• No results found

Analysis of waters for campaign 1949-1950 Billings factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of waters for campaign 1949-1950 Billings factory"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CC:

ANALYSIS OF WATERS FOR CAMPAIGN

1949-1950

BILLINGS FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

General Chemist

/

Assistant General Superintendent

(2)

INDEX

KIND OF WATER

MAIN TANK (RIVER WATER)

CITY

WELL

BATTERY SUPPLY

PRESS WASH

CENTRIFUGAL WASH

COLD SACCHARATE CAKE

BOILER FEED

BOILER

PAGE

1

2

.3

4

5

6

7

8

9

(3)

Form 443 -2M-8-48 -Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

___

_

_

_

___ ;I?.

_

): ___

~

__

}:,

_

_

J _

_

_

~

__ g

__

§.

____

_

_

_

_

__

_

_

__

Factory

__________ ·

____________

April

_

_

17 ,

_________________

_

____

19 ___

50 _

Kind of Water:

River

W

ater

Description of Sample:

Average Sample for Campaign

1959-50

pH 8.

2

Source of Water:

Ye

ll

owstone River

Intake one mile sou

t

h of

f

actory

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulfuric Acid

so,

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt, District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

Parts Per Million

18o0

2.5

44.0

18.4

4lol

10.1

132.5

65.1

331.7

31119

6 6

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulfate Na.SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na2COs Sodium Phosphate NasPO, Magnesium Chloride MgCI.

Magnesium Sulfate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOs

Magnesium Phosphate Mgs(P0,)2

Calcium Sulfate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCOs Calcium Phosphate Cas(PO,). Ferrous Carbonate FeCOs Ferrous Phosphate Fea(PO,).

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

--=

Parts Per Million

1s.o

16.7

106.6

75.7

10.7

98.8

5.2

331.7

31,9

(4)

Form 443- 2M-8-48- Pa.ds 100

WATER ANALYSIS

..

.

.

..

.

..

. B

.

. 1

.

. 1

.

. L .. l .. N

..

. G

...

S ..

.

.

....

...

..

.

Factory

.

...

April

.

. 17-,

...

.

.

.

.

.

...

19

.

50 ..

.

.

Kind of Water:

City Water

Description of Sample:

Avera

·

ge Sample for Campaign 1949-50

pH

8.25

Source of Water:

,

River water

treated and filtered thru City Water Plant

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulfuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

Parts Per Million

17.0

2.0

50.6

16.3

32.9

11.8

112.3

79.0

2.0

32.3.9

5.5

-2-HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulfate Na.SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na2COs

Sodium Phosphate NaaPO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCb

Magnesium Sulfate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa Magnesium Phosphate Mga(PO,).

Calcium Sulfate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCOs

Calcium Phosphate Caa(PO,).

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Ferrous Phosphate Fea(PO,),

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

Parts Per Million

17.0

19.5

77.8

126.4

.4

3.8

323.9

5.5

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C _ _ _ ,_,,29_..JJ,

(5)

Form 443-2M-8-48 -Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

....

...

~

.

.

J.

..

k

.

k

.

l.: .

.

N

.

. 9

...

$. .

...

.

.

....

Factory

.

....

.

...

.

...

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

..

!P~J .

..

~!J

...

.

...

.

19 ...

.?.9 .

.

.

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water:

Well Water (Used for Cold Sacch.

W

ash)

Average Sample for Campaign 1949-50

pH

8.2

-We

l

l located south and ad

j

acent to lime rock hopper

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulfuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO General Chemist Asst. General Supt, District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory pH.

Parts Per Million

26.0

Silica Si02

2.3

Sodium Chloride NaCl

53.3

Sodium Sulfate Na2SO,

35.3

Sodium Carbonate Na2COa

145.4

Sodium Phosphate Na,PO,

19.S

Magnesium Chloride MgCI.

