• No results found

Analysis of water samples saved during campaign 1922-1923 Mitchell factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples saved during campaign 1922-1923 Mitchell factory"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

0

lilTQBEH, FAQ'20RY

Analysis of Water Samples laved During Campaign 1922~1923

Copies to;

General Supt.

General Chemie

Asst. Genl. Supt.

Asst Chief

Engineer

Superintendent

Laboratory

(2)

Mr.

S.

J.

Osborn, General Chemist,

Denver, Oolo.

Dear

Sir;-You will please find herewith the

report of a

n

alysis o'* samples of water saved during

the past ca,iaign. You will notice that there is no

analysis reported for battery supply water, since these

samples for some unaacountable reason

became

contaminated

to such an extent that they were not fit to

me

a.nalized.

Very

truly yours,

(3)

King Of

Water

llain Water Supply ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

l

Water from Boiler Feed Tank••••••••••••••••••••2

Water from

Steam

Ooils

of

White

Pa.n ••••••••••••

3

Wat

.

er in Boilers ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , .4

Rot Press Wash Water•••••••••••••••••••••••••••5

First Evaporatoi- Oondenser Leg Pipe Seal ... 6

Seoond Evaporator Condenser Leg Pipe Seal •• , •••

?

Water from Oondenser Leg Pipes ot All Ps.ns ...

e

Water from Pan Seal Tank•••••••••••••••••••••••9

Water from Seal of Portland Filters Oondenser,10

(4)

- ~

Jli

~

t~

o

=

h

=

=

ll

~

_ _

F

actory

- - - ~

Ka.r=~·

~

9,_.,

_ _ _ _

l92_3_

Kind of Water:

llain

Water

Supply

Description of Sample:

Average Sample

for

The Campaign

Source of Water:

Water

is ta.ken from a drainage di teh whioh carriea aeep water from

awamp land to the river. The factory supply illtake ia located about one

mile weat

ot

the taotoey.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium

Na

Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Part, Per 100,000

7.40

.06

4e38

2.02

5.13

3.90

4.57

12.oa

39.54

.12

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04 Sodium Carbonate Na2C03 Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaS04 Calcium Carbonate CaC03 Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

(l}

Part, Per 100,000

7.40

6.43

6080

,85

7,00

10.94,

.12

39.54

.72

40.26

(5)

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

-

--=

Mi

=--'

t

=

c

=

h=•

=

l

=

l

_ _ _

F

actory

_ _ _ _

____...

ar..,..,_~o

~

9

~

,

,__

_ _ _ _

l92_3__

Kind of Water:

Water from Boiler Feed

Tank

Description of Sample:

Average Sample for the Campaign

Source of Water:

Dripa from coil&

Ot

Wb.1 te Pan, from

Cs.l&ndri&II Of

the

Raw

Pana, from the

steam chambers

ot

2n,da

3rd. 4th, and

5th,

ettecta,

and from steam trap•

OD

the

ma.in ateam line• and from the

radiator•

of the heating

ayatemo

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium

Na

Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile {by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parts Per I 00,000

.46

.10

.29

.10

.68

1.05

.49

.48

3o65

2,22

5.87

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

(2)

Part, Per 100,000

.46

1.73

.14

.62

.21

51187

(6)

Mi

toh

=

e

=

ll

= - - -

_

Factory

- - - - -

=Ua=

r

~

·

-

9-,

~ - -

192..L_

Kind of Water:

Water

from

Steam Ooila of

White

Pan.

Description of Sample:

Average Sample :for the Campaign, taken from the Steam Trap before

Boiler

Feed

Tank.

Source of Water:

From

Steam

Coils of the

White Pan.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe C.lcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid 504 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parts Per I 00,000

'11120

.10

.19

.13

062

.71

.21

079

5.52

(3)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04 Sodium C.rbonate Na2C03 Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 Magnesium C.rbonate MgC03 Calcium Chloride C.Cl2 Calcium Sulphate C.504 C.lcium C.rbonate CaC03 Ferrous C.rbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS Part, Per 100,000

2.20

1.11

.;n

.14

4.95

.57

5.52

(7)

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

Mitohell

_

Factory

- - - -

~Ma

... r~ •

._..94,

1---

192-3--Kind of Waler:

Water in Boiler•

Description of Sample:

Average Se.111,Ple

tor the

Campaign

Source of Water:

Water actually in the Boilers

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium

Na

Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Oopper

Ou

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS I

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemi,t Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

6.84

.67

le92

.2e

94.81

5.32

18.09

112.17

.64

240.74

150068

391.32

(4)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Parts Per 100,000 Silica Si02

6.84

Sodium Chloride NaCl

a.11

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

26.75

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

190.58

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

.97

Calcium Chloride CaClz

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

4.80

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

1.39

Oopper

Ou.

.u

240.74

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

150.58

TOT AL SOLIDS

(8)

-

--=

m

=--"

t

=

oh

=

e

=

l

=

l

=--

__

F

actory

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

Mar

~~

·

'---'---

9~,

_ _ _

192~

Kind of Water:

Hot Presa Waah

Description of Sample:

Average Sample for the Campaign

Source of Water:

Overflow

trom

Boi:i,er Feed

Tanlt,

dripa trom

T

hick

Juice Heater,

Thin Juice

Heater,

1st, 2nd,

&

3rd,

Carb.

