Examensarbete, 30 hp
Psykologprogrammet, 300 hp
Ht 2017
Handledare: Jacobus Pineaar
Resources available to psychologists within two adult psychiatric clinics
Malin Doolin, Erika Helmersson
Abstract
Since 2011, several reports regarding the increasing number psychologists on sick leave in Sweden have
been published. These suggest deficits in their working environment. The aim of this study was to ex-
amine resources in the working environment of psychologists within the adult psychiatric clinics in a
county council in northern Sweden. The research questions involved identifying resources in the work-
place of psychologists, based on the four levels of the Job Demand-Resources model (Bakker &
Demerouti, 2007). The sample consisted of six participants and data was collected through individual
in-person interviews. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. The results
are in parts consistent with previous research but also include several resources less well-known related
to well-being amongst psychologists. These were Nature of the work, Training and education, Physical
resources and Mentoring. The conclusions provide useful information to improve the working environ-
ment of psychologists, by protecting existing resources and providing important resources requested.
Keywords: psychologists, resources, working environment.
Abstrakt
Sedan 2011, har flera rapporter publicerats som rapporterar att antalet psykologer i Sverige som sjuk-
skriver sig ökar. Detta tyder på att det finns brister i deras arbetsmiljö. Syfte med denna studie var att
undersöka resurser i arbetsmiljön bland psykologer i vuxen psykiatrin inom ett landsting i norra Sverige.
Forskningsfrågorna innefattar att granska tidigare forskning och litteratur efter tidigare kända resurser
samt att identifiera aktuella resurser i psykologers arbetsmiljö, baserat på de fyra nivåerna som föreslås
i Job-Demand-Resources modellen (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). Urvalet bestod av sex deltagare och
data samlades in via individuella intervjuer. Intervjuerna transkriberades och analyserades sedan i enligt
tematisk analys. Resultaten stämmer delvis överens med tidigare forskning men inkluderar också flera
resurser som inte är lika välkända i relation till välmående bland psykologer. Dessa var Nature of the
work, Training and education, Physical resources och Mentoring. Slutsatserna bidrar med värdefull
information för att förbättra psykologers arbetsmiljö, genom att skydda existerande resurser och till-
handa hålla viktiga resurser som efterfrågas.
Nyckelord: psykologer, resurser, arbetsmiljö
Resources available to psychologists within two adult psychiatric clinics.
Introduction
In 2011, a Swedish Social Insurance Agency report (Försäkringskassan, 2011:17) high- lighted the psychologist occupation, among a few high-risk occupations, as one of those with the highest amount of sick leave due to mental health issues. The most frequent diagnoses were de- pression, anxiety, stress-related issues, sleeping difficulties and alcohol abuse. The report also showed that psychologists, both men and women, were the second highest ranking profession with employees on sick leave due to being diagnosed with reactions to severe stress or adjustment disorders. These findings were again confirmed in a subsequent social insurance report from the same public authority (Försäkringskassan, 2015:1), indicating psychologists as one of few pro- fessions between 2012-2014, with not only the highest number of absences longer than two weeks due to sick leave, but also as one where a significant increase in sick leave can be seen.
Within the field of organizational psychology, the idea that the working environment can be assessed in terms of stressors and demands, in relation to available resources, is a widely acknowledged paradigm (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Karasek, 1979). The need to assess the employees’ working environment stems from the knowledge that work characteristics can have a substantial impact on employee well-being. The theory chosen in this study is that of Job De- mands-Resources (JD-R) (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). The model was designed on the basis and opinion that previous influential models were too restricted and limited, and not applicable for all job positions. Also, characteristic of the JD-R model is the focus on negative as well as positive indicators of employee wellbeing. It has, since the first introduction in the international literature in 2001, been exceptionally influential (Bakker & Demerouti, 2017).
In the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007), demands are described to be physical, psychological, social and organizational aspects of a job that demand prolonged physical and psychological effort and skill. These efforts are associated with physical and psychological costs. A few examples of demands are workload, emotional strain, conflicts, inadequate support and work pace. Demands are not inherently negative, yet they can however become stressors when meeting these demands require high effort and there is no possibility for adequate recovery. The description of resources provided by the JD-R model (Bakker &
Demerouti, 2007) states that resources could be aspects of work that are physical, psychological, social and organizational in nature. To be defined as a resource, it must contribute to one or more of the following: Be functional in achieving goals at work, reduce the demands and the accom- panied physiological and psychological cost, and facilitate personal growth, learning and devel- opment. Within the JD-R model, resources are emphasized to be of value in their own right; not exclusively to manage demands. According to the JD-R model, resources are means for the em- ployee’s’ achievements, or for protecting other important resources. Job resources can be found on an organizational level, in interpersonal and social relationships, in work and task character- istics (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007).
An additional theory helpful when examining resources is that of Conservation of Re-
sources theory (COR; Hobfoll, 1989). The model was presented as an alternative stress model
due to limitations in existing ones and has since become one of the most cited theories within the
field
(Halbesleben, Paustian-underdahl, & Westman, 2014)
. In the COR-model, stress is defined
as a response to the environment where there is (1) a threat of a net loss of resources, (2) the net
loss of resources, or (3) a lack of resources gains following investment of resources – both actual,
potential and perceived loss and lack of resource gain could result in producing stress. The de-
fining principle of the model revolves around the universal premise that people strive to retain
and protect current resources and acquire new ones. Hobfoll (1989) defined resources to be things