerance to grazing

Plant tolerance to herbivory has been defined as the capacity of a plant to maintain growth and reproduction following a defoliation event (Strauss and Agrawal 1999). Compensatory growth occurs when plant growth increase after defoliation resulting in smaller losses for the plant than expected and has been intensively studied in African grasslands where intense ungulate grazing optimizes plant primary production (McNaughton 1979; McNaughton 1984; McNaughton et al. 1997).

Aboveground herbivory often enhances shoot N concentration (Hamilton and Frank 2001) either directly through the reallocation of nutrients from the plant belowground parts into shoot (Bardgett and Wardle 2003) or indirectly through the grazing-induced increase in soil nutrient availability as discussed above. Foliar herbivory can also induce a pulse of root exudates which stimulate soil microbial activities and thus N mineralization and ultimately plant nutrient uptake (Hamilton and Frank 2001; Guitian and Bardgett 2000). These defoliation induced changes in the quality and quantity of plant resources entering the soil will affect plant litter decomposition rate (Diaz et al. 2007) and have further consequences for ecosystem nutrient cycling. Exploring plant tolerance to grazing is thus highly important to understand the relationship between grazing and nutrient cycling.

1. 2 Study system: the arctic tundra

Nutrient availability for plants

(11)

Arctic tundra ecosystems are strongly N-limited environments. Litter decomposition and nutrient mineralization is slow in cold arctic soils (Van Cleve and Alexander 1981; Stark 2007; Weintraub and Schimel 2003) and the slow release of nutrients to plant uptake controls primary production (Aerts and Chapin 2000; Schimel and Bennett 2004). Due to variation in topography over very short distances affecting soil microclimate, snow accumulation and wind exposure, tundra vegetation commonly consists of a mosaic of vegetation types. These range from nutrient poor tundra heaths dominated by mosses and dwarf shrubs to nutrient rich meadows, dominated by graminoids and forbs (Bjork et al. 2007) (Fig 1). N is commonly seen as the main limiting nutrient for plant productivity in the tundra. However, there is an increasing recognition that co-limitation by N and phosphorus (P) could be operating in more fertile tundra habitats (Giesler et al. 2012; Sundqvist et al. 2011) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1 Characteristics of the two most common vegetation types in the tundra. The heath vegetation is dominated by slow-growing and long-lived dwarf shrubs and a thick moss layer covering the ground surface almost entirely. Typical species are Betula nana, Vaccinium

myrtillus, Vaccinium vitis-ideae and Empetrum hermaphroditum. The meadow

vegetation, commonly found in shallow depression, is dominated by the fast-growing graminoids such as Festuca ovina and Carex bigelowii and forbs such as Saussurea alpina,

Viola biflora and Bistorta vivipara. Most of the graminoid species found in arctic secondary

(12)

In arctic soils, dissolved organic N (DON) dominates N cycling where most of the N is bound in complex organic compounds and thus not directly available for plant uptake (Neff et al. 2003). In addition, a considerable amount of N can be immobilized by soil microbes acting as strong competitors with plants for available N (Jonasson et al. 1996; Jonasson et al. 1999; Michelsen et al. 1999). However, recent evidence suggest that arctic plants can compete more efficiently with soil microbes than expected (Schmidt et al. 2002). Indeed, in the long term, a larger proportion of soil nutrients will be immobilized within plants, since nutrients are retained for longer periods in plant tissues compared to soil microbial biomass (Hodge et al. 2000).

Plant nutrient uptake and mycorrhiza symbiosis

Resource partitioning of available nutrients in space (i.e. root depth), in time (i.e. differential uptake during the growing season) and on their chemical forms (i.e. organic and inorganic forms) is an important mechanism facilitating plant coexistence in nutrient poor ecosystems (McKane et al. 2002) (Fig. 2). Most plants commonly bypass N mineralization processes by using organic N as a large part of their nutrition. In the Arctic, plant nutrient uptake then occurs primarily through the symbiosis between mycorrhizal fungi and plant fine roots (Read and Perez-Moreno 2003). Complex forms of organic N and P are passed from the fungus to the plants, while the fungal partner receives labile carbohydrates in exchange (Hobbie and Hobbie 2008).

Ericoid mycorrhizae (ERI) and ectomycorrhizae (ECM) dominate in nutrient-poor heath (Fig. 2). Although both ERI and ECM fungi have considerable proteolytics enabling them to depolymerise complex organic N compounds (Read and Perez-Moreno 2003; Schimel and Bennett 2004), ERI fungi have higher saprotrophic capacities than ECM fungi (Bending and Read 1996). Arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) are found in more fertile habitats (Fig. 2). They access mainly organic form of P and lack of the enzymatic capacities to degrade recalcitrant form of organic N (Read and Perez-Moreno 2003). However, recent studies reveal that AM could be more active in the uptake of DON than previously thought (Leigh et al. 2009; Whiteside et al. 2012). Although non-mycorrhizal tundra plants (NON) access mainly inorganic forms of N in the soil solution, they can also directly take up low molecular weight organic N (i.e. amino acids) (Chapin et al. 1993; Kielland 1994; McKane et al. 2002) (Fig.2).

(13)

Figure 2 Plant mycorrhizal associations and plant N partitioning in the Arctic. Arctic plant species are commonly well differentiated in chemical forms, timing and depth of available N uptake.

Stable N isotopes and arctic plant ecology

The relative abundance of the stable isotopes 15N and 14N provides an effective

tool for analysing tundra ecosystem N dynamics, since changes in plant and soil 15N natural abundance integrates the net effect of different mechanisms

in plant nutrient uptake and N cycling (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1994; Högberg 1997; Robinson 2001) (See Box 1, Materials and Methods). Foliar δ15N

depends on plant N sources (proportion of proteins, amino acids and ammonium taking up) and on nutrient uptake mechanisms (direct or mycorrhizal-mediated nutrient uptake) (Hobbie and Hogberg 2012).

Differentiation in foliar δ15N is strong in nutrient poor tundra ecosystems

as a result of a high plant N partitioning (Nadelhoffer et al. 1996; Michelsen et al. 1996; Michelsen et al. 1998; Hobbie et al. 2000). In arctic soils, inorganic N pools are 15N enriched relative to organic N pools (Yano et al. 2010) and ERI

plants have commonly the lowest foliar δ15N followed by ECM plants and NON

plants have the highest foliar δ15N while AM are intermediate (Fig. 2)

(Michelsen et al. 1996; Michelsen et al. 1998). Any changes in tundra ecosystem N cycling is likely to be reflected in foliar and δ15N signatures.

