• No results found

Accounting of sugar introduced from molasses silos

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Accounting of sugar introduced from molasses silos"

Copied!
4
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

~925

Molasses

Residues

(2)

ACCOillrT!NG OF SUGAR IN'TRODUCED FRO]! MOLASSES SILOS

(This section, which formerly was

a

part of the directions for the

Ex-traction Statement, has been reissued in separate form for the sake of greater convenience. )

(a)

General

\Vhon residues from molasses silos a.re taken into the factory for the recovery of crystallized sugar, take particular care that the accounting is correctly handlod in the figures which appea,r on the reports and that the necessary data and samples are obtained.

The principle of tho method is first, thn.t all sugar introduced must be charged somewhere against the :footory, and secondly, that the factory is allowed to receive the benefit on its extraction of any granulated which it can recover, without being charged with nny of this sugar as introduced in the form of granulated. Since this method does not affect the unknown loss, it may create an incentive to improve tho extraction by sacking (as granulated) sugar which would otherwise remain in. tho forr:i of molasses.

(h) Data Required

(1) The Amount of Residues From Silos Introduced. If the residues are pU!!JP0d, obtain the a.mount from.tho mixor measure~ents and tho actual de~or-mination of the "lbs. por cu. ft.11 If they are handled in wheelbarrows, r:l!lko

arrangements for .direct weighing of ea.ch wheelbarrow. If this is ir.lpossible estimate the weight .bY countinz the nur.iber of loads and detcrr.iining the average weight per load~ In the latter oaso, also chock the weight by mixer ooa.surements

if possible.

(2) ''Polarization of Rosidues''• an average sar.iple .of the residues.

Obtain by direct polarization of

(3} ''Pounds of Raw Sugar Producod Fron Residues". the raw sugar as it is produced.

Actually weigh·

(4 J "Polarization of ,Rs.w Sugar Prod:uced Fron Residues''. Obtain by direct polarization of an average sar.1ple of tho raw suge.r.

(5 J "Apparent Purity of Raw Sugar Produced From Residues".!. Obtain by determining the apparent purity of an average sample of raw sugar.

(6} "Pounds of Molasses Produced Fror.i Residues''· Actually weigh all nolasses produced.

---

The Groat Western Sugar Cor.ipany,

Chenical Departncnt.

Molasses Residues (l) August 1, 1925.

(3)

(7) ''Polariza:ti0n of Hoh:.ssos Pro<iucoJL!rom Residues't. direct polarization of an average sar.1ple of tho molasses.

Obtain by

(8} QQE:!12let0 Ap.a.lyses, Save averaee sar:iples of the massecui te (residues introduced), raw sugar, and molasses, and make tho .usual analyses. It is also pa!'ticularly ir.iportant ~hat the raw sugar bo exrunined for sulphates at the

t.ime when it is spun, as such sugar is likely to be high in sulphates and the factory may have to exercise care in its introduction.

(c} Calcul~tions.

(1) "Pounds of Sugar in Residues". Multiply the "Pounds of residues fror.1 silos introduced" by tho "Polarization of residues" and divide by 100.

If the raw sugar is weighed, on additional check on the total amount of sugar introduced, or 1tPounds of sugar in residues", can be obtained by adding together the pounds of sugar in the raw sugar and in the molasses produced from the r.esidues. The amount of sugar ostinated in this manner ma.y noIT.Dally be a little lower than thn.t determined directlv, on account of ~olassos which rem~ins

in pipe linos9 etc. ·

(2} "Pounds of sugar in the ra.w sug?,rtl, Multiply the ."Pounds of raw sugar produced from residues" by t.he "?olarhation' of raw sugar produced froo residues1

t and divido by 100 to obtain this figure.

(3) "Pounds of Grar-uln.tod Sug~P-.rnr.i the Raw Sugar". Mi.iltiply the ''Pounds of sugar in the raw sugar" p.y tho gr·a.I1ula.tod factor corresponding to the ''Apparent purity of the raw sugar prci<luced f'ron residues'' and divide by 100. Use Table 22 for obtaininG the granulated factor.

(4) "Pounds of sugnr in :Molasses Produced FrO!!l R':l.w Sugar", Subtract the "Pounds of granulated sugar r'rom. raw sugar" frro tho "Pounds of sugar in the raw sugar." .•

(5) "Tota~ds of Sugar in Molasses Produced Fl7or.1 Residues". Multiply the "Pounds of i}!olasses produced from residues" by tho "PoJ.arization of tho r.iolasses produced from residues", divide by, 100 and to this add the "Pounds o:f

Sugar in r.iola.sses produced f:ror:i raw sugn,r".

Note: If tho rav, sugar is not weighed calculate the "Pounds of Sugar in the raw f?Ugar", the "Pounds of grnnulated sugar fror:1 the raw suga.ri' the "Pounds of sugar in ~classes produced fror.1 rc,w sugar", and the "Total pounds of sugar in molasses produced· fron residues'' indircc t ly according to the follovving example:

Lbs. sugar in residues introduced " '' " :r.:ioln.sses weighed out

11

' ' " raw sugar (by difference }

200,000 150,000 50,000

If the apparent purity of the raw sugar is 85.8, the "Pounds of granulated sugnr fron the raw sugar" is 50y000 :x: .7517"' 37,585. l?.0,000 - 37,585 or 12,415 is the "Pounds of sugar in :r.:iole..sses produced from raw sugar", and 150,000

+ 12,415, or 162,415, is the "Total pounds of sugar in :r:iolasses produced fror:i residues".

