• No results found

Analysis of water samples for the campaign of 1920-1921 Windsor factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples for the campaign of 1920-1921 Windsor factory"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMP"".uES

FOR THE CAMPAIGN OF

1920 - 1921

THE GREAT WESTEPJT SUGAR COMPANY

WINDSOR FACTORY

Copies to:

General Chemist

-Chief

Engineer

Ass't Chief Engineer

Manager

SU:perintenden

t

Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

(2)

SAMPLE

INDEX

OF

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES

PAGE

City

Water••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••l

Ditch Water•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••2

Leg Pipe Water

from

Condensor

of

Pan

"A" {White) •••••••••••••••••••• 3

Leg Pipe Water

from

Condensor

of

Pan

"B" (Brown) •••••••••••••••••••• 4

Leg Pipe Water

from Condensor of Pan "C" (Brown) ••••••••••••••••••••

5

Leg Pipe Water

from First Condensor of

Evaporaters

•••••••••••••••••• 6

Leg Pipe Water

from Second Condensor of Evaporaters ••••••••••••••••• 7

Water

from Boiler

Feed Tank

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •

-

• ••••••• 8

Water

used

for Washing Hot Presses

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

9

Battery SUpply Pure ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••• 10

(3)

WA

I~~ Al"IAL

r;::,

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

WINDSOR

_

.Factory

City Water

--- _

C.AMPilGlL,

___ __

,19a~ I

92L

~

Kind of Water:

Description of Sample:

Average ~or Campaign

Source of Water:

Greeley City rater Main

ANALYSIS Paris Pe< 100.000 Silica Si08

1.36

Iron Fe

.o3

Cailcium Ca

1.98

Magnetium Mg

.72

Sodium Na

.87

Chlorine Cl

.36

Sulphuric Acid

so.

2.76

Carbonic Acid C03

3.88

11.96

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

.94

12.90

COPIES TO HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Parts Per 100.000 Silica Si02

1.36

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.59

Sodium Sulphate Na8S04

1.98

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

1.78

Magnesium c,...bonate M«C03

1.25

Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

4.94

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

.06

11.96

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

.94

TOT AL SOLIDS

12.90

Genttal Supt. General Chemist Aaot. Genl. Supt. Aat. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemie!

Laboratory

Page 1

~a'Jlit1£~ ,.

(4)

WA

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

WINDSOR

Factory

__

CA.MeAIGN.

____

li20-

I 92L.__,

Kind of Water:

"Ditch

Water

DescriptiGn of Sample:

Average for Campaign

Source of Water:

4lpen

J)i

to.h from

Kern

Lake,

¼

mile north-west of Factory.

ANALYSIS Silica Si01 lr01, Fe Cailcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist A96t. Genl. Supt. Ast. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

Paris Per I00,000

.78

1.41

15.50

e.02

10.00

2.32

70.87

11.34

120.24

24.64

144~88

Page 2

HYPOTHETICAL COM131NATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na0C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium c,...bonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

Parts Per I_OO_lOOO

.78

3o82

26.25

39.70

30.38

16.38

2.93

120.24

24.64

144.88

(5)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUCAR COMPANY

_ _ _

-:.,W-=I

!f

D S O

R

Factory

_

QAUPAIJJ.N

_____

1920-

192L

~

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Leg Pipe Water :from condensor o~ Pan "A" (White).

Average :for Campaign

Source of Water:

Main Water Supply Tank (1>1 tch Water), and condensation :from Pan "A"

(White).

ANALYSIS Silica SiO• lroa Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic aad Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist

AIISI. Genl. Supt. Aat. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Porta p.., 100,000

1.34

.15

14.31

a.19

10.36

2.17

71.75

8.65

116.92

25.52

142.44

Page 3

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Parta Pu 100,000 Silica Si02

1.34

Sodium Chloride NaCl

3.58

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

27.64

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

40.54

Magnesium C.,:bonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

29.35

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

14.16

F erroua Carbonate FeC03

.31

116.92

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

25.52

TOT AL SOLIDS

142.44

(6)

ALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUCAR COMPANY

_ _

___,

W

..__.

I

.___,.,

N

._

:D

-""--

S..._,O

~

~

_.__

_ _ _

F

actory

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Leg Pipe Water from oondensor of Pan

"B"

(Brown).

Average for

Campaign

C.AMeAIGN

____

1920-

_

192--1.