(14)

1. 3 Reindeer grazing and nutrient cycling in the Arctic

In the strongly N-limited tundra ecosystem, any processes that could modify plant-soil interactions can have dramatic consequences on the whole ecosystem. Grazing by the large and semi-domesticated reindeer populations is one of them. While negative effects of grazing on nutrient cycling have been sometimes observed in reindeer winter range (i.e. nutrient poor heath in the boreal forest) (Stark et al. 2000), reindeer grazing in the summer ranges appears to have strong positive effects on ecosystem nutrient cycling and plant community (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 Effects of summer reindeer grazing on plant species composition and nutrient cycling in tundra ecosystems.

Although the deposition of dung and urine provides highly decomposable resources to the arctic belowground communities (Fig. 3) (van der Wal et al. 2004; Olofsson et al. 2004), their specific role for plant productivity and soil nutrient availably is still poorly understood and experimental evidence is scarce. In addition, the effect of dung seems also to differ between ecosystems of contrasting fertility (Bardgett and Wardle 2003). Since tundra ecosystems are composed of a mosaic of vegetation types, it is thus highly important to explore the strength and the direction of dung deposition for tundra ecosystem functioning. The return of nutrients through urine deposition has attracted even less attention probably because tracing and quantifying urine

(15)

in natural ecosystems is highly complex. However, exploring the effect of urine deposition on nutrient dynamic is highly important, since urine is more readily available to plants than most N compounds in dung which have to undergo the slow process of organic matter decomposition (Hobbs 1996).

Mosses are a key component of tundra plant communities and with their large insulating capacities they have strong effects on arctic ecosystem functioning by keeping soils cold and wet (Gornall et al. 2007). Large herbivores play a central role in regulating the extent of the moss cover in tundra ecosystems. Reindeer have been shown to decrease the extensive moss layer directly by tramping over the vegetation (Fig. 3) (Olofsson et al. 2004) (van der Wal and Brooker 2004; van der Wal et al. 2001). A dung manipulation study in the High Arctic has also demonstrated that reindeer can also reduce the moss cover by the deposition of dung alone which stimulate organic matter decomposition and thus increase moss decomposition rate (Fig. 3) (van der Wal et al. 2004). The decrease in moss cover increases soil summer temperatures and the maximum depth thaw of the permafrost, and thus positively affects N mineralization (Olofsson et al. 2004; van der Wal et al. 2001; van der Wal and Brooker 2004). Exploring the effects of reindeer grazing on soil microclimate is thus important for a better understanding of tundra ecosystem nutrient cycling.

With their large effects on N mineralization processes and soil microbial communities, reindeer have a strong potential to affect the proportion and the type chemical forms of N in the soil and the strength of the symbiosis between plant root and mycorrhizal fungi. Reindeer can thus to influence how plant acquire their nutrients from the soil solution and affect plant resource partitioning of available nutrients. However, it is still unclear to which extend herbivores can influence plant nutrient uptake.

On their summer pasture, reindeer feed preferentially on the most palatable plants such as forbs and graminoids (Fig. 3). Under some circumstances, such as intense summer grazing, reindeer can induce a shift in vegetation from a moss and dwarf shrub vegetation to graminoids dominance (van der Wal 2006) and there is increasing evidence of grazing induced promotion of graminoids in the Arctic (Olofsson et al. 2001; van der Wal and Brooker 2004; van der Wal et al. 2004). Although it has been suggested that the positive effect of aboveground herbivory occurs when graminoids respond to defoliation by compensatory growth (McNaughton 1983), the mechanisms behind plant tolerance to herbivory are still poorly understood.

(16)

1. 4 Objectives of the thesis

The overall objective of this thesis is to explore the indirect effect of reindeer grazing on arctic plant community via soil nutrient availability and plant nutrient uptake. More precisely I examine the following questions:

(Paper I) What are the effects of dung deposition alone on arctic plant

productivity and structure? Do these effects differ depending on soil fertility?

(Paper II) Which ecosystem N pools will sequester reindeer urines? (Paper III) Which mechanisms regulate plant tolerance to grazing? (Paper IV) How does reindeer grazing influence plant N partitioning

(17)

2. Materials and Methods

2. 1 Study sites

Kärkevagge valley (Paper I)

Kärkevagge valley is located in northern Sweden (Fig 4). The landscape is dominated by intermingling patches of tundra heath and tundra meadow vegetation (Fig. 5). The study site is an important summer grazing area for the Gabna reindeer herding district and reindeer are mainly grazing the area in July and August.

Reisa valley (Paper, II, III and IV)

Reisa valley is located in northern Norway (Fig. 4). At the research site, a 50 years old reindeer fence divide the landscape over several kilometres and separate the summer grazing range from the spring and autumn range where reindeer only pass the area during their migration (Fig. 4). The spring and autumn range is dominated by tundra heath vegetation. It only experiences little grazing and thus will be referred to as lightly grazed sites. By contrast, the summer range experiences intense grazing in August and the dwarf shrub and moss rich vegetation has been replaced by a graminoid vegetation (Olofsson et al. 2001). These sites will be referred as heavily grazed sites.

Figure 4 Map of northern Fennoscandia showing the locations of the research sites. On the right, the reindeer pasture fence in Reisa.

(18)

2. 2 Experimental designs

Paper I: Reindeer dung manipulation (2004-2010)

A 7 years old dung manipulation experiment was performed in a nutrient rich tundra meadow and in a nutrient poor tundra heath. The effects on plant community composition and nutrient cycling were analysed. 10 sites were selected in the two habitats types by a random block design (Fig. 5). The following treatments were allocated and repeated every year in early August: (1) Control, i.e. natural reindeer dung deposition; (2) Removal of pellets and (3) Double, i.e. all reindeer pellets in the removed plots were transferred to the Double plots; (4) High, addition of about 10 times the natural dung density (pellets were collected in the surrounding area).

Figure 5 Experimental design of the reindeer dung manipulation (in total 20 blocks). As reindeer preferentially grazed in the meadow (forage of a better quality), reindeer density was 2-3 times higher in these control plots and thus also in the double treatments.

Paper II: 15N tracer study (2011-2012)

A 15N tracer study (Box 1) using labelled urea was performed in Reisa. 10

blocks were selected along the fence and in each block, a control plot and one

15N-urea addition plot were randomly allocated at the lightly grazed and at the

(19)

Box 1: N stable isotope in plant-soil ecology

N stable isotopes: N has two stabile isotopes: 15N is the rare (0.36% of natural N) and

heavy (8 neutrons) variant, and 14N the abundant (99.63% of natural N) and light (7

neutrons) one. δ15N is the relative natural abundance of 15 N and 14N in samples expresses

as

δ15N (‰) = 1000 × (R𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒− R𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑

R𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 )

with Rsample the stabile isotope ratio 15N/14N in a sample compared to atmospheric N2.

