• No results found

Analysis of water samples saved during 1928-29 campaign Longmont factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples saved during 1928-29 campaign Longmont factory"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Anal.7sia

of Water

S.aple• Bawd

During

1928

-

29 Oanpaign

.ilnsmont

Faotgry

!nut

Great

Weatern

Sugar

cmpany

Oopiee

to,

General

sui:-erinte

eral

Ohaniat

District Engineer

SUper1nte:ndent

Chief

Chttmi st

(2)

..

\

I:

i

fl

0

1

.

...

J.

s

.,..

....

:.

..

i

)

1

n

...

,.a

..

;

'

..

..

1

'

..

::.>

(3)

Form 443-1500-8-28---Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

Lml9D-DJ1.t.

...

..

.

...

Factory

...

.

...

.

...

.A;pl"_il

..

1 •

...

192

..

,

....

Kind of Water:

Boiler Feed.

Description of Sample:

Average

aample for osnp&lgn 1928-29.

Source of Water:

Drip• tram ataan

ohanbera of 2nd, 3H,

and

4th

ettecta

of

the

evaporators,

clripa

from granulator

end

pan

001111

and

atemn traps from

all main

steam

lines.

Occasionaly City water.

Notw

-

Thia

sample was

evidently

contaminated

w1

th

some

ot

h

er

waters

as

the

total

aolida

i

nol"lllal.7

about

3.00 parts per

100,IOO

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist

Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

.ao

.12

.73

.12

1.09

.20

4.01

1.24

8.71

1,64

10.25

(1)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate Magnesium Chloride Magnesium Sulphate Magnesium Carbonate Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate ,SiO, 'NaCl Na,SO, Na,CO, MgCl MgSO. MgCO, CaCI. CaSO. CaCO, FeCO, Parts Per 100.000

.ao

.33

2«96

2.52

003

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

s.n

1,54

TOTAL SOLIDS .,.? / .----···-~ ·-·· · ~··· Chie.f Chemist.

(4)

Form 443-1600- 8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

... -····-···

·

·l,oD1J1Rcm.t

....

-····-···

··

··-·-

··

_-·Fa

ctory

...

....

... _.J»r.11

..

i.

... _

... -.

.

l92

.

J ....

.

Kind of Wate1·:

Preas

alh ater

Description of Sample:

ATerap

••pl• tor Oapailm.

1928-29.

Source of Water:

Drlpa i'roll

lat 8Jld 5th

ETapoanor1,

drlp1

tro

a.Jl

heater1,

Blem-up

tra~•,

arboantion

trap,.

aJlll

oTerflow

from

Boller

Hd

tank.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

.69

.06

• 31

.22

.M

.15

2.;a6

.22

4.46

1,81

6.26

(2)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate Magnesium Chloride Magnesium Sulphate Magnesium Carbonate Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate SiO, 'NaCl Na,SO • Na,CO, MgCl M:gSO. MgCO, CaCI. CaSO. CaCO, FeCO, Parts Per 100.000

.69

.25

1.36

1.09

.67

.2'1

.12

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

6.26

.

,f'_

_

_

.

_

h_~----

--

·----

-

·---·--·-·

·

--

(5)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

I

I

j

________

__

___________________

Lo.DpOJlt ____________

Factory

-~11 __

1.,.

_

_

__

___

________

__

_

192f ___

__ _

/ Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

Batter7

·:a.pply

Water.

(Pw!e) Single

ayat••

.ATerage S•ple tor Capa1gn 1928-29.

Corulenaer ater from

North Evap. Condanser

(City water)• Condenser

water

tr

Oliver Vacuum

S

atem (CitJWJter),

Oo

ling

wa.:

er :trom ga•

pump••

Dripa

trQ

batter oal.orizatore, eTer:tlow trom preaa waah tank,

oaaaaionly

wat

r from pan condenaer seal t&J3ka.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100.000

SiO,

.so

Silica :SiO,

Fe

.1e

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Ca

2.5z

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Mg

1.18

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Na

2.11

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Cl

.20

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

so.

13.?9

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

co.

.86

Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

21.66

2,66

24.30

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

Parts Per 100.ono

.so

.33

6.11

6.86

,.o,

1.12

.3'7

21.66

2.66

24.30

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt.

Asst. Chief Engineer

Superintendent

Laboratory

(3)

··--··--

--

-

··---

-·--~~

r ,

j)

--

--

~ :

P

~

-··-

---

-

··-

-

-

---Chief Chemist.

I

J

(6)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

... I.ongllont ...

Factory

... Aprll

..

l, ... 192 ...

1

..

.

Kind of Water:

onh

Evaporator Cond.euer (Front}

Description of Sample: ATV&@lt 8811pl9

tor

Campaign

1928-29.

Source of Water:

City

.ater

wheD

a,ailab

e. otherwise river water, snd condensed vapors

~rom

No.

5

North Evaporator

Condenaer.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100.000 Parts Per 100,000

Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

lel58

.14

.70

.35

.86

.a,

2.75

1.16

Silica :SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

(4)

1.58

.6~

le91

.11

l.67

.29

,.ea

la66

(7)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100 Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium l\1g Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

-

-

- - - -

-

-WATER ANALYSIS

---

·---~11

__

.lt-

---1

92

___

9

__ _

ou~h

Ter

por tor Condenser

s

ple

or

C p&1

1928-29.

