Varför tabellen saknar nummer 1 och nummer 18 är för att dessa två artiklar exkluderades ur litteraturöversikten
Artikelnummer/
Titel, år
Författare/
Publikation styp
Land/ Tidskrift Studietyp/
metod
Urval Resultat Tema/
Kvalitet/ stress owing to indistinct risk for sickness absence of 8 studien inte är helt generaliserbar för målgruppen
3.Long-term sick leave in female white-collar working life, as well as in private life, played an important role in the informants' deteriorated health and long-term sick leave.
Job and ett rikt innehåll i resultatet.
34
4. Social support at work and leisure time and its association given a greater awareness of the importance of employees receiving social support, regardless of type of support or from whom the support is coming.
5.Involvement and structure: A qualitative study of organizational change and sickness absence among women in the public sector in Sweden.
The themes that most readily Keisu & Elin Kvist ement, Leadership &
Governance task conflicts are unrelated to well-being.
it is not only work-related well-being that is affected by intragroup conflicts, we also found that it is related to
Bra kvalitet på artikeln, de n vilket innebär att det inte går att dra några kausala samband.
35
Kohortstudie 2223 inom hälso-
Bra kvalitet på studien, alla obalans har inte testats work factors and psychological
American journal of industrial medicine
Kohortstudie 7810 individer förvärvs with poor work ability for both women and men. For men, also low skill discretion was associated with poor work ability. For both women and variable in the association white-collar workers in Sweden Journal of Public Health
There seems to be a greater tendency for the sick-listed women in this study to experience low control and too high mental strain at work and to live in traditional family relationships
Bra kvalitet, i princip alla n vilket innebär att det inte går att dra några
36 resources and a stressful work environment was associated with all three subscales of sick-listing in Swedish women – a
Factors in work and in family mobility in work life and control over decisions
Skriver lite om de etiska aspekterna.
37
12. Job strain and loss of healthy life years between ages 50 and 75 by sex showed that job strain was consistently related to shorter healthy life years.The difference in healthy life years was more pronounced mild to severe depression in a Swedish cohort: Journal of Public Health, appeared to vary by occupational small extent to be explained by psychosocial bias och etiska aspekter väl. stress in midlife and all-cause journal of public health better health and longer lives,
38 sector in Sweden
År: 2017 work-related stress in late midlife, educational attainment, and serious health problems in old age: a longitudinal study with over 20 years of stress may serve as a springboard for the before and after retirement. lång tids follow up. importance of the psychosocial a mixed gender composition was factors did not explain the
39
19. Psychosocial working conditions and exhaustion in a working
European Journal of Public Health low job control and low job were found for low job support.
Synergy between high job demands and low job control and between job strain and low job support was most evident for women, but
Tog hänsyn till många leave in Sweden:
A population
Registerstudie Hela den svenska is higher among women in families with underage services have an elevated risk of mental disorder sick leave and constitute a large proportion of the workforce
Bra kvalitet, uppfyllde de flesta kriterier i strobe gender - results from the northern Sweden of burnout was 13%. Women had a higher level of burnout than men with
Kvaliteten på artikeln är bra, alla kriterier i strobe checklistan var uppfyllda.
40 difference in the age group 35-44 years. Demand and control at work, and job insecurity were related to burnout. In women the level of education,
almost half of the gender difference could be explained by work related and life situational ellen i studien förklarade cirka m kan betraktas som lågt.
22. Work-related psychosocial risk factors and risk of disability pension among employees in health and personal care: A prospective support, but not job control, were associated with future disability pension. An increase in risk was also with low social support. An increased risk for disability pension due to mental diagnosis was found among care assistants who reported high job demands. In all other
Bra kvalitet på artikeln, kan ha påverkat risken för sjukpension.
41 Bilaga 2: Exempel på checklista, Strobe
STROBE Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies
Item
No Recommendation
Title and abstract 1 (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract
(b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found
Introduction
Background/rationale 2 Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported
Objectives 3 State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses Methods
Study design 4 Present key elements of study design early in the paper
Setting 5 Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection
Participants 6 (a) Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants
Variables 7 Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential
confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable Data sources/
measurement
8* For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group
Bias 9 Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias Study size 10 Explain how the study size was arrived at
Quantitative variables 11 Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and why
Statistical methods 12 (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding
(b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions (c) Explain how missing data were addressed
(d) If applicable, describe analytical methods taking account of sampling strategy
(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses Results
Participants 13* (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analysed (b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage (c) Consider use of a flow diagram
42
Descriptive data 14* (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) and information on exposures and potential confounders (b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest
Outcome data 15* Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures
Main results 16 (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval). Make clear which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included (b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized
(c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk for a meaningful time period
Other analyses 17 Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and sensitivity analyses
Discussion
Key results 18 Summarise key results with reference to study objectives
Limitations 19 Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias
Interpretation 20 Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence
Generalisability 21 Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results Other information
Funding 22 Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based
*Give information separately for exposed and unexposed groups.
Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at
http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is available at www.strobe-statement.org.
43