• No results found

Neutrino detection Neutrino detection

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Neutrino detection Neutrino detection"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Neutrino detection Neutrino detection

Laura Rossetto Laura Rossetto

Follow–up questions

Follow–up questions

(2)

• Homestake experiment  detection of solar ν

e

emitted by the decay of

8

B and

7

Be in the Sun via the reaction

37

Cl + ν

e

37

Ar + e

E

th

= 0.814 MeV

• GALLEX and SAGE experiments  detection of solar ν

e

via the reaction

71

Ga + ν

e

71

Ge + e

, E

th

= 0.233 MeV

• GALLEX  Gran Sasso laboratory, Italy, 1991–1997

30.3 tons of gallium as GaCl

3

in an aqueous HCl solution

• SAGE  Soviet–american Gallium Experiment, Baksan underground observatory, Caucasus

~ 50 tons of gallium

I – I – Explain how energy thresholds for neutrino Explain how energy thresholds for neutrino

detection depend on the absorbing medium detection depend on the absorbing medium

(3)

I – I – Explain how energy thresholds for neutrino Explain how energy thresholds for neutrino

detection depend on the absorbing medium detection depend on the absorbing medium

GALLEX, SAGE E

ν

> 0.233 MeV

Homestake Homestake

E

ν

> 0.814 MeV

• Because of the low energy threshold, the gallium experiments (GALLEX,

(4)

• At E > 10

17

eV  GZK neutrinos produced when cosmic ray protons

interact with the cosmic microwave background photons  rate 1 event km

–3

yr

–1

• ν

µ

+ N  X + l  leptons may propagate for 20 – 30 km before being detected in the optical Cherenkov array

II –

II – Describe radio detection of neutrinos Describe radio detection of neutrinos

ν

µ

+ N  X + l

hadronic shower  π

+

, π

, π

0

electromagnetic shower

electrons produce Cherenkov radio emission

radio spectrum

~ 100 MHz – 1 GHz

(5)

• RICE (Radio Ice Cherenkov Experiment)

 16 antennas installed in the AMANDA part of IceCube  peak sensitivity at 200 – 500 MHz

 upper limit on the flux of high relativistic magnetic monopoles  GZK neutrino detection limit set to E = 10

17

eV

• ANITA (Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna)

 balloon experiment which twice circled Antarctica at 35 – 37 km altitude  radio range 200 – 1200 MHz

 field of view = 1.5 · 10

6

km

2

 16 cosmic ray events of mean energy of 1.5 · 10

19

eV

originating from the interaction of

II –

II – Describe radio detection of neutrinos Describe radio detection of neutrinos

(6)

• GLUE (Goldstone Lunar Ultrahigh energy neutrino Experiment)  two radio telescopes separated by 22 km and linked by optic fiber  search for microwave pulses ≤ 10 ns from the lunar regolith

 such pulses would arise from subsurface electromagnetic cascades induced

by interactions of neutrinos in the lunar regolith, E

ν

≥ 10

20

eV

II –

II – Describe radio detection of neutrinos Describe radio detection of neutrinos

• other experiments at the South Pole: ARIANNA, IceRay, AURA 22 km

Earth Moon

(7)

III –

III – During one phase of operations, salt was added During one phase of operations, salt was added

to the heavy water in SNO. Why? to the heavy water in SNO. Why?

• In June 2001 about two tonnes of NaCl were added to the heavy water volume to give a concentration of 0.002 g(NaCl)/g(D

2

O)

Neutral current reaction νx + D  p + n + νx

(8)

IV –

IV – Why is a Cherenkov ring a ring and not a disk ? Why is a Cherenkov ring a ring and not a disk ?

θ θ

x

x = β · c · t β = v / c

cos θ = 1 / β · n

in water c / n < v < c

0.75 · c ≤ v < c

n = 1.33

β ≥ 0.75

β = 0.75  γ = 1.5

E

lim

= ( γ – 1) m

0

c

2

~ 53 MeV

m

0

c

2

= 105.6 MeV for µ

(9)

Bibliography Bibliography

Articles:

• J.N. Abdurashitov et al., Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate with gallium metal, arXiv:0901.2200v3, 2009

• J. Kiko, The GALLEX solar neutrino experiment at the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory, Astrophysics and Space Science 228, 107–112, 1995

• R. Davis, A review of the Homestake Solar Neutrino Experiment, Prog. Particle Nuclear Physics 32, 13–32, 1994

• D.P. Hogan et al., Relative magnetic monopoles flux constraints from RICE, arXiv:0806.2129v2

• S. Hoover et al., Observation of ultra-high -nergy cosmic rays with the ANITA balloon-borne radio interferometer,

arXiv:1005.0035v2, 2010

• P.W. Gorham et al., Experimental limit on the cosmic diffuse ultrahigh energy neutrino flux,

References

Related documents

Analytic methods are used to determine the difference in the day and night solar electron neutrino survival probabilites and numerical methods are used to determine the effect of

• the SNEWS project involves several neutrino detectors currently running or nearing completion, like Super–KamiokaNDE, SNO, LVD, IceCube,.

Figure 5.3: Survival probability for a muon-neutrino going through the Earth for a range of energies with linear cross-section (left panel) and corrected cross-section (right

• 1962 – Maki, Nakagawa, and Sakata (in the context of what looks today like a very odd model of nucleons) proposed that the weak neutrinos known at the time were superpositions

● reconstructed vertex inside the detector instrumented volume Quality cuts applied for zenith angular resolution comparable to intrinsic ν-μ median angle. No background

All decay modes that engender 0-neutrino double- beta decay require that the neutrinos involved are Majorana particles: This was shown by.. Schechter and Valle in their

[r]

We calculate the prompt neutrino flux from atmospheric charm production by cosmic rays, using the dipole picture in a perturbative QCD framework, which incorporates the