• No results found

Analysis of waters for campaign 1940-1941 Billings factory Great Western Sugar factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of waters for campaign 1940-1941 Billings factory Great Western Sugar factory"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Copies

tp:

ANALYSIS

OF

WATERS FOR

CA'fllPAIGN

1949-1941

BILLINGS FACTORY

THE GREAT

WESTERN

SUGAR COMPANY

General Chemist ..,/

General Supt.

Asst

.

General Supt.

District

Engineer

Superintendent

Laboratory

R

n~,

-\

/chief

Chemist

(2)

INDEX

-KTh1D OF WATER

PAGE

River

1

City

2

Battery Supply

3

Press

W

ash

4

Centrifugal Wash

5

Boiler Feed

6

Boiler

7

(3)

Form 443-3M-7-38-Pads 100

WATER

ANALYSIS

Billings

...

Factory

---

... March .. 25.1 ..

1941

....

...

...

19

... .

Kind of Water:

River

Water

Description of Sample:

Average sam

p

le for cempaign. 1940-41

Source of Water:

Yellowstone River

Intake one mile south of

Factory

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine CI Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

l.70

.. 13'

4.50

1.,72

4.74

.92

10.84

9,78

34.32

.03

34.36

1

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiOs

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na.SO, Sodium Carbonate Na.CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCI, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaC12 Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO, Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100.000

1.70

1.52

12.79

2.74

4o07

11.24

.27

34,.03

.03

-34036

Chief Chemist.

(4)

Form 443-31'4-7-38-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

____________

Billi~_g~---

_-

__________

Factory

_______

M

arch_

~9.~ __ _:t._~1:i, ____________________

19 _______ _

Kind of Water:

City Water

Description of Sample:

Average

sample

for the

1940-41

Campaign

Source of Water:

River water treated and filtered thru city plant

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

lo46

ol3

4 .. 86

1.79

4.43

1.00

llo50

9o59

34076

1.24

36.00

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na.SO, Sodium Carbonate Na.CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCI2

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100.000

lo46

1.,65

11.67

4.52

3.05

12.14

027

34.76

_L24

36.00

Chief Chemist.

(5)

Form 443-311!1- 7-38- Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

Billings

·-

··

···

Factory

--

---

-

--

----

---

-

----

-

.

.

..

....

M

~rch

__

25_'--1941 _____

_

_____________

19

_______ _

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt.

General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

Battery Supply

Average sample for Campaign 1940-41

All drips from hot

condensors

od eve

.

ps

,

drips from vapor

pan, overflow from press wash

Parts Per .!22:QQ.!!.

1.48

.

08

3.49

1.-34

3

.

20

.7

2

7

.

30

7o61

25.22

3§_54

28.76

3 HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si01

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na.CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCl, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride GaCl. Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

1.,48

1

,1

9

8

,

43

2.01

3.22

8.72

.

17

25

.

22

3

.

54

28

.76

Chief Chemist.

(6)

Form 443-3M-7-38-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

Billings

____

___

_

______________ Factory

---

________

_____

Ma

tch __

25.L 1941

_____________

19

_

_

_____

_

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water:

Press

Wash

Average sample for 1940

-

41 Campaign

Condensed waters from all 1st effect Evaps

••

Battery

e\i~~;y

Calorisators

,

all heaters and overflow from boiler feed,

Possible to

send

battery

Supply to press wash, and drips from all

evaps., carbonation and

blowup

traps, and office heating system

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid SO,

Carbonic Acid CO2

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

3.4

Silica SiO.

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO, Sodium Carbonate Na2CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl2 Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

Parts Per 100,000

3.4

(7)

Form 443-SM-7-38-Pads 100

WATER

ANALYSIS

___________

.Billings.

________________________

Factory

_

___

J1fa.r.ch

.. .25., ...

l.9il

___

___

________________

19

_______ _

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Centrifugal

Wash

(

White Sugar)

Average

sample for campaign 1940-41

Source of Water:

Drips from

steam shest of the

4th

effect

of

north evaps.

