• No results found

Attitude and Orbit Control for Small Satellites

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Attitude and Orbit Control for Small Satellites"

Copied!
123
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Satellites

Examensarbeteutfort iReglerteknik

vidTekniskaHogskolaniLinkoping

av

Jonas Elfving

Regnr: LiTH-ISY-EX-3295-2003

(2)
(3)

Satellites

Examensarbeteutfort iReglerteknik

vidTekniskaHogskolaniLinkoping

av

Jonas Elfving

Regnr: LiTH-ISY-EX-3295-2003

Supervisors: AlbertThuswaldner

Jonas Elbornsson

(4)
(5)

Avdelning, Institution

Division, Department

Institutionen för Systemteknik

581 83 LINKÖPING

Datum

Date

2002-11-14

Språk

Language

Rapporttyp

Report category

ISBN

Svenska/Swedish

X Engelska/English

X Examensarbete

Licentiatavhandling

ISRN LITH-ISY-EX-3295-2003

C-uppsats

D-uppsats

Serietitel och serienummer

Title of series, numbering

ISSN

Övrig rapport

____

URL för elektronisk version

http://www.ep.liu.se/exjobb/isy/2003/3295/

Titel

Title

Attityd och banstyrning för små satelliter

Attitude and Orbit Control for Small Satellites

Författare

Author

Jonas Elfving

Sammanfattning

Abstract

A satellite in orbit about a planet needs some means of attitude control in order to, for instance, get

as much sun into its solar-panels as possible. It is easy to understand that, for example, a spy

satellite has to point at a certain direction without the slightest trembling to get a photo of a certain

point on the earth. This type of mission must not exceed an error in attitude of more then about

1/3600 degrees. But, since high accuracy equals high cost, it is also easy to understand why a

research satellite measuring solar particles (or radiation) in space does not need high accuracy at

all. A research vessel of this sort can probably do with less accuracy then 1 degree.

The first part of this report tries to explain some major aspects of satellite space-flight. It continues

to focus on the market for small satellites, i.e. satellites weighing less than 500 kg.

The second part of this final thesis work deals with the development of a program that simulates

the movement of a satellite about a large celestial body. The program, called AOSP, consists of

user-definable packages. Sensors and estimation filters are used to predict the satellites current

position, velocity, attitude and angular velocity. The purpose of the program, which is written in

MATLAB, is to easily determine the pointing accuracy of a satellite when using different sensors

and actuators.

Nyckelord

Keyword

satellites, attitude, orbit, control, Kalman estimation filters, quaternions, stabilization, pointing

accuracy

(6)
(7)

Asatellite in orbitaboutaplanet needssomemeans ofattitude control in order

to, forinstance, getas much sunintoits solar-panelsaspossible. The missionof

thesatellitemaybeanotherreasonforbothattitudeand orbitcontrol. Itis easy

tounderstandthat,forexample,aspysatellitehastopointat acertaindirection

withouttheslightesttremblingtogetaphotoofacertainpointontheearth. This

typeofmission must notexceedan errorin attitude ofmorethen  1

3600 Æ

. But,

sincehigh accuracyequalshighcost, itisalso easytounderstand whyaresearch

satellitemeasuring solar particles (or radiation) in space does not need high

ac-curacy at all. A research vessel of this sort can probably do with lessaccuracy

then1 Æ

.

The rstpartofthisreporttries toexplainsomemajoraspects ofsatellite

space- ight. Itcontinuestofocusonthemarket forsatellites,weighinglessthan500kg.

Thesecondpartofthis nalthesisworkdealswiththedevelopmentofaprogram

thatsimulatesthe movementof asatelliteaboutalargecelestial body. The

pro-gram,called AOSP,consists ofuser-de nablepackages. Theusercande nedata,

suchassatelliteconstantsandattitudepreferences,tosimulatetheattitudein

or-bit. Sensorsandestimation ltersareusedtopredictthesatellitescurrentposition,

velocity,attitudeandangularvelocity. Thepurposeoftheprogram,whichis

writ-tenin MATLAB,is to easily determinethepointing accuracyof asatellitewhen

usingdi erentsensorsandactuatorssothatacraftdoesnotgettooexpensivenor

toolessaccurate.

MATLAB6Release13issuesarealsobrie ydiscussedattheendofthisdocument.

Keywords: satellite,attitude, orbit,control,Kalmanestimation lters,

(8)
(9)

I would start to direct a warm thank you to the persons below, since this nal

thesisworkcouldnothavebeencompletedwithouttheirhelpandaid.

Par Degerman{whohelpedmewiththelayoutofthereportaswellasassisted

mewiththesyntaxL A

T

E

X, inwhichthis nalthesiswork iswritten.

Anders Helmersson{apart frombeingtheexaminerof this work,Anders has

alsoaided me in several otherways, includingthe quaternion representationand

pure technical support on emacs and L A

T

E

Xhandling. I have seen him as a last

resortwhenin needofhelp.

Albert Thuswaldner { for his assiduously read-through of my report, making

surethateverythinginitiswellwritten. Also,hehasbeen,inoppositetoAnders

above,my rst resort,when in needof help. Manyof thethings would nothave

beeninsidethisreportwithoutAlbert pointingoutformethat itshould.

Jonas Elbornsson { my supervisor at Linkoping Institute of Technology has

helped me with both the report and the program. Mostly, he helped with my

Englishlanguage, but he has also put some perspective to the actual work and

assistedmewithsomecontrolissues.

Apart from the mentioned people above, all of whom I owe large gratitude to,

thewholesta at SaabEricssonSpace in Linkoping,and especiallymyboss

Jan-OlofHjartstrom,havemysincerestthanksfortakingcareofwethelast7months.

Lastly,Imustthankmygirl-friendAnna Lennarthssonforhermentalsupport.

(10)
(11)

There are substantial di erences between notations in di erent textbooks. The

ones chosen in this text are stated below. Observe that a few de nitions also

canbe found in the appendices, such as the de nition of the Vernal Equinox in

AppendixC,forinstance.

Vectors and Matrices

x;X Boldfacelettersareused forvectorsandmatrices.

q TheboldfacedletterqarespeciallyreservedforQuaternions.

N Numberofsamplesusedforparameterestimation.

 Parametervector.

^

y(tj) Predictor.

1 Identitymatrix.

I Momentofinertiatensor.

Standard symbols

The letter \t" in all forms are used for time or time intervals, except for the

(12)

a Semimajoraxis.

e Eccentricity.

i Inclination.

! Argumentofperigee.

Rightascensionfortheascendingnode.

P Orbitperiod.

Vectors:

L Angularmomentum.

F Torque.

A Attitudevector.

x m-dimensional statevector.

y n-dimensionalobservationvector.

Astronomical Symbols:

L Earth. J Sun.  VernalEquinox. Constants

 Planetarygravitationalconstant(alsoknownasGM).

G UniversalGravityconstant(GivenbyNewton).

Standard notations

rf(x) Thenablaoperatordescribingthefunction 0 B B B B @ @f @x1 @f @x 2 . . . @f @xn 1 C C C C A  Subset.

O(n) FunctionwiththepropertythatO(n)=nisboundedasn!1.

E[nn T

] theexpectation valuewherenisanyvectoror matrix.

 Quaternionmultiplication.

R Denotes theradiusofabody.

(13)

AOCS AttitudeandOrbitControlSystem.

AOSP AttitudeandOrbitSimulationPackage.

ASAP ArianeStructureforAuxiliaryPayloads.

CDH CommandandDataHandling.

CHAMP ChallengingMini-SatellitePayload.

COTS CommercialOfTheShelf(Products).

EELV EvolvedExpandableLaunchVehicles.

EO EarthObservation(mission).

ESPA EELVSecondaryPayload.

F 3

A Fast,Frequent,FlexibleandA ordable.

FH FigureHandle(inMATLAB).

GALILEO AEuropeanGPS.

GEO GeostationaryOrbit.

GLONASS ARussianGPS.

GTO GeoTransferOrbit.

GPS GlobalPositioningSystem.

HEO HighlyEllipticalOrbit.

ICO IntermediateCircularOrbit.

I-Cone Intelligent(adapter-)Cone.

IR InfraRed.

IT InformationTechnology.

JIT MATLABaccelerationengine.

LEO LowEarthOrbit.

LQ LinearQuadratic.

MEO MediumEarthOrbit.

MEX MATLABEternalcode(interfacebetweenMATLABandotherprogramlanguages).

NAVSTAR TheUS GPS.

PID Proportional,InductiveandDerivate.

S/C Spacecraft.

S/S SubSystem(in spacecraft).

