• No results found

Analysis of water samples for campaign 1928-1929 Billings factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples for campaign 1928-1929 Billings factory"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Copies to:

APR

29

f.fl'L tHEM'S OFFJc;

. w. s. er~

ANALYSIS OF

~ATER

SAMPLES FOR O.AtrPAIGN

1

928-l:

9

2

9

BILLINGS FACTOBY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMP

ANY

General C h e m i s t ~

Asst

.

Gen

.

Supt.

Asst

.

Gen.

Eng.

superintendent

Laborator7

([)

(2)

-KIND OF

WATER

PAGE

Yellowstone

River

l

City

2

Ma.in

Ta.nlc

3

Battery Supply

4

Hot Press

Wash

5

EYaporator Condenser

Tail

Pipes

6

Pan Conienser Tail

Pipes

7

Boiler Feed Tanlt

8

ater

from

Boilers

9

(3)

Form 443-1500-8-28---Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

Billi~.111

...

.

...

Factory

---Kind of Water:. Description of Sample: Source of Water:

Yellofltone

111ver

water

Average

Sample

for Campaign

Yellowstone River

...

.

...

April ..

lZ.~

..

1.9.29

...

192

.

.

---·

Intake one

mile south of Factol'T

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist

Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

1.86

.,22

4.06

lo44

31120

1R25

llo93

5.53

29049

11;25

30.74

1

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica :SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO.

Calcium Carbonate CaCO, Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100.000

1086

2.06

7.38

7.14

lo76

8084

045

29049

1.25

00.14

Chief Chemist.

(4)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

Bil.l.1ng_$

...

.

...

Factory

... ...

J.priLll •.

.

.19.29

...

192

...

.

Kind of Water:

City

Water

Description of Sample:

Average Sanple

for Campaign

Source of Water:

Yellowstone

RiTer water

Filtered thru City

Filtering Pla.nt

ANALYSIS

I

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt.

General Chemist

Asst. General Sunt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

lo78

.21

4.07

le42

3.24

1.20

11.44

5.88

29424-~

29.80

2

Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO.

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100.000

lo78

lo98

7.60

7o00

1.oz

9.42

044

29.24

a..2.6

29_.ao

--- ---·-Chief Chemist.

(5)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER

ANALYSIS

___________________________

JU_ll.lJJg_e _________ .

___

Factory

---.Al>ril--l~---1929---192

_______

_

Kind of Water:

Tank

Water

Description of Sample:

Average Sainple -for

Campaign

Source of Water:

Yellowstone

River

Ma.ill

source

of supply

!or

all

factor.y ope rat

.

ions

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

lo82

.20

4.10

lo38

3o08

1.20

11077

5.42

28.97

_k09

30.06

3

Silica :.Si02 Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Sodium Carbonate Na2CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride- CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

lo82

lo98

7.10

6085

2.12

a.69

.41

28.97

k09

30.06

Chief Chemist.

(6)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

-···-·-··-···J3iU ..

iM.8,

... ..

.

...

Factory

.

...

...

...

A.P.~U, ..

l..?.,._J ..

~-~~---···

-····-····-

192

...

.

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Source of Water:

Battery supply

Average Sample for Csnp aign

All waters from upper com.ensers o-r Evaporators

Drip waters

from

Vapor Pan

Possible

to send

water from main tank

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory PaTts Per 100.000

lo84

.21

4.00

1.36

3.23

1.15

10.74

6.11

28064

laM

30052

4

Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

l.84

1.90

7.66

6075

.2.A

9.81

.44

28064

1088

30052

Chief Chemist.

(7)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

·---

---

----

---

-- ---

Bii.l.JM~

.

..

..

.

Factory

-···-

_____

J._prjJ._J._g~--J~~~---192----

-

---Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water:

Press

Wash

Average

Sample

for Campaign

Condensed waters from 1st Effect EVaporators,

Battery Oalorisators, all heaters and overflow

fran Boiler

Feed

Tank.

Pos si.ble to

send

:sa.ttery

Supply to Press

Wash

.m.d Drips from all eT&porator1,

carbonation and bloW""ll.p traps and office heating

system •

.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid SiO, Fe Ca Mg Na Cl

so.

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt.

