• No results found

Views on free trade and TTIP in the Nordic Countries

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Views on free trade and TTIP in the Nordic Countries"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Medlemsföretaget Slite Stenhuggeri i Slite

Views on free trade and TTIP in the

Nordic Countries

(2)

Is free trade over all positive or negative?

71%

76%

69%

81%

61%

71%

15%

10%

16%

5%

27%

12%

15%

15%

15%

14%

13%

17%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

TOTAL DENMARK FINLAND ICELAND NORWAY SWEDEN

Positive Negative No difference/don't know

Question: Do you think that free trade -enabling [COUNTRY]’s companies and individuals to export and import goods and services to and from foreign countries without tariffs or other barriers - is overall something positive or something negative?

(3)

Prefered trade partners for each country

73-81 percent regards increased trade with USA ’good’

Question: Which of the following countries do you think it would be good/bad for [COUNTRY] to increase trade with? EXCLUDE [COUNTRY] FROM ALTERNATIVES LIST

Good for DENMARK.. Good for FINLAND..

44%

48%

54%

49%

59%

53%

69%

71%

80%

76%

75%

80%

71%

79%

82%

69%

78%

0% 50% 100%

Turkey Russia South Africa South Korea Brasil India China Belgium USA France Netherlands Great Britain Finland Norway Germany Iceland Denmark Sweden

43%

73%

56%

60%

62%

59%

72%

78%

81%

83%

81%

85%

88%

89%

80%

87%

89%

0% 50% 100%

33%

44%

46%

50%

50%

53%

58%

74%

79%

80%

81%

84%

84%

84%

84%

84%

85%

0% 50% 100%

Good for ICELAND..

34%

43%

53%

51%

59%

57%

59%

64%

73%

72%

71%

77%

72%

77%

69%

80%

80%

0% 50% 100%

Good for NORWAY..

39%

34%

56%

55%

60%

59%

62%

72%

77%

78%

74%

82%

82%

83%

81%

77%

81%

0% 50% 100%

Good for SWEDEN..

(4)

Strongest pro-trade arguments in each country Export perspective stronger in SE, DK, import

perspective in NO, IS

47%

59%

47%

36% 35%

55%

41% 33% 39%

69%

39% 37%

29% 28%

40%

24% 23% 27%

21% 20% 19% 17% 21% 27%

12% 15%

2% 6%

20% 15%

10% 8% 11% 10% 12% 8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

TOTAL DENMARK FINLAND ICELAND NORWAY SWEDEN

Free trade is an advantage for [COUNTRY]’s export business and thus creates jobs in [COUNTRY]

Consumers would see lower prices and a greater range of products and services Free trade fosters competition and develops enterprise

Free trade strengthens relations between countries and decreases the risk of war Free trade lifts countries out of poverty

None of the above

Question: Which, if any, do you consider the strongest arguments FOR free trade? (choose max 2)

(5)

Perceived TTIP impact on jobs Danes most optimistic

42%

62%

39%

25%

31%

46%

24%

14%

27%

28%

26%

26%

11%

5%

13%

8%

19%

9%

23%

18%

21%

39%

24%

19%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

TOTAL DENMARK FINLAND ICELAND NORWAY SWEDEN

The number of jobs would increase The number of jobs would not be affected The number of jobs would decrease Don't know/Don't wish to answer

Question: How do you think a free trade agreement between EU and USA would impact the number of jobs in [COUNTRY]?

(6)

Strongest arguments AGAINST free trade

31% 31%

23%

17%

32%

46%

31%

27%

34%

29%

38%

29% 29% 33% 29%

23% 21%

34% 37% 36%

43%

34%

30% 28%

9% 9% 8%

5%

12% 9%

17% 16%

13%

31%

14% 14%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

TOTAL DENMARK FINLAND ICELAND NORWAY SWEDEN

Increased transportation volumes could lead to increased environmental impact Free trade could threaten jobs due to increased competition from other countries

Harmonized product standards could lead to lower environmental and product safety standards We might have to open our market to GMOs

Free trade leads to higher food prices in developing countries None of the above

Question: Which, if any, do you think are the strongest arguments AGAINST free trade? (choose max 2)

(7)

Who will benefit the most from TTIP – EU or the US?

19%

25%

11%

16%

21%

19%

22%

20%

25%

11%

26%

22%

45%

41%

54%

42%

40%

46%

15%

14%

9%

31%

13%

13%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

TOTAL DENMARK FINLAND ICELAND NORWAY SWEDEN

EU US Both would gain or lose the same amount Don't know/Don't wish to answer

Question: Which side do you think has the most to gain from a free trade agreement between the EU and the US?

(8)

Overall sentiment towards the TTIP agreement

59%

65%

55%

56%

53%

64%

14%

12%

17%

7%

18%

13%

27%

23%

29%

36%

29%

23%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

TOTAL DENMARK FINLAND ICELAND NORWAY SWEDEN

Positive Negative Don't know/Don't wish to answer

Question: A free trade agreement intended to increase transatlantic trade is currently being negotiated between the EU and the US. How do you feel about the EU signing a free trade agreement with the US?

(9)

Methodology

• CINT delivered interviews with web panelists in all countries except for

Iceland, where the panelists were delivered by MMR. Both Panel providers work with ESOMAR approved panel recruitment and maintenance. Stratified sampling with regards to gender, age and region was applied in each country.

• Field period Swe-Nor-Den-Fin: 2015-July-31 – 2015-August-11

• Field period Iceland: 2015-August-06 – 2015-August-11

• Number of respondents:

– Sweden: 1002

– Norway: 1002

– Denmark: 1003

– Finland: 1001

– Iceland: 578

References

Related documents

This effect suggests that countries with high shares of manufactures to primary product exports have lower income inequality because manufactures are relatively intensive in their

This book Access to Information in the Nordic Countries explains and compares the legal rules determining public access to documents and data in Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway,

Germany is demonstrably the most important Western trading partner of the Baltic countries (especially for Latvia and Lithuania) and there is reason to believe that this

To summarise, the general assessment of both European legislation and legal practice illustrates that the modern concept of bad faith provides a fair balance between (i)

operationalisation of innovation that was applied in the HCSFS survey is a prerequisite for understanding why – in contrast to previous studies – there are no statistically

DEGREE PROJECT, IN MASTER THESIS , SECOND LEVEL STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2015.. Developing an sleep scorer by using Biosignals

In the 2000s, starting with the Swedish law revision in 2001 and followed by law revisions in Iceland, Finland, and Norway and the restrictive changes in Danish

Integration in the labour market – opportunities and challenges THEME: A COMBINATION OF WORK AND LANGUAGE TRAINING Best practice: Swedish for professionals (Sfx), Sweden!.