(14)
(15)

1 Introduction 1

1.1 Problemformulation . . . 1

2 Satellites in general 3 2.1 Modulesin aregularsatellite . . . 3

2.1.1 Thebus . . . 3

2.1.2 Thepayload . . . 5

2.2 Movementlawsofsatellites . . . 6

2.2.1 Orbitlawsofmotion . . . 6

2.2.2 Attitudelawsofmotion . . . 8

2.2.3 Orbittimeandvelocity . . . 9

2.3 Disturbancesin orbitandattitude . . . 10

2.3.1 Solarradiationpressure . . . 10

2.3.2 Aerodynamicdrag . . . 11

2.3.3 Magneticdisturbancetorques . . . 12

2.3.4 Gravitygradienttorque . . . 13

2.3.5 Micrometeorites . . . 14

2.3.6 OblatenessoftheEarth . . . 14

2.3.7 Discussiononthemagnitudeofdisturbances . . . 14

3 Orbits and missions 17 3.1 Fromlaunchto orbit . . . 17

3.1.1 Orbits . . . 18

3.2 Missions . . . 23

4 A studyof smallsatellites 27 4.1 Previouslylaunched satellites . . . 27

4.2 Tendencyinlaunchestoday . . . 29

4.3 Customers . . . 29

4.4 Potentialuse . . . 30

4.4.1 Dispenser . . . 30

4.4.2 Mainvehicle . . . 31

(16)

4.5.1 ASAP . . . 32

4.5.2 ESPA . . . 32

4.5.3 Munin . . . 32

4.5.4 I-Cone . . . 32

4.6 Theneedforsmallsatellites . . . 36

5 Orbit and attitude stabilization 37 5.1 Redundancy . . . 37

5.2 Sensorsandactuators . . . 37

5.2.1 Sensors . . . 38

5.2.2 Actuators . . . 41

5.3 Stabilization methods . . . 44

5.3.1 Whydoweneedstabilization? . . . 45

5.3.2 Passivestabilization . . . 45

5.3.3 Activestabilization. . . 47

6 The Attitudeand Orbit SimulationPackage (AOSP) 51 6.1 Requirements . . . 51

6.2 Prerequisites . . . 52

6.2.1 Developmentenvironment . . . 52

6.2.2 Coordinateframes . . . 54

6.2.3 Modelrepresentation. . . 54

6.2.4 Di erentialequationsolvers . . . 57

6.2.5 Linearization . . . 59

6.2.6 Measurementdetermination . . . 63

6.2.7 Stabilizationstrategy . . . 64

6.2.8 Neededdata . . . 66

6.3 MATLABissues . . . 66

6.4 BehavioroftheAOSP . . . 67

6.4.1 Examplerun . . . 67

6.4.2 Program ow . . . 68

7 Conclusion and suggestionsto further work 75 7.1 Smallsatellitesstudy . . . 75

7.2 TheAOSP . . . 75

Bibliography 79 Appendix 81 A AOSP - users manual 81 A.1 Howto getstarted . . . 81

A.1.1 Whatdatacanbefound . . . 81

A.2 Inputneededto theprogram . . . 85

(17)

A.3.1 LoadandSavedata . . . 86

A.3.2 Printresultsfromsimulation . . . 87

A.3.3 Changeparameters. . . 87

A.4 Whatissavedintheoutput le . . . 87

A.5 Shortcuts . . . 87

B Orbit movements 89 B.1 KeplerianOrbitalElements . . . 89

B.2 Elliptical Orbits. . . 89

B.2.1 Orbitperiod . . . 90

B.2.2 Velocity . . . 93

C Coordinate systems 97 C.1 TheGeocentricEquatorialcoordinatesystem . . . 97

C.2 Quaternions . . . 98

C.3 Other coordinatesystems . . . 99

(18)
(19)

Introduction

Toexplorespaceisstillmanypeoplesdream. Butbeforemankindcanenterspace

themselves, investigating probes have to besent out in advance. Their missions

aremany,suchascommunication,globalsurveillanceorplanetaryresearch. With

acombinedname,theseprobesareoftencalledarti cialsatellites.

Thesatelliteindustrypossesseshugepossibilities, althoughthemarket todate is

abit slow. Of course, these crafts have to be automatic in the sense that if the

groundcontrollosescommunicationwiththesatelliteforacoupleofhours,itstill

shouldbeoperationalwhenthecommunicationlinkisreestablished. Furthermore,

the demand for accuracy and performance might be, depending on the mission,

exceptional. Thecostforsatellitestendto increaseexponentiallywiththe

perfor-mance;thusitisreallytrickytodesignacraftwithhighpointingaccuracywithout

gettingatooexpensiveone. Tokeepthecost down, expensivemeasurementand

propulsioninstrumentsmustbeassimpleaspossible;while tokeepprecisionup,

theymustbeasadvancedaspossible.

Butcomponents arenot themost expensivepartin asatellite. Thedesign, test,

veri cationandlaunchproceduresarefarmoreexpensive,sincethe rstthreetake

manyman-hoursandthelastonedemandsanexpensivelaunch-vehicle. An

exam-pleofalaunch-vehiclethatisinusetodayontheOcean'siscalledtheSea-launch,

andcanbefoundin Figure1.1.

This nalthesisbeginswithdescribingtheessentialsofspace ight(especiallyfor

smallsatellites) in Chapter2. Itcontinues to describethemarket,and trendsof smallsatellitesin Chapter4. Thedevelopmentofasimulationprogram to deter-minetheattitude variationwhen usingdi erent sensorsand actuatorsin orbitis

nallydescribedinChapter 6.

1.1 Problem formulation

This nal thesis work is actually twoaimed. The rst aim is to nd out where

(20)

Figure1.1. TheOdysseylaunchplatformwiththerocket\Sea-launch"|away

oftransportingrocketsoutontheoceanforlaunchasneartheequatoraspossible

forcountriesthatdonotownlandinthatregion(forinstanceRussiaandNorway

areparticipantsinthisproject)[25].

future, and what demands are there today? The second aim is to nd out how

goodpointingprecisioncanbeexpectedwithacertainsetofsensorsandactuators

whenthesatellitehasacertainmission? Thesequestionswillbefurtherexplained

anddealt with, but not completely answered. Thereasonfor this isthat no one

can accurately predict the future and that there was a time limit to the nal

thesiswork. Thereare, however,somesuggestionsonfurther developmentof the

(21)

Satellites in general

Asatelliteis anobjectthat movesbyitselfin orbitaboutalargercelestialbody,

accordingto [21]. In this de nition one can easily understand that moons also are satellites, in fact; even the Earth itself is oneof the Sun's satellites and the

Sunis a satellite in ourgalaxy, the Milkyway. In generalthough, when talking

about satellites, we refer to arti cial, i.e. man-made, satellites moving in orbit

around the Earth orany other planet in our solar system. In orbit means that

thesatellitehashigh enoughaltitudeand/orspeedto holdit withinthe celestial

bodies'gravitational eldwithoutfallingdownontoit. Thismayseemharderthan

itreallyis. A presentation ofthemovementlawswill bepresentedin Section2.2

which will explainthis. Butbefore that, ashort introduction to satellitesshould

beinorder.

2.1 Modules in a regular satellite

Satellitesof today can look virtuallyeverywayyoucould possibly imagine. The

satellite CHAMP, for instance, which was launched in 15th of July 2000 from

PlesetskinRussialookslikearegularelectricguitar(seeFigure2.1or[9,20]). As seentherearenorulesatallonhowtheyappearontheoutside. Theinteriorofa

satellite,however,hasafewsimilarparts,orat leastpartsthat canbeidenti ed.

Thesepartsarecalledthebus andthepayload accordingto[18].

Thepayloadisthemodulethatcompletesthemissionspeci ctasks,suchastaking

photographs,measuringradiation, relayingTV etc. Thebus,on theother hand,

consists of subsystems that work together to help the payload to complete its

mission. Thiswillbefurther explainedinthenexttwochapters.

2.1.1 The bus

Thebusinasatelliteisaninfrastructuralaidforthepayload,andishighlymission

speci c. MissionsaredescribedlaterinSection3.2. Theaidforthepayloadconsists in,forinstance, keepingthepayload atanacceptable temperature, providing the

(22)

Figure 2.1. The satellite CHAMP (Challenging Mini-Satellite Payload). An

exampleofanoddshapedspacecraft[20].

payloadwithpowerandhelpingittonavigateandpointat speci c locations.

Often, the bus is divided into subsystems, or S/S. In the chart below, the most

commonclassi cations(accordingto[18])ofS/Sareshown.

Structure: UsuallythewholestructureisconsideredtobeaS/Sofitsown. The

actual structure includes the hull and load-bearing walls in the satellites.

Sincethestructurewillbeexposedtodi erentpressures,solarradiationand

smallmeteorites,thisstructurehastobecompletelythoughtthroughsothat

itcanhandlethis harshspaceenvironment.

