, giving to things real forms with touchable surface.

For bilboard task I was trying to make controversal piece, nothing is absolute. We can see this

problematics on attack to charlie hebdo. I dont trust to big religions, Its more alive in new individual

religions nowdays. Sure some values from big religions makes sense, but not in exactli in this spacetime when we shall be aware from new warfare danger, when symbols have to die.

By invention of photography, writing died for new magic, but now is another step in digitalization, reasembling and judging? Resurecting zombies all the time. Thinkings is complemented by writing and images but.. Unimaginable texts (indescribable images), the situation.

When I am pressed on specific topics, and heard that I am using reactions more like metaphor, when topic form of billboard should fight against

addiction, but all of this preventing may be only substitution of another action. Big presure in time but skills everywhere around have to be catched.

About Mr. Cardinal, unfortunately, the image of him and theft of our churches (buildings), our property also insolent, therefore I am going to be cheaty and not seriousl, expressing what I think with all danger.

Horrified about that danger because words are nothing and its not 16 but 160 bilions infront of people scared to have something to eat.

{THE ORIGIN IS THE SUN}

Heart in abstract forms because there were no words. It's hard to show heart mechanism, not as a metaphor when I am all the time braided and surrounded by that mechanism.

By tendencies of video mapping, most of them look like design mix over old things, copying old

aesthetic and when is it trying to look new, it is also trapped on building. But also crashing new spaces.

I do not know from where came tendency of on the table aligned parallel to each other closely cropped pencils aligned clean books in name of sterility.

Yes photo and these outputs perceive therefore like painting, which is in many cases representing mythical task, but with new paintings must also come new places. What is done in cyberspace as one step. In real by hand devices etc. but..

Colors of middleage and exotic cultures are magical symbols, part of myths, while for us colors are symbols of myth theoretically created, part of program. And we are also closing it into galleries.

Each of my movement and each pixel, so is it laying by glitchy view or realy real respect to value ability whicht was founded on specific journey.

Technical image – created by screen device, pritn or also by man helping

, giving to things real forms with touchable surface.

.

It may not be decrypted, the content is already on their surface. Without added historical philosophy it is creating new purged itself

.

38 26 49 15 16 43 04 28 11 06 13 41 40 37 22 46 04 17 46 24 46 21 43 31 04

Life in mirror, I am all my life dealing with own identity.

personality, like most of young people in this global era of internet. When I was late, lost on the

beggining and than asking, if I am enough good, but questions is what made it, not real presentation, real decisions.

Producting magic, reaction, values

,

Which kind of magic is that? Illusion and propaganda.

Everything old was used and only new is in the virtual. Most situation use old visuals in the newest media. Question about creating person itself or copy.

We all are programmed, it is demanded from us, to use aesthetic photos showing everything in beautiful way. In cult of young. When time and space is no more. Rather go around and look, what realism is.

Photo post manipulation, the purity of taken images.

Refer to person staying in virtual cyber space, the coder especialy, with extravagancy or another one with purity in visual, cleaned from that information mass to himself. God interpreted by everyone in front of screen.

Much more than the abuse of photos in news to inform / disinform, hit me but a sexual nature,

presented personality of people of different sex and orientations. Most of us today live their virtual profile and so expressed. Therefore, it is certain thoughts. I hope ingrown account for the fashion and to what should be objectively correct. Which is subjective.

So short illusion of freedom.

In the majority we observe a general trend as in the news when it is used again and esoteric illusion, professionalism, specificity. Is it the complexity of thinking, which make some photos and information.

In the user profile evoke a whole universe of ideas.

When we live often just from these imaginations.

Therefore already trying to cope with this, ignore, there are more possibilities, but it is a direct confrontation of characters, views, intelligences.

These reactions and discussions take place mostly in the form of text, but it is often in many small windows characterized by its insignificance.

In this regard, I would like to dedicate this issue more exploration, as I contemplated in planned netart project Dating, whom I would like to dedicate in year, which would like to simulate an environment such dating / social pages and study or leaf elements, these experiences of cyber

communication, its new forms, database and others.

Another level of my interest is undoubtedly a big brother problematics. Certainly large systems, forming a database algorithms conduct for its operation in the new era. Technique use camera and personal info in our spaces, to manipulate and controll, especially our governments. Therefore, I would like to be close to applications of

technologies and not be only consume sheep, insiders in system complexity.

There are only what surrounds me and my mind serious changes and ideas.

Rather take a certain catharsis and peace because complicated strikes accompanied me, too many times, all the time.

Development of photography and more details and fetched representation, in hollywood movies, where scenes are created to be sharp, detailed,

too much.

