• No results found

Three-wave coupling coefficients for a magnetized plasma

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Three-wave coupling coefficients for a magnetized plasma"

Copied!
3
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Three-wave coupling coefficients for a magnetized plasma

G. Brodin1and L. Stenflo2

1Department of Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden

2Department of Physics, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden

Abstract

The resonant interaction between three waves in a uniform magnetized plasma is reconsidered. Start- ing from previous kinetic expressions, that contain a general but too little used result, we are able to improve the formulas. This leads to an explicit expression for the three wave coupling coefficient which applies for arbitrary wave propagation in a magnetized Vlasov plasma.

Introduction

The resonant interaction between three waves in a plasma has now been studied during more than half a century. The first review of such processes in an unmagnetized plasma [1] was followed by specific studies for a magnetized plasma. In Ref. [2], a general theory for wave interactions in a cold one-component plasma was then developed. The numerous subsequent improvements of the theory were later reviewed in Refs. [3]

and [4].

However, partly due to the lack of simple explicit expressions for the coupling coefficients, the production of alternative formulas continued. In the present paper we are going to discuss another expression which can be considered as the final result of previous efforts.

Results

Considering the resonant interaction between three waves with frequencies ωj ( j = 1,2,3) and wave vectorskj, we assume that the matching conditions

ω3=ω1+ω2 (1)

and

k3= k1+ k2 (2)

are satisfied. When calculating the coupling coefficients, it turns out that they contain a common factor V.

It is then possible to write the three coupled equations as dW1,2

dt = −2ω1,2ImV (3)

and dW3

dt = 2ω3ImV (4)

where W =ε0E· (1/ω)∂ (ω2εεε)E is the wave energy, εεε is the usual textbook dielectric tensor, and ImV stands for the imaginary part of V where ([3])

V =

s

m dvF0(v)

p1+p2=p3 pj=0,±1,±2,...

I1p1I2p2I3−p3�k1·u1p1

ω1d u2p2·u3p3+k2·u2p2

ω2d u1p1·u3p3+k3·u3p3

ω3d u1p1·u2p2 39th EPS Conference & 16th Int. Congress on Plasma Physics P5.132

(2)

c

ω3d

� k2z

ω2d k1z ω1d

u3p3·

u1p1× u2p2

(5) whereωjd=ωj− kjzvz− pjωc, Ij(= exp(iθj))= (kjx+ ikjy)/kj⊥, and the velocityujpj satisfies

ωjdujpj+ iωc�z× ujpj = iq j

ωjdJpjEj+

��

vzEjz+pjωc

k2j⊥ kj⊥·Ej⊥

Jpj+

ivωc

k2j⊥ (�z× kj)·Ej d dvJpj

kj

(6) where Jpj= Jpj(kj⊥vc) denotes a Bessel function of order pj.

The general theory for resonant three-wave interactions in plasmas then shows that the growth rateγ can be determined from [3]

γ2= ω1ω2|V|2

W1W2 . (7)

Eq. (7) is very useful when rather complex kinetic effects are involved, for example in the interaction between two kinetic Alfvén waves and one ion-sound wave [5].

The development of, for example, the z-components (Ejz) of the wave electric field amplitudes is here governed by the three coupled bilinear equations (e.g. [3])

dE1z

dt =α1E2zE3z (8a)

dE2z

dt =α2E1zE3z (8b)

and dE3z

dt =α3E2zE1z (8c)

where the z-axis is along the external magnetic field (B0�z), the star denotes complex conjugate, αj are the coupling coefficients, d/dt =∂/∂t +vg j· ∇ + νjwherevg jis the group velocity of wave j, andνjaccounts for the linear damping rate. Formulas that determine the coefficients αj for a magnetized Vlasov plasma have been derived previously [3], although in rather inexplicit forms. It is the purpose of the present paper to point out that explicit expressions forαjcan also be deduced from those formulas.

Starting from Eqs. (12)-(14) of Ref. [3] it turns out that we can write αj in the comparatively simple form

α1,2= M1,2

∂D(ω1,2,k1,2)/∂ω1,2C (9a,b)

and

α3= − M3

∂D(ω3,k3)/∂ω3C (9c)

where the general coupling constant C as well as D and Mj are given by Ref. [6].

As a specific example we first mention the limiting case where all the waves are electrostatic. In that limit Eq. (6) reduces to

39th EPS Conference & 16th Int. Congress on Plasma Physics P5.132

(3)

ujpj= − iq jdkz j

1 − ωc22jd

kjc

ωjd�z× kj ωc2 ω2jdkz j�z

Jpj (10)

whereas Mj in (9) is

Mj=kz j2k⊥ j2 c4

ω2j (11)

and the dispersion function D(ωj,kj) is described by the wellknown formula (c.f. Ref. [3])

D(ωj,kj) =

1 +

s,p

q2 0k2j

dv ωjd

� pωc v

∂F0

∂v+ kz j∂F0

∂vz

J2p

k4jc4

ω4j (12)

Thus the expressions forαjare comparatively simple in the electrostatic limit.

Finally, we point out that Eqs. (10)-(12) have recently been generalized [6] so that arbitrary wave prop- agation is now also included. As the corresponding expressions for αj are lengthy, we refer the reader to Ref. [6].

Conclusions

In the present paper we have improved the limiting results for three wave interactions in a cold plasma and pointed out that the explicit expressions for the coupling coefficients for wave interactions in a hot magnetized Vlasov plasma have been found recently. Our coupling coefficient C can thus be used as a starting point to estimate the coupling strength where the interaction between any kind of waves in a plasma has to be considered. It can also be useful in interpretations of stimulated scattering of electromagnetic waves in space plasmas. In the latter case we refer the reader to a short historical account of stimulated electromagnetic emissions in the ionosphere [7]. Our results can also play a key role in the theoretical interpretations of laser-fusion experiments.

References

[1] Sagdeev, R.Z. and Galeev, A.A., Lectures on the non-linear theory of plasma, IC/66/64 (Int. Centre for Theor. Physics, Trieste, Italy 1964).

[2] Stenflo, L., 1973 Planet. Space Sci.21, 391.

[3] Stenflo, L., 1994 Phys. Scr. T50, 15.

[4] Shukla, P.K., 1999 Phys. Scr. T82, 1.

[5] Chen, L. and Zonca, F., 2011 EPL96, 35001.

[6] Brodin, G. and Stenflo L., 2012 Phys. Scr.85, 035504.

[7] Stenflo, L., 2004 Phys. Scr. T107, 262.

39th EPS Conference & 16th Int. Congress on Plasma Physics P5.132

References

Related documents

sativa where we used our in-house derived library (Paper I). The comparative study was performed species by species, i.e. each cold stress set was compared to

(2008) In silico analysis of promoter regions from cold-induced CBFs in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the importance of combinatorial

Referring to the second time marker in Figure 5, which is in the region of electron stagnation on the magneto- sphere side of the X-line and also near the apex of the

40 Så kallad gold- plating, att gå längre än vad EU-lagstiftningen egentligen kräver, förkommer i viss utsträckning enligt underökningen Regelindikator som genomförts

We construct a multiscale scheme based on the heterogeneous multiscale method, which can compute the correct coarse behavior of wave pulses traveling in the medium, at a

A classical implicit midpoint method, known to be a good performer albeit slow is to be put up against two presumably faster methods: A mid point method with explicit extrapolation

They were an E-field probe, two Poynting vector probes for measuring the contribution to the z-component of the Poynting flux given by the and field component, and the and

Active engagement and interest of the private sector (Energy Service Companies, energy communities, housing associations, financing institutions and communities, etc.)