~

Source of Water:

Main Water Supply Tank

(D.l

teh

Wa.te r), and condensation from Pan "B" (Brown).

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 lroa Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile {by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIF.S TO

Genffal Supt. General Chemist

Asst. Genl. Supt. Ast, Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts P« I00,000 Parts Per I 00,000

1.86

Silica Si02

1.86

.31

Sodium Chloride NaCl

3.74

13.52

Sodium Sulphate Na8S04

25.42

7.81

Sodium Carbonate Na3C03

9.70

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

2.21

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

38.66

66.53

Magnesium C..bonate MgC03

9.03

Calcium Chloride CaCl8

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

26.20

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

14.51

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.64

111.03

111.03

22.55

Organic and Volatile lby difference)

22.55

133.58

TOT AL SOLIDS

133.58

(7)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

- - ~

VT

~

I

N_D

_

.6_JLR

__

Factory

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Leg

Pipe Water from Condensor of Pan

"0"

(Brown).

Average

~or the Last

75

Days

of Campaign.

CAMPAIGN

1920-

_

192_1__

Source of Water:

J.18.in Water

SUp:ply

Tanlt

(Ditch

Water},

and condensation from

Pan

"0" (Brown).

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

HYPOTHETICAL COMl:IINATIONS

Part, Per I 00,000 Parts Per 100,000

1.90

Silica Si02

1.90

.11

Sodium Chloride NaCl

3.92

13.21

Sodium Sulphate Na0S04

31.00

7.95

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

11.58

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

2.38

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

39.34

71.07

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

a.21

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

26.53

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

13.49

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.23

116.41

116.41

15.55

Organic and Volatile ( by difference)

15.55

131.96

TOT AL SOLIDS

131.96

(8)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

- - -

~

.:.,...

f

...,

I=---=N

'-'

D :t_

_

Q___R

_

Factory

Kind of Water:

DescriptiGn of Sample:

Leg Pipe Water from First Condensor of Evaporaters

Average for Campaign

CAMPAIGN

1920-J

92],__

_

Source of Water:

City Water, Ditch Water and Condensation from 5th Effect of Evaporaters

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile {by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

Gen~ral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parll Per I 00,000 Parll Per 100,000

1.02

Silica Si02

1.02

.06

Sodium Chloride NaCl

1.27

4.43

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

6.55

2.06

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

2.62

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

.77

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

10.20

15.31

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

4

.99

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

3.88

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

8.22

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.. 12

3la26

31.26

5.62

Organic and Volatile lby difference)

5.62

36.88

TOT AL SOLIDS

36.88

(9)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

WINDSOR

__

factory

.

QM{P)\.IGN

~

. _

1920-

J

92

_

1

_

Kind of Water: DescriptiQn of Sample: Source of Water: Silica lroa Cakium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

Leg Pipe rater from Second Condensor of Eva.poraters

Average

for Campaign

Main Water

SU.-~ply

Tank (Ditch Water), and Condensation from the

5th Effect of Evaporaters.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Paita p,. I00.000

Si09

1.10

Silica Si09

Fe

.1s

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Ca

15.58

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Mg

e.oo

Sodium Carbonate Na

2C03

Na

9.85

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Cl

2.22

Magnesium Sulphate

Mgso

.

so.

70.40

Magnesium Cqrbonate MgC03

co

.

10.25

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate

easo.

Calcium Carbonate CaC08

F errou, Carbonate FeCO,

117.58

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

23.32

140.90

Organic and Volatile lby difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO Gene-al Supt. General Chemist Aost. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

Page 7

Paris Per I ()0.000

1.10

3.66

25.97

39.60

30.10

16.78

.37

117.58

23.32

140.90

(10)

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

- -

-

--'-'

W

...--CC.

I

--=--c

N

-'

D

=-...;:

S

c..._.c

O

---=

R

'----

_ _

F

actory

-~---·~·

CAMPAIGN. ____ 1920-1921_

Kind of Water: DescriptiGn of Sample:

Source of Water:

Water from Boiler Feed Tank:.

Average for the First Sixty-five

Days

of Campaign.