Thermal: Inthedesignofspacecrafts,thermalcontrolisneededinorderto

main-tainstructure and equipment integrityoverlongperiods of time, according

to [18]. It has been recognized since theconception and design of the rst spacevehiclesthataprimeengineeringrequirementisasystemfor

tempera-turecontrolthatpermitsoptimumperformanceofmanycomponents. Infact,

ifit waspossibleto operateequipmentat anytemperature, there would be

noneedforthermalcontrol. Normaloperationtemperaturesmustbewithin

 20 Æ

C to+50 Æ

(23)

CDH: (Command and Data Handling) This is the brain of the satellite. Here,

all calculations and control of other S/S are done. CDH also works as a

communicationhandlerbetweendi erentS/S.Incomputertermsthiswould

becalled amaster unit,and theotherstructuresforslave units.

AOCS: (Attitudeand Orbit Control System)This S/S couldbecompared with

thehumaninnerear,i.e. fromsensorsthisS/Sdetermineswherethesatellite

isand how itis oriented. With thisinformation theAOCSdetermineshow

to navigate (in case its position orattitude is wrong). To summarize, the

AOCS consists of three parts; one that operatessensors, another one that

calculateswhattodoandathird onethatoperatesactuatorswithwhathas

beencalculated.

Propulsion: Everysatelliteneedssomemeansoftransportationandsomemeans

ofattitudeadjustment. ThesemeansarecalledthepropulsionS/S.It

main-tainsthefuelconsumptionandcontroltheoutputgivenby,forinstance, the

AOCSabove.

ElectricalPower: Thissubstructuremanages thepowersupplyin the satellite.

ItprovidesalltheotherS/Swithelectricalpower,andrechargesthebackup

batteries, when the satellite is not within an eclipse. Otherwise, this S/S

makessurethat thesatellitestopsoperatingandmovesintoa\wait"mode

topreservepower. Thispower-savingmodeoperatesonthebackupbatteries

untilthesatellitehascomeoutoftheeclipseagain.

Communication: Itwouldberatherpointlesstosendsomethingintospacethat

cannot communicate. All satellites should have this S/S, although there

mightbespecialcaseswhenthissubsystemisnot needed. Oneoftheearliest

satellites,forinstance,wasmadeofare ectivematerial. Insteadofactively

receivingandrelayingasignal,astodayscommunicationssatelliteswork,it

re ectedsignalsbackdownagainto theEarth,thusnotneedinganysortof

communicationdevice.

2.1.2 The payload

Apart from the subsystems in the previous section that constitutes the bus, a

payload isalsoneeded. Thepayloadiswherethemissionspeci ctoolsarelocated.

Therecouldbecamerasthat takesatellitephotos oftheEarth,orcommunication

equipmentwhich enableus tosee satelliteTV andsoon. These di erent eldsof

applicationforpayloadsarecalleddi erentmissions,andwillbediscussedlaterin

Section3.2.

When constructing the payload, the manufacturer has to consider many things,

suchaskeepingpowerconsumptionandweightdown. Thereasonforthisisthata

higherdemand onthebusmakesthewholesatellitelargerandheavier. Themore

(24)

2.2 Movement laws of satellites

A man-made satellite has to be stabilized due to many disturbance forces. For

instancethepressurefromtheSun'sphotons,thesolarwind,othercelestialbodies,

spacedust and other factorsmay play amajorpartin howthe satelliteactually

moves in space. In addition, the owner of the satellite may want to adjust the

orientation,orattitude,to acertainmissionspeci ctask(takephotographsof,or

broadcastTVto, thecorrectlocation). Tobeabletomeettheserequirementsthe

satellitecontrol systemsmust consist ofat least twoseparate parts. Onecontrol

systemthat keepsthesatelliteinacorrectorbit,sincethedisturbancesdescribed

inthischapterwill tendtodegeneratethesatellitesorbit(i.e. decreaseitsspeed).

Theother control system keeps theattitude correct. The control needed for the

lattertask doesnot haveto be activecontrol |passivestabilization techniques

mightbejustasuseful. TheactualcontrolsystemisdiscussedinChapter5. To be able to control the satellite, we have to know its movement laws. The

following sections will deal with orbit and attitude movement laws, as well as

di erentdisturbances.

The orbit and the attitude movement are however not uncorrelated, as implied

earlier. Thisisdueto thefact thatdisturbancetorquesdependsonwhereweare.

Forexample, weonly get adisturbancefrom theSun ifthe satelliteis notin an

eclipse. Thiswillbefurther discussedinSection2.3.

2.2.1 Orbit laws of motion

Accordingto[19,21],therearemainlysixlawsgoverningthemotionofasatellite. ThreearefromKeplerandtherestfromNewton. Thesetwowelknownphysicists

theorem'saredescribedbelow.

Theorem2.1(Kepler's Laws)

I: Theorbit of eachplanet isanellipse, withthe Sunasfocus.

II: Thelinejoining the planettothe Sunsweepsoutequal areasin equal times.

III: The square of the period of a planet is proportional to the cube of its mean

distancefrom theSun.

Theorem2.2(Newton's Laws)

I: Every body continues in itsstate of rest or of uniform motion in astraight line

unlessitiscompelledtochange that stateby forcesimpressedupon it.

II: The rate of change of momentum isproportional to the force impressed and is

inthe samedirection asthatforce.

III: Toeveryaction thereisalways opposedanequal reaction.

(25)

constitutesawaytocalculatetheforceactingbetweentwobodiesduetogravity 1 : F g = Gm 1 m 2 r 2 r r (2.1)

The Equation (2.1) states that the force attracting two bodies to each other is proportionalto theirmasses (m

1 andm

2

)and inverse proportionalto thesquare

ofthedistancebetweenthem(r). Gistheuniversalgravityconstantderivedfrom

theterm,oftenreferedto asGM, whereM themassoftheplanet

2

. The term

=GM iscalled theplanetarygravitationalconstant(withunit m

3

s 2

),where Gis

theuniversalgravityconstant,withthevalueG6:6710 11 Nm 2 kg 2 .

InEquation(2.2),the Newtonforce described in Equation(2.1)isgeneralizedto anequationofnbodies: F g = Gm i n X j=1;j6=i m j r 3 ji (r ji ) (2.2)

Thisforcealoneconstitutesthegreatestforceactingonasatelliteinorbitatalow

to medium height abovethe Earth's surface. But there are other forces as well,

suchasthesolarpressure,thenonsphericalsymmetryoftheEarth,aerodynamic

drag due to the Earth's atmosphere and, of course, induced forces like thruster

burnsetc. Tosummarize,wehave:

F TOTAL = F g +F DRAG +F THRUST +F SOLARPRESSURE + +F OBLATEEARTH +::: (2.3)

Ifwedi erentiateNewton'ssecondlaw(Theorem2.2)and ndthedistance r i we get: d dt (m i v i )=F TOTAL (2.4)

Keepinginmindthat wemightusethrustersthat expelmatter(which makesthe

satellite'smasstimedependent),Equation(2.4)evaluatesto:

 r i = F TOTAL m i _ r i _ m i m i (2.5)

These equations combined (Equation(2.3) and Equation (2.5))can be solved to ndanysatellite'smovementintime.

1

Observethattheinnernatureofgravity,i.e.whatgravityreallyisandhowitactuallyworks,

stillisapuzzlefortodaysscientists.

2

SinceGisderivedfromforall planets,it isbothmorecommonand accuratetousethe

(26)

2.2.2 Attitude laws of motion

Depending onthecoordinateframe usedtorepresenttheattitude, themovement

equationsdescribingtheattitude willlookdi erent. Forexplanationsofdi erent

coordinatesystems,studyAppendixC. Themovementequationsforthedi erent coordinate frames haveonething in commonthough. Theyare all derived from

theequationofangularmomentum (from[27,4]):

_ h A =r P=A ma+ _ r P=A mv (2.6)

wherea=v_ is theacceleration,r

P=A

is thevectorfrom point A topointP and

h

A

isas inDe nition 2.1.

Whenutilizing Newton'ssecondlaw(F =ma,where F istheresultingforce) on

thesecond term,weget:

r P=A ma=r P=A F =M A (2.7)

Wherethe last step is the de nition of the moment of a force F about point A,

denotedM

A

,asin [4].

Whenweapplythis, Equation(2.6)evaluatesto:

M A = _ h A _ r P=A mv (2.8)

Accordingto[12]theangularaccelerationofasatellitecanbederivedfrom Equa-tion(2.8)andfromthefact that:

De nition2.1 (Angularmomentum)

h

A

I! (2.9)

WhereI isthe momentofinertia tensorand ! istheangular velocity. The nal

angularaccelerationbecomes:

_ !=I 1 (M _ h ) I 1 (I!+h ) (2.10)

WhereM istheapplied torque, andh istheinternal angular momentumvector

from,forinstance,thedi erentreactionwheels. hisinotherwordsnottheangular

momentumfromthesatelliteitself,asinEquation(2.8)(i.e. h A

=I!+h

Others ).