Heatera,

Baw Juice Huter•,

lat.

Effece Steam Ohember, lat,

'h

2nd,&: 3rd, O&rb. and Blow,..up Steall Ooill, Upper lranulator Steam Drum and Steam Coils,

Pan

Storage Tank

Steam Ooila

and Battery O&lorisa.torao

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium

Na

Chlorine

-

Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt.

General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory ,I Part, Per 100,000

1.27

.06

1.18

.53

.ss

.71

.37

3.01

7.68

2.38

10.06

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

(5)

Parts Per I 00,000

1.27

1.17

.28

.23

lo66

2.95

.12

7.68

21~6

10.06

(9)

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

Uitahell

Factory

Kind ol Water:

First

Evaporator

Condenser

Leg

Pipe

Seal

- - -

-~m=r~o~9-,

~ - - - -

l92_3__

(Hot

Leg)

Description of Sample:

Average Sa.mrle tor the Oampaig.n.

Source of Water:

Water

from

Ma.in

Water Supply

after

eondsnaing

V~

.

pors in the 1st Oondenser

et

5th

Ef'feot.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium Na Chlorine CI Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

5.90

.22

2.32

1.90

4.28

2.84

a.12

6.13

32.31

1.25

33.56

(6)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS PartJ Per 100,000 Silica Si02

5.90

Sodium Chloride NaCl

4.68

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

7.54

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

4.54

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

3.40

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

s.19

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

..

46

32.31

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

1.25

(10)

_

_lfi._tchJ.,..el

... l..._

_ _

~

_

Factory

Kind of Water:

Seoond

Evaporator Condenser

Leg

Pipe

Seal

- - - -

-

-*-rJ...Q_o~9~,-

-

-

-

-192____3__

{Cold Leg)

Description of Sample:

Average

Sample

for the Campaign.

Source of Water:

Water

from Ma.in

Water

Supply

after

aondensing

Vapors

i

n

the 2nd

Condenser of 5th

Effect.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium

Na

Chlorine Cl· Sulphuric Acid 504 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

4.84

.24

1.94

1.42

s.10

3.19

8.56

5/26

30.55

097

31052

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

. Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference}

TOT AL SOLIDS

(7)

Part, Per 100,000

4.84

5.26

9.36

2.eo

2o95

4

.,

e4

.50

30.55

,97

31

..

52

(11)

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

___

Mitohell

_

Factory

- - - - -

~l'.a.-

·

-r~c-h~,

-

9..__..,

_ _ _

192___3__

Kind of Water:

Description of Sample:

Water

from Condenser Leg Pipes of all

::ana

Average

sample for the Onrr.l)&ign

Source of Water:

Water from Ma.in

Water

Supply after condensing Vapors in the

Condensers of all Pane.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile {by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemiat Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

6.18

.11

2.57

2.04

6,47

3.19

9.05

9,09

38070

1.74

40.44

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS

(8)

Paru Per 100,000

6.18

5.26

13.38

.16

7.07

6e42

.23

38.70

1.74

40.44

(12)

lt!itchell

_

Factory

Maroh

_

~

_ _ _

J92

_

3

_

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Water

from

Pa.11

S

aal Tank

Average Sample f

o

r the Campaign

Source of Water:

W

ater from

all

Pan

Condenser Leg Pipes with aome water from

1s

t.

&

2nd.

Co

nden

sers

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

'

Parts Per 100,000

5.24

.39

2.89

1.45

4.87

3.19

0.11

6.93

33.07

.85

33.92

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04 Sodium Carbonate Na2C03 Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaS04 Calcium Carbonate CaC03 Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

(9)

Part, Per 100,000

5.,24

s.20

8.65

2.e4

3o05

7.22

.81

33007

.86

33.92

(13)

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

M.1

.

~

t

~

oh

_

e

~

l

_

l

~

_ _ _

F

actory

- - -

--=1b=

r

"-

o=-.c.h

-=---c

9__..,

_ _ _ _ _

l 92

_

3

_

Kind of Water:

Water

from Leg Pipe Seal of

Portland

Filter• Condenser

Description of Sample:

Average

Sample

for

the

Campaign.

These samples

Of

water had a

considerable

quantity of organic growth at

the tim

e

of

analysil•

Source of Water:

Water

from Main

Water

Supply

afte

r

oondenling the

Vapors

from

the

Portland Filters.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Part, Per I 00,000

6.06

e

29

3.76

1.43

6.81

3ol9

8.56

9.00

38.10

13042

61

.

52

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaClz

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS

(10)

Part, Per 100,000

6.06

5,26

11.55

9.39

060

38.10

13.,42

51.52

References

Related documents

Detta kan vara ett sätt för dem att skapa förtroende hos mottagaren eftersom de på så vis inte upplevs som säljare som försöker tvinga på mottagaren något vilket kan bidra

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users

Since the boundary quantum field theory in this case is defined over a p-adic number field either Q p or its unramified extension Q pn , further development of

In previous works [9,10], the following correspondence between driven two-dimensional conformal field theories and dynamical systems has been established implicitly: Evolution of

Work of Ferwerda, Schedl, and Tkalcic [12, 10] on Instagram pictures, showed that the way filters are applied to create a certain distinctive- ness that can be used to

The middle adulthood group show a negative correlation with Heavy Metal (r =-.339) music, which indicates that their preference to listen to Heavy Metal goes down when reaching the