• No results found

(VTAF01) – Traffic noise

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "(VTAF01) – Traffic noise"

Copied!
55
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Ljud i byggnad och samhälle (VTAF01) – Traffic noise

MATHIAS BARBAGALLO

DIVISION OF ENGINEERING ACOUSTICS, LUND UNIVERSITY

(2)

… recap from last lecture (I)…

(3)

• Plane:

• Cylindrical:

• Spherical:

… recap from last lecture (II)…

I r ∝ 1 r 2 ;

I ≡ constant ;

I(r) = ∏ 4πr 2 I r ∝ 1

r ; I(r) = ∏

2πhr

(4)

Outline

Introduction Indicators /

regulations

Measurement / prediction Noise barriers

Examples

Summary

(5)

Is traffic noise really a problem?

(6)

Socialstyrelsens miljörapport (2009)

• Trend from 1999 – 2007

‒ Reported hearing loss  Increased by 24%

‒ Annoyed by road traffic noise  Increased by 40%

‒ Difficulties sleeping due to noise  Increased by 31%

Amount of people exposed to L

Aeq,24h

>55 dB(A)

Road traffic 1.2 – 1.8 milj.

Railway noise 400 000 – 600 000

Flight noise (civ/mil) 15 000-25 000 / 25 000-35 000

Outside 1.6 – 2.4 milj.

(7)

Health effects due to exposure to (traffic) noise

• Auditory effects

‒ Acoustic trauma

‒ Tinnitus (ringing ears)

‒ Temporary and permanent threshold shift (TTS/PTS)

‒ Interference with communication

• Non-auditory effect

‒ Annoyance

‒ Cardiovascular disease

‒ Sleep disturbance

‒ Disturbed cognitive functioning

‒ Cancer

‒ Diabetes Few studies

(8)

Overview

The source Anti-propagation measures

Noise emissions Noise exposure

(9)

Environmental sound pollution

• Road traffic noise

‒ Most disturbing

‒ Depends on: vehicles per hour, speed, inclination, vicinity to buildings, percentage of heave vehicles, road surface, type of tires,

aerodynamics…

‒ Mainly from engine and frictional contact road/tire

• Railway noise

‒ Less disturbing than road traffic for the same sound level

‒ Depends on: train frequency, type of rolling stock, roughness, train load, length and speed

• Aircraft noise

‒ Generates noise, vibrations and rattle

‒ Depends on: plane size/model, type of engine, flight paths, number of

aircraft, atmospheric conditions…

(10)

Traffic noise control strategies

Minimise noise levels

– Source (vehicle) controls

» Maintenance

» Traffic design controls (e.g. speed/load limits, diverting traffic)

– Path controls

» Sound barriers

» Non-residential buildings

» Earth embankments

» Buffer zones

» Distance

– Receiver-side controls

» Insulation and absorption (façade & indoors)

Mike Kelley

(11)

Outline

Introduction Indicators /

regulations

Measurement / prediction Noise barriers

Examples

Summary

(12)

Cummulative environmental noise descriptors (I)

• Traffic noise levels vary quickly over time  Many descriptors

‒ Equivalent continuous A-weighted SPL

Ex: Calculate the L Aeq,8h that corresponds to 105 dBA for 15 min.

L Aeq,T = 10 log 1

∆T න

T

1

T

2

p A 2 (t)

p ref 2 dt = 10 log 1

∆T න

T

1

T

2

10

L

p,A

(t)

10 dt

(13)

Cummulative environmental noise descriptors (II)

• Day and night average sound level (DNL or L den )

‒ Average SPL over 24-hour periods

‒ Weighting factors for evening and night times (country-dependent)

‒ L

den

=L

Aeq,24h

[dBA] (with +10dB from 22:00 to 7:00)

• Community noise equivalent level (CNEL)

‒ Average SPL over 24-hour periods

‒ Weighting factors for evening and night times

‒ CNEL=L

Aeq,24h

[dBA] (with +5dBA from 19:00-22:00 and +10dBA from 22:00 to 7:00)

‒ CNEL ≈ L

den

+1 dB (normally used interchangeably)

• Time above threshold

• Effective perceived noise level (EPNL)

(14)

Single event environmental noise metrics

• Maximum/minimum sound level (L max / L min ):

‒ Greatest/lowest RMS sound amplitude [dB/dBA…] for the measurement period

‒ NOTE: L

peak

: maximum value of SPL (no time-constant applied and signal not passed through an RMS circuit or calculator, i.e. ≠L

max

)

