• No results found

Mode matching method 111

V H

Ω Ω

A (z)+ B (z)+

B (z)

-

-A (z) z

z

0

Figure 5.16: The geometry for the mode matching method.

and is called the Green dyadic, which is a vectorial analogue of the Green function for scalar fields.

extract the transverse components of the fields from these sums











EVT(r) = X

ν=TM,TE,TEMn



a+eikz nV z+ ae−ikz nV z

EVT nν(ρ)

HVT(r) = X

ν=TM,TE,TEMn



a+eikz nV z− ae−ikz nV z

HVT nν(ρ)

z < z0











EHT (r) = X

ν=TM,TE,TEMn



b+eikz nHz+ be−ikHz nz



EHT nν(ρ)

HHT(r) = X

ν=TM,TE,TEMn



b+eikHz nz− be−ikHz nz



HHT nν(ρ)

z > z0

Note that transverse mode functions are different in the two waveguides since the trans-verse wavenumber ktn depends on the cross section of the waveguide. We denote the mode functions in the waveguides EVT nν and EHT nν. The same indices are used for the mode functions for the magnetic field and for the longitudinal wavenumbers, i.e., kH,Vz n . At z = z0 the transverse components of the electric and magnetic fields are continuous on ΩV, while the transverse electric field is zero over the remaining part of ΩH, i.e., in the part ρ∈ ΩH but ρ /∈ ΩV. This leads to

EHT(ρ, z0) =

(0, ρ∈ ΩH and ρ /∈ ΩV

EVT(ρ, z0), ρ∈ ΩV

HHT(ρ, z0) = HVT(ρ, z0), ρ∈ ΩV

(5.60)

We now evaluate the normal surface integral over ΩH of the vector product between HHT n0ν0 and the upper equation in (5.60). We utilize the normalization integral (5.37) on

page 97 ZZ

H

zˆ· EHT nν(ρ)× HHT n0ν0(ρ)

dS = 2PHδnn0δνν0

where the mode powers in the lossless waveguide are given by, see (5.38),

PH,V =



















0ωkzH,Vn

2 ktH,Vn 2, ν = TM µ0µωkzH,Vn

2 ktH,Vn 2 , ν = TE 1

0η, ν = TEM

(5.61)

The following relation is obtained

P(B+(z0) + B(z0)) = Qt(A+(z0) + A(z0)) (5.62) where A±(z0) and B±(z0) are column vectors A±(z) = a±e±ikzVnzand B±(z) = b±e±ikzHnz wheret denotes transpose. The matrix Q is given by

Qnν,n0ν0 = 1 2

ZZ

V

ˆ

z· EVT nν(ρ)× HHT n0ν0(ρ) dS

Mode matching method 113

while P is the diagonal matrix

Pnν,n0ν0 = PHδnn0δνν0

Next we evaluate the normal surface integral over ΩV of the vector product of EVT n0ν0 and the lower of the equations in (5.60) and get the relation

Q(B+(z0)− B(z0)) = R(A+(z0)− A(z0)) (5.63) where R is the diagonal matrix

Rnν,n0ν0 = PV δnn0δνν0 The mode power PV is given by (5.61).

The system of equations (5.62) and (5.63) gives the relations between the amplitudes of the incident modes, A+(z0), B(z0), and the amplitudes of the outgoing modes A(z0), B+(z0):

A(z0) B+(z0)

!

=

S11 S12 S21 S22

 A+(z0) B(z0)

!

= S A+(z0) B(z0)

!

where S is the scattering matrix with elements given by











S11= (QP−1Qt+ R)−1(R− QP−1Qt) S12= 2(QP−1Qt+ R)−1Q

S21= 2(QtR∗−1Q+ P )−1Qt

S22= (QtR∗−1Q+ P )−1(QtR∗−1Q− P )

We have so far considered waveguides for which ΩV <ΩH. The case when ΩV >ΩH leads to similar expressions for the relations between the amplitudes

A(z0) B+(z0)

!

= Se11 Se12 Se21 Se22

! A+(z0) B(z0)

!

where the scattering matrix is













Se11= (R + eQtP∗−1Qe)−1( eQtP∗−1Qe− R) Se12= 2(R + eQtP∗−1Qe)−1Qet

Se21= 2( eQR−1Qet+ P)−1Qe

Se22= ( eQR−1Qet+ P)−1(P− eQR−1Qet) and where

Qenν,n0ν0 = 1 2

ZZ

H

ˆ

z· EHT nν(ρ)× HVT n0ν0(ρ) dS

Example 5.14

Consider a transition between the two planar waveguides depicted in figure 5.17. An incident TEM wave propagates in the positive z-direction and gives rise to a reflected and transmittet TEM-wave at the transition z = 0. The frequency is low enough such

a = 7.5 mm b = 15 mm 0

z

Figure 5.17: Transition between two planar waveguides.