Isotopic fractionation and N cycling: Fractionation is the changes in the partitioning

of 15N and 14N between a source and a product. Biologically mediated isotope fractionation

is called discrimination, the light and less stable 14N (forming bonds that are more easily

broken) will react faster and is likely to accumulate more rapidly in the product than the heavier 15N (Robinson 2001; Dawson et al. 2002). As a consequence, the major soil N

transformations such as N mineralization and nitrification lead to a product depleted in 15N

compared to the residual N pool.

Higher soil nutrient availability is often associated with a higher rate of ecosystem N cycling. This increase in N cycling will result in an 15N enrichment of soil N pools, since the lighter 14N isotopes are preferentially lost during N leaching and denitrifications (Amundson et al.

2003).If herbivores enhance soil N cycling, they are thus also expected to increase the δ15N

of the system.

Isotopic fractionation and mycorrhizal-mediated N uptake: In the arctic,

mycorrhizal arctic plants have been reported to have lower δ15N signatures than

non-mycorrhizal plants (Michelsen et al. 1996): (1) They access a higher proportion of organic N sources (with lower δ15N than inorganic N sources) and (2) The large 15N fractionation

associated with N assimilation with fungal hyphae (Macko et al. 1986) and N transfer processes in fugal symbionts (Hobbie and Hobbie 2006) leave the plants depleted in 15N.

15N enriched (tracer) study: This method involves applying trace amount of N compounds highly enriched in 15N (labelled N compound). Tracing and quantifying the N

compounds derived from urine is methodologically challenging. In paper II, the molecule of urea was enriched in 15N by 98%. Since its abundance will be much higher than any

natural occurring level, it is thus possible to follow its transportation and partitioning in a system without altering its natural behaviour (Robinson 2001; Dawson et al. 2002).

(20)

All the plots were selected within a distance of 5 m from the fence. The 15N

urea, diluted in 2 litres of stream water, was sprayed uniformly over the vegetation at a rate of 0.2 g m-2 at the peak of the growing season. Following

each tracer addition, the control plots received the equivalent amount of non-enriched water. The distribution of 15N-urea into the different N pools of the

two grazing sites was examined after 2 weeks and 1 year after tracer addition.

Paper III: Common garden with Festuca ovina (2011-2012)

To test the effects of soil origin (heavily or lightly grazed soil) and simulated herbivory on plant growth and soil N bioavailability, a full factorial common garden pot experiment was established at the Scientific Research Station in Abisko (Fig. 4). Festuca ovina was used as model species. It is a grazing-tolerant graminoid very common in arctic secondary grasslands. Soil samples were collected at 5 location along the reindeer fence in Reisa (Fig. 4) and half of the plants were grown in soils from the heavily grazed sites and the other half in soils from the lightly grazed sites. The following treatments were allocated in 5 blocks corresponding to each soil sampling site (Fig. 6): (1) Shoot defoliation, plants were cut down to 3 cm two times in 2011 and one time in 2012. This clipping treatment mimics reindeer defoliation; (2) Reindeer dung fertilization (volume 1 dl) with pellets collected close to the reindeer herd in Reisa and (3) Presence or absence of a thick layer of feather mosses to manipulate soil microclimate (soil temperature and moisture).

(21)

Figure 6 Experimental design of the common garden with F. ovina with C = Control; F = reindeer dung fertilization; M = presence of a moss layer; and D = defoliation. On the right, the photos illustrate one experimental block and one pot unit of the common garden in Abisko. In each block, each treatment had two replicates (in total 32 experimental plots in each block). The plant root simulators are the orange anion probes and the purple cation probes inserted in some of the experimental pots.

Paper IV: 15N natural abundance study in the heavily grazed and lightly grazed tundra

The long term effect of reindeer grazing on plant N uptake of coexisting tundra plants was examined by exploring differences in 15N natural abundance

signatures in plants, microbes and soil (Box 1) and in mycorrhizal colonization rate. 10 sites along the reindeer fence in Reisa were selected with similar abiotic conditions. The studied plant species included two ERI dwarf shrubs Vaccinium myrtillus and Empetrum hermaphroditum, an ECM dwarf shrub Betula nana, an AM grass Dechampsia Flexuosa and a NON sedge Carex bigelowii. These were the only plant species that were common enough to get a representable sample from both sites of the reindeer fence.

2. 3 Field sampling and laboratory procedures

Plant sampling

In paper I and II, all aboveground vegetation (including litter) was harvested in a subplot (25 cm x 25 cm) located in the middle of each plot (Fig. 7a). Root biomass was sampled from soil cores (depth 5 cm, area 44 cm2) in the middle

of each subplot. In paper III, the common garden was ended shortly after the peak of the second growing season. The entire aboveground plant biomass was clipped and the belowground plant biomass was collected. In paper IV, foliar tissues of the 5 studied plant species were collected from 5 to 10 individuals for each plant species. Root samples were also harvested by tracing the fine root from the main root down into the soil. Fresh reindeer dung was also collected at close location of the reindeer herd for nutrient and isotope analysis (paper I and IV).

(22)

Aboveground plant biomass was sorted at the species level except for the graminoids and cryptogram groups. In paper I, to estimate aboveground primary production, the current year shoots of dwarf shrubs were separated from the previous years´ growth. All graminoids and forbs were considered to represent new biomass. All root samples were thoroughly washed to remove any soil and other organic materials. In paper IV, roots were stored in ethanol until mycorrhizal analysis. All other plant and dung samples were oven dried, weighted for biomass estimation and finely grinded and sent for analysis.

Mycorrhizal analysis

In paper IV, root samples were cleared and acidified. Darkly pigmented roots were bleached to remove any phenolic compounds left in the cleared roots prior acidification. The fungal structure for ERI and AM fungi was stained and mycorrhiza colonization frequency was estimated as the proportion of coils or arbuscules intercepted in 1 cm long root segment (diameter < 1 mm) by a modification of the line intersection procedure (McGonigle et al. 1990). ECM colonization rate was measured by the line intersection procedure (Fig. 7b) (Brundett et al. 1996).

Figure 7 a) Aboveground and belowground plant biomass sampling b) Root mycorrhizal preparation and analysis c) Soil samples extraction and filtration

(23)

Soil sampling and soil measurements

A set of three soil cores (volume 500 cm3) was collected at each experimental

plot (paper I and II) or sampling location (paper IV). Only the thin humus layer was sampled while the mineral layer was discarded. Soil samples were kept frozen until analysis. In paper III, plant root simulators, PRSTM probes

(Western Ag Innovations, Saskatoon, Canada) were buried in the soil of selected experimental pots for the whole growing season 2012. These ion exchange membranes (Fig. 6) are effective surrogate for biomimicking nutrient absorption by plant roots and provide a dynamic measure in situ of N available in the soil. Soil temperature and moisture were also measured in each experimental unit (Paper I, III and IV).