• Sound exposure level (SEL/L AE ) & Single event noise exposure level (SENEL)

‒ Total “noisiness” of an event. It takes duration into account

‒ If SENEL is measured for the period when the level is within 10 dB of the L

max

, it will be essentially the same as SEL

L AE = L Aeq,T + 10 log t 2 − t 1

(15)

Regulations – Traffic noise

• Infrastrikturprop. 1996/97:53 – projects initiated before 2/1/2015 or involving new or rebuilding of infrastructure

‒ Sets guidelines, which are indications but not binding

‒ “Vid tillämpning av riktvärden i trafikinfrastruktur-propositionen bör hänsyn tas till vad som är tekniskt möjligt och ekonomiskt rimligt. I de fall som

utomhusnivån inte kan reduceras till riktvärdesnivåerna bör inriktningen vara att inomhusvärdena inte överskrids.”

Location Measure Road Track Flight

Indoors L

Aeq,24h

30 30 30

Indoors L

AFmax

45 45 45

Outside (façade) L

Aeq,24h

55 60 55

Outside L

AFmax

70 70 70

(16)

Regulations – Traffic noise

• Trafikbullerförordningen SFS 2015:216, med förordningsändring SFS 2017:359 – projects initiated after 2/1/2015

‒ “Om den ljudnivå som anges i [tabellen] ändå överskrids bör 1. minst hälften av bostadsrummen i en bostad vara vända mot en sida där 55 dBA ekvivalent ljudnivå inte överskrids vid fasaden, och 2. minst hälften av bostadsrummen vara vända mot en sida där 70 dBA maximal ljudnivå inte överskrids mellan kl.

22.00 och 06.00 vid fasaden.”

Location Measure Road/Train

Indoors L

Aeq,24h

Se BBR

Indoors L

AFmax

Se BBR

Outside (façade) L

Aeq,24h

60

Outside (façade) ≤ 35 sqm L

Aeq,24h

65 Outside (balcony/garden) L

Aeq,24h

50

Outside (balcony/garden) L

AFmax

70

(17)

Regulations indoor noise – Boverkets byggregler –

föreskrifter och allmänna råd, BBR

(18)

Regulations indoor noise – General advice

• Maximum sound level: L AFmax = 45 dB

• Equivalent sound level: L Aeq,T = 30 dB

• Sound with audible tone components: L Aeq,T = 25 dB

• Sound from music systems: L Aeq,T = 25 dB

• Values for low third octave bands (31.5-200 Hz)

f [Hz] 31.5 40 50 63 80 100 125 160 200

L [dB] 56 49 43 42 40 38 36 34 32

(19)

Regulations indoor noise – SS 25267:2015

(20)

Outline

Introduction Indicators /

regulations

Measurement / prediction

Noise barriers Examples

Summary

(21)

Road traffic noise prediction methods (I)

• Nordic prediction method (from 1978; last update 1996)

– Account for differences between light and heavy vehicles – Total equivalent sound pressure level during a period of time

• New method: Nord2000 (simulations)

– Equivalent sound pressure levels (L

A,eq

) in 1/3-octave bands – Maximum sound pressure level for individual vehicles (L

A,Max

) – L

den

/ L

night

to use in European directives on environmental noise – Implemented in SoundPlan and other commercial software

• European Commission has funded projects called Harmonoise/Imagine

– Develop prediction standard for the EU  very similar to Nord2000

(22)

Road traffic noise prediction methods (II)

• Commercial software (e.g. Soundplan)

‒ Example: railway noise animation

NOTE: It is the results from the prediction methods that count and not measured levels in the case of road traffic noise related legal disputes. This is based on the idea that measurements

may have too large variations and do not represent the average behaviour.

(23)

Road traffic noise prediction methods (III)

• Noise map (Lund)

(24)

Sound propagation – General equation (1996)

• 𝐿 𝐴𝑒𝑞 = 𝐿 1 + ∆𝐿 2 + ∆𝐿 3 + ∆𝐿 4 + ∆𝐿 5

• 𝐿 1 : starting value. At 10 m from centreline, dependent on speed and number of light and heavy vehicles during the period of observation.

• ∆𝐿 2 : distance correction.

• ∆𝐿 3 : extra damping due to hard or soft ground, barriers.

• ∆𝐿 4 : other correction (exceptions in previous steps)

• ∆𝐿 5 : fasade correction to calcualte indoor value.

