• No results found

NextGenNK Competence Center Executive Board Meeting

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "NextGenNK Competence Center Executive Board Meeting"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PROTOCOL

Page | 1

NextGenNK Competence Center

Executive Board Meeting December 2

nd

, 2020 16:00 – 17:00, CEST

Meeting called by

Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren, Director

Present

Jan Andersson (JA), Chair

Agneta Edberg (AE) Douglas Calder (DC) Henry Ji (HJ)

Maria Eriksdotter (ME)

Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren (HGL), Director, invited adjunct member Evren Alici (EA), Deputy Director, invited adjunct member

Karl-Johan Malmberg (KJM), Deputy Director, invited adjunct member Carin Dahlberg (CD), Scientific Administrator, invited adjunct member Mats Jarekrans, Vinnova representative

Location

Online, Zoom

AGENDA and MEETING MINUTES

Housekeeping items

1. Opening of the meeting

• The Chair of the Board JA welcomed everyone and opened the meeting

2. Election of meeting secretary and attestant of the meeting

• CD was elected as meeting secretary

• HJ was elected as attestant of the meeting

3. Confirmation of the agenda

• Revision of financial plan 2020 was added under Discussion and decision points

4. Previous protocols

• The previous meeting protocol was approved as distributed

Activities

5. Communication

• Updates of the Competence Center’s Website was presented

o HGL has written a review article highlighting NK cell–mediated immunotherapy o EA presented NextGenNK at Allogeneic Cell Therapies Summit – 2020

6. Current activities

(2)

Page | 2

• Current activities were presented, with focus on the clinical trials within the Center

7. Timelines and near-term plans

• The current timeline was presented

Discussion and decision points

8. Registration of trademark

• Costs for trademark application in Sweden and international registration was presented

• The Board decided to continue to investigate a trademark registration

9. Entry of new parties

• A strategy for entry of new parties to the Competence Center was presented

1. The aspiring party should establish a collaboration, including a signed agreement, with the coordinator and/or another party within the competence center

2. The new party should approve the consortium agreement, as is defined

3. The Executive Board should approve the new party, and recommend the party to the General Assembly

4. General Assembly should approve the new party, within a reasonable timeframe

• The Board approved the plan, with the addition that a set time for the General Assembly to reply should be included. 14 days was suggested.

10. Revision of financial plan 2020

• A revision of the financial plan for 2020 was presented

• The Board approved the suggested financial plan revision for 2020

11. Budget 2021

• The Board approved the budget for 2021

12. Next board meeting date

• Date and time for the next board meeting was decided, March 3rd, 16.00-17.00 CET

13. Other items

o No other items were discussed

14. Closure

• The Chair of the Board, JA, closed the meeting

Chair of the meeting Attestant of the meeting

--- ---

Jan Andersson Henry Ji

References

Related documents

The KI disciplinary board comprises the president (chair), a legally qualified member, a faculty representative, a student representative from the Medical Students’ Association

När det gäller elever som kan möta svårigheter i undervisningen, delges olika argument för på vilket sätt användandet av SMART Board skulle kunna bidra med möjligheter eller

[r]

Riksantikvarieämbetet tillstyrker även förslaget att Lantmäteriet ska säkerställa en gemensam punkt för tillgång till informationen. Förslaget om en

Det vill säga, studerande under 40 år, kan endast beviljas extra studiemedel för behörighetsgivande utbildning om det finns synnerliga skäl, medan studerande kommer att kunna

We performed correlation analysis and regression analysis including the independent variable women on board (W/B) and all control variables: women in management (W/M), women in total

Detta styrks dessutom av det faktum att studieföretagen har en genomsnittligt lägre volatilitet både innan och efter listbytet än vad jämförelseföretagen har (se Bilaga

Article BD Material class