Förslag till framtida forskning

För vidare forskning hade det varit intressant att göra en jämförelsestudie över hur ungdomar och äldre vuxna upplever sociala medier. Det hade varit intressant att undersöka hur de olika sociala medierna används och hur känslorna skiljer sig åt mellan de yngre och de äldre

35

personerna. Det hade även varit intressant att undersöka andra sociala mediekanaler, eller helt andra webbplatser som är populära.

36

Referensförteckning

Aillerie, K., McNicol, S. (2016). Information literacy and social networking sites: challenges and stakes regarding teenagers’ uses. Essachess, 9(2), 89-100.

Alhabash, S., Mengyan, M. (2017). A Tale of Four Platforms: Motivations and Uses of

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat Among College Students?. Sage Journals, 3(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1177/2056305117691544

Alvehus, J. (2013). Skriva uppsats med kvalitativ metod: en handbok. Stockholm: Liber. Anderson, K. E. (2015). Getting acquainted with social networks and apps: Snapchat and the

rise of ephemeral communication. Library Hi Tech News, 32(10), 6-10.

Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. (2. uppl.) Oxford: Wiley. Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: the social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale

University Press. [www]. Tillgänglig på webbplats:

<http://www.danah.org/books/ItsComplicated.pdf> (Hämtad 2017-02-23)

Can, L., Kaya, N. (2016). Social Networking Sites Addiction and the Effect of Attitude towards Social Network Advertising. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 484-492. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.059

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

Cross, M. (2014). Social Media Security: Leveraging Social Networking While Mitigating Risk. [Elektronisk resurs].

Dogan, U., Kaya, S. (2016). Mediation Effects of Internet Addiction on Shame and Social Networking. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(5).

Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions?. Phsycological Review, 99(3), 550-553.

Ekström, M., Larsson, L. (red.). (2010). Metoder i kommunikationsvetenskap. (2. uppl.) Lund: Studentlitteratur.

37

Fejes, A., Thornberg, R. (red.). (2009). Handbok i kvalitativ analys. Stockholm: Liber.

Forsman, M. (2011). Internetpublicering och sociala medier: en juridisk vägledning. (4. uppl.) Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.

Fu, P. W., Wu, C. C., Cho, Y. J. (2016). What makes users share content on facebook? Compatibility among psychological incentive, social capital focus, and content type.

Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.010

Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world. (3. uppl.) Los Angeles, London: SAGE. Guillory, J. E., Hancock, J. T., Kramer, A. D. I. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale

emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320040111

Harboe, T. (2013). Grundläggande metod. Den samhällsvetenskapliga uppsatsen. Malmö: Gleerups.

Harding, W. T., Reed, A. J., Gray, R. L. (2001). Cookies and WebBugs: What They are and How They Work Together. Information Systems Management, 18(3), 17-24. DOI: 10.1201/1078/43196.18.3.20010601/31286.3

Hochman, N., Manovich, L. (2013). Zooming into an Instagram City: Reading the local through social media. First Monday, 18(7).

Holme, I. M., Solvang, B. K. (1997). Forskningsmetodik: om kvalitativa och kvantitativa

metoder. (2. uppl.) Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Internetstiftelsen i Sverige. (2016a). Svenskarna och internet 2016. [www]. Tillgänglig på webbplats: <https://www.iis.se/docs/Svenskarna_och_internet_2016.pdf> (Hämtad 2017-02- 01)

Internetstiftelsen i Sverige. (2016b). Svenskarna och sociala medier 2016. [www]. Tillgänglig på webbplats: <https://www.iis.se/docs/Svenskarna_och_sociala_medier_2016.pdf> (Hämtad 2017-03-16)

Kralj Novak, P., Smailovic, J., Sluban, B., Mozetic, I. (2015). Sentiment of emojis. PLoS ONE, 10(2), 1-22. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144296

38

Larsen, A. K. (2009). Metod helt enkelt: en introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod. Malmö: Gleerup.

