• No results found

Supervisors certificate for passed degree project Master programme in Applied Biotechnology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Supervisors certificate for passed degree project Master programme in Applied Biotechnology"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

——————————————————————————————————————————

IBG Evolutionsbiologiskt centrum (EBC) Norbyvägen 14, SE-752 36 Uppsala Uppsala biomedicinska centrum (BMC) Box 592, SE-751 24 Uppsala

www.ibg.uu.se

Supervisors certificate for passed degree project

Master programme in Applied Biotechnology

The certificate should be sent to the appropriate coordinator at IBG, before the student is allowed to give his/her oral presentation at the programme.

Name of the student:………...

Swedish civic registration number:...…

The degree project has been implemented with the following element accepted:

Written report accepted for final oral presentation.

... /... 20...

Date ...

Supervisors´ signature

(2)

——————————————————————————————————————————

IBG Evolutionsbiologiskt centrum (EBC) Norbyvägen 14, SE-752 36 Uppsala Uppsala biomedicinska centrum (BMC) Box 592, SE-751 24 Uppsala

www.ibg.uu.se

Degree project – Supervisors detailed opinions

Information: These opinions, that in part may form the foundation for the final assessment, are to be sent directly to the coordinator and will not be forwarded to the student.

I rate the students’ performance according to the following:

1. The student had adequate previous knowledge for the Degree project.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

2. The student had enough of practical/laboratory skills to successfully complete the project.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

3. The student was thorough and documented the experiments/studies well.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

4. The student was creative, took own initiatives and worked independently.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

5. The student responded to instructions well and was active.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

6. The student generated and analysed data reliably.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

7. The student mediated and discussed results orally in a good way.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

8. The student has summarized the work well in the written report.

Do not agree at all □ □ Fully agree

Possible additional comments about the course or the student:

References

Related documents

The student had adequate previous knowledge for the Degree project.. The student had enough of practical/laboratory skills to successfully complete

Different factors affecting the diffusion rate were studied experimentally, and compared to simulated computer models, ultimately yielding the optimization

The novel microfluidic assay showed good agreement with standard Etest and macrodilution and the variability of the MIC obtained with CellDirector ® 3D was much smaller

In this study four of the selected transcription factors, Scleraxis a, Scleraxis b, Mohawk a and Mohawk b turned out to be expressed close to points where muscles are attached to

In this work, the relation between H 2 -production and photosynthesis in the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was studied with respect to three main aspects: the

The immunological characterization included analysis of IgE to the purified components in serum samples with known reactivity with storage proteins from other

Det som är viktigt är dels en tydlig närvaro av lärare eller andra vuxna inom skolan, ytor där lärare och barn kan umgås tillsammans utanför lektionstid, samt placering av

The four best network configurations in regards to the least drop in accuracy, compared to the original network, and the speed-up gained for convolutional layers are presented in