• No results found

Greener energy’s benefits and trade-­‐offs: Discussion

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Greener energy’s benefits and trade-­‐offs: Discussion"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Greener  energy’s  benefits  and   trade-­‐offs:    

Discussion    

by  Elena  Paltseva  (SITE  and  NES)    

 

SITE  7th  Energy  Day   Nov  21st,  2013  

(2)

Green  energy:  benefits  

•  Environment,  especially  in  terms  of  CO2   emissions  

•  Once  up  and  running  –  long-­‐term  sustainable   (renewable!)  

•  DiversificaPon  of  energy  porQolio  –  good  for   energy  security  

•  Not  very  localized  (unlike  e.g.  oil  and  gas),  

which  also  contributes  to  energy  security  

(3)

Green  energy:  costs  

•  Costs  of  installment    

•  Costs  of  aUracPng  private  investors  

–  Cheaper  opPons  with  carbon  (shale  gas  boom)   –  Higher  risks,  so  subsidies/guaranPes  are  needed  

•  Technological  costs  

–  Lower  flexibility  

–  IntermiUent  power  generaPon  

(4)

Green  energy:  costs  (cont.)  

•  NegaPve  externaliPes  of  greener  energy  

–  Interrelated  transmission  networks  →  shocks    due  to  

intermiUent  power  generaPon  are  spread  to  neighboring   regions/countries  →  demand  for  compensaPon  mechanisms  

•  E.g.,  Germany  sets  high  green  targets.  Does  it  mean  that  the  

neighboring  EU  members  (from  former  Eastern  block)  would  have   to  develop  more  of  (dirty)  smoothening/compensaAon  power  

plants?  

 

–  Greener  energy  (e.g.  in  the  EU)  →  lower  local  demand  for  

carbon  →  lower  price  of  carbon  energy  →  “outside”  countries   with  so_er  “green  standards”  consume  more  carbon-­‐based   energy  

 

(5)

Green  energy:  costs  (cont.)  

•  Costs  of  transiPon  to  new  energy  types  

–  Monetary:  direct  (including  higher  energy  prices  of  final   consumers)  and  indirect  (reallocaPon  of  labor,  and  capital)   –  PoliPcal:  costly  acPons  may  be  difficult  to  “sell”  to  voters;  

also  significant  counter-­‐lobbying  from  affected  energy-­‐

intensive  industries  

–  Also,  historically,  such  transiPons  were  slow  (e.g.,  in  the  US  it   took  38  years  to  nuclear  electricity  generaPon  to  reach  20%  

share,  and  40  years  to  natural  gas  -­‐run  turbines)  

•  May  be  even  slower  due  to  boom  in  shale  gas  

•  PoliPcal  fricPons  due  to  asymmetries  

–  In  composiPon  of  energy  porQolio  

–  In  policies  towards  polluPon  (some  countries  “free-­‐ride”  on   the  abatement  effort  of  the  others)  

(6)

Green  energy  policy  

•  All  in  all,    we  need  to  have  a  realisPc  expectaPons  of   forthcoming  poliPcal  and  economic  costs  

 

•  Green  energy  will  be  requiring  a  lot  of  smartly   designed  government  involvement  (and  

intergovernmental  coordinaPon)  for  many  more   years

 

 

(7)

Green  energy:  more  challenges  

•  How  to  prevent/minimize  “relocaPon”  of  “dirPer”  

environment  to  LDCs?  

 

•  How  to  moPvate  (relaPvely)  short-­‐horizon  poliPcians   to  support  long-­‐term  green  development?

 

 

References

Related documents

Furthermore, the world economy is changeable and the member countries constantly change the preconditions and the dynamic within the multilateral trading system, which in turn

Huffman decoder and sample decoding Misc calculations IMDCT (18 point transform)?. Misc calculations DCT (32 point transform) Windowing (16 tap FIR

A conference on Development, Trade and Investment will be held in Stockholm on 26-27 August 2016 by the Stockholm China Economic Research Institute at Stockholm School of Economics,

Det har inte varit möjligt att skapa en tydlig överblick över hur FoI-verksamheten på Energimyndigheten bidrar till målet, det vill säga hur målen påverkar resursprioriteringar

In terms of methodology, two separate approaches are taken in the disserta- tion, which we can call “using pre-defined categories”, and “generating cate- gories” (cf. mainstream

One of the implications of the first study is that both suppliers and customers should reduce information asymmetries in order to extend the duration of trade relationships, as

First, I show that hold-up, information asymmetry, and trade credit affect the duration of inter-firm relationships.. Particularly, if suppliers are held up by their customers

61.. weighted according to their importance to the end quality of the intervention in question. In this way, a higher quality skills assessment scale is being devised to