• No results found

answered partially Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 15, 2017

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "answered partially Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 15, 2017"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Nirav Ganeshbhai Sailor Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: S15000609

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good

Course of the defence:

Comments and questions from the opponent of the diploma thesis and the supervisor - answered

dr. Loufek: How was real parts produced. How was generated elements during automatic process setting on 3D-F simulation software. Is there difference between simulation of semicrystalline and amorphous polymers. - answered partially

dr. Čontoš: Are results of your simulation enought for prediction of real properties. Can you somehow predict coalescence of bubles during simulation. - answered partially

Assessment: Very good

Defence date: June 15, 2017 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Related documents

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of