Condensation from all

Live

Steam Heating Coils (~'1lite and Brown Pans),

and drips from 2nd, 3rd and 4th Effects of Evaporaters.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parll Per 100,000 Parts Per I 00,000

Silica SiO. lroa Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine CI Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic aad Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Aost. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

.37

Silica Si02

.37

.03

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.43

.16

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

.03

.06

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

.18

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

.26

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

.30

.55

Magnesium C.bonate MgC03

.09

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

.41

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

.10

F erroua Carbonate FeC03

.06

1.70

1.70

1.26

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

;i,.g6

2.96

TOT AL SOLIDS

2.96

(11)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

_

_

--!!W_,,,_I

_

N""'.

-'

1)"'--'S,.,__,,O

,,___,_

R

,__

_____

Factory

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica lroa Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

Water for

Washing

Hot Presses

Average for the Last Seventy-five

D9¥s

of Campaig11.

l>rips from the 1st and 5th Effects of Evaporaters, Carbonation and Sulphur

Station Heating Coils, all Heaters and

Low

Pressure Coils of

Brown

Pans.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parta Per I 00,000 Parll Per 100,000

SiO,

.33

Fe

.06

Ca

.20

Mg

.07

Na

.06

Cl

.10

S04

.27

co

.

.36

Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate Magnesium Chloride Magnesium Sulphate Magnesium C..bonate Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate SiO, NaCl Na2S04 Na,C03 MgCI MgS04 MgC03 CaCI, CaS04 CaC03 FeC03

.33

.15

.35

.50

.12

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

1.45

2.51

3.96

Organic and Volatile {by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

1.45

2.51

3.96

COPIES TO Genft'al Supt. General Chemist A96t. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

Page 9

/}

/ll);W_v _,

--~A(L2 -

.

Ch, '"efCh .

(12)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

WINDSOR

__factory

---~A.MPAI_G__IL

- - .

_

l,_920-

192_1

_

Kind ol Water:

Pure Battery supply

Description of Sample:

Average for the First Thirty Doys and the Last Forty 'Daye Of Campaign.

Source ol Water:

Leg Pipe

Water

:from the First Evaporater Condensor, overflow of Press

Wash

Tanlc and

1st Effect drips.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO• lroa Fe c.lcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic aad Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist A9SI:. Genl. Supt.

A!l!!t. Chief Engineer

Superintendent

Traveling Chemiot Laboratory

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parta P .. 100.QOO Part, Per I 00.000

.a2

Silica Si09

.a2

.21

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.53

1.30

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

.43

Sodium Carbonate Na.C03

.21

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

.05

,36

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

2.oa

1.a1

Magnesium Ci,,bonate MgC03

2.09

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

.21

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

3.10

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.44

7.23

7.23

i.69

Organic and Volatile (by difference}

2.69

9.92

TOT AL SOLIDS

9.92

Page

10

M

1 / / } J ~ -

.

(_JI___

(13)

Kind of Water: DescriptiQn of Sample: Source of Water: Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine CI

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

Factory

Water

in Boilers

Average for Campaign

Water f~om Boiler Feed Tank

_ _ ___

C..AML> AIGN

_

l ~(cl

92__1___,

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per I 00,000 Part, Per I 00,000

.42

Silica Si02

.42

.17

Sodium Chloride NaCl

2.39

.95

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

9,98

,67

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

66,69

28.77

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

1.45

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

6,75

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

2,32

35,34

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

2,37

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

1035

74.52

74,62

Organic and Volatile (by difference}

TOT AL SOLIDS

58.76

133,28

Organic and Volatile (by difference}

58.76

TOT AL SOLIDS

133,28

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

Page 11

/ ~ A , / l A

/

k=)L_CJJ.

tf

f ~

-Chief Chemi,1.

References

Related documents

Land use planning has been proven an effective tool in addressing the impacts of climate change and natural hazards, as well as in minimizing risk and

Troligen hade media länkat skivbolagen till de artister som nu ligger på Jive som till exempel Britney Spears, varpå skivan hade mottagits snarlikt som Don’t stop the music.

The study explores the usage of social media in launching brand by tes- tifying consumer attitude in terms of a specific product category within two countries, Sweden and China..

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users

Since the boundary quantum field theory in this case is defined over a p-adic number field either Q p or its unramified extension Q pn , further development of

In previous works [9,10], the following correspondence between driven two-dimensional conformal field theories and dynamical systems has been established implicitly: Evolution of

Work of Ferwerda, Schedl, and Tkalcic [12, 10] on Instagram pictures, showed that the way filters are applied to create a certain distinctive- ness that can be used to