Soil preparation

Soil samples for soil extractable and microbial N (Paper I, II and IV), soil and microbial δ 15N signatures (Paper II and IV) and soil extractable and microbial

P (Paper I) were thawed and sieved to remove plant material and stones. Water content was measured gravimetrically and organic matter content was determined by loss on ignition. Soil microbial N and P was determined as the chloroform labile fraction using the chloroform-fumigation-extraction technique describes by Brookes et al. (1985). Non-fumigated soil extracts were used to determine soil extractable N. Soil extracts were filtered and total extractable N and P were determined by oxidizing the entire extractable N and P to NO3- and PO3- (Williams et al. 1995) (Fig. 7c). To determine soil

extractable and microbial δ15N signatures, fumigated and non-fumigated

extracts were prepared following a modification of the acid trap diffusion technique (Holmes et al. 1998). Glass microfiber filter disk were incubated for 7 days to trap all the volatilized NH3 onto the acidified disks.

Chemical analysis and calculation

Samples for elemental C and N and δ15N signatures were encapsulated in

pre-weighted tin capsules and were analysed on a continuous flow CHN analyser interfaced to an isotope ration mass spectrometer by the stable isotope facility of the University of Davis and the University of Copenhagen (Paper II, III and IV). Kjeldahl N and P content of dung and a selected forage species were analysed on a continuous flow colorimetric analyser by the Landcare Research

(24)

laboratory (Paper I). The PRSTM probes were analysed colorimetrically using

an automated flow injection analysis system by western Ag Innovation (Paper III). Soil extracts for N and P availability were analysed by flow injection analysis and by spectrophotometry respectively (Paper I, II and IV).

The microbial N and P content was calculated as

𝑁𝑚𝑖𝑐 = 𝑁𝑓− 𝑁𝑒 𝑃𝑚𝑖𝑐 = 𝑃𝑓− 𝑃𝑒

In paper II and IV, the isotope signature of the microbial biomass N pool was determined using isotope mass balance as

δ 15𝑁𝑚𝑖𝑐 (‰) =(δ15𝑁𝑓× 𝑁𝑓− δ15𝑁𝑒× 𝑁𝑒)

𝑁𝑚𝑖𝑐

In paper II, The 15N enrichment in each ecosystem N pools was calculated as

the 15N atomic frequency in excess as

Atom15𝑁 % excess = Atom % 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑟 − Atom % 𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑

The percentage tracer recovery in each ecosystem N pool was estimated as

% 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 15𝑁 = (𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚15𝑁 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 × 𝑁 × 𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠)/104 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑒𝑑 ∗ 100

Box 2: Notation

Nmic and Pmic: soil microbial N and P

Ne and Pe: soil extractable N and P (from the non-fumigated extracts)

Nf and Pf: N and P availability in the fumigated extracts

δ 15Ne and δ15Nmic: δ 15N signature in soil solution and in the microbial N pool

Atom % tracer: 15N atomic frequency of a sample collected in the 15N urea addition plot Atom % background: 15N atomic frequency of the corresponding sample collected in the

non-labelled plot

(25)

2. 4 Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) without repeated factors (Paper IV) and with repeated factors (Paper I, II and III)) was mainly used. The use of linear mixed effect models allow the incorporation of random factors (i.e. time, sampling location or both) to account for variation between sampling locations and to avoid pseudo-replication, for example by taking into account the different recording of the same plots at a different sampling time. For all ANOVAs, when the analysis showed a significant effects between categorical variables, differences among means were further explored using post hoc tests. Akaike´s information criteria and residual plots were used to assess the model fit. Other statistical methods were also used, for example student t-test (Paper I). Data were log or arcsine-transformed when necessary to fulfil the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity. All statistical analysis were conducted using the R statistical package (R development Core Team 2016).

(26)

3. Results and Discussion

This thesis aimed at getting a better understanding of the indirect effects of grazing by large herbivores on ecosystem N dynamic, soil nutrient availability and plant N uptake in the nutrient limited tundra ecosystems. The key findings of each paper are presented and briefly discussed together.

3. 1 The role of reindeer grazing for ecosystem N cycling

Changes in arctic plant community and soil processes

Intense reindeer grazing transformed the plant community from a moss and dwarf shrubs dominated vegetation to a vegetation dominated by graminoids and forbs, creating an arctic secondary grassland (Paper II and IV). The shift in plant community composition was also accompanied by a shift in mycorrhizal community composition, from the dominance of ERI and ECM fungi at the lightly grazed sites to the dominance of AM fungi and NON plant species at the heavily grazed sites (Paper IV). 50 years of reindeer grazing have also increased soil nitrogen availability, evident both from a higher extractable N in the soil and higher N concentrations in all plant species investigated. These results are in line with previous work reporting a reindeer-induced vegetation shift and increase N cycling in tundra ecosystems (Olofsson et al. 2001; van der Wal et al. 2004; van der Wal and Brooker 2004; Olofsson et al. 2004; Stark and Väisänen 2014) and highlight the strong effect of herbivory on ecosystem N cycling.

Further, Paper IV reveals that intense reindeer grazing resulted in a 15

N-enrichment of both soil N and microbial N pool δ15N signatures. This 15

N-enrichment is likely due to the grazing-induced faster N turnover, since mineralization processes discriminate against the 15N isotope (Högberg 1997;

Bedard-Haughn et al. 2003) and the deposition of dung and urine providing nutrient-rich resources with relatively high δ15N compared to other soil N

sources. This finding demonstrates the powerful used of 15N natural

abundance in capturing the positive effect of reindeer grazing in soil N dynamics.

(27)

Aboveground herbivory severely reduced the growth of F. ovina (Paper III). This result demonstrates that even a grazing tolerant graminoid species which increases largely in abundance under heavy reindeer grazing (Olofsson et al. 2001) was damaged following defoliation. Both final aboveground and belowground biomass decreased more than expected from the proportion of biomass removed. Plants did not tolerate defoliation better at higher nutrient availability, i.e. when grown in soil from the heavily grazed or after dung fertilization. This indicates that an increase in tolerance to aboveground herbivory at more fertile conditions might be restricted to when plants in natural communities experience light N-limitation in the absence of defoliation (Johnson and Gough 2013).

