• No results found

Beef sugar factory process flow chart

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Beef sugar factory process flow chart"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

.. '.~t-~

-

....

u.t::

~ 'I

BElLT SUGAR FACT<EY PROCESS FLOW SHEEI'

H!

'fl! DAHLBl:R~ ~ R.R. CABS FROM

IF

NON..STEFFms RECXIVING BE:s'.IS 'lRUC.ftS & R.R. C~ beets

!'IRAS!!

&

sf

x Rl!Mov.u.j

beets

!

r

MOL • ..I_ARD T~ll~

~

.1

1':r-.

Cll['

1scfm1

beets

B~..

I

J~

0

!suc~msl

@

~

g

~ p..,

I

I

~

I

!B

I

~

& scAtts ~ . . I •

g

,L'-t..(Molasses)(Water) c'fs . .

f

t

~ j !MIXING TA?<lKS 0 . o [COOLI!RS eossettes

DIFFUSICN

I

l

.,

1

WET SILO~( Wet pulp to

' trucks)

juice

~ - - --.ilst CARBONATICN

THI C Km ER

I

f

uc~-aa

R .a •.

CAR~

t

G>

~ ~

@.~r~I

HEATERS ~ ~ 5) .Cl (.)

i

2nd CARBONATICN · 2nd FILTB&S Cl} +:>

s

1

_

1

I

I

:

~

l

3rd SATURATION al Q)

f

:

l

l

HEATKRS] ~o - ~ ir.

I

EV .APORATffiS

- f -

-

-

1 • - - J

[

[iirru

PANj

n

~R. p ~ [L.R., PAIi

I

I MI1ER

I

Jij

Y~ms

l

lmrm T ~

iCEt-TT.-,IlOOALSI CJH'IHI::<'ffi~

[ciii1./r:JoA.1S::]

'

_______.__

{--1~

.

.

..

.

r.:-::

-

L-1

I

rsimu.oE Br:.s~ -)e,;~~·u~.Nr'aHs! -- M~:.L'!'F-~ J - - i 1.r.£I.:.'E __

~ ·-

·

. ---

--· -

- - - -- __

t

__

--- --

···

-

- - - 1 . ----· -

I

J

I WA l~.1·0:.,siL. ---~SA;' lil .G /',, PAC .;.AC.1,~G j 1MO....AS~Ti}, 'IPN .<S---1 · · 1 S•,:A·. ~ .... ~ j...q

.,... l'~ •. t:'..

---i--

~--

.

.

.. ·-·· ·--·-·•

.

..

-- -- -- -- -- , . --- I I

.

J

-··

l"''. ·

'l . ii ,, ...; )t > _.,,.,

.,.

- l JI -,..4. ,.. .. ,.. ~ .. . ... . . ,J I • • ...11I• · ... .... ,. ,·~i-,, , . ~- • • · --:. \ . J · 7 ..,._

~

I

~

c,; (\

(2)

..

MW

cw;

§Y9A&

FAQTQR%

f,&00&8

FL0l

.

Sl!EIT

RECEIVING CANE

TRUCK

&

R.R. CARS

j

CRUSHING

1--__,,-_ (Baggase)

JUICE SOREErlS Boiler Hous&

., Li.me D1\1d

:J

J To Plantations

I

EVAPOR.ATOB.Sj . let PANS MIXER eNTRIFUGALS

R.R. C.ARB

I

SHIPS

t

CRYSTALLIZERS

t

CErJTRIFUGALS

I

(Black Strap }.fol.)

T

I

TANK

C.ARS

I

t

I

SHIPS

I

I

lus~J

(3)

,.

CANE SOOAR REl'Itmcr PROCESS FLOW SHUT

2nd A11''1"N PAIi

CRYSTALUZERS CINTR AL8

J.TIT'N SooiR° MELTER

___..,.___

___

- - ---

---

-CHARCOAL PILTERS _ - ~ CHAR KILN

1,

~Attt 'n Molaasee) ( to Discard )

' - - - - -(-blg

-

L

iquorji

(enr

Wate~

BROWN PAI

CINTRIJ"OOALS CENTRIFUGALS

..

WAREHOUSES

(mEHOUSISj

!WAREHOUSES) TANKS

(4)

PRilJCIPAL U, S, BEET SUGAR COOAN!l§

Amalgamated Sugar

American Crystal

Great Western Sugar

Holly Sugar Michigan Sugar Spril.~kels Sugar

;[1ctw,

Lewiston, Utah ) Rupert, Idaho) Twin Falls, " )

Nampa,

n ) Nyssa,

Ore.