(25)

Sound propagation – Distance

• Equivalent level (cylindrical propagation):

-3 dB with doubling the distance

• Maximum level (spherical propagation):

-6 dB with doubling the distance

(26)

Sound propagation – Some data

• Intensity: doubling of vehicles  + 3dB

• Heavy vehicles cf. with light  +10dB

• Speed:

‒ 50-70 km/h  +4dB

‒ 70-90 km/h  +3dB

‒ 90-110 km/h  +3dB

• Tire noise dominates from 40-50 km/h

• Intersections and connections provide increased annoyance

Rules of thumb from Vägverket (current Trafikverket)

‒ Any increase in noise level by 1dB gives an annoyance increase of 20%

‒ 3dB increase in noise level will double the disturbance

• Psychoacoustics: 10dB increase is perceived as a noise level doubling

(27)

Measurement of traffic noise

• Sound level meter

‒ Microphone measures acoustic levels omni-directionally

‒ Sampling:

» Fast (F - 0.125 s)

» Slow (S - 1 s)

» Peak (P - impulse value 35 ms)

‒ Weighting filters (A, C…) built-in

‒ Calculation of:

» L

eq,T ,

L

Aeq,T ,

SENEL

» Building acoustic indicators

» …

‒ Calibrated … more about this during the course labs

& measurement technique lecture

(28)

Traffic noise measurements – Nordtest methods

• When calculations are considered insufficient  measurements

‒ Nordtest method NT ACOU 039, Road traffic: noise

‒ Nordtest method NT ACOU 056, Road traffic: noise – simplified method

» Road traffic noise inside and outside buildings in open terrain under specific traffic and enronmental conditions at distances up to 100 m from the road

» Simplified methods to obtain L

Aeq,24h

/L

den

/L

year

» Measure during shorter intervals

» Counting number of heavy/light vehicles

» By use of know data (traffic/weather/road…) for each place…

» … corrections are made to get the desired value

(29)

Traffic noise measurements – NT Acou 056

(30)

Outline

Introduction Indicators /

regulations

Measurement / prediction Noise barriers

Examples

Summary

(31)

Noise barriers – Introduction (I)

• Noise barriers

‒ Protect people living near busy roads

‒ More effective than distance when reducing noise

‒ Amount of diffracted noise reaching the receiver depends on the frequency

Source Propagation Receiver

DISCUSS: Intuitively, what is the best place to place a noise barrier? A? B? C?

A B C

(32)

Noise barriers – Introduction (II)

O. A. B. Hassan (2009)

(33)

Noise barriers – Introduction (III)

• High frequencies:

<< H

• Low frequencies:

>> H

Shadow H

Screen

(34)

Noise barriers – Design considerations (I)

• Factors influencing effectiveness of barriers:

‒ Transmitted sound << diffracted over its edge

‒ Max. efficiency: placed as close as possible to the source or receiver

‒ Attenuation increases with barrier height

» High enough to break the line of sight (2-3 m reduce 10-15dB)

‒ Scattering due to turbulences can reduce barrier’s efficiency

‒ Foliage/different materials can affect the efficiency

‒ Atmospheric conditions

‒ Should be >10 kg/m 2 and completely sealed

‒ …

(35)

Noise barriers – Design considerations (II)

• Non-acoustic considerations:

- Maintenance - Withstand loads - Good-looking - Vandal-proof

- Take into consideration receivers downwind the barrier

• Cost*

- 2 m high screen in pressure-treated wood

» 10 000 kr/m (+ 10 kr/m

2

and year of maintenance)

- Noise barrier, 3-5 m high: about 5000 kr/m

(36)

Noise barriers - Calculation

• Insertion loss (IL) = Attenuation barrier (A barr ) = L p,NoBarr - L p,Barr

• Many empirical models to predict barrier attenuation

‒ Equation

‒ Plots…

• A practical expression: Model (Fehr, 1951)

‒ r r >> r s

‒ r s > H

‒ r h ≥ 2r s

• In practice, barrier attenuations are limited to 15-20dB

A barr ≈ 10 log 20H 2

λr s

(37)

Noise barriers calculation – Maekawa’s diagram (I)

• Semi-infinite half-space, i.e. for open air above a hard flat ground

• Accounts for the effect of diffraction of sound over the top

O. A. B. Hassan (2009)

N f = ± 2𝛿

𝜆

𝛿 = 𝑟 1 + 𝑟 2 − 𝑟 0

(38)

Noise barriers calculation – Maekawa’s diagram (II)

• Semi-infinite half-space, i.e. for open air above a hard flat ground

• Accounts for the effect of diffraction of sound over the top

N f = ± 2𝛿

𝜆

𝛿 = 𝑟 1 + 𝑟 2 − 𝑟 0

(39)

Attenuation calculation – Example

A 10 m tall noise barrier is installed in front of a house, 10 m away from the nearest tire.