Equation(2.10)ishowevernotauniversalone,sinceittakesforgrantedthat the principal and the inertial axes are the same, i.e. it is a symmetric body with

regardto the mass and the shape. Because this evidently seldom is the case, a

moregeneralequationthat workswith any kindofinertia matrixis(alsoderived

in[12]): _ ! x = J x T x +P xy T y +P xz T z _ ! y = P yx T x +J y T y +P yz T z _ ! = P T +P T +J T (2.11)

(27)

where T x = h (M x _ h x ) ! z ! y (I z I y ) (! y h z ! z h y ) DX i T y = h (M y _ h y ) ! x ! z (I x I z ) (! z h x ! x h z ) DY i T z = h (M z _ h z ) ! y ! x (I y I x ) (! x h y ! y h x ) DZ i (2.12) where DX = D zy ! 2 y D yz ! 2 z +! x (D zx ! y Dyx! z ) DY = D xz ! 2 z D zx ! 2 x +! y (D xy ! z Dzy! x ) DZ = D yx ! 2 x D xy ! 2 y +! z (D yz ! x Dxz! y ) (2.13)

Thegeneralinertiamatrixisdescribedby:

I= 0 @ I x D xy D xz D yx I y D yz D zx D zy I z 1 A (2.14)

andtheinverseby:

I 1 = 0 @ J x P xy P xz P yx J y P yz P zx P zy J z 1 A =J (2.15)

Again, h is the totalangular momentum due to reaction wheels etc. within the

satellite.

2.2.3 Orbit time and velocity

FromKepler's Theorems (2.1)andNewton's Theorems (2.2)theorbitperiod, P, and the velocity, v, at perigee

3

can be calculated. Since the velocity changes

during one lap, a satellite has its maximum speed at perigee and its minimum

speedatapogee,onlythevelocityinperigeeorapogeeisreallysimpletocalculate

inadvance.

Theseequationsareasfollows:

P = 2 p  a 3 2 (2.16) v = s   2 r 1 a  (2.17)

Wherea isthe semi-majoraxisasin Appendix B, and the velocity expressionis givenforperigee.

(28)

2.3 Disturbances in orbit and attitude

Disturbances in space could be a rather extensive chapter, since virtually every

existing objectwill act uponthe satellitewithgravitationalforces and moments.

Tokeepthischaptertoareasonablelevel,somesmallerdisturbanceswilltherefore

beneglected.

How much torques actually will act upon the satellite'sattitude depends on the

size-to-massratio. If, for instance, the satellite looks likea perfect sphere, there

willprobablybeonlysmall(notsigni cant)disturbancestothesatelliteinattitude

fromoutere ects. Butontheotherhand,ifthesatellitelookslikealong atrod

wewill gete ectsto theattitude fromdisturbancetorques.

ThemaincausetothesedisturbancesmightbetheSun,theEarth'satmosphereor

thegravitational eldsofdi erentcelestialbodies,buttheyhaveasimilarimpact

onanon-symmetricspacecraft.

Example1

IfweusetheSunasanexample,wecanseethatthesolarwind fromtheSunwill

putan evenlydistributed pressureonthesatellite. This pressurewillbeuniform

on each part that is exposed to the Sun. You could therefore replace all these

smallforceswiththesumofthoseonthegeometricalmiddlepointexposed tothe

Sun, called the center-of-pressure. If this center-of-pressure is not on the same

spot as the center-of-mass, there will bean additionalmoment. The size of this

moment,ortorque,istheforcetimesthedistancebetweenthecenter-of-massand

thecenter-of-pressure. Inother words,itisnotthesymmetry oftheshapealone,

ratherthedisplacementrelativetothemassdistributionsymmetry,thatwillcause

thisdisturbance.

Similarthingsasin Example1happenswhendealingwithaerodynamicdrag. Gravitygradient,however,isadi erentstory. Thisisaforcethatwilltrytoalign

thesatellite with the Earth's magnetic eld. If this seem interesting, the reader

shouldstudy[27].

Allofthesedisturbancescanbemodeled,andabriefexplanationonhowisgiven

inthenextfewsections. Foramoreinvestigativeexaminationofthesedisturbance

models,[19]wouldbetoprefer.

The reader should note that the oblateness of the Earth is no real disturbance

torque since it can be modeled with agood accuracy. Instead of regarding this

anomalyasadisturbance,itshouldbeconsideredtobeanupdatetothemovement

equation,i.e. Equation(2.1).

2.3.1 Solar radiation pressure

ThesolarradiationpressureisduetophotonsfromtheSunconstitutingapressure

(29)

moreenergythenthecolorsilver(whichre ectsmostenergy).

Ifweusethegeocentricequatorialcoordinates(whichareexplainedinAppendixC), radiationpressurecanbemodeled. Thisisdonein[19],buttheretheyhavetaken forgrantedthat it isablackbody

4

that travelsin space. Whilethis is not

com-pletelytrue,agoodapproximationof thetorquedue tosolarradiationis:

 x = fcosA  y = fcosi  sinA  z = fcosi  sinA (2.18) Where f = 4:510 10A m [ m s 2 ]:

A = Crosssectionofvehicleexposedto theSun[m]:

m = Massofvehicle[kg]:

A

= MeanrightascensionoftheSunduringcomputation.

i



= Inclinationofequatortoecliptic(=23:4349):

Observethatthe andthesignsarecommonsymbolsusedfortheSunandthe

Earthrespectively.

Thesolarradiatione ectsboththeattitudeandtheorbitofthespacecraft,since

theresultofapressureat apointapartfrom thecenter-of-masswill constitutea

torque. The e ect on orbit is normallynegligible (if the satellite hasnot got an

extremelyhighaltitude)sinceitisrathersmallcomparedtootherforces.

Ontheotherhand,thisis thedominantdisturbanceforceonveryhigh altitudes.

Additionallythisforce isindependentofthedistancefrom theEarth(althoughit

obviouslyis dependentonthedistancefrom theSun).

2.3.2 Aerodynamic drag

Aerodynamic drag is a disturbance that arises when the satellite move through

theEarth'satmosphere,which(althoughitisnotdense)isenoughforatorqueto

appear.

Accelerationscaused byaerodynamicdrag canbedescribedasfollows:

 r = 1 2 C D A m V a _ r a (2.19) 4

(30)

where

C

D

= DimensionlessdragcoeÆcientassociatedwithA.

A = Crosssectionalareaofvehicleperpendicular

tothedirectionofmotion[m]:

m = Massofvehicle[kg]:

 = Atmosphericdensityatthevehicle'saltitude[ k g m 3 ]: V a = jr_ a

j=Speedofvehiclerelativetotherotating

atmosphere[ m s ]: _ r a = 0 @ _ x + _ y _ y _ x _ z 1 A _ r = 0 @ _ x _ y _ z 1 A

=Theinertialvelocity.

_

 = RateoftheEarth'srotation[ rad

s ]:

Tosimplifytheequations,youcouldusetheballisticcoeÆcientforthevehicle,,

whichisde ned by:

= C

D A

mg

Obviouslyg isaltitudedependent.

This force both slows the craft down as well asit starts to spin the craft if the

center-of-pressureisapartfrom thecenter-of-mass.

Theaerodynamicdisturbanceisthedominantdisturbancebeneath500km

alti-tudefromtheEarth,anditdependsonthedistancefromtheEarthase r

,where

isaconstant.

2.3.3 Magnetic disturbance torques

Themagneticdisturbancetorqueisaresultfromtheinteractionbetweenthe

space-craft residual magnetic eld and the geomagnetic eld. There are three main

sourcesin thesatellitefordisturbancetorquesof thissort,andtheyare:

1: Spacecraftmagneticmomentums

2: Eddycurrents(due tospinningmotionofcraft)

3: Hysteresis(duetospinningmotionofcraft)

Depending on the material, construction technique and mission, the two latter

sourcesfordisturbancecanbemadenegligible. Thisleavesthespacecraftmagnetic

momentum as the largestsource of disturbance,and theinstantaneousmagnetic

disturbance, N

mag

, due to the spacecraft e ective magnetic momentum, m, is

givenby:

(31)

whereBisthegeocentricmagnetic ux.

Thisdisturbanceisdominantintheregionbetween500kmtoabout35000km,

anditdependsonthedistanceformtheEarthasr 3

. Togetacompletediscussion

onhowthis disturbancetorquecanbemodeled,please referto[27].

2.3.4 Gravity gradient torque

The gravity gradient torque is a torque that wants to align the craft with the

Earth'sgravitationalforce eld. Sincethe force eldwill notbeconstantoverall

non-symmetricalobjectsinorbit,di erentforceswillacton di erentpartsof the

satellite. Ifthe gravitationalforce- eldwould be uniform,this disturbancewould

vanish.

Aconceptualexpressionof thegravitygradienttorquecanbeexpressedas:

N gg = Z r i dF i = Z (+r 0 i ) R i R 3 i dm i (2.21)

InFigure2.2, thede nitions ofthecoordinateframecanbefound.

r

R

S

R

i

r

i

Center

of mass

r

i

'

dm

i

Geometric

center

Body

reference

frame

Figure 2.2. CoordinateSystemfor theCalculationofGravityGradient Torque

de nedinEquation(2.21)

Thistorqueis,likethemagnetic disturbancetorque,dominantbetween500km

and35000km. ItdependsonthedistancefromtheEarthasr 3

.

