• No results found

Avian Brood Parasitism: Variation in Host Repsonse

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Avian Brood Parasitism: Variation in Host Repsonse"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Avian Brood Parasitism: Variation

in Host Response

(2)

What is Brood Parasitism?

• Obligate vs. Facultative

(3)
(4)

Host vs. Parasite

•Parasites benefit, at the cost of the host

•Co-evolutionary arms race often occurs

between the host and the parasite

(5)

Frontline Defenses

• Mobbing-alarm calls, physical attacks • 2 purposes

- prevent parasitic egg laying

(6)

Egg Rejection

• Discrimination among eggs • Two forms

- ejecting parasitic egg from nest

-abandoning entire nest

• How do hosts know when to reject?

- visual cues (spotting, size, brightness,etc.) - egg arrangement

(7)

Spottiswoode, C.N., and Stevens, M. (2011). How to evade a coevolving brood parasite: egg discrimination versus egg variability as host defences. Proc Biol Sci 278, 3566–3573.

(8)

Polačiková, L., Takasu, F., Stokke, B.G., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., Cassey, P., Hauber, M.E., and Grim, T. (2013). Egg arrangement in avian clutches covaries with the rejection of foreign eggs. Anim Cogn 16, 819–828.

(9)

Chick Rejection

• Less common than egg rejection • 2 forms:

- Physically remove chick - Abandon entire nest

• How do host know when to reject?

-amount of parental care required -incubation call as password

(10)

Influences on Host Response

• Variety of defenses seen in hosts • Influenced by:

-parasitic pressure -parasitic species

-host personality/behavior • Host that do not defend:

-evolutionary lag

(11)

To Conclude…

• Brood parasitism benefits the parasite, at the cost of the host

• Host use variety of defenses to avoid parasitism

• Which defense is used, and when, is dependent upon the specific situation • Some hosts choose to accept parasitism

References

Related documents

This uptake is, however, unlikely to fully compensate for the costs of paternal care since another experiment (paper IV) showed that males brooding full broods had lower

pipefish. Still, the proximate mechanisms of brood reduction are not identified. For instance, I expect a genetic conflict to be present between the parents, as outlined above.

The present thesis addresses some of these issues by investigating retention and dispersal of early life stages of two fish species in two fairly different marine systems,

The three‐spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is an intermediate host of  the cestode Schistocephalus solidus. The parasite must specifically infect this fish 

This study aimed to investigate if heterozygosity, allelic richness, number of alleles, inbreeding and differentiation of brown trout (Salmo trutta) are related to the encystment

However, if paternal quality is independent of male size one should expect the more protein-rich embryos developing in small males’ pouches to become larger than embryos developing

In the broad-nosed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle Linnaeus, both sexes prefer to mate with large partners; large females produce more and larger eggs and large males can care for more

Underhåll var ett förslag som ansågs som en enklare lösning för att få itu på alla stopp i produktionen där olika orsaker till problemen skulle kunna identifieras. Förslaget om