---·

The Great Western SugarCor.ipany,

·

---Chenical Departnent.

Molasses Residues (2} August 1, 1925.

(4)

Ar1y raw sugar produced froi:'l tho intcodaction of silo residues which

n,,-,.s not been nelted at the tine of tc:.J.c:1.rg stock should be carried on tho Inventory Sl:0et as raw sugar in procGS3. Tho Inventory Sheet is not othorwi.so affected.

(e) Data re;:i'.lirod. and manner of roporting sane on the first nperiod'' and

all subsequent "To-Date'r .~truction Statenents.

(1) "Sugar in molasses produced fron residues introduced from

mol-a.ssos silos". This ite!:l corresponds to 11(5) Total pounds of sugar in molasses

pro-d"J.l}8d fro!cl rosidues" under "(c) Calculations", aud is equal to 162,415 lbs. in the

exa.':lplc. Use the vacant line under 11:.rolassos Balance" for reporting this item,

:;,nu do not include any of such sugar under "Sugar in molasses produced fro.':'! this

;year's beets. 11

(2) "Sugar in rosiduos ostir.ia.ted introduced fror:i r.iolasses silos •11

'l1his iteo corresponds to "{l) Pounds of sugar in residues'' under ''(c) C~lculations",

aLd equals 200,000 lbs. in the e:xar.:iple given. Uso the vacant line under "Molasses

Balance", "Deduct" for reporting this iten.

(3) " _______ lbs, grD.nulated. equivalent obtained from residues

introduced fror::-, rnolussos silos" 11 See 11 (3

i

Founus of granulated sugar from the raw

sugar" under "(c) Co.lculations'' for th0 !:iethod. of obtaining this iter.1, which is

equal to 12,415 lbs. in the exa-:iple. Re~ort this iton in a footnote on the

Ex-craction Statenent.

(f) I~ethods of h:"IDdling "~.qolasses produced fror.1 residues introduced

from r.iolasses silos. 11

(1) In the L~ooratory record book. Include no nolasses produced

frm:i silo residues (this inc1'.1des not only nolasses actually weighed out of the

house but also r:iola..sses prod.uced fron the raw sugar; :in molasses produced fron this

ye,9.r's beets. It will, therefore, be necessary to deduct fron the tonnage of

nolasses weighed out fron beots of the current year the equivalent in tons of

nol-1:i.sses of the "Sugar in no lasses proc.ucod fron the ra.w sugar."

For exanple, assur·,o th/3 first da.y' s product ion of r.iolasses fror:i beets

to be 40 tons at 54.0 polarization. ~hen 12,415 (seo exar.iple above) divided by

.54 = 22,991 pounds or 1L5 tons oquivalent of 1:1olasses. Accordingly report the

a>:1ount of this day's molasses pro,~:uct ion as 28 .5 tons.

(2) On Renelt Pan Sheet aI1d Sunerinte11dent 's Dn.ily Report. Report no

nolasses produced until nolasses fron beets of the current ye:ir passes through the

:::iolassos scales.

(3) On t:tio Molas:se::._St~tenent. On this stator.ient it is suggested that

th0 best ·way to hand.le tho working of such residuos is to charge under "Deductions",

on one of the blank lines -sui ts:oly designated, tho amount of residues taken into tho

house,

and,

when the nolasses fro!:1 these residues is returned to the s.ilo, to credit

1,::ider "Additions", on one of the blan."l{ lines, the anount of ~olasses w0ighed back.

'..2-hc diff"erence between the two i ter:is will then represent the sugar rot:ainod in the

house in the ra:w sugar, as 'Noll as take care of any discrepancies in the figures •

The Great Western Sugar Cor.ipany,

C~enical Denartnont. '

..

.

llolasses Residues (3)

References

Related documents

the mean scores for all respondents, the neutral attitude reflects that the respondents will not intend to perform social accounting, which is consistent with

A multiple sensor fusion approach to find esti- mates of the tool position by combining a 3- axis accelerometer and the measurements from the motor angles of a commercial

More specifically we compare the equivalent flop count given by (26) to the actual computational time measured in MATLAB. The result is given in Fig. 6, where it is clear that

This research aims to analyse and identify the role of tools used in the restaurant industry to improve resource management efficiency and performance, to develop and test a

Fördelning över utbildningsskede för (1) olyckor där övningsbilen blivit påkörd baki- från vid oväntad inbromsning eller vid mo- torstopp, (2) övriga olyckor då

Figure 4.20: Experimental measurements of the Timetable Generation algorithm, illustrating a com- parison between travelling time and average waiting of passengers, while modifying

Förskollärarna beskriver precis som Kadesjö (2008) att barn med koncentrationssvårigheter är i stort behov av att vila, då tröttheten blir påtaglig eftersom

En möjlig förklaring till detta är att inte tillräckligt många (27%) av deltagarna tidigare hade varit med om en liknande situation som den som beskrevs i berättelsen, vilket