(32)

2.3.5 Micrometeorites

Disturbance torque from small fragments in space are rare, and often not taken

intoaccountatall. Thistextwillnotbebotheredwithsuchrandomevents.

2.3.6 Oblateness of the Earth

Accelerationscausedby theasymmetryof theEarth,i.e. thefact that theEarth

is slightly attened by its poles, is rather diÆcult to model. The force in

Equa-tion(2.1)will actuallynot bedirectedat thecenteroftheEarthasstatedbefore whenassumingEarthtobeaperfectsphere,ratherslightlymoreagainstthe

equa-torsincetheEarthhasmoremassin thatregion.

Thereforethis anomalyis regardedasan update to Equation(2.1) ratherthen a perturbationofitsown.

Themain resultingupdate acceleration,still accordingto [19], to Equation (2.1) becomes: a = r (2.22)  =  r " 1 1 X n=2 J n  r  r  n P n sinL # (2.23) where

 = GM (Theplanetarygravitationalconstant).

J

n

= CoeÆcientstobedeterminedbyexperimental observation.

r



= EquatorialradiusoftheEarth.

P n = Legendrepolynomials. L = Geocentriclatitude. sinL = z r : Forn=2ton=4thetermsofJ n

areexperimentallydeterminedto:

J 2 = (1082:640:03)10 6 J 3 = ( 2:50:1)10 6 J 4 = ( 1:60:5)10 6

It is fairly easyto see that these equations, printedin theirrespective direction,

willberatherlarge. Thereforetheywill notbeprintedhere. Toseethecomplete

expressions,consult[19], whereonealsocan ndthree moretermsofJ n

.

Thedisturbance due to theoblateness of theEarth is adisturbance that canbe

completelymodeled,andisnotonecompletelyconsistingofwhitenoise. Therefore

itseldomisregardedasadisturbanceat all,butratherasamodelingerror.

2.3.7 Discussion on the magnitude of disturbances

(33)

Disturbance Regionofdominance Distance dependence

Aerodynamic .500km e

r

fromtheEarth

GravityGradient 500kmto 35000km r 3

fromtheEarth

Magnetictorques 500kmto 35000km r 3

fromtheEarth

Micrometeorites Normallynegligible

Solarradiation &20000km r 3

fromtheSun

OblateEarth Consideredamodelerror

Table2.1. Anestimateofdisturbancesinspace

altitudes,wheretheEarth'satmosphereislessdens,theforceandtorquecausedby

solarpressuredominates. Eventhemoonsgravitationalforcevaryin time. When

thesatelliteisnearthemoon,itwillobviouslybesubjecttoalargermagnitudeof

forcefromthemooncompared towhenthesatelliteisontheoppositesideof the

Earth.

Every other force, such as gravitational forces from the other planets and the

re ected solar pressure from the Earth and the moon, acting on a satellite are

small enough to be completely discarded. The reason for this is that they will

vanishinthesystemsnoise.

To sumthis chapter up, a simpletable where magnitude of disturbancescan be

foundisgivenin Table2.1. Observethat these guresarerepresentativeand not necessarilycompletelycorrect. Forfurtherreading,thereadershouldlookinto[27].

(34)
(35)

Orbits and missions

Beforeconducting amorethorough investigation onhowtostabilize aspacecraft

whenit isoperationalin orbit,somethingshould besaidabouthow asatelliteis

putintoorbitandwhat kindoforbitsthereare. Thisiswhatthischaptercontains

alongwithdi erentmission de nitions.

3.1 From launch to orbit

There are but one way to get a satellite into the correct orbit that we know of

today. And that is by launching it with a rocket, which is separatedat agiven

altitude. Afterthat,aseriesofthrusterburnshastobemadetoreachthedesired

orbit.

Forlargesatellitesthisisprettymuchwhathappens. Anadapterconeisboltedto

thecarrierrocketandthesatelliteismountedontopofit. Thereasonforusingan

adapterconeis boththeneedforaseparationsystembetweentherocket andthe

satelliteand thefactthatcarrierrocketsaremanufacturedinparticulardiameters,

and the satelliteoften has other dimensions. The adapter cone supplies both of

thesefunctionalities.

For small satellites, however, other launch possibilities may be used. If it is

re-ally small, it can use abig satellite as a transport, i.e. alarge craft has many

smallsatellitesinside,anddeploythem attheirdestined position. Anothermean

to travelinto spaceis by hitchhiking with alargersatellite. This is similar with

theprevious transport method, except that it does notuse the main satellite at

all. Insteaditisattachedtotherocket,inonewayoranother,andseparatesafter

themainsatellitehasseparated. Thisis agoodsolutiontokeepcostdown, since

carrierrocketsoftenhasacapacitytotakemoreweightthenitoftendoes. Ashort

presentationofthesedi erentmethodswill bepresentedinChapter4.

Oftenlaunches happen neartheequator,this isdue to theEarth'soblateness. It

issimplynotasmuchgravityneartheequatorcomparedto thepoles,thusnotas

(36)

sitecalledPlesetskinnorthernRussia,forinstance. There,thecarrierrocketslook

verydi erent. Insteadofonlyonemainrocket,theyhaveattachedseveralbooster

rocketsto thesideofthemain onetobeableto put thesatelliteinto thewanted

orbit,thusmakingtheselaunchvehiclesoneofthemostpowerfulin theworld.

Thereareother waystolaunchsmall satellitesintospacethantheprevious

men-tioned. Thereare, forinstance, oldintercontinental rocketsthat hasbeenrebuild

totakesmallcrafts intospaceinsteadofdumpingdestructivepower. Theseother

methodswillnot bementionedanymorein thisdocument.

3.1.1 Orbits

Whenthe satellite is positioned into space by its rocket, it sometimes is parked

in thecorrect orbitdirectly. Butsince thisseldom is thecase, thesatelliteoften

hasto makea series of thruster burnsto get into the right position. When this

isthecase,the satelliteisparkedinto anotherorbitcalled aGTO (GeoTransfer

Orbit). Thisisanorbitthat willintersectwitheither thecorrectorbitor another

GTO,althoughthelatterisseldomthecase. Thereasonforthisisthatthesekind

of maneuversare fairly expensive to do, thereforeis it pro table to separate the

satellitein asgood position aspossible.

Whenmakingatransferbetweentwodi erentorbitsaHohmann transfer isoften

If you get your velocity

boost here, you'll go from

a circular orbit to an

elliptical orbit

If you give your velocity a

boost here, you can

change your orbit from an

ellipse to a larger circle

Assume that we

begin with a

circular orbit

Figure3.1. AHohmanntransferfromonecircularorbittoanotherinthesame

(37)

used. A Hohmanntransferusesthe minimum energypath betweenthe orbitsin

thesameorbitplane,andisdonein twostages. Firstathrusterburnchangesthe

currentorbit into aGTO, whose apogee (the orbitsmaximumdistance from the

orbitedobject) isexactlyinthewantedorbitspath. Then,when thesatellitehas

reached theorbitsapogee, anotherthrust is made, andthe neworbit isattained

(seeFigure3.1).

Todoatransferbetween orbitsin di erent planes, aHohmanntransfermay not

betheoptimalone,butitwill stillwork.

Therearefour di erentkindsoforbitsthat areoftenreferredtoaccordingto[3], GEO(GeostationaryOrbit),LEO(LowEarthOrbit),MEO(MediumEarthOrbit)

andHEO (HighlyEllipticalOrbit). Thefollowingsectionswilldescribethesetypes

oforbitsinmoredetail.

Figure3.2. GeostationaryorbitaswellastwoLowEarthOrbits;APolarOrbit

andanordinaryLEO[3].

GEO

GeostationaryorbitsarecircularorbitsthatareorientedintheplaneoftheEarth's

equator. In thisorbit, thesatelliteappearsstationary,i.e. ina xedposition,to

an observer on the Earth. More technically speaking, a geostationary orbit is a

circularprograde

1

orbitin theequatorialplanewithanorbitperiodequaltothat

oftheEarth;thisisachievedwithanorbitradiusof6:6107(equatorial)Earthradii,

oranorbitheightof35786km. Asatelliteinageostationaryorbitwillappear xed

abovethesurfaceoftheEarth,i.e. at a xedlatitudeandlongitude.

Thefootprint

2

,ofageostationarysatellitecoversalmost1/3oftheEarth'ssurface.

This means that near global coverage canbe achieved with a minimum of three

1

WiththesamerotationaldirectionastheEarth.

(38)

satellitesin orbit.

Thisorbitshouldnotbemistakenforthegeosynchronous orbit. Thede nitionfor

thiskindoforbitis:

De nition3.1 (Geosynchronousorbit) A geosynchronousorbit means that a

satellite makes one orbit every 24hso that it is \synchronized" with the rotation

periodof theEarth.

