Elektromagnetism och ljus
Problem 1
a) Reasoning: In the setup of this problem is entirely one-dimensional, you only have to think about what happens along the line of the two charges. To determine the electric field is pretty straight-forward once the formula is known.
The electric field is a vector quantity, the contributions from different charges add (vectorially). This means that you have to determine the electric field from each of the charges, and think about whether the two contributions add or subtract from each other. The electric field points away from positive charges, and towards negative charges. This is implied by the sign in the equation for the electric field, when you consider a negative charge the field will be negative which just means that it is pointing towards the source. You still have to think yourself whether this direction (towards the source) adds or subtracts with the electric field from other sources.
Solution: The electric field from a single point charge is E =
kqr2N/C, where k is Coulomb’s constant k =
4πε10= 9 · 10
9 NmC22. The electric field from q
1is
E = kq
1r
2= 9 · 10
9× 20 · 10
−80.05
2= 7.2 · 10
5N/C
and since q
1is positive the field point away from the source, i.e. to the right.
The electric field from q
2is E = kq
2r
2= 9 · 10
9× −5 · 10
−80.05
2= −1.8 · 10
5N/C
where the negative sign means that the electric field points towards q
2. Since q
2is to the right of P , the field generated by the source q
2in point P is pointing to the right. So the contributions from q
1and q
2in the point P point in the same direction, to the right. The field will therefore be stronger than from any of the two sources alone, and the magnitude of the two contributions have to be added. The total field in P is therefore 9 · 10
5N/C and pointing to the right.
b) Reasoning: When the solution to a) is known, the force on a charge q which
is placed in point P is easy to calculate from the equation for the force acting on
a charge placed in an electric field. Regarding the sign of the test charge, you again have to use your reasoning (although it is not required for this particular problem). For a positive test charge, the force acting on it will point in the same direction as the electric field. For a negative test charge however, the force acting on it will be in the opposite direction of the electric field.
Solution: The force acting on a test charge q in an electric field E is F = qE N. So for our test charge q = −4 · 10
−8C we get
F = qE = −4 · 10
−8× 9 · 10
5= −3.6 · 10
−2N
where the negative sign means that the force is pointing in the opposite di- rection from the electric field, i.e. to the left (it is attracted by the positive charge q
1and repelled by the negative charge q
2).
c) Reasoning: This one is maybe a bit trickier. First it is clear that the field is never zero anywhere in between the two charges q
1and q
2since they are of opposite charge and therefore the fields from them add together in between the charges as was seen in a). The the left of q
1, there can also not be any point where the field is zero since the magnitude of q
1is larger than q
2and since q
1will be closer to any point x which is to the left of q
1there will always be a non-zero electric field to the left of q
1. The solution must be some point x to the right of q
2, where the electric field from q
1point to the right and the electric field from q
2point to the left (towards q
2). We must find the point x where the longer distance from q
1cancels the fact that q
1has a larger charge than q
2.
Solution: Let us say that the charge q
2is located at x = 0, and we are looking for a point x which is to the right of q
2. The distance r
2from q
2to the point x is then just x. The distance r
1from q
1to the point x is then 10 cm longer than r
2, i.e. r
1= x + 0.1 m. Now we require that the electric field contributions from q
1and q
2to the point x are of the same strength, since we have already reasoned that they contribute in opposite directions and therefore will cancel each other
1:
E
1+ E
2= 0 ⇒ kq
1(x + 0.1)
2= −kq
2x
2⇒ q
1x
2= −q
2(x + 0.1)
2⇒ q
1x
2= −q
2(x
2+ 0.2x + 0.01) = −q
2x − 0.2q
2x − 0.01q
2⇒ (q
1+ q
2)x
2+ 0.2q
2x + 0.01q
2= 0
1
Here the equations are written such that the nagtive sign of the charge q
2is respected. Per- sonally I often find it easier to first just reason about the directions of the contributions (whether they cancel or not) and then just work with the magnitude of the charges q
1= |q
1| and q
2= |q
2|.
The relation would just read E
1= E
2then, and you would end up with the same equation to solve
in the end.
So we are left with just a second-order polynomial, ax
2+ bx + c = 0, to solve.
Solving it and the putting in the numbers for q
1and q
2gives:
x = −b ± √
b
2− 4ac
2a = −0.2q
2± p(0.2q
2)
2− 4(q
1+ q
2)0.01q
2q
1+ q
2= 1 · 10
−8± p(−1 · 10
−8)
2+ 3 · 10
−1630 · 10
−8= 1 ± √
4 30
We end up with two solutions (as always with a quadratic equation), but only one which has the positive x value that we are seeking
2. So the final solution is that x = 3/30 = 0.1 m. So in a point 10 cm to the right of q
2the total electric field is zero.
Problem 2
a) Reasoning: The potential generated by a single charge is easily calculated once the formula is known.
Solution: The potential generated by a point source is given by U =
kqrV.
We know that k = 9 · 10
9 NmC22and that q = 2 µC. So U = 9 · 10
9× 2 · 10
−60.1 = 1.8 · 10
5V.
b) Reasoning: The first part of the problem is trivial once the solution to a) is known. For the second part of the problem, we can make use of the hint. If the proton start at r
1= 10 cm and moves to r
2= 50 cm, it will have traveled from a point with higher potential to a point with lower potential. The potential U is the potential energy per unit charge, so by multiplying the potential with the charge of the proton we can find the potential energy in each of the two points. Since energy is conserved, the difference in potential energy has been transfered into kinetic energy (the initial kinetic energy in point r
1is zero since the velocity is zero there). A similar situation is a falling object, it starts at rest in a point with high potential energy (i.e. high up) and after it has been falling some distance it has lower potential energy and the potential energy difference has been translated into kinetic energy. For the proton in our problem, once we have the magnitude of the kinetic energy (from the potential energy difference), we can calculate which velocity it corresponds to.
Solution: Let us call the potential we calculated in a) as U
1, and then we
2