ANALYSIS Silica Si 0, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine CI

Sulphuric Acid SO, Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

1.3

5 HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na.SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na.CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCI, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaCI, CaSO, CaCO, FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

Parts Per 100,000

L3

(8)

Form 443-3M-7-38-Pads 100

WATER

ANALYSIS

··

·

··

·

···-

··

-Bil+i~g~---···-

·

·

··Factory

..

.

.

..

...

...

..

....

..

.

March

__ 25

, .

.. 194l _

_

___

l9

..

.

....

.

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Source of Water:

Boiler

,.tfeed

Average sample

for campaign 1940

-

41

Drips from

2nd

,

3rd

,

4th

,

and

5th effects of

Evaps.,

all

granulators

,

all live steam traps, all heating and blowup

traps

.

Possible

to

send

drips

from

all

heaters.

Total Ammonia

N.¾

ppm

22

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so

.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

0

07

2

.

60

I

6 Silica SiO.

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na.SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaC12 Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

Parts Per 100,000

2.60

(9)

Form 443-3M- 8-40- Pads 100

W

A

TER ANA

L

YS

I

S

Billin.gs.·--·-···---·

-

·

Factory

--- -

... 1,iar_QJ;l,

..

~o.

,

...

i~fl

...

194

.... .

Kind of Water: Description of Sample:

Boiler Water

Average

sample for

Added

to Boilers

Campaign 1940

~

4

1

For

~a:mpaign

100

Source of Water:

Soda

Ash,

Lbs

ljaustic

Soda

'l'

ri S<hdium. Phosphate

Boiler

Feed

Alkalinit

y

tiardness

,

pp

100

,

000

P04,

ppm

ANALYSIS Parts Per 100,000 Silica Si02

.

20

Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulfuric Acid

so

.

Carbonic Acid

co

,

Phosphoric Acid PO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS AT 105° C

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt.

District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

.14

.oo

.

13

29

.

39

1

.

30

6

.

60

31

.

12

2

.

60

?l.48

52

.

92

124040

7

4025

3025

-

.

000

.

8

26

Per

Day

1

.

0

38

.

4

28

.

9

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride

Sodium Sulfate Sodium Carbonate

Sodium Phosphate Magnesium Chloride Si02 NaCl Na.SO., Na,CO, Na,PO, MgCl, Magnesium Sulfate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, M-agnesium Phosphate Mg,(PO,), Calcium Sulfate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Calcium Phosphate Ferrous Carbonate Ferrous Phosphate Cn,(PO,), FeCO,, Fe.,(PO,),

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS AT 105° C Parts Per 100,000

.

20

2

.

14

9

.

7?

54

.

9?

3,.63

.

4?

.

30

?l

.

48

52

.

92

124

.

40

Chief Chemist.

References

Related documents

I senaste läroplan för grundskola, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet, Lgr11, finns en tydlighet om att samarbetet och utbytet av kun- skaper mellan lärare i de olika skolformerna

Den ena kommer att vara de som inte bryr sig särskilt mycket om att äga musik, de som bara vill lyssna, för dem kommer tjänster som Spotify eller Last FM eller vad det

The aim of the present study, within the “Implementing injury Prevention exercise ROutines in TEams and Clubs in youth Team handball (I‐PROTECT)” project, was to

placerade så att man har genomblick till de större delarna av huset. Huset är orienterat för att erhålla maximalt med ljusinsläpp från söder, det sprids in genom köket o

By combining Tan and Sutherland’s (2014) multi- dimensional trust model with the relationships present in the sharing economy, this paper introduces a framework in which

Men om man kan diskutera humor som pedagogiskt verktyg genom att inom lärarutbildningen använda lärares erfarenheter av framförallt de strategier som Dimbleby &amp; Burton

Our working definition is in accord with these central points in Blunden’s (2015) work: each perezhivanie includes what is done and suffered and also the how of action of the

(2013) studie beskriver detta tillstånd då endast en känsla av hoppets närvaro finns, vilket kan jämföras med hur personerna i Juvakkas och Kylmäs (2009) studie också beskriver det