By contrast, defoliation increased N concentrations and decreased C to N ratio both in shoots and in roots, likely due to the production of new biomass with higher N concentration than older plant parts. This finding indicates that the grazing-induced increase in plant quality could drive the high N cycling in arctic secondary grasslands by providing plant litter of a better quality to the soil, resulting in a faster decomposition rate (Olofsson and Oksanen 2002). Further, plants grown in previously heavily grazed soils produced more biomass, had higher nutrient uptake and higher N concentration than plants grown in previously lightly grazed soils. This finding highlights the strong effect of soil grazing legacy on plant productivity and indicates that herbivores could have long lasting effects on plant growth and ecosystem N dynamics even after the herbivory has ceased.

3. 2 The role of dung and urine deposition

The effect of dung deposition for tundra plants

Paper I and Paper III revealed that herbivores can increase plant productivity by the deposition of dung alone. Dung addition increased both shoot biomass and N concentrations of the grazing tolerant plant F. ovina (Paper III). Further, dung addition at high density increased plant productivity in the meadow and heath vegetation types (Paper I). Doubling and removing the natural dung deposition had only weak effects, mainly in the heath vegetation. Graminoids and deciduous shrubs responded the strongest to dung additions and were thus the plant functional groups the most sensible to changes in resource availability. Dung addition had mixed effects on plant nutrient

(28)

status, with an increase in N concentration for F. ovina (Paper III), while no changes were observed for plants in natural communities (Paper I), where added nutrients were diluted in plant tissues.

Although reindeer preferentially used the more fertile meadow vegetation, the effect of long term dung manipulation was stronger in the nutrient poor heath vegetation (Paper I). This finding does not support the prediction that dung is more important in nutrient rich habitat, as a larger proportion of plant biomass should be converted into dung and urine (Bardgett and Wardle 2003). Further, since dung addition did not decrease the proportion of slow growing and nutrient poor plant species, Paper I suggest that dung deposition alone cannot drive the dramatic vegetation shifts reported in Paper II and IV. Aboveground defoliation, trampling and urine deposition may also be needed in order to induce a large vegetation transition (van der Wal 2006).

Urea partitioning in plant ecosystem N pools

Most of the added 15N-urea was incorporated into aboveground part of plants.

Vascular plants in each of the grazing regime appeared to sequester 15N-urea

in proportion to their abundance in the vegetation (Paper II). Dwarf shrubs were as efficient as graminoids and forbs in taking up the added 15N-urea. This

result is in contrast with studies were 15N was injected in the soil (Oulehlea et

al. 2016) and with Paper I, where the opportunistic and fast-growing plants took the most advantages of enhanced nutrient availability from dung addition. A possible explanation for this finding could be that, in addition to root uptake, a large proportion of urea from reindeer urine might have been absorbed directly by the plant canopy (Baur et al. 1997; Schreiber 2005). Litter was also a large sink for the added 15N-urea, highlighting the biological

importance of this layer for tundra ecosystems functioning. These findings provide further evidence of a key role of urine for arctic plant productivity.

Dung and urine availability to plants

Although both dung and urine appeared to be important for arctic plant nutrition, their effects were decoupled in the short and long term. Plants responded to dung addition after two years in the meadow and after 7 years in the heath (Paper I). Similarly, dung addition effects on the growth and productivity of F. ovina were still weak two years after dung fertilization

(29)

(Paper III). This slow effect of dung is consistent with previous studies in arctic tundra, indicating a delay of some years in the response of plant communities to dung fertilization (van der Wal et al. 2004). Previous work indicates that the decomposition rate of reindeer dung is strongly positively correlated to soil temperatures and soil moisture (van der Wal et al. 2004; Skarin 2008). The faster response to dung addition in the meadow probably originated from more favourable soil microclimate conditions for dung decomposition with higher soil temperature and moisture content than in the heath. By contrast, urine assimilation by plants can be very rapid since 15N-urea recovery in plants was high only after 2 weeks after tracer addition (Paper II). This demonstrates that nutrients from urine are used much faster than N added through dung (Paper I and Paper III) or plant litter (Olofsson and Oksanen 2002), as for both it can take years before nutrients are released into plant available forms.

Strong competition between plants and microbes for the incoming nutrients? Dung fertilization, even at high density, had only weak effects on soil nutrient availability and no effect on microbial N and P immobilization in both vegetation types (Paper I) and did not affect soil N bioavailability to the graminoid F. ovina (Paper III). Similarly, although soil extractable N and microbial N constituted a considerable ecosystem N pool, they sequestered only a marginal proportion of the N added in the form of 15N urea, irrespective

of the grazing intensity (Paper II). Taken together, this indicates that arctic plant communities are well adapted to take advantage of the pulse of incoming N compounds derived from dung and urine and that arctic plants are efficient competitors to soil microbes for the soil available N (Jonasson et al. 1999; Schmidt et al. 2002; Stark and Kytoviita 2006). These findings suggest a direct effect of dung and urine for plant productivity by providing nutrient-rich resources for plant uptake, rather than an indirect effect by stimulating microbial activities, N mineralization and ultimately plant nutrient uptake. Further, dung addition did not affect moss layer decomposition (Paper I). These findings are in contrast with previous work demonstrating that the deposition of dung alone can induce cascading effects in high arctic tundra ecosystems (van der Wal et al. 2004).

(30)

3. 3 How does herbivore grazing influence plant nutrient

uptake?

Intensive reindeer grazing induced a large shift in plant 15N natural abundance

(Paper II and Paper IV). The large variation in δ15N among coexisting plant

species in the lightly grazed sites was dramatically reduced in the heavily grazed sites. This indicates a reduced N partitioning on the basis of chemical N forms. All dwarf shrubs, forbs, mosses and lichens had higher and graminoids lower δ15N at the heavily grazed sites.

First, all plants could access more easily available mineral N sources, with higher δ15N compared to most complex organic N compounds (Yano et al.

2010), at conditions of high mineral nutrient availability that predominate at the heavily grazed sites (Stark and Väisänen 2014) (Fig 8). Plants at the heavily grazed sites were also more defoliated and the more similar δ15N

signatures might thus result from a reduced capacity of defoliated plants to access organic N sources. Paper II and III supported this thesis. Defoliation caused a strong decrease in plant N uptake for F. ovina (inducing an increase in soil N bioavailability), likely due to the observed decrease in root biomass (Paper III). Further, heavily grazed shrubs were also less efficient in taking up the added 15N urea than lightly grazed shrubs (Paper II).

Figure 8 Key findings for paper IV: intense reindeer grazing decreases N partitioning among coexisting plant species. Plain arrows indicate direct nutrient uptake and dashed

(31)

arrows mycorrhizal-mediated nutrient uptake. The thickness of each arrow indicate size effect. DON = dissolved organic nitrogen and DIN = dissolved inorganic nitrogen.