Always against realiy, as is it interpreted, by lying , only corrupting our relationship to the materia and draws inside.

The character of pixels I see more noticeable at time, but it is more colorphull painting, the system, not just overall impression

.

Reproachful / by my camera device artwork, it

prefers something beyond, compared to image itself, which contains

Photos made empirical (professionals / amateurs), rhetorical (landscape / objects / portraits / Acts), Aesthetic (realism / pictorialism). Really? Who cares and look? Which kind of eyes?

I have freely decided to a different approach to the photography.

Since I was a witness to several deception in reality.

I have always wanted to retain my individuality, which also includes its development and form structure in time. but has clear rules on the basis of which form the whole genesis alongside other works and other forms of expression.

When circumstances put differently, and I own more complicated than the experimental apparatus, my cell phone, web cam, I'll look for other qualities, but in certain circumstances, I have these that I use simply, mostly instinctively.

That is how I seek new options. However, the

relationship to big selection and artifice of photos I refuse. Much bigger friend is coincidence in case of nice photos, I mean its quality in values.

It is not possible to pick just one photo from the series because it is about virtual view nuance of meanings in time and space.

Photography shall be moving, to avoid lies, in view of the problem of interpretability.

For photography I was constantly pushed to compartmentalizing it to set it out to few topics.

I have never worked like this last years. No concept is so stable and illustrating target beauty and border it I am unable to.

PHOTOGRAPHIC DEVICE These people yet made objects: books, paintings, musical scores, balance, plans ­ objects that do not consume, but serve as information carriers: Were view, read, played, included in the account, used as basis for decision making. Not the purpose, but a means.

In some case ordinary camera is controled, with settings. My device has no display, just instinct about what is captured with knowlage about programing which was made by specific circumstances. But still, it is object made by author and photos taken have his journey destiny character, it is taking in time by his hands, in special times, on special places, but the real form of photos are unknown until download.

To say, these are right photos and do not edit them.

The photo is the object, the photography is all of them with connection to object, the device and to the author. Author is no longer slave of device, but making friend, it is some other kind of light painting with this function, kind of author artifacts.

Look that device can free us is the illusion making from us the slave of photos, where tey are making universum and our identity more in cyberspace. So there is difference, maybe I am not taking photos , but technical images, some kind of paintings, I want to have them to my story line, its my painting, I dont want to join that theatre to look the best as is

possible.

Hail the satan and stop possing, I am going to take it to more abstract level, with destiny and in movement of snapshots fenomena. I am free and I am using camera as so special aparat when we are free for something more than for output, just to make jpeg files in that time, the kind of symbol is expression made not hyper realistic keatchie :P.

On the issue of materiality, mass prevailing over that software, is a reference to the action art, necessity to performe based on creation

.

For and because this such esoteric experience to do what not real programmers, but most of them and mechatronics and new era independent industry based od internet shared technology is to make these deviceces as you wont and experiment.

In this case put it into object to find some other alchymist possibilities even not on first view looking so special also if the special moment when this device is taken is only some times, so it is figurating in long terms, but it has its hard placement with no order to the destiny, litle destiny of ones.

For me resulting photos are fated and much more visually interesting than designed ones. But now repeating myself. In fact, photos are processing us, programmed to take us into ritual behavior, serving like feedback for apparatuses.

I have up to my neck, I want you to make my own symbology spatio­temporal images, almost nothing can be trusted or it is anyway building and

supporting pseudo pure capitalist utopia and kitsch aesthetics of perfect series, movies, unreality, naivete and crudeness.

where I in speed through the gallery and to another I went to have in those days took the most informations and I found what I caught, in many cases also the camera on my cell phone when the quality is questionable, but its the recovery of memory function is valid. And if is it so horrible, then perhaps himself better than aesthetics of tourist albums and perfect record, I have among other folder containing thousands of photos, the question for me is, rather, how to work with the database at the time of collected photos than to distinguish its visuality, which gives sense to the whole, when those selected are merely symbols.

Array of photos today is much more in a virtual cyberspace, where my interest is solely photographs not printed. Although I have used several photo as part of the installation, then perhaps perceived as part of the overall painting depends on

circumstances, it was rather an exception. At the exhibition in Jelenia Gora I showed photos as a loop of photos on a TV screen, where the interval is so small that it was not possible to have a single view of the photo, but rather perceive movement reality relative to what to refer, to a certain special

circumstances of time space. like dream memory. For granted in that certain realism, which is seeking to show, which partially himself creates, to help with choose. There was a catharsis from actual correct photographs closer to the actual process with pixels, more attention to the device, photographic module, processor, memory, transfer, copy. Manage the thousands database or rather the accumulation to the selection.

Jakub Krejčí