Li, J., Xu, H. (2016). Suggest what to tag: Recommending more precise hashtags based on users’ dynamic interests and streaming tweet content. Knowledge-Based Systems, 106, 196- 205. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.047

Mai, L. M., Freudenthaler, R., Schneider, F. M., Vorderer, P. (2015). “I know you’ve seen it!” Individual and social factors for users’ chatting behavior on Facebook. Computers in human

behavior, 49, 296-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.074

Marengo, D., Giannotta, F., Settanni, M. (2017). Assessing personality using emoji: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 74-78.

Misra, G., Such, J. M. (2016). How Socially Aware Are Social Media Privacy Controls?.

Computer, 49(3). DOI: 10.1109/MC.2016.83

Nordicom. (2016a). Mediebarometern 2015. [www]. Tillgänglig på webbplats:

<http://www.nordicom.gu.se/sv/aktuellt/nyheter/mediebarometern-2015> (Hämtad 2017-03- 16)

Nordicom. (2016b). Digitala plattformar (totalt). [www] Tillgänglig på webbplats: <http://www.nordicom.gu.se/sites/default/files/mediefakta-

dokument/Mediebarometern/Mbar_Tema_rap/mediebarometern_2015_bara_internet.pdf> (Hämtad 2017-03-16)

Oberst, U., Wegmann, E., Stodt, B., Brand, M., Chamarro, A. (2016). Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: The mediating role of fear of missing out.

Journal of Adolescence, (55), 51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.008

Ortony, A., Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s Basic About Basic Emotions?. Phsycological Review. 97(3).

Phua, J., Jin, S. V., Kim, J. (2017). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041

39

Pilar, L., Balcarova, T., Rojik, S. (2016). Farmers' markets: Positive feelings of instagram posts.

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 2095-2100.

DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664062095

Piwek, L. (2015). ”What do they snapchat about?” Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, (54), 358-367. DOI:

10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.026

Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics: how social media transforms the way we live and do

business. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

Seufert, M., Hosfeld, T., Schwind, A., Burger, V., Tran-Gia, P. (2016). Group-based

communication in WhatsApp. [www]. Tillgänglig på webbplats:

<https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e6b4/e06e82cab6ca6efca4587e02bc1cc1a7e1b4.pdf> (Hämtad 2017-06-13)

Tettegah, S. (2016). Emotions, Technology, and Social Media. [Elektronisk resurs].

Toscano, P. (2017). Instagram-City: New Media, and the Social Perception of Public Spaces.

Visual Anthropology, 30(3), 275-286. DOI: 10.1080/08949468.2017.1296313

Vetenskapsrådet. (u.å.). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig

forskning. [www]. Tillgänglig på webbplats: <http://www.codex.vr.se/texts/HSFR.pdf>

(Hämtad 2017-04-26)

Wang, J. L., Jackson, L. A., Wang, H. Z., Gaskin, J. (2015). Predicting Social Networking Site (SNS) use: Personality, attitudes, motivation and Internet self-efficacy. Personality and

Individual Differences, (80), 119-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.016

Wargo, J. M. (2015). Spatial Stories with Nomadic Narrators: Affect, Snapchat, and Feeling Embodiment in Youth Mobile Composing. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 11(1), 47-64.

Yang, T. Y., Dehghantanha, A., Choo, K. K. R., Muda, Z. (2016). Windows Instant Messaging App Forensics: Facebook and Skype as Case Studies. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1-29. DOI:

40

Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Samah, B. A., Omar, S. Z., Bolong, J., Kamarudin, N. A., Akhtar. N. (2014). Addictive Facebook Use among University Students. Asian Social Science, 10(6). Zarouali, B., Ponnet, K., Walgrave, M., Poels, K. (2016). ”Do you like cookies?” Adolescents'

skeptical processing of retargeted Facebook-ads and the moderating role of privacy concern and a textual debriefing. Computers in human behavior, (69), 157-165. DOI:

41