Secondly, with increasing soil N availability, the importance of mycorrhizal-mediated N uptake could be reduced and plants could shift toward a more direct uptake of N sources. Since N assimilation within fungal hyphae (Macko et al. 1986; Jin et al. 2005) and N transfer processes (Hobbie and Hobbie 2006) highly discriminate against the 15N isotope, a decrease in

mycorrhizal-mediated N uptake could be at the origin of the higher δ15N signatures for all

dwarf shrubs. Thus is supported by the strong decline in mycorrhizal colonization for the ECM B. nana and the ERI E. hermaphroditum.

Finally, the uptake of labile nutrients from dung and urine could also be a central mechanism for the observed shift in plant δ15N, since all investigated

plants had δ15N values converging toward the δ15N signature in dung and

urine. Evidence comes from the δ15N signature of mosses (Paper II). If direct

uptake of soil N by diverse bryophyte species have been reported (Ayres et al. 2006), wet deposition is the main pathway of N acquisition. The large increase in moss δ15N at the highly grazed sites could thus only result from a change in

incoming N over the vegetation, through the deposition of dung and urine with higher δ15N than those recorded in moss tissues.

Paper II suggest thus that the combined effect of a reduced mycorrhiza-mediated nitrogen uptake and a shift towards a more mineral nutrition of labile nitrogen from dung and urine was at the origin of the observed shift in plant δ15N in heavily grazed areas. These findings indicate that herbivores do

not only influence the soil nutrient availability, but also how plants acquire nutrients. This may have potential consequences for the effects of herbivores on plant coexistence, as it reveals that nutrient availability in the soil in different grazing regimes does not fully depict the nutrient availability for plants.

3. 4 The complex role of mosses

Mosses and lichens were the largest 15N sink both at the lightly and heavily

grazed tundra (Paper II). This findings is consistent with previous tracer studies in arctic tundra, demonstrating the high capacity of cryptogams for

(32)

nutrient uptake (Gundale et al. 2014; Tye et al. 2005). Bryophytes possess very absorptive surfaces and can capture large proportions of mineral and organic N compounds for several years (Jonsdottir et al. 1995; Weber and Van Cleve 1981; Krab et al. 2008; Street et al. 2015) and thus could negatively affect plant nutrient uptake (Jonsdottir et al. 1995). Since intense reindeer grazing caused a large decrease in moss biomass, reindeer have the potential to increase N cycling and the growth of vascular plants by enabling more nutrients from urine to enter the soil. Although urea may rapidly contribute to a higher primary production in tundra ecosystems, it does not automatically result in a higher abundance of high quality forage, since large amounts of N compounds derived from urine could be trapped for extended periods plants not preferred as forage by reindeer (Thomas and Kroeger 1981). Paper III also revealed that the presence of a thick moss layer had a negative effect on growth of F. ovina, reducing in particular belowground plant productivity. Further mosses reduced plant compensatory growth after a defoliation event.

By contrast, Paper III also demonstrated that the presence of a moss layer increased plant N concentrations and enhanced total nutrient uptake. Since precipitation is low at the common garden site in Abisko (Kohler et al. 2006) and mosses increased soil moisture without affecting soil temperature, it is likely that the positive effect of mosses on plant nutrient status and plant nutrient uptake resulted from an improvement in soil hydrology. This is in line with previous work reporting that mosses, especially in harsh and dry environments, reduce evaporation and retain moisture from snow melt and precipitation (Sohlberg and Bliss 1987; Gornall et al. 2007; Sand-Jensen and Hammer 2012). N leached from the mosses could have been an additional facilitative effect on plant growth since feather mosses have N fixing symbionts (Stuiver et al. 2015). Mosses also did not seem to prevent nutrients from the added reindeer dung to enter the soil. Since moisture is an important determinant of the growth of mosses, it is likely that the dry environment that mosses were experiencing in the common garden in Abisko reduced their absorbing capacity.

Taken together these findings indicate that mosses can retard or reinforce the positive effect of reindeer on plant productivity and ecosystem N cycling. Soil microclimate appears to be of a particular high important in controlling the direction of the effect of mosses on tundra ecosystem functioning.

(33)

3. 5 Conclusion and perceptive

The results presented in this thesis provide a more detailed framework about some of the key mechanisms through which grazing by large herbivores can influence plant productivity, soil nutrient availability and N cycling in tundra ecosystems. This thesis brings evidence for a central role of herbivore dung and urine in regulating plant community composition and ecosystem N dynamics in both nutrient-poor and nutrient-rich tundra ecosystems where herbivore density is high (Fig. 9). This work reveals that, although both dung and urine provide highly decomposable resources to the system, these resources differ in their availability to plants. It can take years before plants can take advantages of the nutrients contained in dung which have to undergo a long decomposition pathway, while nutrients in urine are readily available to plant. Further, this thesis suggests a strong effect of dung and urine for plant productivity by providing directly nutrient-rich resources for the system rather than by stimulating soil microbial activities, N mineralization and ultimately increasing soil nutrient availability. This more detailed understanding of how nutrients derived from dung and urine are sequestered by different ecosystem pools improve our understanding of nutrient cycling in the Arctic. Still, there is a crucial need for further investigations on how nutrients from dung and urine are entering the system, are transformed and cycled by plant and soil microorganisms.

Figure 9 Key findings for the Paper I, II and III. Central role of herbivore dung and urine and defoliation-induced changes in plant quality in regulating plant community composition and ecosystem N dynamics.

(34)

Importantly, this work indicates that the increase in plant N contents following defoliation reported for the graminoid F. ovina could drive the high N cycling in arctic secondary grasslands. The mechanism is a provision of litter of better quality, which enhances organic matter decomposition (Fig. 9). Defoliation commonly not only changes plant nutrient status but also plant chemical and structural mechanisms, such as the increase in the proportion of C-based secondary metabolic (Coley et al. 1985) or the increase in silicon uptake to increase leaf abrasiveness for graminoids (McNaughton and Tarrants 1983). After leaf senescence, the concentration of such defence compounds control litter decomposition rate. Exploring how different plant functional groups respond to and tolerate aboveground herbivory is thus highly important, if we want to better understand how herbivores control N cycling by changing litter quality.