Thiswillhappenatanaltitudeofapproximately36000kmabovetheEarth's

sur-face.

Thisde nitiondoesnot sayanythingabouttheorbitsposition,thusgeostationary

orbitisasynchronousorbit,butnotnecessarilytheotherwayaround. Thereason

forthisisthatthegeostationarymustbeinorbitintheEarth'sequatorialplane,

thusbeingasmallsubsetofthegeosynchronousones.

Theorbitlocationofgeostationary satellitesiscalled theClarkeBelt in honorof

Arthur CClarkewho rstpublished thetheory oflocatinggeosynchronous

satel-litesin theEarth'sequatorialplaneforusein xedcommunicationspurposes[6]. SeealsoFigure3.2or Figure3.3.

LEO

LEOs (Low Earth Orbits) are either elliptical or (more usual) circular orbits at

aheight of less than 2000km above the surface of the Earth. The orbit period

atthese altitudesvariesbetween90minand 2h. Theradius ofthefootprintof a

communicationssatellitein LEOvaries from3000kmto 4000km. The maximum

timeduringwhichasatelliteinLEOorbitisabovethelocalhorizonforanobserver

ontheEarthisupto 20min.

Inthis category,which isthemostcommonorbittype,thereareseveralsubtypes

of orbits. For instance there is a Polar orbit where the orbit almost has a 90 Æ

inclination

3

,andaSunsynchronous orbitwherethesatelliteneverisshadedfrom

theSunbytheEarth.

Mostsmall LEO systemsemploy polar, ornear polar, orbits. A complete global

coveragesystemusingLEOorbitsrequiresalargenumberofsatellites,inmultiple

orbitplanes,invariedinclinedorbits. Seeexamplebelow.

Example1

Thecurrently in operation Iridium(Motorola) system, utilizes 66satellites (plus

sixinorbitspares)insixorbitplanesinclinedat86:4 Æ

atanorbitheightof780km

withanorbitperiod P =100min;28sec. Global coveragewiththis singlesystem

isanastounding5:910 6

miles 2

persatellite.

SeealsoFigure3.2orFigure3.3,wheredi erentexamplesofLEOsaregiven.

3

(39)

Figure 3.3. Usualorbitde nitionsfromtheEarth'scenterandout;LowEarth

Orbit, Medium Earth Orbit, Geostationary Orbit and Highly Elliptical Orbit.

AlsotwoexamplesofRussianHEOisgiven(thecommunicationsatellitesystems

Molnya andTundra)[3].

MEO

MEOs(MediumEarthOrbits),alsoknownasICOs(IntermediateCircularOrbits),

arecircularorbitsatanaltitudeofaround10000km. Theirorbitperiodmeasures

about 6h. The maximum time during which a satellite in MEO orbit is above

thelocal horizon foran observeron the Earthis in theorder of a few hours. A

globalcommunicationssystemusingthis typeof orbit,requiresamodestnumber

ofsatellitesin 2to3orbitplanesto achieveglobal coverage. SeealsoFigure 3.3.

Example2

TheUS NavstarGlobal PositioningSystem(GPS)isaprime exampleofaMEO

(40)

Figure 3.4. TheUSNavstarGlobalPositioningSystemsnominalconstellation.

Using24satellitesin6orbitplaneswith4satellitesineachplane. Thealtitude

being20200kmandtheinclination55 Æ

,thuslayinginaMEOorbit[3].

HEO

HEOs(HighlyEllipticalOrbits)forEarthapplications wereinitially exploited by

theRussiansto providecommunicationstotheir northernregions notcoveredby

(41)

at63:4 Æ

inordertoprovidecommunicationsservicestolocationsathighnorthern

latitudes.

Theparticularinclinationvalueisselectedinordertoavoidrotationoftheapses,

i.e. theintersectionofalinefromtheEarthcentertoapogee,andtheEarthsurface

will alwaysoccurat alatitudeof 63:4 Æ

North. Orbit period varies from eightto

24h.

Owingtothehigheccentricityoftheorbit,asatellitewillspendabouttwothirds

of the orbit period near apogee, and during that time it appears to be almost

stationary foran observeronthe the Earth(this is referredto asapogee dwell).

A well designed HEO systemplaces each apogee to correspond to aservice area

ofinterest, i.e. which would coveramajorpopulationcenter, forexamplein the

RussianMolnyasatellitesystemdesignedtocoverSiberia,seeExample3.

Aftertheapogeeperiodoforbit,aswitch-overneedstooccurtoanothersatellitein

thesameorbitinordertoavoidlossofcommunicationstotheuser. Freespaceloss

andpropagationdelayforthistypeoforbitiscomparabletothatofgeostationary

satellites. However,duetotherelativelylargemovementofasatelliteinHEOwith

respecttoanobserverontheEarth,satellitesystemsusingthistypeoforbitneed

tobeabletocopewith largedopplershifts.

Example3

OneHEO systemsis the Russian Molnya system, which employs3 satellites in

three 12h orbits separated by 120 Æ

around the Earth, with apogee distance at

39354km andperigeeat 1000km. With these three satellites, theRussians have

completecoveragewithcommunicationsoverthewholearcticarea,includingtheir

owncountry.

AnotherexampleistheRussianTundrasystem,whichemploys2satellitesintwo

24horbitsseparatedby180 Æ

aroundtheEarth,withapogeedistanceat53622km

andperigeeat17951km.

InFigure3.3 twoHEOsareshown.

3.2 Missions

Thereareavarietyofmissions possibleforsatellites. Afewof themhavealready

beenmentioned, butwill bediscussed alittlemorein detailin this chapter.

Ob-servethatallofthebelowmissionclassi cationsarestrictlysubjectivetomyown

opinion,andaredrawnfromobservationofpreviouslylaunchedsatellitesmissions

presentedin[14]. Otherbooksmaythereforehaveotherclassi cations,butinthis texttheseonesareused:

Communication: If acommercial companiy owna satellite,it probably belong

(42)

1.7 %

Education

11.0 %

Tech Demo

2.3 %

Military

69.2 %

Commercial

14.4 %

Science

1.4 %

EO

Figure 3.5. Di erent market shares of missions calculated to the year 2000.

(Sourceis[14]).

EarthObservation: Inthiscategoryyoucan ndweathermonitoringsatellites

aswellas environmentmonitoringsatellites. Commerciallysomecompanies

sellphotographsoftheEarthtakenfromsatellites. Also,mapsarenowadays

drawn from satellitephotos,andlastly tracking airplanesand certainboats

isalsoa eld ofusebelongingin thiscategory.

Military: Thesesatellitesarefor defenseando enseuse. Forinstance thereare

spysatellites, taking high resolution picturesof theEarth. A few satellites

belonging in this mission pro le could also be Earth surveillance satellites,

suchasweathersatellites, orglobalpositioning satellites. Yet another may

alsobesomesortofcommunicationsatellites. Thecommonground,however

isthatallareusedin militarypurposes.

Education: Someuniversitieshavecoursesthatbuildsatellitestosendintospace.

(43)

Techdemo: Companies that want to trytheir components, and show the

con-sumersthattheyactuallywork,sendthesekindsofsatellitesintospace. They

sometimesalsohavesecondarymissions.

Science: This is by far the widest and the most diverse category. These

satel-litesdoeverythingfromobserving(suchastheHubbleSpace Telescope)via

researchonsolarphenomenatoresearchonotherplanets(suchasthe

Mars-lander).

GlobalPositioning: This is, in contrastto thepreviousitem, themostnarrow

category. Allofthesatelliteswiththesemissionsactuallyhasthesamekind

oforbit,aMEOorbit.

TheNAVSTAR GPSisaUSvariantofthissystem. AEuropeanone,called

GALILEO,isonthe way,but willprobablytakeat leastafewyearsbefore

operational(See[8]). TherealsoexistaRussianvariantofglobalpositioning, calledGLONASS(Global'nayaNavigationnayaSputnikovayaSistemaGlobal

Navigation SatelliteSystem), which isthe mostaccurate globalpositioning

systemonthemarket today. See[22]forfurtherinformation.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

EO

Education

Science

Tech Demo

Military

Communications

Figure 3.6. Di erentmissions marketsharedividedperyearsince 1980to the

year2000. Sourceis[14].

Global positioning does not really make up a category by itself, rather it is a

combinationbetweenEarth observationand military. Butfor simplicitytheyget

(44)

andin Figure 3.6 ahistorical aspect ofdi erent missions are given(observethat EOstandsforEarthObservation). Thesechartsarederivedfrom[14].

Itwouldbeaneasyguessthattherearemostlycommunicationsatellitesinspace,

buttechdemohasasurprisinglylargeshare. Theprobablecauseofthiscouldbe

thatthespaceindustryisextremelyconservative,andnoonewillspendanymoney

onasatellitethathasnotbeentestedinrealityatleastafewtimes(exceptmaybe

governmentsor the military). This has lead to a most peculiar phenomena; old

proventechnologyispreferredovernewandadvanced (i.e. a386computerwould

(45)

A study of small satellites

Nowadays there areseveralsatellites in orbit. Most commonare communication

andEarth surveillance satellites, but these arefairly big satellites. Smaller ones,

i.e. witha weight.500kg arecalled smallsatellites. These are historicallyfew,

buttheyaregrowinginnumbersaswewillseeinthis chapter.

