• No results found

An evening with Anat Admati.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "An evening with Anat Admati."

Copied!
61
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

An evening with Anat Admati.

Location: Swedish House of Finance.

Monday, October 15, 2018.

6:00 – 8:00 pm.

(2)

Banking, Governance, and Politics

Swedish House of Finance and Stanford GSB Alumni Chapter Stockholm, October 15, 2018

Anat Admati

Stanford Graduate School of Business

(3)

My daughter came home from school one day and said, ‘daddy, what’s a

financial crisis?’

And without trying to be funny, I said,

‘it’s the type of thing that happens every five, seven, ten years.’

Jamie Dimon, January 2010 (to Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission)

(4)

Italy political crisis hits financial markets

BBC News, May 29, 2018

“The Sequel to the Financial Crisis is Here”

Frank Partnoy, Financial Times, July 31, 2017

“The Next Financial Crisis is Closer than You Think,”

Tim Lee, Washington Post, October 10, 2018

Natural Disaster? Sudden “Shock?” “100-year flood?”

(5)

A Liquidity Problem? “A Classic Bank Run?”

(6)

The financial crisis was avoidable

Widespread failures in financial regulation Breakdown in corporate governance

Explosive and excessive borrowing.

Lack of transparency

Government was ill-prepared and responded inconsistently

Widespread breaches in accountability at all levels.

Delivered January 27, 2011

(7)

Household and Other Debt in Sweden

(8)

Leading the list are Australia, Canada and Sweden.

Sweden offers a case study in financial crises.

Private debt in general and mortgage debt in particular is one of the most reliable indicators of trouble ahead.

Sweden’s indicator of financial vulnerability is higher than ahead of its 1992 crisis.

Riksbank, Sweden’s central bank, has been warning about the risks from the housing market, and worrying in public about the strength of its banks.

To Spot the Next Financial Crisis, Look Who Was Spared by the Last One

James Mackintosh, Wall Street Journal, April 26, 2018

$400,000 - $380,000 = $20,000

(9)

$410,000 - $380,000 = $30,000

2.5% 50%

$420,000 - $380,000 = $40,000

5% 100%

(10)

$440,000 - $380,000 = $60,000

10% 200%

$390,000 - $380,000 = $10,000

-2.5% -50%

(11)

$380,000 - $380,000 = $0

-5% -100%

(12)

What about the lenders?

Total Liabilities and Equity of Barclays 1992-07

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Trillion pounds

Equity Other

Liabilities Total MMF

Funding Customer

Deposits

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)

Historical Equity/Asset Ratios in US and UK

Mid 19th century: 50% equity, unlimited liability

After 1940s, limited liability everywhere in US

“Safety nets” expand Equity ratios decline

Alesandri and Haldane, 2009; US: Berger, A, Herring, R and Szegö, G (1995). UK: Sheppard, D.K (1971), BBA, published accounts and Bank of England calculations.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Percentage (%)

Year United States

United Kingdom

JPMorgan Chase Balance Sheet

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500

2,260

GAAP Book Assets

4,060

IFRS Book Assets

126

Market Equity

Dec. 31, 2011 (in Billions of dollars)

(17)

Banks Remain Extremely Heavily Indebted

Source: Financial Stability Report, Riksbank 2018

The Mantra in Banking: “Equity is Expensive”

To whom?

Why?

Only in banking?

(18)

Anat Admati, Peter DeMarzo, Martin Hellwig and Paul Pfleiderer Fallacies, Irrelevant Facts and

Myths in the Discussion of Capital Regulations: Why Bank Equity is

Not Socially Expensive

August 2010 (revised 2013)

The Leverage Ratchet Effect

Journal of Finance, 2018

https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/excessive-leverage

Zombie (Insolvent) Borrowers: Opaque and Dysfunctional

(19)

Zombie (Insolvent) Borrowers: Opaque and Dysfunctional

Unable to raise equity

“Gamble for resurrection”

Anxious to take cash out Avoid equity

Sell assets, even at fire-sale prices Underinvest in worthy “boring” assets Try to hide insolvency in disclosures Lobby policymakers for supports

Regulatory Measures are Uninformative

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1

May 02 Nov

02 May 03 Nov

03 May 04 Nov

04 May 05 Nov

05 May 06 Nov

06 May 07 Nov

07 May 08 Nov

08 'No crisis' banks

'Crisis' banks 8% threshold

Lehman failure 15 Sep 08

2006 was a great year in banking

Between summer 2007 and end of 2008, the largest 19 US institutions paid out nearly $80B to shareholders.