Ri~er ater

a1'..d

Condensed

vapors

~ro South

vap. o.

5.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100.000

2.6

Silica .SiO,

.25

Sodium Chloride NaCl

e.8!

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

·'°

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

15.4'

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

1.58

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO.

73 • .&6

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

7.66

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Parts Per 100.000

42.59

13.26

12.31

.52

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

118.36

13,80

132.16

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

118 36

J3e80

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst_ General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent

Laboratory

(6)

---··--··-···--··-·-··---·~~.-

J

...

(8)

Form 443-1500-8-28----Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

---

LoJ1810:n:~-

---··---Fact

ory

_________ ___________

.Apr.U.-

-

l_,

______________________ 192_9 ____

_

Kind of Water:

White

l

an

Condanoer

Description of Sample:

A.\'e;rage •ample tor

1926-2

C paign

Source of Water:

B1Ter ater

and

Condensed

Vap

ors

from ,h1te ans.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory P"rts Per 100 .000

1

70

.20

12.36

7.69

13.11

1.26

64.11

t,3.M

lUS.99

14,31

(6)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate Magnesium Chloride Magnesium Sulphate Magnesium Carbonate Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate :SiO, NaCl Na,SO, Na,CO, MgCl l\'.!gSO. MgCO, CaCl, CaSO. CaCO, FeCO, Parts Per 100.000

1..

0

2.11

37.92

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

113.'39

14.31

TOTAL SOLIDS

128.SO

-·-··-···-~---.

t

.

.,.~---

-

-

---

---·-··

··

···

(9)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

-WAT

E

R ANALYSIS

---

Lo

~

on.t.

_____________ ...

Fact

o

ry

______________________ .A

pril

..

1 ..

____________________

1

9

2

___

9

__ _

Kind of Water:

R

aw

ran

C

o

ndensere

Description of Sample:

A

ver

ag

e

S

ample for

0

811

ai

gn

1

9

28-2

9

Source of Water:

R

iTer ater an

d

conde

n

sed

Ta

pors fro

m

Ra

w

P

an

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Su:Aerintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

2.

5

2

.14

12.66

8.62

14.82

1.58

7

3

.7

0

12.3

4

126.31

139.7.6

l7)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride 'NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesiu~ Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100.000

42.68

16.33

20.33

.29

126.37

13,39

139.76

,,

(10)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

·

·-

···--···-···· ....

L.OJts,l.OJJ.t.

·-···

··

-

·

.

___

Factory

·

-·---··---··--Ap:r.ll._.l._ ______________________

192

___

,.

__

_

Kind of Wate1·:

City

W

~ter

Description of Sample:

Average

antt>le for

Camr•aien

1928-29

Source of Water:

St.

Vr in

P.~Ter abcut

15 miles west of

Lo

gmont

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium l\Ig Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist

Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100.000

1,13

.06

.41

.11

033

.46

.70

.49

:5.?7

,20

3.91

(8j

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate Magnesium Chloride Magnesium Sulphate Magnesium Carbonate Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate :SiO, 'NaCl Na,SO. Na,CO, MgCl l\igSO, MgCO, CaCl, CaSO, CaCO, FeCO, Parts Per 100.000

.'i'2

.u:

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

3.T'I

.20

TOTAL SOLIDS

3.9'1

~-,

/_

../2

~(·

···-·--··:.,-:".t .. ····'-··-···---.. ···--·--··-···· Chief Chemist.

(11)

Form 443-1500-8-28-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

________________

1,engmom _________

_________

_____ Factory

_________

.

______________ _qril

__ l., _____

_____________

192

___ , __ _

Kind of Water:

Jliftr

tff

Description of Sample: A'f'er&ge

•ple fer

C•

•!gn

1928-29

Source of Water:

St.

Vrain

1ver.

110uth,

tactol'J' aite.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer

Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100 000

3.72

.13

11.'18

9.86

1'1.48

le68

84.2'1

10.82

139.'13

163.72

(9)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica .Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride lligCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Fenous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100.000

3.'12

2 • .,,,

60.62

16.'19

1'1.81

.27

139.73

13.99

153.72

Chief Chemist.

References

Related documents

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users

In previous works [9,10], the following correspondence between driven two-dimensional conformal field theories and dynamical systems has been established implicitly: Evolution of

Work of Ferwerda, Schedl, and Tkalcic [12, 10] on Instagram pictures, showed that the way filters are applied to create a certain distinctive- ness that can be used to

The middle adulthood group show a negative correlation with Heavy Metal (r =-.339) music, which indicates that their preference to listen to Heavy Metal goes down when reaching the

I den här rapporten redovisas resultaten från inventeringar av lodjur, varg, järv och kungsörn, samt länsstyrelsens bedömning av förekomsten av björn i Gävleborg

De som planerar redogör mera för hur verkligheten i deras dagliga arbete ser ut och de tror då inte att det är realistiskt att enklare hinder kommer att vara avhjälpta år 2010.