The chapters of this thesis reinforce a growing literature of a strong positive effect of summer reindeer grazing on tundra ecosystem nutrient cycling. For the first time, they reveal that reindeer do not only influence soil nutrient availability, but also by which mechanisms plants acquire their nutrients (Fig. 8). Intense reindeer grazing strongly reduced δ15N variation

between coexisting plant species. This indicates a reduced N partitioning on the basis of chemical N forms, and might have strong implication for plant coexistence and tundra ecosystem functioning. Further investigations are needed to disentangle the driving mechanisms behind this reported decrease in plant N portioning following defoliation. Particular knowledge gaps exist regarding the specific importance of mycorrhizal mediated N uptake, the shift toward a more mineral nutrition for plants and the effect of aboveground herbivory on plant nutrient uptake capacity. The application of different organic and inorganic labelled N compounds into tundra habitats of contrasting grazing intensity could bring direct evidence of grazing induced shift in plant N nutrition.

Finally, this thesis highlights that the effects of mosses can range from negative to positive, depending on how they influence soil microclimate and nutrient cycling. Arctic climate is currently changing at an unprecedented rate (Serreze and Barry 2011) with major changes in temperatures and precipitation. Consequences for plant species composition including a large decrease in moss cover are therefore expected (Sorensen et al. 2012). Understanding the effect of herbivore grazing in a changing arctic involves integrating the effect of soil microclimate (temperature and water balance) and considering the specific effect of mosses.

(35)

References

Aerts, R. & Chapin, F. S. (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, Vol 30 (eds A. H. Fitter & D. G. Raffaelli), pp. 1-67. Elsevier Academic Press Inc, San Diego.

Amundson, R. Austin, A. T. Schuur, E. A. G. Yoo, K. Matzek, V. Kendall, C. Uebersax, A. Brenner, D. & Baisden, W. T. (2003) Global patterns of the isotopic composition of soil and plant nitrogen. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1031-1041.

Ayres, E. van der Wal, R. Sommerkorn, M. & Bardgett, R. D. (2006) Direct uptake of soil nitrogen by mosses. Biology Letters, 2, 286-288. Bardgett, R. D. Keiller, S. Cook, R. & Gilburn, A. S. (1998a) Dynamic

interactions between soil animals and microorganisms in upland grassland soils amended with sheep dung: A microcosm experiment. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 30, 531-539.

Bardgett, R. D. & Wardle, D. A. (2003) Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology, 84, 2258-2268.

Bardgett, R. D. Wardle, D. A. & Yeates, G. W. (1998b) Linking above-ground and below-ground interactions: How plant responses to foliar herbivory influence soil organisms. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 30, 1867-1878.

Baur, P. Buchholz, A. & Schonherr, J. (1997) Diffusion in plant cuticles as affected by temperature and size of organic solutes: similarity and diversity among species. Plant Cell and Environment, 20, 982-994. Bedard-Haughn, A. van Groenigen, J. W. & van Kessel, C. (2003) Tracing

N-15 through landscapes: potential uses and precautions. Journal of Hydrology, 272, 175-190.

Bending, G. D. & Read, D. J. (1996) Nitrogen mobilization from protein-polyphenol complex by ericoid and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28, 1603-1612.

Bjork, R. G. Klemedtsson, L. Molau, U. Harndorf, J. Odman, A. & Giesler, R. (2007) Linkages between N turnover and plant community structure in a tundra landscape. Plant and Soil, 294, 247-261.

Brookes, P. C. Landman, A. Pruden, G. & Jenkinson, D. S. (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen- A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 17, 837-842.

Brundett, M. Bougher, N. Dell, B. Grove, T. & Malajczuk, N. (1996) Working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture. ACIAR Monograph 32. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra. Chapin, F. S. Moilanen, L. & Kielland, K. (1993) Preferential use of organic

nitrogen for growth by a nonmycorrhizal arctic sedge. Nature, 361, 150-153.

(36)

Coley, P. D. Bryant, J. P. & Chapin, F. S. (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science, 230, 895-899.

Dawson, T. E. Mambelli, S. Plamboeck, A. H. Templer, P. H. & Tu, K. P. (2002) Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 507-559.

Diaz, S. Lavorel, S. McIntyre, S. Falczuk, V. Casanoves, F. Milchunas, D. G. Skarpe, C. Rusch, G. Sternberg, M. Noy-Meir, I. Landsberg, J. Zhang, W. Clark, H. & Campbell, B. D. (2007) Plant trait responses to grazing - a global synthesis. Global Change Biology, 13, 313-341.

Giesler, R. Esberg, C. Lagerstrom, A. & Graae, B. J. (2012) Phosphorus availability and microbial respiration across different tundra vegetation types. Biogeochemistry, 108, 429-445.

Gornall, J. L. Jonsdottir, I. S. Woodin, S. J. & Van der Wal, R. (2007) Arctic mosses govern below-ground environment and ecosystem processes. Oecologia, 153, 931-941.

Guitian, R. & Bardgett, R. D. (2000) Plant and soil microbial responses to defoliation in temperate semi-natural grassland. Plant and Soil, 220, 271-277.

Gundale, M. J. From, F. Bach, L. H. & Nordin, A. (2014) Anthropogenic nitrogen deposition in boreal forests has a minor impact on the global carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 20, 276-286.

Hamilton, E. W. & Frank, D. A. (2001) Can plants stimulate soil microbes and their own nutrient supply? Evidence from a grazing tolerant grass. Ecology, 82, 2397-2402.

Hobbie, E. A. & Hobbie, J. E. (2008) Natural abundance of (15)N in nitrogen-limited forests and tundra can estimate nitrogen cycling through mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Ecosystems, 11, 815-830.

Hobbie, E. A. & Hogberg, P. (2012) Nitrogen isotopes link mycorrhizal fungi and plants to nitrogen dynamics. New Phytol, 196, 367-82.

Hobbie, E. A. Macko, S. A. & Williams, M. (2000) Correlations between foliar delta N-15 and nitrogen concentrations may indicate plant-mycorrhizal interactions. Oecologia, 122, 273-283.

Hobbie, J. E. & Hobbie, E. A. (2006) N-15 in symbiotic fungi and plants estimates nitrogen and carbon flux rates in Arctic tundra. Ecology,

87, 816-822.

Hobbs, N. T. (1996) Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60, 695-713.

Hodge, A. Robinson, D. & Fitter, A. (2000) Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen? Trends in Plant Science, 5, 304-308.

Holmes, R. M. McClelland, J. W. Sigman, D. M. Fry, B. & Peterson, B. J. (1998) Measuring N-15-NH4+ in marine, estuarine and fresh waters: An adaptation of the ammonia diffusion method for samples with low ammonium concentrations. Marine Chemistry, 60, 235-243. Högberg, P. (1997) Tansley review No 95 - N-15 natural abundance in

(37)

Jin, H. Pfeffer, P. E. Douds, D. D. Piotrowski, E. Lammers, P. J. & Shachar-Hill, Y. (2005) The uptake, metabolism, transport and transfer of nitrogen in an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist,

168, 687-696.