“Tier 1” capital ratios:

What crisis?

(20)

Regulatory Measures are Uninformative

From: Andrew Haldane, “Capital Discipline,” January 2011 0

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1

May 02

Nov 02

May 03

Nov 03

May 04

Nov 04

May 05

Nov 05

May 06

Nov 06

May 07

Nov 07

May 08

Nov 08 'No crisis' banks

'Crisis' banks 8% threshold

Lehman failure 15 Sep 08

Largest 19 institutions received

≈$160B under TARP.

Fed committed $7.7 trillions in below-market loans to 407 banks.

Tier 2 capital proved useless to absorb losses (except Lehman).

“Tier 1” capital ratios:

What crisis?

Regulatory Measures are Uninformative

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1

May 02 Nov

02 May 03 Nov

03 May 04 Nov

04 May 05 Nov

05 May 06 Nov

06 May 07 Nov

07 May 08 Nov

08 'No crisis' banks

'Crisis' banks 8% threshold

Lehman failure 15 Sep 08

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14

May 02 Nov

02 May 03 Nov

03 May 04 Nov

04 May 05 Nov

05 May 06 Nov

06 May 07 Nov

07 May 08 Nov

08 'No crisis' banks

'Crisis' banks 5% threshold

Lehman failure 15 Sep 08

“Tier 1” capital ratios:

What crisis?

Market-based measures

(21)

(No proper justification)

Basel “Capital Regulation”

Basel II (pre-crisis) Basel III (reformed rules)

“Common equity Tier 1 capital” to risk-weighted assets: 2%

“Tier 2” Loss-absorbing debt

“Common Equity Tier 1 Capital” to risk-weighted assets (RWA): 4.5%

» Plus 2.5%conservation buffer

» Plus 1.5%“Tier 1” to RWA

Leverage Ratio: “Tier 1” to total

» Basel III: 3%

» US: BHC: 5%, insured banks: 6%

“Tier 2”/TLAC (“loss-absorbing debt”).

Tripling almost nothing does not give one very much .

Martin Wolf, “Basel III: The Mouse that Didn’t Roar,”

Financial Times, Sep 13, 2010

(22)

3 % 5 % 6 %

Tough Reforms?

If at least 15% of banks’ total assets were funded by equity, the social benefits would be substantial. And

the social costs would be minimal, if any.

Temporarily restricting bank dividends is an obvious place to start.

Anat R. Admati, Franklin Allen, Richard Brealey, Michael Brennan,

Markus K. Brunnermeier, Arnoud Boot, John H. Cochrane, Peter M. DeMarzo, Eugene F. Fama, Michael Fishman, Charles Goodhart , Martin F. Hellwig,

Hayne Leland, Stewart C. Myers, Paul Pfleiderer, Jean Charles Rochet, Stephen A. Ross, William F. Sharpe, Chester S. Spatt, Anjan Thakor

Financial Times, November 9, 2010

(23)

Don’t Believe Reassurances

___________________________

The system is too complex, opaque, and dangerous;

“systemic (contagion) risk” is significant.

This situation reflect policy failures

Investors can’t understand the nature and quality of the assets and

liabilities... The disclosure obfuscates more than it informs.

Kevin Warsh, Jan. 2013

The unfathomable nature of banks’

accounts make it impossible to know which are sound. Derivatives positions, in particular, are difficult for

outside investors to parse.

Paul Singer, Elliot Management, Jan. 2014

Wells Fargo: Quaint?

