• No results found

Results from a field study using steel industry slags in a landfill cover construction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Results from a field study using steel industry slags in a landfill cover construction"

Copied!
22
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

A field study using steel industry slags

i l dfill t ti

in a landfill cover construction

S. DIENER, L. ANDREAS, I. HERRMANN, A. LAGERKVIST Luleå University of Technology, Sweden

f S &

Division of Waste Science & Technology

5

th

ICLRS Colorado 2008

2008-09-12

(2)

1. Materials used 2. Cover design

3. Lab results 4. Field results

5. Summary and conclusions

(3)

Materials (slags from Uddeholm Tooling AB) ( g g )

ƒ Electric arc furnace slag (EAF)

- four types whereof EAF 1, 2, 3 are:

- coarse (gravel-like)

no cementitious properties - no cementitious properties EAF 4: similar ladle slag

ƒ Ladle slag

- 67 w.-% < 0.25 mm

- cementitious properties - cementitious properties

- disintegrating (high Ca/Si ratio)

(4)

Composition of the steel slags –

major o ides

Ca/Si Al/Si

EAF1+2 1.7 0.2

EAF4 4.1 0.7

major oxides

CaO SiO2 MgO Al2O3 Fe2O3

Ladle 5.6 1.3

MSWI BA 0.4 0.3 Fly ash 2.9 0.1

C t II 3 0 0 2

40 50

% ]

g Cement II 3.0 0.2

30

ati on [w t- %

10 20

C onc ent ra

0

EAFS 1 EAFS 2 EAFS 4 LS

(5)

Composition of the steel slags –

minor oxides minor oxides

6 7

MnO Cr2O3 TiO2 V2O5 P2O5

4 5

on [w t- % ]

2 3 4

C onc ent ra ti

0 1

C 2

0

EAFS 1 EAFS 2 EAFS 4 LS

(6)

Design of the top cover g p

Compost

≥ 0,2 m

Vegetation layer

Ash Sludge Excavated soil

≥ 1,5 m

Protection layer

EAF slag 1+2 (8-60 mm)

≥ 0,3 m

Drainage layer

Geotextile

50% EAF slag 1+2 (<8 mm) 50% Ladle slag (<20 mm)

≥ 0 7 m

Li

g y

Geotextile

50% Ladle slag (<20 mm)

≥ 0,7 m

Liner

Excavated earth, sweepings

≥ 0,3 m

Foundation layer

(7)

Three different test areas Three different test areas

Test area 1 Test area 2 Test area 3

Compost

Vegetation layer Compost Compost 0.3 m

Ash Sludge

Soil (excavated earth)

Protection layer Ash

Sludge

Soil (excavated earth)

Ash Sludge

Soil (excavated earth)

≥ 1.5 m

EAF slag 1+2 (8-60mm)

Drainage layer EAF slag 1+2 (35-60mm) EAF slag 1+2 (35-60mm) ≥ 0.3 m

Excavated earth, Sweepings 50 % EAF slag 1+2 (<8mm)

50 % Ladle slag (<20mm) Liner

Foundation layer Excavated earth, Sweepings

65 % EAF slag 1+2 (<35mm) 35 % EAF slag 4 + Ladle slag

Excavated earth, Sweepings 50 % EAF slag 1+2+3 (<8mm) 50 % EAF Ladle slag (<20mm)

≥ 0.3 m 0.7 m

Waste y

Waste Waste

(8)

Laboratory investigation of Hydraulic Conductivity

1.E-03

EAF 45%, WC 9%, time 0h EAF 55%, WC9%, time 0h EAF 55% WC 13% ti 0h EAF 35% WC 9% ti 24h

in EAF slag & ladle slag mixtures

1 E 06 1.E-05

1.E-04 EAF 55%, WC 13%, time 0h EAF 35%, WC 9%, time 24h EAF 55%, WC 9%, time 24h EAF 35%, WC 13%, time 24h EAF 55%, WC 13%, time 24h EAF 45%, WC 11%, time 6h estimated limit value

1.E-08 1.E-07 1.E-06

H C (m /s )

1.E-10 1.E-09

H

1.E-12 1.E-11

0 10 20 30 40 50

0 10 20 30 40 50

Time (days)

C2S (dicalcium silicate) -> curing

(9)

Installation of lysimeters and probes y below the liner, area 2

August 2007

(10)

Leachate amounts for test area 1 and 2

Hydraulic conductivity for test area 1: 28 L / m 2 *a (05/2006 - 08/2008) Hydraulic conductivity for test area 2: 147 L /m 2 *a (12/2007 - 08/2008)

80

2006-08-30 2006-12-05 2007-05-08 2007-09-04 2007-10-17 2007-11-30 2008-05-22 2008-08-27 Test area 1

Test area 2 80

2007-11-30 2008-04-14 2008-05-23 2008-08-28

60 60

e [L ]

40

ach at e [ L ]

L each at e 40

20

Le a

20

0

Lys 1 Lys 2 Lys 3 Lys 4 Lys 5 Lys 6 Lys 7 Lys 8 Lys 9 Lys 10

0

Lys 1 Lys 2 Lys 3 Lys 4 Lys 5 Lys 6 Lys 7 Lys 8 Lys 9 Lys 10

(11)

Amounts of leachate below the liner d t i it ti

compared to precipitation

precipitation sum in sampling period leachate mean n =10 area 1 leachate mean n = 10 area 2

350 400

80

precipitation sum in sampling period leachate mean, n =10, area 1 leachate mean, n = 10, area 2