4.1 Previously launched satellites

Figure4.1. Smallsatellites(i.e. mass.500kgplottedpermonthsince1980. A

(46)

Thehistoryof actualspace ightis, asalmost everyoneof youprobably already

know,extremelyshort. But,onthecontrary,thelongroadfrom discoveringblack

powderto the actual rstlaunch isabit moreextensive,and isbrie y described

inAppendix D.

Ifwejustlookatsmallsatellites,themainmissionsusuallyareglobalpositioning,

weathersurveillanceandofsciencenature. Ifwedividesmallsatellitesevenmore,

intomini(<500kg), micro(<100kg)and nano(<10kg)satellites,wecan

com-pare the numberof launches that have been historically (that we know of) with

theweightof thelaunched satellite. This comparison hasbeendone in [14], and theresultisshownin Figure4.1.

From gures4.1and4.2,onecanseethatbetween1997-1999,whentheinformation technology haditspeak, theincreaseoflaunchedsmall satelliteswassubstantial.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

Mini

Micro

Nano

Figure4.2. Massdistributionoflaunchedsmallsatellitesdividedperyear.

(47)

4.2 Tendency in launches today

Toguess the future in this areais rather diÆcult. There is notmuch happening

rightnow,butin thefuture therewillprobablybeanew\boom". Thereasonfor

thisisthelifetimeofsatellites. Mostsatelliteshavesomekindofsolarpanels,which

meansthattheycanrestoreitspowerresources. Thereisoneproblemthough. To

change orbit, or just adjust it, the satellite needs to use thrusters of somekind,

andtheyallusesresourcesthatarenot renewable. Therefore,thesatellitewillrun

outoffuelatacertainage(whichrangesfromanythingbetweenacoupleofyears

toacoupleofdecadesdepending onthepropellingsystem,size and missionetc).

Whenit runs out of fuel, it will use its last propellant to do agraveyardburn

1

,

andburnup.

Thisproblemwithfuelrunningoutcanbesolvedinafewways. Either,theowner

couldjustreplacethesatellitewithanewone,ortheycansendarefuelandrepair

team to it. There are a lot of communication, weather and positioning satellites

in space now, that are growingvery old, thereforethere will probablybeseveral

launchesinthefuture,withtheaimonrenewingthepopulation.

Sincetheactuallaunchisamongthemostexpensivepartsofasatellite,therewill

probablybealotofcompanies/scientiststhatwilltryto takeadvantageofothers

thatwantto renewtheirsatellitesin space. Becausewithsmallercrafts thereisa

possibilityto\hitchhike"into space,thusreducingcosttremendously.

4.3 Customers

Themarketforsatellitescanbedevidedinto vemaincategories(accordingto[14]):

 Military(exampletype: spyorweathersatellite)

 Amateur(exampletype: radio relaysatellite)

 University(exampletype: studentresearchprojects)

 Commercial(exampletype: TVbroadcastorGPS)

 Government(exampletype: researchorweathersatellites)

Historicallythegovernmenthasbeenthecustomersthathasbeenthelongesttime

inthebusiness(forsmallsatellites),seeFigure4.3. Buthistorically,thecommercial grouphaveincreasedtheirmarketshareconsiderably,aswecansee inFigure4.4.

1

Awaytopreventthespacetobe lledwithtrash. Theprocedureissimplyto rea series

(48)

5.1 %

Amateur

35.1 %

Military

5.4 %

University

37.1 %

Commercial

17.3 %

Government

Figure 4.3. Di erent customers marketshare for historically launched small

satellites. (Source[14].)

4.4 Potential use

Thissectionwilldiscusshowand towhatsmallsatellitescouldbe,andare,used.

Thereare probablymorewaysto usethem thanthese, and theinterested reader

couldlookinto[14,27].

4.4.1 Dispenser

Onewaytousethese smallsatellitesisastransportationand deploymentofeven

smallerones,for instancenanosatellites. This kindofsatelliteis usuallycalled a

dispenser,sinceitdispensesmallercraftsin space. Theadvantagewithdoingthis

isthat manysmall satellitescanshare onelaunch. Since, asstated severaltimes

inthistext,thelaunchisthefarmostexpensivepartofasatellitestotalcost,this

wouldlowerthecostpersatellitetremendously.

The use of many small satellites can be motivated by the obvious reason of

re-dundancy. Ifonelargesatellite malfunctions,youare smoked, but ifasmall one

malfunctions,thereareothersthat still work.

Dispensers are increasing in number especially in space research missions, since

(49)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999

Government

Commercial

University

Amateur

Military

Figure4.4. Marketsharebetweendi erentcustomersforsmallsatellitesdivided

peryear. Noticethetrendthatmilitaryisdecreasingandcommercialisincreasing

theirmarketshare. (Dataderivedfrom[14].)

4.4.2 Main vehicle

As a main vehicle there are some limitations when speaking of small satellites.

Since they are just that, much of the interior will be aimed at controlling the

vehicle, which leavesa\not sobig"space left forthe payload. Thebudgets

2

for

thepayloadarealsomuch smaller.

2

(50)

4.5 Ways to launch small satellites

Assaidbefore,themainadvantageofsendingasmallsatelliteintospaceisthatit

can\share"thelaunch vehiclewith othersatellites,thusreducingthelaunchcost

foreachsatellite. Therearebut afew waystohitchhikeintospaceonthemarket

today,and thesewaysarebrie ydiscussedinthenextcoupleofsections.

4.5.1 ASAP

The ASAP, Ariane Structure for Auxiliary Payloads,is a way to launch several

smallsatellitesatthetime, bymountingthem ona\rig". Therigismountedon

theadaptercone,andin spacethemain satelliteseparatesbeforethehitchhiking

satellitesdoes. See Figure 4.5. ASAP is meant to besent by the carrierrocket Ariane.

ASAPisafullyworkingsysteminuse. Themaindrawbackistheadditionalwork

before launch thatmustbedone. Test and rocketparametershas to be changed

forthis towork.

Furtherinformationcanbefoundat[14,23]

4.5.2 ESPA

Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Alliant Techsystems, three manufacturers of the

launch vehicles calledAtlas,Delta andTitan respectively, havedevelopeda

stan-dardtogetherfortheUS government,calledEELV (EvolvedExpandableLaunch

Vehicles) according to [7]. This standard implies that a satellite that can be mountedon top of oneof these carrier rocket alsocan be mounted on theother

ones.TogethertheyhavealsodevelopedtheSecondaryPayloadAdapterforEELV,

calledESPA. Here,thesmallsatellitesaremountedasinFigure4.6.

Themain drawback with this kind of satellitetransport is the placement. Most

oftheforcesacting onthelauncherare inthe vericalplane, which coincideswith

theseparation plane for all of these small satellites. This is not good, since the

separationsystemsis theweakest pointand should notbe exposed toanystress.

Forfurther informationaboutESPA,consult[9].

4.5.3 Munin

Muninis anexample onhowto have but oneother satellitehitchhiking. Inthis

concept,asmallsatelliteresidesontopof themainsatellite. Thesetwosatellites

areseparatedwith asmall separationsystem. Forfurther information about the

Muninproject,consult[2].

4.5.4 I-Cone

I-Conestandsforintelligentcone, andisaconcepttousetheactualadapter-cone

(51)

Secondary

small

satellites

The rig

Adapter-cone

Primary

satellite

Figure4.5.HowsmallsatellitesaremountedonacarrierrocketwiththeASAP

system. Aringisboltedtotheadapter-conebeneaththepayload. Onthisring,

(52)

EELV

Standard

Interface

Plane

ESPA

Small

Secondary

Space-craft

Large

Secondary

Space-craft

Separation plane of

Secondary Spacecraft

Small Secondary

Space-craft

Primary

Space-craft

EELV

upper

stage

Figure4.6. SchematicofESPAmountedtoEELVupperstagewithoneprimary

payloadandsixsmallsatellites. (Referenceis[1].)

at take o , the structure of the cone must be very stern. Thus resulting in a

heavyconstruction, which actually isthe main limitation to the I-Coneconcept.

In Figure 4.7, a suggestion of how an I-Cone satellite could look like is shown. F

3

A is aSESpace used \slogan"for I-Cone. Itstands forfour di erent positive

characteristicsofthesatellite:

Fast: Thetimeto developanI-Conefrom theconceptto thecompleteproduct

isshort.

Frequent: SinceaI-Conecan be launched withany kindoflaunch vehicle,the

satellitecangainafrequentaccess intospace.