Johnson, D. R. & Gough, L. (2013) Two arctic tundra graminoids differ in tolerance to herbivory when grown with added soil nutrients. Botany-Botanique, 91, 82-90.

Jonasson, S. Michelsen, A. Schmidt, I. K. & Nielsen, E. V. (1999) Responses in microbes and plants to changed temperature, nutrient, and light regimes in the arctic. Ecology, 80, 1828-1843.

Jonasson, S. Michelsen, A. Schmidt, I. K. Nielsen, E. V. & Callaghan, T. V. (1996) Microbial biomass C, N and P in two arctic soils and responses to addition of NPK fertilizer and sugar: Implications for plant nutrient uptake. Oecologia, 106, 507-515.

Jonsdottir, I. S. Callaghan, T. V. & Lee, J. A. (1995) Fate of added nitrogen in a moss sedge arctic community and effects of increased nitrogen deposition. Science of the Total Environment, 160-61, 677-685. Kielland, K. (1994) Amino-acid-absorption by arctic plants- Implications for

plant nutrition and nitrogen cycling. Ecology, 75, 2373-2383. Kohler, J. Brandt, O. Johansson, M. & Callaghan, T. (2006) A long-term Arctic

snow depth record from Abisko, northern Sweden, 1913-2004. Polar Research, 25, 91-113.

Krab, E. J. Cornelissen, J. H. C. Lang, S. I. & van Logtestijn, R. S. P. (2008) Amino acid uptake among wide-ranging moss species may contribute to their strong position in higher-latitude ecosystems. Plant and Soil,

304, 199-208.

Leigh, J. Hodge, A. & Fitter, A. H. (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can transfer substantial amounts of nitrogen to their host plant from organic material. New Phytologist, 181, 199-207.

Macko, S. A. Estep, M. L. F. Engel, M. H. & Hare, P. E. (1986) Kinetic fractionation of stable nitrogen isotopes during amino-acid transamination. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta, 50, 2143-2146. McGonigle, T. P. Miller, M. H. Evans, D. G. Fairchild, G. L. & Swan, J. A.

(1990) A new method which gives an objective-measure of colonization of roots by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist, 115, 495-501.

McKane, R. B. Johnson, L. C. Shaver, G. R. Nadelhoffer, K. J. Rastetter, E. B. Fry, B. Giblin, A. E. Kielland, K. Kwiatkowski, B. L. Laundre, J. A. & Murray, G. (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature, 415, 68-71. McNaughton, S. J. (1979) Grazing as an optimization process - grass ungulate

relationships in the serengeti. American Naturalist, 113, 691-703. McNaughton, S. J. (1983) Compensatory plant-growth as a response to

herbivory. Oikos, 40, 329-336.

McNaughton, S. J. (1984) Grazing lawns - animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. American Naturalist, 124, 863-886.

(38)

McNaughton, S. J. Banyikwa, F. F. & McNaughton, M. M. (1997) Promotion of the cycling of diet-enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science,

278, 1798-1800.

McNaughton, S. J. & Tarrants, J. L. (1983) Grass leaf silicification - natural-selection for an inducible defense against herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-Biological Sciences, 80, 790-791.

Michelsen, A. Graglia, E. Schmidt, I. K. Jonasson, S. Sleep, D. & Quarmby, C. (1999) Differential responses of grass and a dwarf shrub to long-term changes in soil microbial biomass C, N and P following factorial addition of NPK fertilizer, fungicide and labile carbon to a heath. New Phytologist, 143, 523-538.

Michelsen, A. Quarmby, C. Sleep, D. & Jonasson, S. (1998) Vascular plant N-15 natural abundance in heath and forest tundra ecosystems is closely correlated with presence and type of mycorrhizal fungi in roots. Oecologia, 115, 406-418.

Michelsen, A. Schmidt, I. K. Jonasson, S. Quarmby, C. & Sleep, D. (1996) Leaf N-15 abundance of subarctic plants provides field evidence that ericoid, ectomycorrhizal and non- and arbuscular mycorrhizal species access different sources of soil nitrogen. Oecologia, 105, 53-63. Nadelhoffer, K. & Fry, B. (1994) Nitrogen isotope studies in forest ecosystems.

Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science (eds K. Lajtha & R. H. Michener), pp. 22-44. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston.

Nadelhoffer, K. Shaver, G. Fry, B. Giblin, A. Johnson, L. & McKane, R. (1996) N-15 natural abundances and N use by tundra plants. Oecologia, 107, 386-394.

Neff, J. C. Chapin, F. S. & Vitousek, P. M. (2003) Breaks in the cycle: dissolved organic nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 205-211.

Olofsson, J. Kitti, H. Rautiainen, P. Stark, S. & Oksanen, L. (2001) Effects of summer grazing by reindeer on composition of vegetation, productivity and nitrogen cycling. Ecography, 24, 13-24.

Olofsson, J. & Oksanen, L. (2002) Role of litter decomposition for the increased primary production in areas heavily grazed by reindeer: a litterbag experiment. Oikos, 96, 507-515.

Olofsson, J. Stark, S. & Oksanen, L. (2004) Reindeer influence on ecosystem processes in the tundra. Oikos, 105, 386-396.

Oulehlea, F. Rowea, E. C. Myškac, O. Chumanb, T. & Evans, C. D. (2016) Plant functional type affects nitrogen use efficiency in high-Arctic tundra. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 94, 19-28.

R development Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

References

Related documents

Despite the potential shortcomings of this type of analysis, the rationale for employing this approach throughout the thesis is threefold: Firstly, to find some general evidence

Number of clusters inferred by Structurama as a function of the number of individuals sampled from each subpopulation, for four cases: island model with high top-left and low

A1 concentrations in the roots and shoots were not well correlated with growth. Aluminium treatment elevated A1 concentrations of the shoots in the first

In soils of both the boreal late-successional Scots pine forest (Paper I) and the subarctic birch forest- tundra ecotone (Paper IV), total phenolic concentrations are high (Fig

There were several hypotheses about the causes, such as drought, gaseous pollutants (sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and ozone), cation leaching from soil by acid

Mostly similar overall responses to nutrient enrichment as in previous Solbergstrand mesocosm experiments were found in macroalgal and macrofaunal community structure, and this was

In both root and soil samples, alpha diversity of fungal, in particular ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF), and bacterial communities increased after long-term nutrient optimi- sation,

In  addition  to  possessing  a  wide  active‐site  cleft,  which  is  capable  of  accommodating  brush‐like  xyloglucan  chains  (Fig.  9a),  GH16  XETs  and