(24)

Shadow Banking

Pozsar, Adrian, Ashcraft, and Boesky, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, July 2010: revised February 2012

(25)

Source: Collateral and Financial Plumbing, Manmohan Singh, 2014; “Leverage: A Broader View,” Manmohan Singh and Zohair Alam Nonbank and Bank Nexus

Intermediaries

Ultimate Borrowers (from Banks and Nonbanks) – however only key

dealer banks shown in this “bank/

nonbank”

nexus map/1

Short- term household

and corp.

savings

Long-term household and corp.

savings Money

Market Funds Banks

(Commercial and Dealer) Hedge

Funds

CCPs Money

Money Collateral REPOs/PRIME BROKERAGE

SHORT-TERM (REPO) FUNDING

Money Collateral

Money/Collateral Collateral SECURITIES

LENDING

Money

Money Custodians

(for asset manager, pensions, insurers, official sector) Risk Transfer

(OTC derivatives) Money/Collateral

Ultimate Borrowers

Ultimate Savers

The omission of off-balance sheet items in the standard measures implies a substantial

underestimation of bank leverage Off-balance sheet funding is

higher now than in 2007

“Leverage, a Broader View,” Singh and Alam, IMF, March 2018

(26)

Monstrous global institutions are a symptom of failed markets and rules

___________________________

“Let fail” defies credibility

(27)

Size of 28 Global Banks

Sources: SNL Financial, FDIC, bank annual reports, Bank of England calculations.

2006

$37.8 trillion total

2013

$49.2 trillion total

Average

$1.35 trillion Average

$1.76 trillion

Derivatives for 21 Banks

2006

$409 trillion (notional)

2013

$661 trillion (notional)

Average

$19 trillion

Average

$31 trillion

(28)

Dexia's structure, 2011

Too complex to Resolve?

Other subsidiaries Other subsidiaries

100% Various

DenizBank (DzB) DenizBank (DzB)

99.8% Turkey

Dexia Banque Internationale a Luxembourg (BIL) Dexia Banque Internationale a Luxembourg (BIL)

99.8% Luxembourg

Dexia Bank Belgium (DBB) Dexia Bank Belgium

(DBB)

99.8% Belgium

Dexia Credit Local (DCL) Dexia Credit Local (DCL)

100% France

Dexia Crediop (Crediop) Dexia Crediop

(Crediop) 70% Italy

Dexia Sabedell (Sabadell) Dexia Sabedell

(Sabadell)

60% Spain

DenizEmeklilik (DzE) DenizEmeklilik (DzE)

100% Turkey

DCL Global Funding (GF)DCL Global Funding (GF)

100% Belgium

Dexia FP (FP) Dexia FP (FP) 100% Belgium

DBNL DBNL

100% Netherlands

Dexia Holdings Inc (DHI) Dexia Holdings Inc

(DHI)

100% US

DCL London Branch DCL London Branch

CBX IA1 SARL, Banque, CBX IA1 SARL, Banque,

CBX IA2 SARL, Banque, CBX IA2 SARL, Banque,

DCL NY branch DCL NY branch

DCL Israel DCL Israel DCL Grand Cayman

branch DCL Grand Cayman

branch Dexia Real Estate

Capital Markets (DRECM) Dexia Real Estate

Capital Markets (DRECM)

DKB Polska (DCL Varsovie) DKB Polska (DCL

Varsovie) Dexia Kommunalkredit Bank AG (DCL Vienne) Dexia Kommunalkredit Bank AG (DCL Vienne)

Dexia Management Services Ltd (DMS UK)Dexia Management Services Ltd (DMS UK)

Dexia Credit Local Mexico SA de CV (DCL

Mexico) Dexia Credit Local Mexico SA de CV (DCL

Mexico)

Dexia Delaware LLC (Dexia US Securities) Dexia Delaware LLC

(Dexia US Securities) DCL Canada branch DCL Canada branch Dexia CAD Funding

LLC (Dexia US Securities) Dexia CAD Funding

LLC (Dexia US Securities) Dexia Credit Local Asia

Pacific Pty (Dexia Pacific / China) Dexia Credit Local Asia

Pacific Pty (Dexia Pacific / China)

DCL America DCL Paris

DCL France

CLF Banque CLF Banque Chuo Mitsui SPV Chuo Mitsui SPV

DCL Tokyo DCL Tokyo

DHI

Deniz Bank

DCL France

DCL France - Dublin

Sofaxis

Sofaxis Domiserve SADomiserve SA Domiserve +Domiserve + ExterimmoExterimmo

Dexia Flobail Dexia Flobail Dexia Regions

Bail Dexia Regions

Bail Dexial Bail Dexial Bail CLF ImmobilierCLF Immobilier SISL

SISL

Dexia Locatoin longue duree, (LLD-JV) Dexia Locatoin longue duree, (LLD-JV) 100% Various