Flexible: TheI-Coneis builtinsuchawaythat it tsmanydi erentmissions,

suchasTechDemo,CommercialorMilitaryforinstance. Furthermoreisthe

I-Coneindependentofthemainsatellite.

A ordable: The most expensive part of a satellite is the launch cost, assaid

before. This concept could however dramatically decrease this cost. By

(53)

Figure4.7. SuggestionhowanI-Conecouldlooklikeasasmallsatellite

con gu-ration. Noticethenon-symmetricmassdistributionovertheareaofthesatellite.

BycourtesyofSaabEricssonSpace[24].

Thereareseveral potentialmissions forI-Cone. Butin general,certainorbitsare

toprefer. It allcomesdowntotheweightofI-Cone. Sinceitis heavy, relativeto

itssize, it is diÆcultto movethe satellitearound to much, thus excluding GEO

orbitswhich needs a lot of thrusterburns to reach. Buton the other hand,due

to theweight italso becomes morestable which makesit an excellentchoice for

LEO-missionsandMEO-missionswithhighaccuracypreferences.

Communication satellite

Thiscouldbea eldofinteresfortheI-ConeunlesstheorbitisaGEO.Thereason

forthisisitsweight. TogetintoaGEO,aseriesofthrusterburnshastobedone

inordertogettherightaltitudeandspeedinthecircularorbit,andwhenacraftis

asheavyasI-Cone,itwillconsumetoomuchenergytomakeitasoundalternative.

Positioningsystems

(54)

position andattitude isimportantfor thesatellites,much fuelisconsumed. This

way,ifanI-conewasto beused,allfouroftheF 3

A atributesareutilizedinfull.

Mainvehicle

The prospect of making I-Cone into a satellite of its own seems to be the most

probable. Then thebusinside I-Conewould take 3

4

ofthespace, leavingtherest

forthepayload.

Dispenser

This isa highly interesting areafor theI-Cone concept, since noother company

asyet hascome forth with a good solution how to attach small satellitesonto a

rocket in agood manner. I-Cone could be the rstreal good solution, since the

mainstructureisnota ectedbythematall.

4.6 The need for small satellites

Smallsatellitesis agrowingmarket. But this market could groweven moreif a

solutiontohowtheycouldbelaunchedintospaceinaneasierandcheaperwaywas

solved. Therearefourpossiblewaysto hitchhikeintospacepresentatthemarket

today, but all of them have some drawbacks. Since no good solution has been

found,companieslaunchinglargesatellites(communicationsatellitesforinstance)

arenothappytohavehitchhikers. SESpacesolution,however,mightchangethis,

since the actual small satellites are almost invisible to the main satellite. This

concept,calledI-Cone,couldthereforehaveapromisingfuture.

Ifwelookhistoricallyonthesmallsatellitesdevelopment,onecanclearlyseethat

moresmallsatellitesarebeingsentupeveryyear. Butwhenlookingatthemissions

andcostumers, therehavebeenbigchanges fromyearto year. Attheend of the

periodresearchedinthisarticle,themostusualsatelliteslaunchedintospacewere

commercial communicationsatellites, compared to just afew years earlier when

research and government was in top of the list \most launched". Since the IT

businessisbadrightnow,thishasprobablychangedbacktothepreviousscenario

withscienceasprimefocusof spacemissions.

Inthefuturehoweverthiswillprobablychangeagain. Thereasonwhythismight

beistheexpected life-timeofsatellites. Sincetheyeventuallywillrunoutoffuel

andheadtowardstheEarthandburnup,theymustbereplaced. Thismeansthat

satellitelaunchesofcommunicationsatellitesprobablywillincreaseagaininanot

toodistantfuture.

What this means for thesmall satelliteindustry is diÆcult to predict, but since

(55)

Orbit and attitude

stabilization

Inordertointeractwithotherbodiesinspaceinone wayoranother,thesatellite

musthaveknowledgeofafewthings. Itmustknowhowitis,andhowitshould be

oriented. This chapterdealswith aspectsofthis matter,and especiallyit focuses

ontheAOCSusedtocontrolaspacecraft.Itstartsbydescribingwaystodetermine

iftheattitudeiscorrectinSection5.2.1,andcontinueswithdiscussingthemeans tomakechangestoasatellite'sorientationinSection5.2.2.

ActualstabilizationmethodsaredescribedinSection5.3,but rstashortnoteon redundancymeasureswouldbeinorder.

5.1 Redundancy

Sinceitisexpensivetolaunchasatellite,ssstatedaboveinChapter3,itwouldbe catastrophicifsomethinginthesatellite,suchassensorsoractuatorsforinstance,

malfunctions. Twothingsaredonetoensurethatthisneverhappens. First,allof

theequipmentenduresheavytests,andsecond,manyofthesensorsandactuators

havea\spare",i.e. ifforinstancethreesensorsofonesortisneeded,fourareused

insteadsothatifonebreaks,theotheroneswillstillbeabletocompletethetask.

Forlargernetworksofsatellites,suchasGPSforinstance,sparesatellitesarealso

orbitingthe planet. This kindofredundancy isneededincase oneormoreof the

satellitesmalfunctionsin one way oranother. Then thespare satellitecould fast

andeasyreplacethe aseone.

5.2 Sensors and actuators

Tocontrolaspacecraft,weneedto knowthreefundamentalthings;whereweare,

(56)

hastobesolvedwithsomesortofsensors. Thesecondhastobegiveninadvance

(the user has to know where the satellite should point, which orbitthe satellite

should haveand what themaximumallowederror is). Themeans by which the

satellitewill be controlled are called actuators. All of these three things will be

dealtwithinthis chapter,startingwithsensorsandactuators.

Thesensorsandactuatorsareveryexpensivepartsonsatellites,sincetheprecision,

aswell asthe durability, of these instrumentsmight beveryhigh (depending on

themission). Since they haveto be ableto withstand the climate in space even

the cheapest sensors and actuators must have a certain standard. To keepcost

down,companiesthat manufacturessatellitestries touse COTS

1

in asfarextent

aspossible. Speci cations,andashortdescription,forafewoftheseCOTScanbe

foundforsensorsinTable5.1andforactuatorsinTable5.2. Mostofthesesensors canbemodeled,andalthoughthatwillnotbedoneinthistext, amorethorough

explanationwill be given in the next few chapters. If the readeris interested in

howtomodelthem, [27,18]ispreferable.

5.2.1 Sensors

Asensor is adevice that bysomemean candeterminesomething aboutthe

sur-roundingenvironment. It could beathermometer measuringthe temperature, a

Geiger-meter that measures the activity on isotopes or a hydrometer measuring

thedampnessin theairetc. Inthesatellite'sbus,actuatorsareusedtodirect the

spacecraftiftheattitude iserroneous. Henceit needssensorsthat candetermine

thecurrentattitude. There aremanywaysto dothis, thenextfew sections

con-stitutes alist of afew ofthese sensors, and asummary of these canbefound in

Table5.1.

Earthsensors

AnEarthsensormeasureswheretheedgeoftheEarth'satmosphereis. Therefore

this kind of sensors sometimes also are called horizon sensors. Since the

atmo-sphereis warmerthen thesurroundingspace,anIR-sensor

2

ndswherethisedge

is.

Byitselfthisdoesnotgivemuchinformation,sincethiskindofsensoronlyknowsif

itpointstowardtheEarthornot. Butwithadditionalsensorsitmightbepossible

to determine more about the attitude for the spacecraft. Especially when using

spinningstabilization

3

withthespacecraft,thissensorissuitableaccordingto[18]. AnEarthsensorisrelativelycheap,and hasincreasingprecisionthefurtheraway

fromtheEarthitis. Thereforethissensoroftenisused asacomplementtoother

sensors,for instance asunsensor. With asun sensor and twoEarthsensors, the

completeattitudecanbedetermined.

TheEarthsensorscanalsobeusedas\moonsensors",butthisisseldomthecase

1

CommercialO TheShelfproducts,i.e. cheapstandardproducts

2

Asensormeasuringheatradiation,i.e. temperature

References

Related documents

The small delay caused by the shaper can be decreased dynamically. In that way, the shaped trajectory reaches the end of the manoeuvre with the same states of the unshaped

Focus on the aspects of conceptual design, mission planning, selection and sizing of components, simulation, design and validation of control laws for ADCS (attitude determination

Figure 4.3: Expected number of blocks lost for each error correcting code in respect to scrubbing time. (block size =

B2D2 experiment counts with several types of sensors for attitude determi- nation: A three axis magnetometer (TAM) that provides magnetic field mea- surements; five coarse sun

This report, however, mainly focus on controlling the aircraft states without much regards to pilot behaviour as the main objective is to offer an aircraft designer a testbed

Other simulation results suggest that sliding mode control is better for precise attitude control in Y and Z axes and also for better stability in X-axis. The simulation of sliding

LDL and HDL were isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation, and proteins were separated with two- dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and identified with

The example FireSat ADCS subsystem design procedure using the ontology presents the possible supports during design by extracting the required knowledge from a vocabulary of