)

Oxnard, Cal. ) ClarksbwJ..i 1 Cal. ) Missoula1 Mont. )

Rocky Ford, Colo. )

Gd. Island, Nebr. )

Mason City, Iowa ) Chaska, Minn. )

Morehead, Minn. )

East Gd. Forks, Minn.)

17 Opera.tine )

3 Closed )

1

Johnstown

)

Alvarado, Cal. )

Hamilton Oi ty, Cal.)

Santa Anna, Cal. ) Tracy,

Cal.

)

Carlton, Cal. ) Delta, Colo. ) Swink, Colo. ) Hardin, Hont. ) Sidney, " ) Sheridan, Wyo. ) Torrington, 11 ) 1,Ior land , n ) Alruna, Mich. ) Caro, 11 )

Carrol ton, Mich. (

Croswell , Mioh. )

Lansing, 11 ) Schbewaing, " )

Mt. Pleasant-," )

Manteca, Cal.

Spreckleo, 11 lfoodland, II -1 -) ) ) Approx.

Annual

'

froduct1on

-

.oo#

b§g 4,000,000 tQ 5,000,000 3,000,000 to 3,500,000 6,500,000 to

9

,000,000

4,000,000

to

4,500,000 1,500,000 to 2,000,000 2,500,000 to 3,000,000 /

(5)

.

PRPJCIPM

U

1

s, BEET

SUGAR COHPAHIES - cont.

Approx. Annuo.l

Nrun.e F§;ctories Production -

lOQiz

bags Utah-Idaho Sugar Garland, Utah )

Gunnison, If ) Spanish Fork, Utah )

West Jordon,

"

)

Dla.ckfoot, Idaho )

Idaho Falls,

"

) 2,500,000 to 3,500,000

Shelley,

"

~

Toppinish, Mont.

~ashington, If

~

Chinook, II

Belle Fouch,

s.

D. )

Other Beet Suear 16 Factories 2,500,000 to 3,000,000

Total 26,500,000 33,500,000

Farr & Co. 1949-50 l-mual of Sugar Co's. gives 83 U.S. beet factories

and 7 Canadian beet factories

(6)

-2-. I

GREAT

WESTERN §UGAR

co,

F1gtQJ1e1

Non-SteffePQ

Prooesg

Steffens

Proco@§

s~

1 ~ilY.

c~

561

1~

w.

!llllz

aJ21ci~

Tons

l

Tons Tons 100/I

~ ~ Btgtt§

Molass1@

--Ki2l2a:

Factcw

"'Eaton

1600

4750 Ft. Collins 2975

190

10000 Greeley 1625 4800 Loveland 2500 160 8500 v Windsor 1650 ~ Longmont .3000

190

10250 vB r i ~ _,I;/! 1900 5800 "Ovid

1900

70

5850

·Ft. Lupton Closed Sterling 1550 95 4950

.,Brush 1660 4.300 Ft. Morgan 2025 95 6250

-

~

1900

5250 Scottsbluff 2o//5 175 o//50

vM!tchell 1900 5250 vGering 1765 95 5500

Lyman

J

Closed Billings .3625 175

11500

· \.lheatl.Jpi Closed

, '

v

Loveh

1450 4200

a..·Total.a 13685

39550

9-

Totals 22315

1245

72550

Barium Process

Tons 100#

,Jipn-Steffens & Steff§¥ Mol4ssea ~

17

Fae.

36000 l12l00 Johnstown 195 1600

~

(7)

References

Related documents

This research resulted in a number of insights and findings constituting a contribution to a design framework or design guidelines for the specific context of

The plan area is also near an industrial area and a sewage treatment plant, which can cause noise and smell disturbance” (Municipality 1. Plan Description

Ett val som en användare gör i exempelvis ett formulär måste skickas till servern för att PHP ska kunna tolka valet.. PHP’s främsta styrkor är dess enkla implementering

According to D EFINITION 1 there is a dynamic Laffer effect if a lower income tax rate allows the government to increase public consumption, today or sometimes in the future.. This

Tabellen redovisar för varje vägtyp utfallet för skadekvot länk plus nod, skadekvot länk samt DSS-kvot för länk plus nod och enbart länk, allt angivet i antal per miljon

Szczepanski (2007) redovisar fem didaktiska frågor som kan ligga till grund och vara styrande för planering av utomhuspedagogiska aktiviteter där bland annat aspekter som

Franck (2003) menar i Domens eller hjärtas etik att människor har en universell rätt att uppleva mening, och att etik och moral i sig inte har ett egenvärde. Vidare menar Franck för

Integrated over the different noise levels, GSM and BM3D work better than the proposed one on all images except for the fingerprint image and the proposed method works better than