International subsidiaries International subsidiaries

DCL East DCL Dublin branch

DCL Dublin branch

Dexia Insurance Belgium (DIB) Dexia Insurance

Belgium (DIB) 99.8% Belgium

Dexia Asset Management (DAM)Dexia Asset Management (DAM)

100% Belgium

RBC Dexia Investor Services (RBCD) RBC Dexia Investor

Services (RBCD)

50% Belgium

Dexia Kommunalbank Deutschland (DKD) Dexia Kommunalbank

Deutschland (DKD)

100% Germany

Dexia Municipal Agency (DMA) Dexia Municipal

Agency (DMA)

100% France

Dexia SA (DSA) Dexia SA (DSA)

100% Belgium

Associated Dexia Technology Services

(ADTS) Associated Dexia Technology Services

(ADTS) 100% Belgium

French Small Subsidiaries French Small Subsidiaries

100% France

Devil in detail

___________________________

“Risk weights” to calibrate requirements are flawed,

manipulable, political, source of systemic risk

(29)

Well Capitalized

Assets

Debt Equity

Greek

Bonds Debt

The Impact of (Zero) Risk Weights

Assets

Debt Equity

Greek

Bonds Debt

Well Capitalized

???????

The Impact of (Zero) Risk Weights

(30)

Assets

Debt Equity

Greek Bonds

Debt

Well Capitalized

???????

Riskless Debt?

The Awful Case of Greece

Bad Regulations Matter

Greek debt restructuring Swiss banks retreat

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Germany

France

Italy Spain

Netherlands Belgium UK

Swiss Other

1stBailout 2stBailout

French banks owned 40% of Greek government debt in 2010.

Regulations (still) assume such

loans are riskless (0 risk weight).

(31)

Leading creditors (in euros)

Who Owned Greek Government Debt, July 2015

Source: Open Europe, BIS, IMF, ECB

Finland Austria Belgium UK US Netherlands ECB IMF Spain Italy France Germany

EU bailout loans Private banks Other

68.2bn 43.8bn

38.4bn 25bn

21.4bn 18.1bn 13.4bn 11.4bn 10.8bn 7.5bn 5.9bn 3.7bn

70 80 90 100 110

t t+1 t+2 t+3 t+4 t+5 t+6 t+7 t+8

Real Output, (Index, pre-crisis peak = 100 1/)

The Economic Crisis In Greece

Greece U.S. Great Depression

(32)

The Economist, May 16, 2015

The Great Distortion: Senseless Debt Subsidies!

Source: Federal Reserve; Bureau of Economic Analysis; The Economist

Financial Firms Non-Financial Firms Mortgages

U.S. tax revenues forfeited as a result of interest deductibility as % of GDP

Sweden's tax loss for mortgage tax relief amounted to around SEK 20 billion in 2016. This sum is expected to increase when interest rates rise

Riksbank Financial Stability Report, 2018

Financial Markets

And Greater Economy

Loans

Equity

Debt Funding

(33)

Financial Markets

And Greater Economy

.

Loans

Equity

Debt Funding

Government Debt Subsidies :

1. Tax shield 2. Subsidized safety net, explicit and implicit

Debt

Equity

Gains are private Losses are social.

Higher Stock Price

Lower Loan Costs ?

Into the

rabbit hole…

(34)

Toxic Mix of Confusion and Politics

http://bankersnewclothes.com/

https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/excessive-leverage /

“More equity might increase the stability of banks. At the same time, however, it would restrict their ability to provide loans to the rest of the economy. This reduces growth

and has negative effects for all.”

Josef Ackermann, Deutsche Bank CEO, November 20, 2009 interview)

(35)

Just about whatever anyone proposes… the

banks will claim that it will restrict credit and harm the economy….

It’s all bullshit

Paul Volcker, January 2010

(From Payoff: Why Wall Street Always Wins, Jeff Connaughton, 2012)

(36)

Because we have substantial self- funding with consumer deposits,

we don’t have a lot of debt

John Stumpf, Wells Fargo Bank CEO, 2013

US banks forced to hold $68 billion in extra capital.