301.2

Magnesium Sulfate MgSO,

154.1

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

Magnesium Phosphate Mga(PO,). Calcium Sulfate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCOa Calcium Phosphate Caa(PO,). Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa Ferrous Phosphate Fea(P0,)2

73704

38.6

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

_ _

.,.__

7,6

...,

0

,.__

.,..

_

g,;L

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

Parts Per MilJion

26.0

32.6

409.5

30.5

100.9

133.1

4.8

73704

38.6

(6)

Form 443-2M-8-48-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

..

...

B

...

I

..

L

..

.L

..

I ..

N

...

G.

..

S .

.

..

...

.

..

..

.

.

Factory

.

...

~.Pr:ti

..

J'.7

.

,

..

..

.

.

.

.

...

.

..

19 .

.5-9 ...

.

Kind of Water:

Battery

Supply

Description of Sample:

Average Sample

for Campaign

1949-50

Source of Water: ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulfuric Acid

so,

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per Million

12.s

Silica Si02

2.4

Sodium Chloride NaCl

33.7

Sodium Sulfate Na2SO,

15.0

Sodium Carbonate Na2COs

32.4

Sodium Pho·sphate NaaPO,

9.2

Magnesium Chloride MgCI.

96.3

Magnesium Sulfate MgSO,

64.4

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

Magnesium Phosphate Mga(PO,). Calcium Sulfate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCOs

Calcium Phosphate Caa(P0,)2

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa Ferrous Phosphate Fes(P0,)2

266.2

l,4.2

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

280._l+

_ _

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

9.

I

Parts Per Million

12.s

15.2

81.5

84.1

5.0

280.

Chief Chemist.

(7)

Form 443- 2M- 8-48- Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

..

.

..

.

..

.

.. :e.

.

.

I .

.

k .

.

J:.

.

.

.

I

.

.

.

N

..

.G

.

..

S. ..

..

.

...

.

.

.

.

.

Factory

...

Apr.tl. .

.

l

.

7.,-

..

...

...

...

..

.

..

19 .

.5.Q

.. .

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Source of Water:

Press Wash

Average Sample for Campaign 1949-50

Condensed waters from all 1st effect evaporators, battery

calorisators, all heaters and overflow from boiler feed.

Possible to send battery supply to press wash, arxi drips

from all evaporators and blow-up traps

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulfuric Acid

so,

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

Parts Per Million

_ _

'27..

0

Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulfate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na2COs

Sodium Phosphate Na.PO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl2

Magnesium Sulfate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

Magnesium Phosphate Mgs(PO,).

Calcium Sulfate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Calcium Phosphate Cas(PO,).

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Ferrous Phosphate Fes(P0,)2

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

Parts Per Million

(8)

Form 443-2M-8-48- Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

..

...

.

... J~ ..

.l ...

l.!

.

.

t

..

l .

.

N

.

. JLS ..

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

..

Factory

...

.

....

.

.

.

...

.. Aptil .

.

17~

...

.

.

..

...

19 ..

.5.9.

..

Kind of Water:

Description of Sample:

Water used to wash white sugar

Average Sample for Campaign 1949-50

Source of Water:

Drips from steam chest of the 3rd effect of north evaporators

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulfuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

Parts Per Million

28.o

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per Million

Silica Si02 Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulfate Na,SO, Sodium Carbonate Na2COa Sodium Phosphate Na.PO, Magnesium Chloride MgCI. Magnesium Sulfate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa Magnesium Phosphate Mg.(PO,)s Calcium Sulfate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCOs Calcium Phosphate Caa(PO,). Ferrous Carbonate FeCOs Ferrous Phosphate Fes(PO,),

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

28.0

(9)

Form 443-2M-8-48-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

... ?.

..

J ... ~.-~.} ..

~

.

.

.?

...

~

...

...

....

Factory

...

....

....

April

..

17,

...

.

..

...

....

..

....

! 9 ..

50

..

