• No results found

Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1933-34 Lovell factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1933-34 Lovell factory"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

.ANALYSIS OF

WATER

SAMPLES

FOR THE CAUPAIGli

1933-34:

LOVELL FACTORY

'fflE cmEAT WESTERN SUCAR COt'CP.A.NY

:Lovell 01 ty

er

Shoshone River

Wate:

.ttery

supply

Water

Press

Wash Water

Boiler Feed

Water

Boile-r

Water

Copies to:- General Supt.

neral Chemist

st. General

Supt.

District

Engineer

Superintendent

Laborat

F

-l

2

3

'

st

(2)

...

...

J ....

O

... V

.. E

..

L.L

...

Factory

"

~C.b

....

2.e •

...

..

...

193

4

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water:

Note:-Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

1,ovell

City

Water

Average

semple

tor

campaign

City

water direct

tram.

city

tank; sample

taken

trCmt tap in laboratory.

City

w~ter

w~~

not

u,ed

tn

tactory

operattol:U[J

except

as an ~rge~cy

l3UPP17

to

the boilers. It is

used

.

in the laboratory

end

also

tor

drinking

water.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL OOMBINATIONS

Parts Per ~ 0 0 Parts Per 100,000

SiO•

2.66

Silica SiO,

2.66

2

.

0

39.55

Fe

.18

Ca

10.93

Mg

3.05

Na

13.63

Cl

1.2'1

so.

44.85

co.

12.

'l'l

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na.so, Sodium Carbonate Na.co.

Magnesium Chloride MgCl,

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl, Calcium Sulphate caso.

Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

15.09

8.59

20.ga

.37

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

ag.34

3.

92.42

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

89.3'

3.08

92.42

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(3)

L O V

E ...

L

..

L ...

Factory

-···-· ... ----···

..

... ..

Jlvoh

.. 2G

...

..

...

1934

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid so, Carbo,nic Acid co.

Shoshone

R

i..er

Wat

er

Average

tor

campai8'Jl

Shoshone River (factory intake) main source

o'f

supply tor all taetory

o:perat,_o~.

ANALYSIS

Parts Per 10.2:Q!!O

2.94

.32

e.40

3.44

13.99

1.18

4:6.09

ll.36

HYPOTHETICAL OOMBINATIONS Silica SiO, Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na280,

Sodium Carbonate Na.co. Magnesium Chloride MgC12

Magnesium Sulphate MgS.0, Magnesium Carbonate Mg008

Calcium Chloride cam. Calcium Sulphate caso. Calcium Carbonate caco. Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Parts Per 100,000

2.

·

94

l.95

40.83

1'1.02

6.94

18.38

.e

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

es.

,2

3.68

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

es.

'12

3.68

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(4)

LOV

·············

E

·········

LL

······ ...

. ...

...

Factory

.

.

..

.

.

...

.

.

...

...

.

.

..

. ..

M~b

...

g~,

.

...

.

..

.

...

..

1934:

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica SiO. Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid so.

Carbonic Acid co.

:tte17

Supply

Water (Single

Systfml)

Average

sample

tor csmpaigli

W

ater tran

the

evaporator condenser

l.eg-:pipe,

_

over.:rl.o~

tron the press

wash

tank,

overtlovt tram the leg-pipe seal

tank

and a

lUllaU

'1!lount

ot

nrst

etteet

drip ....

ANALYSIS PartsP~OOO

2.46

.24

6.09

3.52

14.85

1.09

41.'13

10.44

HYBOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica

sm.

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2SO, Sodium Carbonate Na2C'08 Magnesium Chloride MgCl,

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate Mg003

Calcium Chloride CaC12

Calcium Sulphate caso,

Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Parts Per 100,000

2.4:6

1.80

4:3.6'1

15.29

1.49

15.21

.50

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

80.42

4.42

84.84

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

80.42

4.42

84.84

COPIES T'O General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(5)

·--···-··_L_.O __

.V ..

E

...

L.L. ...

··-···

·

·

Factory

.

·-···

·

··

--·--··- _

-~o..b.. ...

-

g.e.

.

,

..

-

l~~

---···

·-·-···

193

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid so. Carbonic Acid co.