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100 000

.20

.15

.57

.16

061

.25

1.40

1.10

4.44

.98

5.42

5 Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO, Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO, Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

.20

.41

lo39

058

.14

1.41

• 3l.

4ci44

~

5o42

Chief Chemist.

(8)

Form 443-1500-8-28--Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

BilliM~--

---

-

---·---

Factory

---

-

_________

. _tI?;""_U. __

J,g_.

__

J

~~-~

_________

---__ 192

___ . --

-

-Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water:

Condenser

Tail Pipes

of EVaporators.

Average Sample for Campaign

Ma.in Water Tank

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt.

General Chemist Asst. General Supt_ Asst_ Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

1.90

.22

4.12

1.40

3.30

1.25

11.56

5.90

29.65

.53

30.18

6

Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO.

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO.

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

1.90

2.06

7.69

6.94

1916

9.44

946

29.65

~

30018

Chief Chemist.

(9)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER

ANALYSIS

---.'Billillg•-·-··- ___ Factory

-····-··-

·----.APr

il.

.

.12 •

.

_1.92

1

_______________

192

_______ _

Kind of Water:

Description of Sample:

Condenser Tall

Pipea

of Pane

ATerage_

Sample

for Canpaign

Source of Water:

Jlain Tanlc

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

2.06

.20

3.

9'1

1.45

3.74

1.20

11.36

6.5'1

o.49

4.11

M.60

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica :SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na,SO. Sodium Carbonate Na,CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgSO. Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaCl, Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO, Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

'1

Parts Per 100.000

2.06

1.98

9.14

6.4r9

.49

9.92

..

u

30.49

•.11

M.60

Chief Chemist.

(10)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pado 100

WATER ANALYSIS

-

---

Bil 1 t.n8!L

....

.

...

Factory

...

..

. AP.~il

..

1-2-,-

..

l

.

~

.

?-~--

---·--

·-

···

·

---

192 ...

.

..

. .

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Source of Water:

Boiler Feed Tank

Average Sample for Camp

sign

Drips from

2d, 3d,

4th, .

and

5th Bodies

ot

E'l'aporators.

Drips from all live steam, all granulators and all heating

systems. 1st, 2d, and

3d

Condensers and Blow-u.p

Trapa

.

Possible to send drips from all heaters

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist

Asst. General Supt.

Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

.52

.15

.39

.09

.49

.35

1.15

.59

3.73

&

4ol4

8

Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium. Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100.000

052

.58

.BO

.45

.35

.72

0

31.

3o73

~41

4.14

(11)

Form 443-1500-8-28-PadE ·100

WATER ANALYSIS

--···---·---.:Billings

_________

_

·--Factory

--- ·---.A;pr.il--12,---19.2.9---192 _______ _

Kind of Water:

:Boiler

W-ater

Description of Sample:

Average Semple for Campaign

Source of Water:

Water

in Boilers - Contains water from Boiler

Feed Tank

and

City

Water

Note - 600 Lbs.

Soda. Ash

reported as added to Boilers

100 Lbs. Caustic Soda reported as added to

Boilers

ANALYSIS

I

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100 .000

2.10

.21

5.62

2

.

53

23.64

3.05

45.80

14.55

97056

21.84

119.40

9

Silica :SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO.

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCI.

Calcium Sulphate CaSO.

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

2.16

5.03

66090

.70

8.29

14.04

.44

97.56

.2.1...8.i

119.40

Chief Chemist.

References

Related documents

Eftersom många av deltagarna menade att de helt enkelt inte har råd att anlita någon, skulle det vara en fördel att ha en formgivare med i grundarteamet för att kunna lägga ner

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users

Since the boundary quantum field theory in this case is defined over a p-adic number field either Q p or its unramified extension Q pn , further development of

In previous works [9,10], the following correspondence between driven two-dimensional conformal field theories and dynamical systems has been established implicitly: Evolution of

Work of Ferwerda, Schedl, and Tkalcic [12, 10] on Instagram pictures, showed that the way filters are applied to create a certain distinctive- ness that can be used to

förhållande till skolbiblioteksverksamheten. Inom några år går det kanske att urskilja en utveckling med tanke på den ändring i skollagen som infördes nyligen och där rektor

Arbetet beskriver lärares syften med att låta elever skapa film i skolan och vad som krävs av lärare och elever för att arbetet ska fungera och svara upp mot läroplan