sökord: centralisering, initiativ (-förmåga, -kraft), pappersmassaindustri, processindustri (2006-01-22)
www.storaenso.com
http://www.storaenso.com/CDAvgn/main/0,,1_-1962-1760-,00.html (2006-01-23)
Intervjupersoner Stora Enso AB
Tid: 10 november 2005 Plats: Stockholm Respondent: Jan Moritz
Titel: Vice President, Human Resources, Sweden Stora Enso Publishing Paper
Tid: 12 december 2005 kl 14.00 Plats: Eilenburg, Tyskland Respondent: dr Ulrich Höke
Titel: Managing Director Sachsen Mill Stora Enso Packaging Boards
Tid: 13 december 2005 kl 15.00 Plats: Baienfurt, Tyskland
Respondent: Udo Lück och Rainer Golle
Titel: Geschäftsführer (Vorsitzender) respektive Managing Director Baienfurt Mill Stora Enso Fine Paper
Tid: 15 december 2005 kl 13.30 Plats: Nymölla
Respondent: Magnus Olsson Titel: Mill Manager
Stora Enso Publication Paper Tid: 19 december 2005 kl 14.00 Plats: Skutskär
Respondent: Johan Lindman Titel: Mill Manager
Stora Enso Packaging Boards Tid: 20 december 2005 kl 14.00 Plats: Fors
Respondent: Håkan Moldén Titel: Mill Manager
Bilaga 1; Agreement of Secrecy
The purpose of this Agreement of Secrecy is to keep the respondents identity confidential, safeguard his/hers integrity and to treat received information as confidential.
The agreement is to be valid between respondents and receivers of information (Karl Friskopp and Carl Kempe) connected to the receiver’s thesis at the University of Uppsala, Department of Business Studies during the fall term of 2005.
Hereby is agreed upon;
• That receivers of written or oral information from respondents shall treat this as confidential. Information that is handled in the thesis is not to be derived to the respondent if so not expressly is admitted by the respondent.
• That sound recording in advance shall be approved by the respondent and that these shall be treated as confidential information according to the above if so not expressly is admitted by the respondent.
• The above only concerns information that is not already publicly known.
• That not by ourselves or third party commercially exploit the received information.
• That to keep presented documents under forms that is satisfactory regarding consideration to reasonable secrecy.
This Agreement of Secrecy is to be valid one year from below date.
This agreement has been draw up in two identical copies where both parties holds one each.
Date:
_________________ __________________ ___________________
Karl Friskopp Carl Kempe
receiver receiver respondent
Bilaga 2; Questions concerning autonomy
These questions are regarded in relationship to the introduction of the Stora Enso Shared Service Concept (SESS).
1. Decisions regarding suppliers without involvement from in higher quarters.
1. Can the subsidiary itself select its own suppliers?
2. If NO, why not? Were lies the decision?
3. Explain the development since 2003 regarding own decision/choice of suppliers?
4. What possibility has the subsidiary to choose its own suppliers today compared to 2003?
5. Do You perceive that Your possibility to choose suppliers has changed since 2003?
• In a positive sense?
• In a negative sense?
6. Has the introduction of SESS had an effect on Your possibility to make decisions?
7. If NO – Why not?
8. If YES – In what way?
2. Decisions regarding organization without involvement from in higher quarters.
1. Can the subsidiary itself change its own organization?
2. If NO, why not? Were lies the decision?
3. Explain the development since 2003 regarding own decision/choice in changing the organization?
4. What possibility has the subsidiary to change the organization today compared to 2003?
5. Do You perceive that Your possibility to change the organization has changed since 2003?
• In a positive sense?
• In a negative sense?
6. Has the introduction of SESS had an effect on Your possibility to make decisions?
7. If NO – Why not?
8. If YES – In what way?
3. Decisions regarding approaching new customers without involvement from in higher quarters.
1. Can the subsidiary choose to approach potentially new customers?
2. If NO, why not? Were lies the decision?
3. Explain the development since 2003 regarding own decision/choice in approaching potentially new customers?
4. What possibility has the subsidiary to approach potentially new customers today compared to 2003?
5. Do You perceive that Your possibility to approach potentially new customers has changed since 2003?
• In a positive sense?
• n a negative sense?
6. Has the introduction of SESS had an effect on Your possibility to make decisions?
7. If NO – Why not?
8. If YES – In what way?
4. Decisions regarding investments in production capacity without involvement from in higher quarters.
1. Can the subsidiary choose invest in new production capacity?
2. If NO, why not? Were lies the decision?
3. Explain the development since 2003 regarding own decision/choice in investment in new production capacity?
4. What possibility has the subsidiary to invest in new production capacity today compared to 2003?
5. Do You perceive that Your possibility to invest in new production capacity has changed since 2003?
• In a positive sense?
• In a negative sense?
6. Has the introduction of SESS had an effect on Your possibility to make decisions?
7. If NO – Why not?
8. If YES – In what way?
5. Decisions regarding new employment and notices without involvement from in higher quarters.
1. Can the subsidiary choose to new employ and notice personnel?
2. If NO, why not? Were lies the decision?
3. Explain the development since 2003 regarding own decision/choice in new employment and notices of personnel?
4. What possibility has the subsidiary to new employment and notices of personnel today compared to 2003?
5. Do You perceive that Your possibility to new employment and notice of personnel has changed since 2003?
• In a positive sense?
• In a negative sense?
6. Has the introduction of SESS had an effect on Your possibility to make decisions?
7. If NO – Why not?
8. If YES – In what way?
6. Decisions regarding investments in R&D without involvement from in higher quarters.
1. Can the subsidiary choose to invest in R&D?
2. If NO, why not? Were lies the decision?
3. Explain the development since 2003 regarding own decision/choice in investments in R&D?
4. What possibility has the subsidiary to new invest in R&D today compared to 2003?
9. Do You perceive that Your possibility to new investments in R&D has changed since 2003?
• In a positive sense?
• In a negative sense?
5. Has the introduction of SESS had an effect on Your possibility to make decisions?
6. If NO – Why not?
7. If YES – In what way?
Bilaga 3; Questions regarding initiative
Changes of your organization during the year of 2000 and 2004?
The answers of the questions need not to bee long, rather they are short and concise.
The question regarding from where the initiative derive from is if it is taken within the mills organization or from divisional HQ or the Group HQ.
1. Suppliers
1.1. How has the number of main suppliers of key components/material changed during the year of 2000 and 2004?
1.2. If a change; Why this change and from where comes the initiative?
2. Organization
2.1. How many larger changes of your organization have been done during the year of 2000 and 2004?
2.2. If a change; Why this change and from where comes the initiative?
3. Customers
3.1. How many new customers relations have You created during the year of 2000 and 2004?
3.2. If a change; Why this change and from where comes the initiative?
4. Investments in Production Capacity
4.1. Investments: How has the number of investments in production capacity changed during the year of 2000 and 2004?
4.2. If a change; Why this change and from where comes the initiative?
Production costs: How has the production costs changed during the year of 2000 and 2004?
4.3. If a change; Why this change and from where comes the initiative?
5. Changes of Posts
5.1. How many changes in posts (with purpose to streamline) have been done during the year of 2000 and 2004?
5.2. If a change; Why this change and from where comes the initiative?
6. R&D
6.1. How many changes of your products have been done during the year of 2000 and 2004?
6.2. If a change; Why this change and from where comes the initiative?