Preas Wash W~ter

ATe~ iJfllllple

t

_

~

c,emp~gn

Drips trom

all

reheaters,

m

ost of drip:i

frooi t1rs1; tttect

ot

'li_

hQ

oTaporator,

and the overflow trom the boiler

teed

tank..

It is

possible to send the drips

tran

the

second

and

third effects

ot

the

enporatora

and the granule.tor trap

to

the p:reas

waah

tank.

ANALYSIS Parts Per 100.:.2_00

.47

.06

.84

.2'1

.98

.18

:a.14

l.'16

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica

sw.

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na.so, Sodium Carbonate Na.co. Magnesium Chloride MgCl, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOs Calcium Chloride CaC12

Calcium Sulphate caso. Calcium Carbonate caco. Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Parts Per 100,000

.,.,

.30

2

.

66

.43

.62

2.10

.12

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

6.70

3.33

10.03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

6.70

3,133

10.03

. COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(6)

L

O

VE t..L

...

Factory

... --··· ... .

.

...

....

.

...

M~b

..

.

.

?.6.

.

..

l~M

...

...

...

193

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so,

Carbonic Acid co.

Boiler Feed

Water

AYA'P'All'A

,aample

t

.

or

~

_

empet.ign

Drips

tr

second,

third, fourth

and tHth ettecta ot the enporatora,

main steam line traps, Pan

"A",

P@.)1 "B", P~

.

"C", graµulator trapa

and genel:'8.1 drips.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL OOMBINATIONS

Parts Per 10.2.:.Q_OO Parts Per 100,000

.58

.10

I

.46

1.13

.18

1.34.

1.

Silica Si0,

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na.so,

Sodium Carbonate Na.co.

Magnesium Chloride MgC12

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate Mg003

Calcium Chloride cam. Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

.58

.3()

l.~

.85

.42

1.15

.21

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

5.4

3.36

a.as

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

5.49

5.36

8.85

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(7)

...

...

.

. ···

··

···

···

.

.. :i:.

o

...

v

..

~

..

LJ'.,

...

Factory

...

.

...

.

...

.March

.. .2.6 ,.

...

.193

4

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water:

Note:-Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid so. Carbonic Acid co.

Boiler

W

ater

Average

IJBJ!lple

'tor campaign

Water

from

.

boiler teed tank

1990 »ounds

ot

soda ash

were

added

to

the

boilers

during campaign

395 pounds

ot

caustic.

soda were

added

to

the

.

boilers

dur1ng campa:

20.9 averase pounds

ot soda uh per day

__

,.

2

ave,~e

pound~

~'t

ce,~

_

tic

a_

o_

da per day

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL OOMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000 Parts Per 100,000

3.00

.28

5.53

.44

59.73

2~18

51.31

53.70

Silica Si01

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na,SO. Sodium Carbonate Na.co. Magnesium Chloride MgC1, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO. Magnesium Carbonate MgC'03

Calcium Chloride cam, Calcium Sulphate ca.so. Calcium Carbonate caco. Ferrous Carbonate FeCOs

3.00

3.59

'15 •

• 78

1.53

13.81

.58

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

1'16.117

62.83

230.00

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

)!16.17

e2.as

39.00

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

References

Related documents

This workshop was organised with partial support from the European Community under the European Commission Framework Programme 7 Design Studies: EUROnu (Project Number 212372).

Den ena kommer att vara de som inte bryr sig särskilt mycket om att äga musik, de som bara vill lyssna, för dem kommer tjänster som Spotify eller Last FM eller vad det

placerade så att man har genomblick till de större delarna av huset. Huset är orienterat för att erhålla maximalt med ljusinsläpp från söder, det sprids in genom köket o

Our working definition is in accord with these central points in Blunden’s (2015) work: each perezhivanie includes what is done and suffered and also the how of action of the

(2013) studie beskriver detta tillstånd då endast en känsla av hoppets närvaro finns, vilket kan jämföras med hur personerna i Juvakkas och Kylmäs (2009) studie också beskriver det

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show

I den här rapporten redovisas resultaten från inventeringar av lodjur, varg, järv och kungsörn, samt länsstyrelsens bedömning av förekomsten av björn i Gävleborg

I mitt dilemma med Karls mamma stannar mina känslor kvar i sympati och bearbetas inte på en kognitiv nivå och kan därmed inte ges tillbaka till mamman utan mina känslor stannar i