• No results found

Swedes in Australia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Swedes in Australia"

Copied!
4
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Halmstad University, School of Social and Health Sciences.

Bachelor thesis in Media & Communication Studies 16-02-2009

Swedes in Australia

- and their thoughts about

business communication and culture

Author: Johanna Gustafsson Supervised by: Lars Palm Examiner: Ulrika Sjöberg

(2)

2

ABSTRACT

Title: Swedes in Australia

– and their thoughts about business communication and culture Author: Johanna Gustafsson

Supervisor: Lars Palm Examiner: Ulrika Sjöberg

Purpose: The purpose of the thesis is to study Swedes who live in Australia about their thoughts concerning differences between the cultures and their communication styles in the following four areas; Power Distance, Masculinity verses

Femininity, Affective verses Neutral, and Time.

Method: I have chosen a qualitative approach for this study. My research is based on 10 telephone interviews; conducted with Swedes who work for various companies in Australia.

Theory: My theoretical chapter includes theories in the field of communication science and culture. Four scientists’ theories are explained; William B. Gudykunst's Anxiety /Uncertainty Management theory, Edward Hall’s High-and Low- context theory, Geert Hofstede’s national culture theory, and Fons Trompenaars’ culture business theory.

Conclusion: My research concludes that there are some main differences between the Swedish and Australian culture and between Swedes’ and Australians’

communication style. My research shows that Sweden is a low-power distance, feminine and neutral culture. While Australia is a higher power-distance, masculine and more affective culture, compared to Sweden. My study also confirmed that the time aspect is not as flexible communicated in Sweden as it is in Australia. All these culture differences are reflected in the cultures’

communication style. For example, Swedes are characterized by a team- oriented, open and equal communication style, whereas Australians use a more hierarchical, assertive and unilateral communication style. While group discussions, personal responsibility, and a high flow of information are common in Sweden, Australia is more characterized by delegation and protectiveness of territories, authority, and information flow.

Key words: Communication, Intercultural communication, Business communication, Culture, Culture differences, Culture diversity, Cross-culture communication, International Business, Geert Hofstede, Fons Trompenaars, Swedish

characteristics, and Australian characteristics.

(3)

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Globalisation – Sweden & Australia 1

1.2 Problem Background 2

1.3 Sweden’s & Australia’s context 3

1.4 Purpose of thesis 4

1.5 Target group 4

1.6 Delimitation of the study 5

2. METHODOLOGY 6

2.1 Quantitative & Qualitative method 6

2.2 Method of selection 7

2.3 Data collection 7

2.3.1 Secondary data 7

2.3.2 Critical discussion of my secondary data 7

2.3.3 Primary data 8

2.4 Methodological reflections 10

3. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 12

3.1 Communication 12

3.2 Intercultural Communication 13

3.3 Gudykunst’s Anxiety/Uncertainty Management Theory 14

3.4 Hall’s High- & Low-context Theory 15

3.4.1 Information processing 15

3.4.2 Time orientation 15

3.4.3 Interaction Patterns 16

3.5 Culture 17

3.5.1 Culture definition – Geert Hofstede 18 3.5.2 Culture definition – Fons Trompenaars 18

3.6 Hofstede’s National Culture Model 19

3.6.1 Power distance (PDI) 20

3.6.2 Femininity verses Masculinity (MAS) 21 3.6.3 Criticism of Hofstede’s research 22

3.7 Trompenaars’ Culture Business Model 22

3.7.1 Affective verses Neutral 23

3.7.2 Time 23

3.7.3 Criticism of Trompenaars’ research 24

(4)

4

4. ANALYSIS 25

4.1 Power Distance 25

4.1.1 Business Hierarchy 25

4.1.2 Roles 27

4.2 Masculinity verses Femininity 29

4.2.1 Social Gender Roles 29

4.2.2 Consensus 31

4.3 Affective verses Neutral 32

4.3.1 Approaching Style 32

4.3.2 Emotions & Confrontation 34

4.4 Time 35

4.4.1 Work-time verses Private-time 35 4.4.2 Planning & Details & Punctuality 36

5. FINAL DISCUSSION 38

5.1 Conclusion 38

5.2 Further research 39

APPENDIX

1. Map of Australia 2. Swedish Trade Council 3. Interview guide

4. The rest of Geert Hofstede’s National Culture Model 5. The rest of Fons Tropenaars’ Culture Business Model

References

Related documents

In order to follow the theoretical framework structure, I will focus on the three elements that constitute a discursive formation, namely, (1) the object of

Thomas, Daniel, Sydney, International Cultural Corporation of Australian Limited & Art Gallery Board of South Australia, 1988, p.. Thomas, Daniel, Sydney, International Cultural

The management commit was crucial to implementation of innovation in organization, in Wahaha, from top management to basic level staff all conceived the conception of

The reason for having team-building activities through out the entire store in IKEA Canada instead of department by department in Sweden is that the Canadian people are not that

If this number of periods is large enough, then each individual in the group develops so great an understanding of their initial target’s perspective that no other target is

Applying a theory developed in the American political communica- tion culture to the Finnish political communication culture may be regarded as a most different systems design,

Using both Hofstede and Hall’s cultural dimensions as framework of the study and comparing and analyzing four websites in food industry( two mineral water

57 Therefore, it can be concluded that for this multi-case study of this research, the business culture not only have an impact on the international business negotiation process