Kind of Water:

Cold

Saccharate

Wash Water

Description of Sample:

Average Sample

for

Campaign 1949-50

See

Page

-3-Source of Water:

Well Water

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulfuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt, District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

Parts Per Million

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulfate Na2SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,COs Sodium Phosphate Na,PO, Magnesium Chloride MgCl2 Magnesium Sulfate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa Magnesium Phosphate Mgs(PO,). Calcium Sulfate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCOs Calcium Phosphate Caa(PO,). Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa Ferrous Phosphate Fes(PO,),

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

(10)

Form 443 -2M-8-48- Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

BILLINGS

... Factory

...

.

...

.-!\p.r.il

..

17,

...

.

....

.

....

.

...

19 ..

.50

..

Kind of Water:

Water in Boiler Feed Tanlc

Description of Sample:

Average Sample

for

Campaign 1949-50

Source of Water:

Drips from 2nd,

3rd,

4th

&

5th bodies

of evaporators

Drips from pans

after flashing to exhaust. All

live steam

traps

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulfuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

Parts Per Million

24.0

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per Million

Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulfate Na.SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,COa

Sodium Phosphate Na,PO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCI.

Magnesium Sulfate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOs Magnesium Phosphate Mgs(P0,)2

Calcium Sulfate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCOs Calcium Phosphate Cas(PO,). Ferrous Carbonate FeCOs Ferrous Phosphate Fea(P0,)2

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

24.0

(11)

Form 443- 2M-8-48-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

..

..

.

.

.

...

.

?. ..

J ..

J,_J~ .. .+. .

.

N

.

.

G. ..

~

.

...

.

....

Factory

...

....

Apri.l

...

l7.

,

...

.

...

I9 ...

50

..

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water:

- - - ~ = ~

Water in Boilers

Average Sample for Campaign

1949-50

Added

to Boilers: Caustic

Soda

Calgon

Sod.

Sulphite

Alkalinity

Hardness

Po

4

Pounds

For Camp.

3315

807

228

Per

Day

44.8

10.9

3.1

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulfuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by diffel'ence)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

pH

Parts Per Million

7.0

2.1

1.7

322.3

18.5

83.0

322.5

74o0

831.1

5J.4e9

Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulfate Na2SO, Sodium Carbonate Na.COs Sodium Phosphate Na,PO, Magnesium Chloride MgCI. Magnesium Sulfate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Magnesium Phosphate Mgs(P0,)2 Calcium Sulfate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCOa Calcium Phosphate Ca,(PO,). Ferrous Carbonate FeCO, Ferrous Phosphate Fea(P0,)2

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS AT 105° C

l!m

48

5

74

Parts Per MiJlion

7.0

30.5

122.7

569.7

90.6

831.1

514.9

References

Related documents

Den ena kommer att vara de som inte bryr sig särskilt mycket om att äga musik, de som bara vill lyssna, för dem kommer tjänster som Spotify eller Last FM eller vad det

Our working definition is in accord with these central points in Blunden’s (2015) work: each perezhivanie includes what is done and suffered and also the how of action of the

(2013) studie beskriver detta tillstånd då endast en känsla av hoppets närvaro finns, vilket kan jämföras med hur personerna i Juvakkas och Kylmäs (2009) studie också beskriver det

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show

I den här rapporten redovisas resultaten från inventeringar av lodjur, varg, järv och kungsörn, samt länsstyrelsens bedömning av förekomsten av björn i Gävleborg

According to D EFINITION 1 there is a dynamic Laffer effect if a lower income tax rate allows the government to increase public consumption, today or sometimes in the future.. This

På små värmeföretag, med en panna på 10-20 MW och stödanläggningar, kan personalen be- stå av en värmechef, som även ansvarar för distributionen/försäljningen av värme och

Man beskriver också hur chefers egentliga uppdrag är att styra liksom representera och hur chefer många gånger inte hinner med sina medarbetare (Brunsson & Holmblad