(T-line theory) T

) T

R R

(T-line theory)

Frekvens/GHz (mode matching)

(mode matching) 1.2

0.8

0

0 5 10 15

0.2 0.4 0.6 1 1.4

Figure 5.18: Reflection and transmission coefficients for the TEM-mode.

that no other modes than the TEM-mode can propagate. For low enough frequencies the transition can be treated by transmission line theory. This gives the reflection coefficient Γ = (Z2 − Z1)/(Z2 + Z1) and the transmission coefficient T = 2Z2/(Z2 + Z1). For a planar waveguide the characteristic impedance is given by Z = dη/w, where d is the distance between the plates and w is the width of the two conductors. The reflection and transmission coefficients are then given by

R= b− a b+ a T = 2b

b+ a

(5.64)

These coefficients can be compared with the corresponding coefficients obtained from the mode matching method. In this case B(z0) = 0. The scattering matrix element S11

acts as a reflection matrix and the matrix element S21

rZ2

Z1 as a transmission matrix, where

rZ2 Z1 =

rb

a is the quotient of the characteristic impedances of the transmission lines at port 1 and 2, c.f., (3.39). In figure 5.18 the reflection coefficient for the TEM wave calculated from the mode matching method is compared with the corresponding coefficients calculated from transmission line theory. In this case a = 7.5 mm and b = 15 mm. We see that transmission line theory is only accurate up to approximately 1 GHz.

Mode matching method 115 5 GHz

15 GHz

25 GHz

Figure 5.19: The magnetic field distribution for the junction in figure 5.17 generated by COMSOL at 5, 15, and 25 GHz. The incident TEM-wave enters from the left. The total length of the waveguide is 32 cm. At 5 GHz only the TEM wave propagates. At 15 GHz only the TEM wave propagates in the left waveguide and both the TEM and TM1 modes propagate in the right part. At 25 GHz TEM and TM1 propagate in the left part and TEM, TM1, TM2 propagate in the right part.

This despite that the cut-off frequency for the next propagating modes TE1 and TM1 is 10 GHz.

Example 5.15

To analyze the transition in figure 5.17 with COMSOL we choose 2D>Electromagnetic waves>Frequency domain. We draw the geometry and define the boundary conditions.

All of the surfaces are perfect conductors except the vertical surface to the left, which is the input port, and the vertical surface to the right, which is the output port. In boundary conditions we specify the vertical surface to the left to be the input port and the vertical surface to the right to be the output port. Now we can specify the frequency in Study>Frequency domain and let COMSOL calculate the field in the waveguide.

Figure 5.19 shows the magnetic field at 5 GHz, 15 GHz and 25 GHz. The cut-off frequencies for the TM1 mode is 10 GHz in the right part of the waveguide and 20 GHz in the left part. This is in accordance with the three figures.

It seems that we can handle junctions with FEM. FEM is more flexible than the mode matching technique since it does not rely on analytical expressions for the waveguide modes. We might then get the impression that the mode matching method is redundant, but this is not all true. There are a number of cases where the mode-matching technique is superior to FEM. If there are long distances between junctions then the mode matching technique is very efficient. The mode matching technique decomposes the waves in their mode sums and that is not as straightforward with FEM.

5.11.1 Cascading

A waveguide with several discontinuities can be treated by a cascading method. Assume the geometry depicted in figure 5.20. The relation between A±(z0) and B±(z0) can be

z

z0 z1

A+(z)

A(z)

B+(z)

B(z)

C+(z)

C(z)

Figure 5.20: Three cascaded waveguides.

written, see equations (5.62) and (5.63)

P0 P0

Q0 −Q0

 B+(z0) B(z0)



=

Qt0 Qt0 R0 −R0

 A+(z0) A(z0)



The relation between B±(z1) and C±(z1) is given by

P1 P1 Q1 −Q1

 C+(z1) C(z1)



=

Qt1 Qt1 R1 −R1

 B+(z1) B(z1)



The relation between B±(z1) and B±(z0) is

B+(z1) B(z1)



=

E+(z1− z0) 0 0 E(z1− z0)

 B+(z0) B(z0)



where Enν,n± 0ν0(z) = δnn0δνν0exp(±ikz nz). By matrix multiplication we obtain the relations between A±(z0) and C±(z1). This is straightforward to generalize to a waveguide with an arbitrary number of transitions.

A continuous (tapered) transition from one waveguide to another can be treated by cascading a large number of waveguides with constant cross sections.

5.11.2 Waveguides with bends

With FEM we can analyze waveguides that are not straight. In the example in figure 5.21 a TE10mode enters the left port and exits at the upper port. It is straightforward to draw the geometry in COMSOL. All of the surfaces are perfect conductors except the ports. At the ports we specify that the mode is the first TE-mode, i.e., the TE10mode. One can let COMSOL calculate the reflection and transmission coefficient as a function of frequency.

5.12 Transmission lines in inhomogeneous media