A 12 m house is built 13 m from the barrier.

How much sound reduction can this wall yield at 550 Hz by the window located 4 m above the ground?

A

barr

≈ 10 log 20H

2

λr

s

= 10 log 20 ∙ 10

2

340 550 ∙ 10

= 25 dB δ = 5.1; N

f

= 16.5

A practical attenuation that can be reached is 20 dB. On top of that and to be in the conservative side, 5 to 8 dB should be further discounted

O. A. B. Hassan (2009)

՜ A

barr

≈ 25 dB

1)

2)

(40)

Noise barriers – ISO norms

ISO 9613-1:1993: Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during

propagation outdoors - Part 1: Calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere

ISO 9613-2:1996: Acoustics - Attenuation of sound during

propagation outdoors - Part 2: General method of calculation

(41)

Outline

Introduction Indicators /

regulations

Measurement / prediction Noise barriers

Examples

Summary

(42)

Traffic noise spectrum – Example (I)

(43)

Traffic noise spectrum – Example (II)

Road traffic Railway traffic Aircraft traffic

(44)

Malmö – Actions for noise exposure 2014

• Citizens exposed to > 30 dBA indoors: 48 000

> 55 dBA outdoors: 126 000

• Estimated cost (incl. health care and loss of work): 1100 MSEK

• Proposed long term measures (250 MSEK):

– Source: Lower speed limit, silent asphalt, driving style and silent car/tires

– Sound reduction: Noise barriers,

allowance for improvement of sound

reduction at dwellings

– Focus on sensitive places, e.g.

schools, pre-schools and parks

(45)

Example

Gård

(46)

Silent sides

• Tyst sida  definition of Boverket:

”Tyst sida i urban bostadsbebyggelse är en sida med en dygnsekvivalent ljudnivå som är lägre

än 45 dBA (frifältsvärde) som en totalnivå från trafik, fläktar och liknande och i förekommande

fall industri. Den tysta sidan bör därutöver vara visuellt och akustiskt attraktiv att vistas på.”

(47)

Noise barrier examples (I)

(48)

Noise barrier examples (II)

Source: FHWA, “Keeping the Noise Down, Highway Traffic Noise Barriers”

(49)

Noise barrier examples (III)

Source: FHWA, “Keeping the Noise Down, Highway Traffic Noise Barriers”

(50)

Silent asphalt

(51)

Outline

Introduction Indicators /

regulations

Measurement / prediction Noise barriers

Examples

Summary

(52)

Summary

• Sound level indicators

• Regulations regarding traffic noise

• Prediction methods of traffic noise levels

• Measurements of traffic noise

• Noise barriers as traffic noise reduction measure

(53)

This week’s exercise – Traffic noise measurements (I)

• Split into groups of about 3-4 students

• Choose three measurement points (2 measurement points at a time):

1. Close to the E22 2. Next to the façade 3. One in the middle

• Measure equivalent A-weighted sound level for 5 minutes ...

• ... In which you count the number of vehicles passing in both directions

• Document the circumstances (weather, wind) and the measurement points

on the map and the pictures!

(54)

This week’s exercise – Traffic noise measurements (II)

‒ Measurement location: E22 by Qlik AB

(55)

Thank you for your attention!

mathias.barbagallo@gmail.com

References

Related documents

1.1 This International Standard specifies requirements for instruments and test procedures for the measurement and reporting of sound pressure levels at crew and passenger locations

This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 94, Personal safety — Personal protective equipment, Subcommittee SC 15, Respiratory protective devices. This second edition

För skada som inträffar med tillfälligt hyrt motordrivet fordon, det vill säga fordon som vare sig ägs eller leasas av den försäkrade, gäller försäkringen dock till den del

[r]

Klubb

[r]

Förslag till kommunala handikapprådets sammanträdestider år 2012 har skickats ut tillsammans med kallelsen till dagens sammanträde. Sammanträdet föreslår att genomföra en

För att kunna använda Basic Braille Plus som en punktdisplay under Windows, används en skärmläsare som också finns tillgänglig från ICAP AB.. Basic Braille Plus har utvecklats