Financial Times, April 8, 2014 Telegraph.

cash

.

(37)

Every dollar of capital is one less dollar working in the economy.

Steve Bartlett, Financial Services Roundtable, Sept 2010

This rule will keep

billions out of the Economy

Tim Pawlenty, Financial Services Roundtable, July 2015

(38)

Banks are forced to hoard money and they can’t take any risks.

Dodd Frank prohibits them from lending.

Gary Cohn, National Economic Council Director, February 3, 2017

From Banking Textbook

Bank capital is costly because, the higher it is, the lower will be the return on equity for a

given return on assets.

Frederic S. Mishkin, 2013, The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets, 3rd Edition, p. 227

(39)

Because we have substantial self- funding with consumer deposits,

we don’t have a lot of debt

John Stumpf, Wells Fargo Bank CEO, 2013

Because we have substantial self- funding with consumer deposits,

we don’t have a lot of debt …

John Stumpf, Wells Fargo Bank CEO, 2013

(40)

US banks forced to hold $68 billion in extra capital.

Financial Times, April 8, 2014 Telegraph.

cash

.

US banks forced to hold $68 billion in extra capital.

Financial Times, April 8, 2014 Telegraph.

cash

.

(41)

This rule will keep

billions out of the Economy

Tim Pawlenty, Financial Services Roundtable, July 2015

This rule will keep

billions out of the Economy

Tim Pawlenty, Financial Services Roundtable, July 2015

(42)

Key Person on Economic Policy (ex Goldman Sachs COO)

Banks are forced to hoard money because they are force to hoard capital and they can’t take any risks.. Dodd Frank prohibits

them from lending.

Gary Cohn, Director of National Economic Council, February 3, 2017

Key Person on Economic Policy (ex Goldman Sachs COO)

Banks are forced to hoard money because they are force to hoard capital and they can’t take any risks.. Dodd Frank prohibits

them from lending.

Gary Cohn, Director of National Economic Council,

February 3, 2017

(43)

From Banking Textbook

Bank capital is costly because, the higher it is, the lower will be the return on equity for a

given return on assets.

Frederic S. Mishkin, 2013, The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets, 3rd Edition, p. 227

(44)

From Banking Textbook

Bank capital is costly because, the higher it is, the lower will be the return on equity for a

given return on assets.

Frederic S. Mishkin, 2013, The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets, 3rd Edition, p. 227

Good or Bad?

Meaningless distinctions Proper questions

Are worthy investments funded?

Is more credit always good?

Wasteful investments in boom

Booms are key predictors of bust/crisis

Debt overhangs exacerbate recession

Why subsidies debt over other funding?

Debt subsidies create unnecessary distortions and risk

Credit Debt

(45)

Banks are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they

frankly own the place.

Senator Richard Durbin (D-Ill), 2009

It is difficult to get a man to understand something

when his salary depends on not understanding it.

Upton Sinclair, author

politician campaign contribution

regulator future job

journalist

access to news

(46)

Excuses, Diversions, and Spin (Flawed Claims)

“The Parade of Bankers New Clothes Continues: 31 Flawed Claims Debunked,” Admati and Hellwig, revised 2015

“ Much has been done It’s very complicated

There will be “unintended consequences”

There are tradeoffs

We must maintain level playing field etc., etc....

»

“Banks are where the money is”

Symbiosis and “bargains” banks-governments

Politics of Banking

Guarantees appear free, invisible social cost, willful blindness

Banks seem sources of funding, not risk

“National champions”

Central banks support governments and private banks

»

»

»

»

(47)

Many Enablers

Supervisors and regulators

Central bankers Politicians The media Researchers/

Economists, including in academia

Financial sector employees (sell side) Institutional investors (buy side) Executives and boards of financial/other firms Auditors and rating agencies

With such friends [as academics], who needs lobbyists?

Risk manager in a major systemic institution, 2016

“It Takes a Village to Maintain a Dangerous Financial System,”

Anat Admati, in Just Financial Markets: Finance in Just Society, Lisa Herzog (ed.), 2017

(48)

Science is what we have learned about how to keep

from fooling ourselves.