200 250 300

ti on [ m m ]

60

h at e [ m m ]

100 150 200

Pr ec ip it at

20 40

L eac h

0 50

jun-06 aug-06 okt-06 dec-06 feb-07 apr-07 jun-07 aug-07 okt-07 dec-07 feb-08 apr-08 jun-08 aug-08 0

LS area 1: 0.002 0.009 0.012 Time 0.020 0.039 0.041

(12)

Leachate quality - pH Leachate quality pH

14

pH area 1 (average 2006-2008) pH area 2 (average 2008)

12

pH [- ] 10

6 8 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(13)

Leachate quality - El t i d ti it Electric conductivity

5

EC area 1 (average 2006-2008) EC area 2 (average 2008)

4

y [m S /c m ]

2 3

co nduct ivi ty

0

El . 1

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(14)

Leachate quality (test area 1) –

j d i l t

1000000

Average 2006-2007

major and micro elements

10000 100000 1000000

100 1000 10000

g /L ]

1 10

[μ g 100

0,01 0,1

Fe Mg Ca K Si Na S Al Cu Cr Mo Ba B Sr V

(15)

Comparison of leachate from column test ( SIS-CEN/TS 14405:2004 (c 0 at LS 0.1) ) and lysimeters in the field

Columnt test laboratory Field 08-2006 (n=6) Field 12-2006 (n=8) Field 05-2007 (n=2) Field 09-2007 (n=7) Field 10-2007 (n=2) Field 05-2008 (n=8)

14405:2004 (c 0 at LS 0.1) ) and lysimeters in the field

50

/l]

Field 09 2007 (n 7) Field 10 2007 (n 2) Field 05 2008 (n 8)

2003/33/EG limit value for landfill for inert waste (c0 at L/S 0.1):

Chloride: 460 mg/l Sulphate: 1500 mg/l

30 40

S O4 2- [m g /

20 30

Cl - , S

10 0

Chloride Sulphate

(16)

Comparison of leachate from column test ( SIS-CEN/TS 14405 2004 ( 0 t LS 0 1) ) and lysimeters in the field

14405:2004 (c0 at LS 0.1) ) and lysimeters in the field

Columnt test laboratory Field 08-2006 (n=6) Field 12-2006 (n=4)

4

0 2 1 2 10

Field 09-2007 (n=4) Field 10-2007 (n=2) Limit for inert waste (L/S 0.1)

0,6

0,2 1,2 1

0,1 0,04

[m g/ l]

0,01

0,001

Ba Cu Mo Se Sn Zn V

(17)

Comparison of leachate from column test ( SIS-CEN/TS 14405 2004 ( 0 t LS 0 1) ) and lysimeters in the field

14405:2004 (c0 at LS 0.1) ) and lysimeters in the field

Columnt test laboratory Field 08-2006 (n=6) Field 12-2006 (n=4)

1

Field 09-2007 (n=4) Field 10-2007 (n=2) Limit for inert waste (L/S 0.1)

0,06

0,02

0,1 0,12 0,15

0,1

0,1

[m g/ l] 0,01

0,001

0,0001

As Cd Cr Co Ni Pb Sb

(18)

Summary and conclusions

ƒ Potential for using the steel slags as cover construction material.

ƒ Profitable for municipality and steel company.

ƒ Liner mixture in area 1 fulfills legal requirements -> area 3.

ƒ Leachate: alkaline, high Ca and Na and low heavy metal content.

ƒ Column test predicted higher concentrations for Cl, Ba, Cr, Mo, Se, Sn, Zn and lower concentrations for SO 4 , Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, V than observed in the field

ƒ Chemical properties (curing) of advantage for liner application.

ƒ Longer series of field data as well as accelerated lab tests are

necessary to understand long-term behavior.

(19)

E GE E

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The financial support of

• Uddeholm Tooling AB,

• Hagfors municipality,

• Jernkontoret – The Swedish Steel producers` p Association

• Vinnova

is gratefully acknowledged.

(20)

Thank you !

(21)
(22)

Leachate quality - pH Leachate quality pH

14

pH area 1 (average 2006-2008) pH area 2 (average 2008) A

Probes

12

3 5 8

10

A

pH [- ] 10

2 3 7

9 B

Lysimeters

6

8 4 1

6

C 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 Well, 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

enclosure

References

Related documents

Då ett ändamål med studien är att tydliggöra prestationen och verksamheten inom VA-avdelningen i Växjö kommun på ett lättförståeligt sätt för de abonnenter som är okunniga

This thesis has studied SMEs' internationalization in the context of Japan and investigated why Japanese SMEs hesitate to expand internationally as well as managers'

Reward systems are used in all the companies and the fact that the rewards are based on individual performance and that theory suggest that a more entrepreneurial

“Information fusion is an Information Process dealing with the association, correlation, and combination of data and information from single and multiple sensors or sources

(2009) was used for geochemical equilibrium modelling with PHREEQC-2 (Parkhurst and Appelo, 1999), based on the composition of the leachates from fresh and aged ash

Under 80- talet fortsatte problemen för Karlslunds damlag, även om man inte var ensamma om dessa problem, eftersom hela organisationen arbetade under stora svårigheter.. Det främsta

Through a discourse analysis of the drug politics debate in the two leading Swedish Newspapers, Svenska Dagbladet and Dagens Nyheter, I argue that the discourses produced in

being of the descripto-explanatory nature, namely because the purpose of the thesis was two-fold. The first part involved describing what challenges and opportunities an