Richard Feynman

“Chameleons: The Misuse of Theoretical Models in Finance and Economics,” Paul Pfleiderer, 2014 (forthcoming, Economica, 2018)

Banking is an extreme example of governance and policy failures

___________________________

Political bargains can exacerbate market failures

(49)

Who makes decisions for the institution?

What information and

constraints do (should they)

have?

What are (should be)

their motivations?

Is the outcome “socially efficient?”

Governance Questions (For All Institutions)

Corporations: Key Features

Abstract legal entities

Separate from stakeholders

Derive existence and legal rights from governments

 Property rights

 “Locked in” capital

 Limited liability

 Political speech (?)

 Religious (?)

(50)

The social responsibility of managers is to make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law

and those embodied in ethical custom.

Milton Friedman (1970)

In theory, the goal of the firm should be determined by the firm’s owners….

Shareholders agree they are better off if managers maximize the value of their shares.

Corporate Finance, Berk and DeMarzo, 2016

(51)

Corporations “owned” by shareholders

Standard View of Corporate Governance

Main governance challenge:

Align managers with shareholders

+ Financialized compensation Stock value

Accounting profits Return on Equity,

Who are shareholders? What do they want?

Individuals or institutions?

What are their other investments?

Also employees or customers?

Ultimately citizens and taxpayers?

Shareholders

(52)

Shareholders are taxpayers, may be employees, customers, creditors…

Corporations are involved in shaping rules and enforcement

The opacity of corporations Diffuse corporate responsibility

Incentives within government institutions Regulatory capture, revolving doors, conflicted experts (“thin political markets”)

The Standard Approach to Corporate Governance…

All markets are competitive

Contracts and “rules of society” (laws, ethics) protect all impacted others

+ Employees + Customers + Creditors + The public

Ignores

Assumes

(53)

Proper questions

Which activities are best done by private sector vs public sector?

How do we ensure that governments

+ design and enforce effective rules to enable markets to work properly + prevent abuse of power

False Contrast

Governments “vs” Markets?

Market Government

Faster, Higher, Farther: How One of the World's Largest Automakers Committed a Massive and Stunning Fraud

Jack Ewing, 2017

(54)

“Purdue Pharma Knew Its Opioids Were Widely Abused”

(and the US government failed to intervene more aggressively)

New York Times, May 29, 2018

Danske’s €200bn ‘dirty money’ scandal

Financial Times, October 2, 2018

(55)

“Wells Fargo Leaders Reaped Lavish Pay Even as Account Scandal Unfolded”

New York Times, March 16, 2017

“Wells Fargo Hit with $1 Billion Fines Over Home and Auto Loan Abuses”

NPR, April 20, 2018

(56)

New York Times Business Section, September 16, 2018

Good news: Aviation is Remarkably Safe!

(57)

111

(58)

Focus on Corporations (Finance) and Society

___________________________

Research, teaching, advocacy, GSB Initiative

https://admati.people.stanford.edu/advocacy https://admati.people.stanford.edu

(59)

NO. 235 FEB2016

(60)
(61)

References

Related documents

4 In California, investors of Cascade Acceptance – a private fund - claimed their money back right after Madoff’s scandal. The fund closed with large losses among

The contribution of such a division will be higher for larger firms (given the presence of a fixed cost), for firms with more diverse divisions in terms of productivity (otherwise

We evaluate the impacts of global climate policymaking in an event study for two high-profile events, the election of President Trump and the Paris climate agreement, on the

In my thesis, the methods to forecast the cellular market and McCaw’s annual revenue are introduced in the book ‘case studies in finance: managing for corporate value

Concerning the two collective choices, Table 3 suggests that the differences in choice 2 among student groups parallel the differences in choice 1 and beliefs: economists and

The results in this thesis are consistent with the hypotheses that: 1) the incomplete dissemina- tion of information across investors helps in explaining the occurrence and the

The local instrumental variables, all lagged one period, are own lagged returns, local exchange rate changes in relation to the Nordic currencies, the Euro, and the US dollar,

As we asked companies regarding their principal location, there might be some companies which have their main office in rural areas, but which are also present in the cities..